DINERVAPACE: Cardioneuroablation Versus Pacemaker Implantation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Sinus Node Dysfunction

Sponsor
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05186220
Collaborator
Spanish Society of Cardiology (Other), Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti (Other)
40
1
2
24
1.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Endocardial ganglion plexus ablation (cardioneuroablation) represents a promising therapeutic technique for the treatment of vasovagal syncope (VV), functional atrioventricular block (AVB) and sinus node dysfunction (SND) with a component of vagal hypertonia. Nevertheless, there is currently a paucity of literature about the results according to the type of presentation (VV, AVB or SND). The investigators aim to assess the safety and efficacy of cardioneuroablation for the treatment of symptomatic SND.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Cardioneuroablation
  • Device: Permanent dual chamber pacemaker implantation
N/A

Detailed Description

Sinus node dysfunction (SND), also known as sick sinus syndrome, comprises a wide spectrum of sinoatrial dysfunctions, ranging from sinus bradycardia, sinoatrial block, and sinus arrest to bradycardia tachycardia syndrome. An additional manifestation of SND is an inadequate chronotropic response to exercise, reported as chronotropic incompetence. Since the first cardiac denervation was reported in 2005, several registries and retrospective studies using this therapeutic approach for reflex syncope, SND and functional atrioventricular block have been published. However, due to the lack of randomized studies, current guidelines recommend permanent pacemaker implantation for patients with symptomatic SND in order to improve symptoms. Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to assess the safety and efficacy of cardioneuroablation versus permanent pacemaker implantation for the treatment of symptomatic SND.

This is a multicenter, randomized, open, interventional study. After being informed of the study and potential risks, participants will undergo a one week screening period to determine eligibility for the study entry. During this week, participants will undergo an exercise test, atropine test, and a 24 hour-holter electrocardiogram. Then, participants who meet the eligibility criteria, will be randomized 1:1 to receive permanent pacemaker implantation (control group) or cardioneuroablation (interventional group).

The primary endpoint (improve in quality of life assessed with 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)) will be evaluated at six months since randomization.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
40 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Endocardial Ablation of Ganglionated Plexi Versus Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Symptomatic Sinus Node Dysfunction
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Cardioneuroablation

After 3D mapping of the surface of the left and right atrium and the superior vena cava (Ensite Navx or Carto system), localization of ganglion plexus (GP) will be performed either anatomically and/or by means of high frequency stimulation (HFS). The anterior and superior right sided GP will always be ablated per protocol. Other GP will be ablated according to interventional electrophysiologist judgement. The endpoint of the ablation procedure will be 1) absence of a vagal response after HFS from the right jugular vein and 2) an increase in at least 10 bpm as compared to baseline.

Procedure: Cardioneuroablation
After 3D mapping of the surface of the left and right atrium and the superior vena cava (Ensite Navx, Carto), localization of ganglion plexus (GP) will be performed either anatomically and/or by means of high frequency stimulation (HFS). The anterior and superior right sided GP will always be ablated per protocol. Other GP will be ablated according to interventional electrophysiologist judgement. The endpoint of the ablation procedure will be 1) absence of a vagal response after HFS from the right jugular vein and 2) an increase in at least 10 bpm as compared to baseline.
Other Names:
  • Endocardial ganglion plexus ablation
  • Active Comparator: Permanent pacemaker implantation

    A dual chamber pacemaker implantation will be performed. The device will be programmed in a AAI-DDDR mode to avoid unnecessary ventricular pacing.

    Device: Permanent dual chamber pacemaker implantation
    Under local anesthesia and using a subclavian or cephalic vein approach a dual chamber pacemaker implantation with a lead in the right atrium and a lead in the right ventricle will be performed. The device will be programmed in a AAI-DDDR mode to avoid unnecessary ventricular pacing.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change from baseline in the SF-36 Health Survey of quality of life [Baseline and 6 months]

      The SF-36 Health Survey is a validated, well known generic test for assessment of the health-related quality of life of patients.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. 6 month free survival from permanent pacemaker implantation in the interventional group (cardioneuroablation) [Baseline and 6 months]

      Percentage of patients free from pacemaker at one year in the cardioneuroablation group

    2. Change in maximal heart rate and chronotropic incompetence in the exercise test [Baseline and 6 months]

      All patients will perform a baseline exercise test and after 6 months. Maximal heart rate and chronotropic response will be recorded.

    3. Differences in complications rates between both gropus [Baseline and 6 months]

      Most common complications regarding the procedure. In the cardioneuroablation group; complications regarding vascular access and pericardial tamponade. In the pacemaker group, pneumothorax, device infection and vascular access.

    4. Differences in 6 month free survival from syncope between both groups [Baseline and 6 months]

      Syncope will be defined as any spontaneous loss of conscious with posterior recovery.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    40 Years to 80 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Symptomatic sinus node dysfunction (dizziness, asthenia or syncope) clearly related to an abnormal electrocardiogram finding (sinus arrest, sinoatrial block, extreme bradycardia (<40 bpm) or chronotropic incompetence in the exercise test).

    • Absence of structural cardiopathy

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Left ventricular ejection fraction <50%

    • Severe valvular disease

    • Any type of cardiomyopathy such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    • Previous ischemic heart disease

    • QRS interval >130 ms

    • Atrioventricular conduction disorder with a former indication of pacemaker implantation (atrioventricular block Mobitz II, advanced atrioventricular block, complete atrioventricular block)

    • Lifetime expectance <12 months

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago Santiago de Compostela A Coruña Spain 15706

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
    • Spanish Society of Cardiology
    • Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Carlos Minguito Carazo, MD, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
    • Study Director: Moises Rodríguez Mañero, PhD, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
    • Study Chair: Jose Ramón González Juanatey, PhD, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Carlos Minguito Carazo, Principal Investigator, Cardiology consultant, Electrophysiology fellow, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05186220
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2021/307
    First Posted:
    Jan 11, 2022
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 11, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Carlos Minguito Carazo, Principal Investigator, Cardiology consultant, Electrophysiology fellow, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jan 11, 2022