DIVERGENCE 1: Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in the Treatment of Small Bowel Crohn's Disease (SBCD)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of filgotinib, when compared to placebo, in establishing clinical remission defined as Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) < 150, at Week 24 in participants with small bowel Crohn's disease (CD). Participants will have the option to enter a separate long-term extension study if they meet eligibility requirements.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Filgotinib 200 mg Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + placebo to match (PTM) filgotinib 100 mg tablet for up to 27 weeks. |
Drug: Filgotinib
Tablet(s) administered orally once daily
Other Names:
Drug: Placebo to match filgotinib
Tablet(s) administered orally once daily
|
Experimental: Filgotinib 100 mg Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet for up to 26.3 weeks. |
Drug: Filgotinib
Tablet(s) administered orally once daily
Other Names:
Drug: Placebo to match filgotinib
Tablet(s) administered orally once daily
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet for up to 28.7 weeks. |
Drug: Placebo to match filgotinib
Tablet(s) administered orally once daily
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 24 [Week 24]
The CDAI score is used to quantify the symptoms of participants with Crohn's Disease (CD). The score ranges from 0 to 600. Clinical remission by CDAI was defined as a score of < 150. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change From Baseline in Terminal Ileum Segmental Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MaRIA) Score at Week 24 [Baseline; Week 24]
Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) is an imaging technique to evaluate disease activity in CD. MaRIA is an MRE-based scoring system. The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and relative contrast enhancement (RCE). A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these components for the terminal ileum segment of the small bowel. A segmental score of ≥ 7 indicates active inflammation and a score of ≥ 11 indicates the presence of an ulcer. Segmental scores less than 7 indicate remission. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Difference in least squared means (Diff in LSM) were from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from baseline indicates disease worsening.
- Change From Baseline in Distal Ileum Segmental MaRIA Score at Week 24 [Baseline; Week 24]
MRE is an imaging technique to evaluate disease activity in CD. MaRIA is an MRE-based scoring system. The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at Screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for the distal ileum segment of the small bowel. A segmental score of ≥ 7 indicates active inflammation and a score of ≥ 11 indicates the presence of an ulcer. Segmental scores less than 7 indicate remission in that segment. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Diff in LSM were from ANCOVA model. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from baseline indicates disease worsening.
- Change From Baseline in Jejunum Segmental MaRIA Score at Week 24 [Baseline; Week 24]
MRE is an imaging technique to evaluate disease activity in CD. MaRIA is an MRE-based scoring system.The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at Screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for the jejunum segment of the small bowel. A segmental score of ≥ 7 indicates active inflammation and a score of ≥ 11 indicates the presence of an ulcer. Segmental scores less than 7 indicate remission in that segment. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Diff in LSM were from ANCOVA model. A positive change from baseline indicates disease worsening.
- Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MaRIA Remission in Terminal Ileum Segment at Week 24 [Week 24]
The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for the terminal ileum segment of the small bowel. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. MaRIA remission was defined as a segmental MaRIA score < 7 in terminal ileum segment at Week 24 among participants with MaRIA score ≥ 7 in the same segment at baseline. A segmental score of ≥ 7 indicates active inflammation and a score of ≥ 11 indicates the presence of an ulcer.
- Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MaRIA Remission in Distal Ileum Segment at Week 24 [Week 24]
The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for the distal ileum segment of the small bowel. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. MaRIA remission was defined as a segmental MaRIA score < 7 in distal ileum segment at Week 24 among participants with MaRIA score ≥ 7 in the same segment at baseline. A segmental score of ≥ 7 indicates active inflammation and a score of ≥ 11 indicates the presence of an ulcer.
- Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MaRIA Remission in Jejunum Segment at Week 24 [Week 24]
The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for the jejunum segment of the small bowel. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. MaRIA remission was defined as a segmental MaRIA score < 7 in jejunum segment at Week 24 among participants with MaRIA score ≥ 7 in the same segment at baseline. A segmental score of ≥ 7 indicates active inflammation and a score of ≥ 11 indicates the presence of an ulcer.
- Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MaRIA Response in Terminal Ileum Segment at Week 24 [Week 24]
The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for the terminal ileum segment of the small bowel. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. MaRIA response was defined as a segmental MaRIA score < 11 with baseline score ≥ 11, or a segmental MaRIA score < 7 with baseline score < 11, or ≥ minimum detectable difference (MDD) units decrease from baseline score for segments with baseline MaRIA score ≥ 7 in the terminal ileum. For segments with baseline MaRIA score ≥ 15, the MDD is 6.5 units and for baseline MaRIA score < 15, the MDD is 4.0 units.
- Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MaRIA Response in Distal Ileum Segment at Week 24 [Week 24]
The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for the distal ileum segment of the small bowel. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. MaRIA response was defined as a segmental MaRIA score < 11 with baseline score ≥ 11, or a segmental MaRIA score < 7 with baseline score < 11, or ≥ MDD units decrease from baseline score for segments with baseline MaRIA score≥ 7 in the distal ileum. For segments with baseline MaRIA score ≥ 15, the minimum detectable difference (MDD) is 6.5 units and for baseline MaRIA score < 15, the MDD is 4.0 units.
- Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MaRIA Response in Jejunum Segment at Week 24 [Week 24]
The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for the jejunum segment of the small bowel. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. MaRIA response was defined as a segmental MaRIA score < 11 with baseline score ≥ 11, or a segmental MaRIA score < 7 with baseline score < 11, or ≥ MDD units decrease from baseline score for segments with baseline MaRIA score ≥ 7 in the jejunum. For segments with baseline MaRIA score ≥ 15, the MDD is 6.5 units and for baseline MaRIA score < 15, the MDD is 4.0 units.
- Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Participant Level Small Bowel MaRIA Remission at Week 24 [Week 24]
The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for each of the 3 small bowel segments. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Small bowel MaRIA remission was defined as MaRIA score < 7 at Week 24 in each of the 3 small bowel segments, among participants with MaRIA score ≥ 7 in at least 1 small bowel segment at baseline.
- Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Participant Level Small Bowel MaRIA Response at Week 24 [Week 24]
The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for each of the 3 small bowel segments. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participant level small bowel MaRIA response was defined as all small bowel segments with baseline MaRIA score ≥7 achieve segment level MaRIA response, with no segment level disease worsening in any other segment(s) at Week 24, among participants with MaRIA score ≥ 7 in at least 1 small bowel segment at baseline.
- Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Early Clinical Remission by Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 10 [Week 10]
The CDAI score is used to quantify the symptoms of participants with CD. The score ranges from 0 to 600. Clinical remission by CDAI was defined as a score of < 150. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
- Change From Baseline in CDAI Scores at Week 10 [Baseline; Week 10]
The CDAI score is used to quantify the symptoms of participants with CD. The score ranges from 0 to 600. A score of < 150 indicates remission. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Difference in least squared means (Diff in LSM) were from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
- Change From Baseline in CDAI Scores at Week 24 [Baseline; Week 24]
The CDAI score is used to quantify the symptoms of participants with Crohn's Disease. The score ranges from 0 to 600. A score of < 150 indicates remission. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Diff in LSM were from ANCOVA model. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria:
-
Males or non-pregnant, nonlactating females, ages 18 to 75 years, inclusive based on the date of screening visit
-
Moderately or severely active CD
-
Minimum duration of CD of at least 6 months
-
Presence of diseased small bowel (SB) segments in at least 1 of the following segments: terminal ileum, distal ileum, or jejunum
-
Patients with additional colonic involvement of CD are permitted in study as long as SBCD is present
-
Previously demonstrated an inadequate clinical response, loss of response to, or intolerance to at least 1 of the following agents (depending on current country treatment recommendations/guidelines):
-
Corticosteroids
-
Immunomodulators
-
Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) antagonists
-
Vedolizumab
-
Ustekinumab
-
Willing and able to undergo magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) per protocol requirements
Key Exclusion Criteria:
-
Presence of symptomatic or clinically significant (eg, obstructive or symptomatic) strictures or stenosis.
