Vasoactive Drugs in Intensive Care Unit

Sponsor
University of Chicago (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT02118467
Collaborator
(none)
836
1
2
91
9.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The investigators hypothesis is that for ICU patients with shock, the use of the vasoactive drugs phenylephrine and vasopressin will reduce tachydysrhythmias when compared to norepinephrine and epinephrine. To investigate this hypothesis, the investigators are conducting a randomized double blind controlled trial comparing phenylephrine and vasopressin vs. norepinephrine and epinephrine in ICU patients with shock that is not responsive to IV fluids. All patients admitted to the adult intensive care units at the University of Chicago will be screened for eligibility.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Detailed Description

Shock, defined by inadequate tissue perfusion, is a common problem in critically ill patients. Most patients who have shock have hypotension and this is typically treated initially with intravenous fluid resuscitation in patients who are fluid responsive. If patients remain hypotensive, they are typically treated with vasoactive medications. Four of the commonly used FDA approved vasoactive medications are norepinephrine, phenylephrine, epinephrine, and vasopressin. Apart from a 2010 trial comparing norepinephrine to dopamine, there are no studies to date that have shown one of the four above-mentioned vasoactive medications to be superior to another. Accordingly, choice of vasoactive medication is based upon individual physician preference, without an outcomes-related evidence base.

Two of the four above mentioned vasoactive medications (norepinephrine and epinephrine) have chronotropic effects (i.e. the tendency to increase heart rate), while the other two (phenylephrine and vasopressin) have less of a propensity to chronotropy. The potential benefits of the chronotropic effects in patients with shock (increasing cardiac output) are offset by the potential detriments (predilection to tachydysrhythmias and myocardial ischemia).

Recent evidence suggests that tachydysrhythmias are associated with worse outcomes in ICU patients. One study demonstrated that administration of the beta blocking agent esmolol improved hemodynamic outcomes and survival in patients with septic shock. It is not clear if a vasoactive drug regimen that utilizes phenylephrine and vasopressin will be associated with lower heart rates compared to a regimen that utilizes norepinephrine and epinephrine.

The investigators hypothesis is that for ICU patients with shock, the use of the vasoactive drugs phenylephrine and vasopressin will reduce tachydysrhythmias when compared to norepinephrine and epinephrine. To investigate this hypothesis, we are conducting a randomized double blind controlled trial comparing phenylephrine and vasopressin vs. norepinephrine and epinephrine in ICU patients with shock that is not responsive to IV fluids. All patients admitted to the adult intensive care units at the University of Chicago will be screened for eligibility.

Patients will be randomized to receive either phenylephrine (0.3-3.0 mcg/kg/minute), with the addition of vasopressin (0.1-0.6 milliunits/kg/minute) if a second vasopressor is required, or norepinephrine (0.03 to 0.3 mcg/kg/minute), with the addition of epinephrine (0.03 to 0.3 mcg/kg/minute) if a second vasopressor is required. These drugs will be mixed and blinded by the research pharmacy. Only the research pharmacist will know the identity of the particular vasoactive drug. As per current standard practice, the medical team in charge of the patient will determine the target blood pressure.

In either group, if two vasoactive drugs are not adequate to raise the blood pressure to the target level, open-label norepinephrine will be added. If three vasoactive drugs are inadequate to raise the blood pressure to the target level, open-label epinephrine will be added.

There will be up to a twelve-hour period from initiation of standard, non-study vasoactive support during which the patient can be consented and enrolled. This will allow the research team to contact the patient and/or family in order to obtain informed consent. Once randomized, all patients will be initiated on study drug vasoactive support at 50 percent of the maximal infusion rate. The study drug will be titrated to maintain blood pressure and the initial non-study drug will be titrated off. The primary team will direct other aspects of patient care.

