NAC: N-Acetylcysteine in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease

Sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01849016
Collaborator
Erasmus Medical Center (Other), Haga Hospital (Other), University Medical Center Groningen (Other), ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (Other), Fonds NutsOhra (Other), Stichting Janivo (Other), CHU Brugmann, Brussels (Other), Erasme University Hospital (Other), Centre Hospitalier Régional de la Citadelle (Other), University Hospital St Luc, Brussels (Other), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre (Other), Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospital (Other), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (Other)
96
11
2
38
8.7
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the drug N-Acetylcysteine on the frequency of pain in daily life in patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD).

Pain is an invalidating hallmark of this disease and has a considerable impact on the Quality of Life of patients and the medical health care system. Oxidative stress is hypothesized to play a central role in its pathophysiology. In pilot studies the administration of N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) resulted in a reduction of oxidative stress. Moreover, administration of NAC seemed to decrease hospitalization for painful crises in a small pilot study in patients with SCD.

This study will be performed as a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial where patients will be treated with either NAC or placebo for a period of 6 months. The investigators expect that NAC can reduce the frequency of pain in patients with SCD, thereby improving their quality of life and participation in society.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
96 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
N-Acetylcysteine in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease - Reducing the Incidence of Daily Life Pain
Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: N-Acetylcysteine

N-Acetylcysteine 600mg 1 oral tablet twice daily during 6 months

Drug: N-Acetylcysteine
Other Names:
  • Acetylcysteine
  • Fluimicil
  • Acetadote
  • Placebo Comparator: Placebo

    Placebo 1 oral tablet twice daily during 6 months

    Drug: Placebo

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. The incidence rate of SCD related pain in daily life per patient year [6 months]

      The incidence of pain in daily life will be expressed as the number of pain days in relation to total follow-up time, and transformed to an event rate per patient year with a corresponding rate ratio and its 95% confidence interval. A pain day will be defined as: When the box "Yes, I have experienced pain" is checked in the daily pain diary. Days with hospital admission for painful crisis will be included in the total number of pain days and in the total number of diary observation days, irrespective of pain diary reports on these dates.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. The severity of SCD related pain in daily life, using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) in the study pain diary. [6 months]

      The average intensity of pain indicated on pain days in daily life will be compared between the two groups. The intensity of pain will be calculated as the average pain score over all pain days, using the highest scores indicated per day (either score over night or over day). Hospital days will be excluded from the analysis, as these scores often have not been completed fully during admission and the analysis is targeted at pain in daily life. Pain scores will be considered as continuous data with a normal distribution.

    2. The incidence rate per patient year of painful crises (episodes, based on pain diary observation) [6 months]

      The number of patient-indicated painful crises in relation to total follow-up time will be transformed to an event rate per patient year, with a corresponding rate ratio and it's 95% confidence interval. Also, the average number of crisis days per patient in relation to total follow-up time will be evaluated (including hospital admission days, see below). A painful crisis will be defined as either (overlap is possible): When the box "Yes, I was in a crisis" is checked in a daily diary. Missing diary days that are immediately preceded and followed by crisis days or by hospital admission. A visit or admission to a hospital that lasted more than 4 hours for acute sickling-related pain, which was treated with orally or parenterally administered narcotics. An acute chest syndrome

    3. The incidence rate per patient year of days with painful crises (days, based on pain diary observation) [6 months]

      The number of days with patient-indicated painful crises in relation to total follow-up time will be transformed to an event rate per patient year, with a corresponding rate ratio and it's 95% confidence interval. A painful crisis will be defined as either (overlap is possible): When the box "Yes, I was in a crisis" is checked in a daily diary. Missing diary days that are immediately preceded and followed by crisis days or by hospital admission. A visit or admission to a hospital that lasted more than 4 hours for acute sickling-related pain, which was treated with orally or parenterally administered narcotics. An acute chest syndrome

    4. The severity of painful crises. This will be defined using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) in the pain diary. [6 months]

      The average intensity of pain indicated on crisis days in daily life will be compared between the two groups. The intensity of pain will be calculated as the average pain score over all crisis days, using the highest scores indicated per day (either score over night or over day). Hospital days will be excluded from the analysis, as these scores often have not been completed fully during admission and the analysis is targeted at pain in daily life. Pain scores will be considered as continuous data with a normal distribution. Painful crisis definition as above.

    5. The incidence rate per patient year of hospital admissions [6 months]

      The number of sickle cell related hospital admissions in relation to total follow-up diary observation time will be transformed to an event rate per patient year, with a corresponding rate ratio and it's 95% confidence interval. Admissions will be verified using hospital medical records, if available. Hospital admission will be defined as: • Every visit to a hospital that lasted more than 4 hours for acute sickling-related disease, which was treated with orally or parenterally administered narcotics.

    6. The incidence rate per patient year of hospital admission days [6 months]

      The number of sickle cell related hospital admission days in relation to total follow-up diary observation time will be transformed to an event rate per patient year, with a corresponding rate ratio and it's 95% confidence interval. Admissions will be verified using hospital medical records, if available. Hospital admission will be defined as: • Every visit to a hospital that lasted more than 4 hours for acute sickling-related disease, which was treated with orally or parenterally administered narcotics.