-
Presence of fistulae
-
Evidence of short bowel syndrome
-
Presence of ulcerative colitis, indeterminate colitis, ischemic colitis, fulminant colitis, or toxic mega-colon
-
History of total colectomy, subtotal-colectomy, presence of ileostomy or colostomy, or likely requirement for surgery during the study
-
Use of any prohibited concomitant medications as described in the study protocol
-
Active tuberculosis (TB) or history of latent TB that has not been treated
Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University of Miami Crohn's and Colitis Center | Miami | Florida | United States | 33136 |
2 | Center for lnterventional Endoscopy- Florida Hospital | Orlando | Florida | United States | 32804 |
3 | University of South Florida South Tampa campus | Tampa | Florida | United States | 33606 |
4 | Indiana University Health University Hospital | Indianapolis | Indiana | United States | 46202 |
5 | University of Kansas Medical Center | Kansas City | Kansas | United States | 66160 |
6 | Gastro Center of Maryland | Columbia | Maryland | United States | 21045 |
7 | Meritus Center for Clinical Research | Hagerstown | Maryland | United States | 21742 |
8 | Clinical Research Institute of Michigan | Chesterfield | Michigan | United States | 48047 |
9 | Fargo Gastroenterology and Hepatology Clinic | Fargo | North Dakota | United States | 58103 |
10 | Gastro One | Germantown | Tennessee | United States | 38138 |
11 | Texas Clinical Research Institute | Arlington | Texas | United States | 76012 |
12 | Gastroenterology Research of San Antonio | San Antonio | Texas | United States | 78229 |
13 | TDDC San Marcos | San Marcos | Texas | United States | 78666 |
14 | Texas Digestive Disease Consultants | Southlake | Texas | United States | 76092 |
15 | McGuire DVAMC | Richmond | Virginia | United States | 23249 |
16 | Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Internal Medicine I | Innsbruck | Austria | 6020 | |
17 | Medical University of Vienna, Department of Internal Medicine III, Division Gastroenterology and Hepatology | Vienna | Austria | 1090 | |
18 | Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen | Edegem | Belgium | 2650 | |
19 | Centre Hospitalier Chretien | Liège | Belgium | 4000 | |
20 | Mount Sinai Hospital | Toronto | Canada | M5T 3L9 | |
21 | PerCuro Clinical Research Ltd. | Victoria | Canada | V8V 3M9 | |
22 | Hepato-Gastroenterologie HK, s.r.o. | Hradec Kralove | Czechia | 500 12 | |
23 | CHU de Toulouse -Hopital Rangueil (Main Office) | Toulouse Cedex 9 | Midi-Pyrenees | France | 31059 |
24 | Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie | Hannover | Germany | 30625 | |
25 | Universitatsklinikum Jena | Jena | Germany | 07747 | |
26 | Bugát Pál Kórház, Gasztroenterológiai osztály | Gyöngyös | Heves | Hungary | 3200 |
27 | Békés Megyei Központi Kórház Dr. Réthy Pál Tagkórháza | Békéscsaba | Hungary | 5600 | |
28 | Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria Mater Domini | Catanzaro | Italy | 88100 | |
29 | Gastroenterologia, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico di Roma | Rome | Italy | 00128 | |
30 | Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada | Fuenlabrada | Madrid | Spain | 28942 |
31 | Hospital Universitario Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin | Las Palmas De Gran Canaria | Spain | 35016 | |
32 | Ivano-Frankivsk Central City Clinical Hospital, Department of Therapy #1, SHEI Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University | Ivano-Frankivsk | Ukraine | 76018 | |
33 | Communal Healthcare Institution Regional Hospital of War Veterans, Department of Therapy #1 | Kharkiv | Ukraine | 61137 | |
34 | Communal Institution of Ternopil Regional Council Ternopil University Hospital. Regional Center of Gastroenterology | Ternopil | Ukraine | 46002 | |
35 | Queen Elizabeth University Hospital | Glasgow | Scotland | United Kingdom | G51 4TF |
36 | Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology | Exeter | United Kingdom | EX2 5DW | |
37 | St Georges Clinical Research Facility | London | United Kingdom | SW17 0QT | |
38 | John Radcliffe Hospital | Oxford | United Kingdom | OX3 9DU |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Gilead Sciences
- Galapagos NV
Investigators
- Study Director: Gilead Study Director, Gilead Sciences
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- GS-US-419-4015
- 2016-003179-23
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Participants were enrolled at study sites in the United States, Canada, and Europe. The first participant was screened on 11 April 2017. The last study visit occurred on 20 July 2020. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | 198 participants were screened. |
Arm/Group Title | Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + placebo to match (PTM) filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 27 weeks. | Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 26.3 weeks. | PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 28.7 weeks. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |||
STARTED | 28 | 32 | 18 |
COMPLETED | 16 | 16 | 11 |
NOT COMPLETED | 12 | 16 | 7 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 27 weeks. | Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 26.3 weeks. | PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 28.7 weeks. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 28 | 32 | 18 | 78 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
46
(16.3)
|
42
(12.9)
|
45
(12.9)
|
44
(14.2)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||
Female |
19
67.9%
|
23
71.9%
|
9
50%
|
51
65.4%
|
Male |
9
32.1%
|
9
28.1%
|
9
50%
|
27
34.6%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | ||||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
2
7.1%
|
4
12.5%
|
2
11.1%
|
8
10.3%
|
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
White |
25
89.3%
|
28
87.5%
|
16
88.9%
|
69
88.5%
|
Other |
1
3.6%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
