Immobilization in External Rotation After First Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Comparison of immobilization in internal versus external rotation after first time anterior shoulder dislocation.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to compare immobilization in internal versus external rotation after first time anterior shoulder dislocation, and thereby increase our knowledge about the best standard of care.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: External rotation shoulder sling External rotation shoulder sling |
Device: External rotation shoulder sling
The external rotation sling will be adjusted to position the injured upper extremity in 90 degrees of elbow flexion, 0 degrees of shoulder abduction and flexion, and 10 to 15 degrees of external rotation at the shoulder.
|
Active Comparator: Internal rotation shoulder sling Internal rotation shoulder sling |
Device: Internal rotation shoulder sling
The internal rotation sling will be adjusted to position the injured upper extremity in 90 degrees of elbow flexion, 0 degrees of shoulder abduction and flexion, and 70 to 80 degrees of internal rotation at the shoulder.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Recurrent instability consisting of a documented episode of anterior shoulder dislocation or multiple episodes of shoulder subluxation. [24 months]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Patient self reported outcome measures [24 Months]
- Time to return to work or sport [24 Months]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
14 to 30 years of age
-
Willing to participate in follow-up for at least two years
-
Acute, first-time, traumatic, isolated anterior dislocation of the shoulder
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Previous instability of the affected shoulder
-
A history of significant ligamentous laxity or demonstrated multi-directional instability of the opposite shoulder
-
Inability or unwillingness to comply with sling immobilization, rehabilitative protocol, or required follow-up assessments
-
Incompetent or unwilling to consent
-
A medical condition making the patient unable to wear a sling
-
Significant associated fracture (Exception Hill Sachs of >20% or bony Bankart lesions>10%)
-
Neurovascular compromise of the affected limb
-
Concomitant ipsilateral upper extremity injuries which may affect the patient's ability to participate in, or benefit from, a rehabilitative program.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CU Sports Medicine | Boulder | Colorado | United States | 80304 |
2 | St. Anthony Hospitals | Winter Park | Colorado | United States | 80482 |
3 | University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics | Iowa City | Iowa | United States | 52242 |
4 | University of New Mexico | Albuquerque | New Mexico | United States | 87131 |
5 | Summa Healthcare | Akron | Ohio | United States | 44310 |
6 | Ohio State University | Columbus | Ohio | United States | 43221 |
7 | Vanderbilt University | Nashville | Tennessee | United States | 37212 |
8 | Inland Orthopaedics | Pullman | Washington | United States | 99163 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Colorado, Denver
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Eric C McCarty, MD, University of Colorado, Denver
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 04-0088