An In Silico Trial to Evaluate Prospectively the Performance of a Radiomics Algorithm for UIP Compared to Medical Doctors

Sponsor
Maastricht University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05784207
Collaborator
(none)
145
1
55
2.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare AI performance to doctor's performance in the evaluation of IPF/UIP and ILDs without UIP(proven by biopsy).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Radiomics model to classify between IPF with UIP pattern and ILDs without UIP pattern

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
145 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Retrospective
Official Title:
An In Silico Trial to Evaluate Prospectively the Performance of a Radiomics Algorithm for UIP Compared to Medical Doctors
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
IPF/UIP_CT based

patients with an ILD and a pathological UIP pattern and a final diagnosis of IPF

Other: Radiomics model to classify between IPF with UIP pattern and ILDs without UIP pattern
The aim is to evaluate the performance of AI with the performance of doctors

IPF/UIP_Biopsy based

patients with a final diagnosis of IPF but a less typical HRCT pattern( lung biopsy required for the diagnosis)

Other: Radiomics model to classify between IPF with UIP pattern and ILDs without UIP pattern
The aim is to evaluate the performance of AI with the performance of doctors

ILD but not IPF and prove by biopsy not UIP

patients with an ILD and a pathological non-UIP pattern

Other: Radiomics model to classify between IPF with UIP pattern and ILDs without UIP pattern
The aim is to evaluate the performance of AI with the performance of doctors

Normal

Normal healthy patients

Other: Radiomics model to classify between IPF with UIP pattern and ILDs without UIP pattern
The aim is to evaluate the performance of AI with the performance of doctors

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. The performance of Radiomics algorithm compared to the ground truth [May 2021]

    Reporting the performance measure: accuracy

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Comparing the performance of the radiomics algorithm to that of physicians [June 2021]

    Correctness of the diagnosis - the most probable thin-section pattern (dichotomous outcome: yes or no)

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Comparing the performance of radiomics algorithm to that of individual doctor [June 2021]

    Correctness of the diagnosis - the most probable thin-section pattern (dichotomous outcome: yes or no)

  2. Comparing the reproducibility of diagnosis between the doctors [June 2021]

    Measuring the concordance in diagnosis in between the physicians, and for each physician separately, using the Concordance correlation coefficient.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • the availability of non-contrast-enhanced HRCT
Exclusion Criteria:
  • the use of contrast enhancement

  • images containing metal or motion artifacts

  • Images reconstructed with a slice thickness larger than 1.5 mm

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Maastricht University Maastricht Limburg Netherlands 6229ER

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Maastricht University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Maastricht University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05784207
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • ISTRU
First Posted:
Mar 24, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Mar 24, 2023
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2023
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 24, 2023