Shoulder Dislocations Treated With Button Plates and Non-absorbable Suture Anchor
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative study through clinical trials to verify the safety and efficacy of the products in the experimental group for clinical use.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The product of this clinical validation is the fixed button plate system, which is used for the reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligament in the treatment of recurrent shoulder dislocation. The clinical trial was conducted to verify the rationality of its structural design, the convenience of its operation, and the effectiveness and safety of its clinical use. This trial was conducted in a parallel controlled trial design, the patients were divided into test and control groups to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the product.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Button Plates fixation system Patients receiving surgery fixed with Button Plates fixation system |
Device: button plates fixation system
The button plates fixation system consists of fixing plate, prefabricated mix, button and fuse. In the process of use, the fuse plays the role of guiding the fixed plate through, pulling the button and shortening the distance between the button and the fixed plate. The prefabricated mix is pre-worn between the button and the fixed plate, and the lead pulls the distance between the fixed plate and the button after tightening and fixing. Prefabricated mix, make mix tight and knot. Finish the preliminary work of fixing.
|
Active Comparator: Non-absorbable Suture Anchor Patients receiving surgery fixed with Non-absorbable suture anchor |
Device: Non-absorbable Suture Anchor
A conventional device used in surgery for shoulder dislocation.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Rowe score [before surgery]
The Rowe score is an internationally recognized scoring system for the assessment of shoulder function.
- Rowe score [3 months after surgery]
The Rowe score is an internationally recognized scoring system for the assessment of shoulder function.
- Rowe score [6 months after surgery]
The Rowe score is an internationally recognized scoring system for the assessment of shoulder function.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- ASES score [before surgery]
The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score is the most commonly used score to describe the function of patients' shoulder joints, ranging from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the function of patients' shoulder joints.
- ASES score [3 months after surgery]
The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score is the most commonly used score to describe the function of patients' shoulder joints, ranging from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the function of patients' shoulder joints.
- ASES score [6 months after surgery]
The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score is the most commonly used score to describe the function of patients' shoulder joints, ranging from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the function of patients' shoulder joints.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
a glenoid defect ≥10%
-
contact sport athletes with a glenoid defect < 10%
-
failure after Bankart repair.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
epilepsy
-
multidirectional shoulder instability
-
concomitant other lesions including rotator cuff tear, symptomatic acromioclavicular joint pathology or pathological involvement of the long head of the biceps
-
Follow-up was less than 2 years or incomplete follow-up data.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PekingUTH | Beijing | Beijing | China |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Peking University Third Hospital
- Hunan People's Hospital
- The First Hispital of Jilin University
Investigators
- Study Chair: Guoqing Cui, Peking University Third Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- D2016052