Gerofit Exercise Intervention for Older Adults With Sickle Cell Disease (SICKLE-FIT Study)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a personalized exercise training program adapted from Gerofit to improve physical health and quality of life for adults with SCD
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to adapt and pilot the Gerofit personalized exercise intervention for older adults with sickle cell disease (age ≥ 40 years). The Sickle Cell Disease Functional Assessment (SCD-FA) will be performed at steady state at baseline and every 3 months to track progress. Endpoints include feasibility, acceptability, and safety. All participants will be interviewed to identify barriers and facilitators to exercise and how to better optimize the exercise intervention.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Exercise Each cohort of 5-8 participants will exercise 3 days a week for up to 12 weeks. Exercise sessions will be virtual |
Behavioral: Gerofit Exercise Program
The tele-Gerofit exercise intervention has training focused on meeting the physical activity guidelines and incorporating cardiovascular, strength, and balance training. Sessions will also include a mindfulness component, warm up, cool-down, and safety checks. Exercises are personalized to each person's functional status. Intensity of exercises will be determined by participants providing a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) on a scale of 0 (easy) to 10 (very hard) throughout the session. Initial exercise sessions will start at low-intensity and will gradually increase the duration and intensity to allow each person to reach recommended exercise levels at their own pace. Exercises are done virtually via Zoom. Each cohort will have 5-8 participants. The exercise program will be optimized after each cohort with modifications based on participant and exercise expert feedback.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Feasibility, as measured by number of participants completing at least 50% of the exercise sessions [12 weeks]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Safety, as measured by number of participants with moderate or severe adverse events [12 weeks]
Number of participants with 1 or more moderate or severe adverse events within 48 hours after each exercise session
- Acceptability, as measured by acceptability survey [12 weeks]
Number of participants reporting the intervention as acceptable
Other Outcome Measures
- Change in mobility as measured by Usual Gait Speed [Baseline, 12 weeks]
- Change in balance as measured by Timed Up and Go [Baseline, 12 weeks]
- Change in aerobic endurance as measured by Six-Minute Walk Test [Baseline, 12 weeks]
- Change in upper body strength as measured by grip strength [Baseline, 12 weeks]
- Change in lower body strength as measured by 30-second chair stand [Baseline, 12 weeks]
- Change in quality of movement measured by functional movement screen [Baseline, 12 weeks]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Have a diagnosis of sickle cell disease (any genotype) confirmed by hemoglobin electrophoresis, high performance liquid chromatography, or genotyping
-
Understand and speak fluent English.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Diagnosed with moderate or severe cognitive impairment based on ICD-10 codes or report from their outpatient provider
-
Unable to self-consent
-
Wheelchair-bound
-
Successfully treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for SCD
-
Have moderate to severe uncorrected visual or auditory impairment
-
Oxygen-dependent
-
Pregnant
-
Have severe avascular necrosis requiring an assist device
-
Unstable cardiac disease.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Duke University
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Charity I Oyedeji, MD, Duke University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Liem RI, Akinosun M, Muntz DS, Thompson AA. Feasibility and safety of home exercise training in children with sickle cell anemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 Dec;64(12). doi: 10.1002/pbc.26671. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
- Liem RI. Balancing exercise risk and benefits: lessons learned from sickle cell trait and sickle cell anemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2018 Nov 30;2018(1):418-425. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2018.1.418.
- Merlet AN, Messonnier LA, Coudy-Gandilhon C, Bechet D, Gellen B, Rupp T, Galacteros F, Bartolucci P, Feasson L. Beneficial effects of endurance exercise training on skeletal muscle microvasculature in sickle cell disease patients. Blood. 2019 Dec 19;134(25):2233-2241. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019001055.
- Morey MC, Cowper PA, Feussner JR, DiPasquale RC, Crowley GM, Kitzman DW, Sullivan RJ Jr. Evaluation of a supervised exercise program in a geriatric population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989 Apr;37(4):348-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1989.tb05503.x.
- Morey MC, Lee CC, Castle S, Valencia WM, Katzel L, Giffuni J, Kopp T, Cammarata H, McDonald M, Oursler KA, Wamsley T, Jain C, Bettger JP, Pearson M, Manning KM, Intrator O, Veazie P, Sloane R, Li J, Parker DC. Should Structured Exercise Be Promoted As a Model of Care? Dissemination of the Department of Veterans Affairs Gerofit Program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 May;66(5):1009-1016. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15276. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
- Morey MC, Pieper CF, Crowley GM, Sullivan RJ, Puglisi CM. Exercise adherence and 10-year mortality in chronically ill older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Dec;50(12):1929-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50602.x.
- Oyedeji C, Strouse JJ, Crawford RD, Garrett ME, Ashley-Koch AE, Telen MJ. A multi-institutional comparison of younger and older adults with sickle cell disease. Am J Hematol. 2019 Apr;94(4):E115-E117. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25405. Epub 2019 Jan 31. No abstract available.
- Oyedeji CI, Hall K, Luciano A, Morey MC, Strouse JJ. The Sickle Cell Disease Functional Assessment (SCD-FA) tool: a feasibility pilot study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Mar 4;8(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01005-3.
- Pro00111833