OPTIVENOSUS: OPTImal Treatment of Sinus VENOSUS Defect

Sponsor

Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue (Other)

Overall Status

Recruiting

CT.gov ID

NCT05865119

Collaborator

(none)

Enrollment

Locations

Arms

Anticipated Duration (Months)

4.6

Patients Per Site

0.1

Patients Per Site Per Month

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Sinus venosus defect (SVD) accounts for 10% of atrial septal defects and is characterized by an anomalous pulmonary venous return in the superior vena cava associated with a high situated atrial septal defect. Since 2013, transcatheter correction of this congenital heart disease has emerged as a new treatment option. The procedure involves placement of a covered stent in the superior vena cava that tunnels the anomalous pulmonary venous return to the left atrium. Preliminary results are limited but promising.

The devices to be used depend on anatomic considerations. XXL stents than 70mm are often required. Today, the availability of CE marked stents is limited. There have been recent reports of successful corrections with the specifically developed Optimus XXL 100mm covered stent (ANDRATEC) with compassionate approval from the Agence Nationale de Sûreté du Médicament in France. Setting up a feasibility study to investigate the use of medical devices in this indication was required.

The objective of this project is to study the feasibility, efficacy and safety of the Optimus stent in this newly developed transcatheter procedure, in comparison with the gold-standard surgical method. A French national multicenter comparative cohort study including all eligible patients referred for transcatheter correction of SVD was designed. The feasibility of the transcatheter procedures will be investigated beforehand by virtual digital simulation and simulation on a 3D printed model. The procedures will then be performed in centers of the M3C network for complex congenital heart diseases (CARDIOGEN). The primary endpoint will be a composite of efficacy, defined as complete occlusion of the shunt, and safety, defined as the absence of major events at 6 months. The secondary endpoints will be anatomical, functional and psychosocial (quality of life).

It is expected that transcatheter treatment gives comparable results to surgery on the primary endpoint. This could justify the further development of this procedure as an alternative to surgery and facilitate the validation of dedicated equipment.

Condition or Disease	Intervention/Treatment	Phase
Sinus Venosus Defect Congenital Heart Disease Sinus Venosus Atrial Septum Defect	Device: OPTIMUS covered stent Procedure: Surgical correction of a SVD	N/A

Detailed Description

OPTIVENOSUS will be offered to patients who have an correction of SVD. A pre-therapeutic assessment will be prescribed with a CT scan and MRI, followed by a complementary assessment with a 6-minute walk test, a functional cardiorespiratory examination, a Holter and an ECG.

In addition, the images from the CT scan carried out during the pre-therapeutic assessment will be transferred to a secure platform approved for hosting health data. These images will be the subject of a 3D reconstruction.

Then a multidisciplinary consultation meeting held by paediatric cardiologists, specialists in adult congenital heart disease, surgeons and interventional cardiologists will be held to assess whether or not the patient is ineligible for surgery and whether or not the patient is eligible for transcatheter correction of SVD on the basis of the imaging examinations and the clinical assessment.

During this meeting, the imaging core lab and the experts will give their opinion on the feasibility of the endovascular procedure.

The criteria considered for ineligibility for surgery will include

Comorbidities
Complications (rhythm disorders, heart failure, pulmonary hypertension).
Age of the patient
Anatomical considerations

The criteria considered for eligibility for percutaneous treatment are:

Ineligibility for surgery
An adult patient with a compatible anatomy (distance between the upper edge of the anomalous pulmonary venous return and the lower edge of the innominate venous trunk > 2cm allowing sufficient stent attachment in the SVD; a diameter of the atrial septal defect >10mm allowing redirection of flow from the anomalous pulmonary venous return to the left atrium without restriction and a position of the anomalous pulmonary veins allowing redirection of flow to the left atrium without obstruction by the stent in digital simulation). These 3 elements will be analysed on the injected scanner and then confirmed by the scanner simulation, the 3D printed model and the simulation of the procedure on an experimental test bench.

If the patient is eligible for the endovascular approach, a bench simulation of the endovascular procedure will be performed.

A simulation of the endovascular procedure is performed on a test bench in the hybrid room of the Marie Lannelongue Hospital. The test bench consists of a 3D model of the heart that corresponds exactly to the patient's anatomy, produced using CT images.

The simulation allows on the one hand to confirm the feasibility of transcatheter correction of SVD and on the other hand to define the characteristics in terms of diameter and length of the necessary devices (stent and balloons) for the procedure in order to have a personalized approach.

The simulation session will take place in the presence of the referring interventional cardiologists.