    7. Time in days to first painful crisis (as defined above) [6 months]

      The time in days from randomization to first painful crisis (patient-defined) and hospital admission for painful crisis will be expressed in cumulative event rates, estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

    8. Time in days to first hospital admission for painful crisis (as defined above) [6 months]

      The time in days from randomization to first painful crisis (patient-defined) and hospital admission for painful crisis will be expressed in cumulative event rates, estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

    9. The health-related Quality of Life, as measured by use of validated questionnaires. [6 months]

      In adults this will be assessed with SF36-forms, a short-form health survey that has been proven to be valid and reliable in the black population.46 In children from 12 to 18 years old, we will use the PedsQL questionnaire, often used to assess quality of life in children, also validated in SCD patients

    10. The SCD-related societal costs, assessed by a prospective cost-effectiveness analysis [6 months]

      The societal costs of pain care with the use of NAC, in the intervention group, will be compared to the societal costs of current pain care in the control group. Estimates of unit costs will be based on calculation of real costs of pain care. Generated direct medical costs will be recorded in the case record forms and by means of the Medical Cost Questionnaire (see appendix). Indirect costs arising from losses in productivity will be assessed by means of the Productivity Cost Questionnaire (see appendix) and will be calculated by means of the friction cost method.

    11. The tolerability of NAC, defined as the number of participants with adverse events. [6 months]

      This will be assessed via the monthly adverse events reports. The frequency of registered adverse events and/or a serious adverse events will be reported per treatment arm, and compared between the two intervention groups.

    12. The incidence rate per patient year of use of home pain medication (based on pain diary observation). This information will be recorded by subjects in their daily pain diary, including type and dosage of pain medication. [6 months]

      The incidence rate of analgesic usage will be defined as the proportion of pain days with reported analgesic use on the total number of pain days (excluding observation days with no reported pain). This proportion will be transformed to an event rate per patient year, with a corresponding rate ratio and it's 95% confidence interval.

    13. Incidence of SCD complications. [6 months]

      The number of patients with sickle cell related complications (i.e. acute chest syndrome, stroke etc.) will be reported per treatment arm, and compared between the two intervention groups. The related incidence of SCD complications; Acute chest syndrome Priapism Hepatic sequestration Splenic sequestration Cerebrovascular accident Leg ulcer Symptomatic avascular osteonecrosis These complications will be assessed monthly by using hospital medical records.

    14. The changes in blood markers of oxidative stress, hemolysis, hypercoagulability, inflammation, erythrocyte adhesion and endothelial dysfunction [6 months]

    15. Compliance of study medication; proportion of study medication used based on pill counts. [6 months]

      Compliance of use of study medication will primarily be checked by pill counts (number administered versus number returned). Compliance will be expressed as the proportion of tablets remaining, compared to the number of tablets that should have been taken based on a prescription of 2 tablets per day and the total number of observation days per patient.

    16. Compliance of study medication; N-acetylcysteine plasma concentrations [6 months]

      We additionally aim to evaluate compliance by N-acetylcysteine plasma concentration measurements in blood samples drawn at T0, T3 and T6 in the intervention group, and assess mean change from baseline in the intervention group. This outcome may be used as alternative parameter for patient compliance if pill counts do not suffice.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    12 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Age 12 years or older

    • Sickle cell disease, either homozygous sickle cell disease (HbSS), compound heterozygous sickle cell disease (HbSC), HbSβ0 or HbSβ+ thalassemia

    • History of at least 1.0 painful crisis per year in the past 3 years (visit to medical facility is not required)

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Chronic blood transfusion or transfusion in the preceding 3 months

    • Painful crisis in the last 4 weeks (with respect to the moment of inclusion)

    • Pregnancy, breast feeding or the desire to get pregnant in the following 7 months

    • Known active gastric/duodenal ulcers

    • Hydroxycarbamide (HC) treatment with unstable dose in the last 3 months or started on HC shorter then 6 months prior to study

    • Known poor compliance in earlier trials regarding the completion of pain diaries

    • Insufficient compliance in run-in period

    • Known hypersensitivity to acetylcysteine or one of the other components of the study medication

    • Use of pain medication for sickle-cell related pains on more than 15 days per month in the past 6 months ('chronic pain').

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 CHU Brugmann Brussels Belgium
    2 CHU St. Pierre Brussels Belgium
    3 Hôpital Erasme Brussels Belgium
    4 Hôpital Universitaire Des Enfants Reine Fabiola (HUDERF) Brussels Belgium
    5 UCL St. Luc Brussels Belgium
    6 CHR de la Citadelle Liège Belgium
    7 Academic Medical Center Amsterdam Netherlands 1105 AZ
    8 University Medical Center Groningen Groningen Netherlands 9713 GZ
    9 Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam Netherlands 3015 AA
    10 Haga Hospital The Hague Netherlands 2545 CH
    11 Guys' & St. Thomas Hospital London United Kingdom

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
    • Erasmus Medical Center
    • Haga Hospital
    • University Medical Center Groningen
    • ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
    • Fonds NutsOhra
    • Stichting Janivo
    • CHU Brugmann, Brussels
    • Erasme University Hospital
    • Centre Hospitalier Régional de la Citadelle
    • University Hospital St Luc, Brussels
    • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre
    • Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospital
    • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Bart Biemond, MD, PhD, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
    • Principal Investigator: Karin Fijnvandraat, MD, PhD, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    B.J. Biemond, dr., Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01849016
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • NAC trial
    • 2012-004892-37
    • 171201003
    • NL 41205.018.12
    First Posted:
    May 8, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 4, 2016
    Last Verified:
    Jun 1, 2016
    Keywords provided by B.J. Biemond, dr., Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jul 4, 2016