We plan to examine the following pre-specified sub-groups:
  1. Patients who received corticosteroids during their ICU stay vs. patients who did not receive corticosteroids during their ICU stay

  2. Patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (< 40%) vs. patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction

  3. Patients with coronary artery disease vs. patients without known coronary artery disease

  4. Patients with different etiologies of shock (i.e. septic, cardiogenic, hypovolemic)

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
836 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized Double Blind Trial of Vasoactive Drugs for the Management of Shock in the ICU
Study Start Date :
May 1, 2014
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Norepinephrine and epinephrine

Patients will receive norepinephrine infusion per standard protocol. Dose range will be 0.03-0.3 mcg/kg/minute. Norepinephrine concentration will be 16 mg/250 mL. If a second vasopressor is required, epinephrine will be added. Dose range of epinephrine will be 0.03-0.3 mcg/kg/minute. Epinephrine concentration will be 16 mg/250 mL. The drugs norepinephrine and epinephrine will be mixed and blinded by the research pharmacy. The research pharmacist will list the dose ranges in mL/hr; this will allow the bedside nurse to program the medication per standard protocol. If the patient's shock is not adequately treated with the highest doses of both norepinephrine and epinephrine, additional, open-label norepinephrine will be added, and titrated to achieve target blood pressure. If the patient's shock is not adequately treated with three vasopressors, additional open-label epinephrine will be added, and titrated to achieve target blood pressure.

Drug: Norepinephrine
Dose range 0.03 to 0.3 mcg/kg/minute, titrated to target blood pressure.
Other Names:
  • Levophed
  • Drug: Epinephrine
    Dose range 0.03 to 0.3 mcg/kg/minute, titrated to target blood pressure.

    Active Comparator: Phenylephrine and vasopressin

    Patients will receive phenylephrine infusion per standard protocol. Dose range will be 0.3 to 3.0 mcg/kg/minute. Phenylephrine concentration will be 160 mg/250 mL. If a second vasopressor is required, vasopressin will be added. Dose range of vasopressin will be 0.1 to 0.6 milliunits/kg/minute. Vasopressin concentration will be 40 units/250 mL. The drugs phenylephrine and vasopressin will be mixed and blinded by the research pharmacy. The research pharmacist will list the dose ranges in mL/hr; this will allow the bedside nurse to program the medication per standard protocol. If the patient's shock is not adequately treated with the highest doses of both phenylephrine and vasopressin, additional, open-label norepinephrine will be added, and titrated to achieve target blood pressure. If the patient's shock is not adequately treated with three vasopressors, additional open-label epinephrine will be added, and titrated to achieve target blood pressure.

    Drug: Phenylephrine
    Dose range 0.3 to 3.0 mcg/kg/minute, titrated to target blood pressure.
    Other Names:
  • Neo-Synephrine
  • Drug: Vasopressin
    Dose range 0.1 to 0.6 milliunits/kg/minute, titrated to target blood pressure.
    Other Names:
  • Pitressin
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Hospital mortality [Six months]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Heart rate [Six months]

    2. Incidence of tachydysrhythmia [SIx months]

      Including both atrial arrhythmias (i.e. atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter) as well as ventricular dysrhythmias

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Hospital length of stay [Six months]

    2. Discharge location [Six months]

      i.e. to home, skilled nursing facility, nursing home, rehabilitation

    3. ICU Complications [Six months]

      Including the following: Ventilator associated pneumonia Barotrauma Gastrointestinal hemorrhage Pulmonary embolism Sacral decubitus ulcer Delirium ICU acquired weakness

    4. ICU length of stay [Six months]

    5. Duration of mechanical ventilation [Six months]

    6. Functional status [one month, three months, six months, and twelve months after discharge]

      Categorized as independent or not independent, based on ability to perform 6 activities of daily living (ADLs) and ability to walk.

    7. Immune cell function [1 week]

      cytokine levels

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Age greater than or equal to 18 years old

    2. Requirement for vasoactive drugs via a central venous catheter for the treatment of shock. Shock will be defined as mean arterial pressure less than 70 mmHg or systolic blood pressure less than 100 mmHg despite administration of at least 1000 mL of crystalloid or 500 mL of colloid, unless there is an elevation in the central venous pressure to > 12 mmHg or in the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure to > 14 mmHg coupled with signs of tissue hypoperfusion (e.g. altered mental state, mottled skin, urine output < 0.5 mL/kg body weight for one hour, or a serum lactate level of > 2 mmol per liter).

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Cardiopulmonary arrest

    2. Pregnancy

    3. Severe right heart failure

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University of Chicago Medical Center Chicago Illinois United States 60637

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Chicago

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: John P Kress, MD, University of Chicago

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    University of Chicago
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02118467
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 14-0047
    First Posted:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 4, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Nov 1, 2020
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Undecided
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Undecided
    Keywords provided by University of Chicago
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Nov 4, 2020