All patients, regardless of the mode of correction of SVD, will have the same follow-up at D7, 1 month, 6 months and then every year for 5 years with an echographic control and a clinical evaluation

Study Design

Study Type:

Interventional

Anticipated Enrollment :

60 participants

Allocation:

Non-Randomized

Intervention Model:

Parallel Assignment

Masking:

None (Open Label)

Primary Purpose:

Treatment

Official Title:

OPTImal Treatment of Sinus VENOSUS Defect - Efficacy and Safety of Transcatheter Correction Compared to Surgical Treatment in Patients With Sinus Venosus Defect

Actual Study Start Date :

May 12, 2023

Anticipated Primary Completion Date :

May 12, 2024

Anticipated Study Completion Date :

May 12, 2029

Arms and Interventions

Arm	Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: endovascular Transcatheter correction of a SVD with an OPTIMUS covered stent	Device: OPTIMUS covered stent The procedure involves placement of a long and large balloon-expandable covered stent in the superior vena cava that tunnels the abnormal pulmonary venous return to the left atrium.
Active Comparator: surgery Surgical correction of a SVD	Procedure: Surgical correction of a SVD Under cardiopulmonary bypass and open heart surgery, surgical correction of SVD either using single patch, double patch or Warden techniques

Arm

Intervention/Treatment

Experimental: endovascular

Transcatheter correction of a SVD with an OPTIMUS covered stent

Device: OPTIMUS covered stent

The procedure involves placement of a long and large balloon-expandable covered stent in the superior vena cava that tunnels the abnormal pulmonary venous return to the left atrium.

Active Comparator: surgery

Surgical correction of a SVD

Procedure: Surgical correction of a SVD

Under cardiopulmonary bypass and open heart surgery, surgical correction of SVD either using single patch, double patch or Warden techniques

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of participants meeting the primary net criteria in the 2 groups [At six month]
Number of participants (%) with complete occlusion of the shunt AND absence of a major procedure-related event (death or open-heart surgery).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of participants meeting the Safety and technical success criteria at 1 month [At one month]
- Number of participants (%) with Technical success rate of the correction procedure defined by correction of Abnormal Pulmonary Venous Return and shunt occlusion AND absence of each of the following complications: ECMO, dialysis, stroke, rhythm disorder requiring drug or electrical intervention, severe conduction disorder requiring pace maker AND absence of re-hospitalization or prolongation of initial hospitalization due to a procedure-related Serious Adverse Event
Difference in functional capacity before versus after intervention [At six months]
Change in baseline and 6-month 6 minutes walking test (in meters)
Difference in NYHA status before versus after intervention [At six months]
Change in baseline and 6-month NYHA score (score from 0 to 4 O the best status 4 the worst functional class)
Number of participants meeting the safety criteria at one year [At one year]
Number of participants (%) with percutaneous or surgical re-intervention, or stroke or conduction rhythm disorder requiring pacemaker placement.
Number of participants meeting the safety criteria at 2 years [At two years]
Number of participants (%) with percutaneous or surgical re-intervention, or stroke or conduction rhythm disorder requiring pacemaker placement.
Number of participants meeting the safety criteria at three years [At three years]
Number of participants (%) with major complications related to the heart disease
Number of participants meeting the safety criteria at four years [At four years]
Number of participants (%) with major complications related to the heart disease
Number of participants meeting the safety criteria at five years [At five years]
Number of participants (%) with major complications related to the heart disease

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:

12 Years and Older

Sexes Eligible for Study:

All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:

Inclusion Criteria:

from 12 years of age
SVD with right ventricular end-diastolic volume dilatation (RV EDV) on imaging (echocardiography and/or MRI), defined by the guidelines as RV EDV greater than 112mL/m2 for women and 121 mL/m2 for men.
With an indication for atrial septal defect correction, indicated at a medical-surgical meeting according to the ESC 2020 guideline criteria
Adult patients who received informed information about the study and signed a consent to participate in the study
Minor patients, no opposition from both holders of parental authority to data processing.
Patient agreeing to be followed for the duration of the study
Affiliated or beneficiary of a social security plan NB: Minor patients will only be considered eligible for the surgical procedure and will be studied descriptively.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient under guardianship or curatorship
Patient deprived of liberty
Patient under judicial protection
Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
Patient already included in an interventional research protocol

Contacts and Locations

Locations

	Site	City	Country	Postal Code
1	CHU Bordeaux	Bordeaux	France	33404
2	Hospices Civils de Lyon	Bron	France	69500
3	CHU Clermont-Ferrand	Clermont-Ferrand	France	63000
4	CHU Grenoble	Grenoble	France	38700
5	Sébastien HASCOËT	Le Plessis-Robinson	France	92350
6	CHU Lille	Lille	France	59000
7	Hôpitaux universitaire de Marseille	Marseille	France	13385
8	CHU Nantes	Nantes	France	44000
9	CHU Necker APHP Paris	Paris	France	75015
10	HEGP Paris	Paris	France	75015
11	CHU Toulouse	Toulouse	France	31300
12	Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse	Toulouse	France	31300
13	CHU Tours	Tours	France	37000