1.3%
|
Not Permitted |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | ||||
Not Hispanic or Latino |
26
92.9%
|
31
96.9%
|
17
94.4%
|
74
94.9%
|
Hispanic or Latino |
2
7.1%
|
1
3.1%
|
1
5.6%
|
4
5.1%
|
Not Permitted |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | ||||
United States |
15
53.6%
|
13
40.6%
|
10
55.6%
|
38
48.7%
|
Hungary |
0
0%
|
3
9.4%
|
1
5.6%
|
4
5.1%
|
Czechia |
0
0%
|
1
3.1%
|
0
0%
|
1
1.3%
|
Ukraine |
2
7.1%
|
0
0%
|
1
5.6%
|
3
3.8%
|
United Kingdom |
4
14.3%
|
1
3.1%
|
2
11.1%
|
7
9%
|
Spain |
1
3.6%
|
2
6.3%
|
0
0%
|
3
3.8%
|
Canada |
0
0%
|
4
12.5%
|
1
5.6%
|
5
6.4%
|
Austria |
1
3.6%
|
1
3.1%
|
0
0%
|
2
2.6%
|
Belgium |
0
0%
|
2
6.3%
|
0
0%
|
2
2.6%
|
Italy |
3
10.7%
|
1
3.1%
|
1
5.6%
|
5
6.4%
|
France |
2
7.1%
|
2
6.3%
|
1
5.6%
|
5
6.4%
|
Germany |
0
0%
|
2
6.3%
|
1
5.6%
|
3
3.8%
|
Crohn's Disease Activity Index Score (CDAI) (score on scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on scale] |
309
(55.7)
|
297
(64.9)
|
300
(63.7)
|
302
(60.9)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | The CDAI score is used to quantify the symptoms of participants with Crohn's Disease (CD). The score ranges from 0 to 600. Clinical remission by CDAI was defined as a score of < 150. A higher score indicates more severe disease. |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full Analysis Set included all the randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. |
Arm/Group Title | Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 27 weeks. | Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 26.3 weeks. | PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 28.7 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 28 | 32 | 18 |
Number (90% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
25.0
89.3%
|
25.0
78.1%
|
16.7
92.8%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 200 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | 8.3 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -16.5 to 32.1 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 100 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | 8.3 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -15.9 to 32.0 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change From Baseline in Terminal Ileum Segmental Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MaRIA) Score at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) is an imaging technique to evaluate disease activity in CD. MaRIA is an MRE-based scoring system. The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and relative contrast enhancement (RCE). A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these components for the terminal ileum segment of the small bowel. A segmental score of ≥ 7 indicates active inflammation and a score of ≥ 11 indicates the presence of an ulcer. Segmental scores less than 7 indicate remission. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Difference in least squared means (Diff in LSM) were from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from baseline indicates disease worsening. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 27 weeks. | Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 26.3 weeks. | PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 28.7 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 28 | 32 | 18 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [score on scale] |
-1.8
(1.51)
|
0.7
(1.39)
|
0.5
(1.64)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 200 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | Difference in least squared means (Diff in LSM), and its 90% confidence interval (CI) were from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusted by baseline segmental MaRIA score, concomitant use of oral, systemically absorbed corticosteroids at baseline, concomitant use of immunomodulators at baseline, prior exposure to biologics, and treatment group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least Squares Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | -2.3 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -5.3 to 0.7 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 1.81 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 100 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | Diff in LSM, and its 90% CI were from ANCOVA model adjusted by baseline segmental MaRIA score, concomitant use of oral, systemically absorbed corticosteroids at baseline, concomitant use of immunomodulators at baseline, prior exposure to biologics, and treatment group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least Squares Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | 0.2 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -2.7 to 3.1 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 1.72 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change From Baseline in Distal Ileum Segmental MaRIA Score at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | MRE is an imaging technique to evaluate disease activity in CD. MaRIA is an MRE-based scoring system. The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at Screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for the distal ileum segment of the small bowel. A segmental score of ≥ 7 indicates active inflammation and a score of ≥ 11 indicates the presence of an ulcer. Segmental scores less than 7 indicate remission in that segment. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Diff in LSM were from ANCOVA model. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement and a positive change from baseline indicates disease worsening. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 27 weeks. | Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 26.3 weeks. | PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 28.7 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 28 | 32 | 18 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [score on scale] |
-1.1
(1.12)
|
-0.5
(1.08)
|
0.5
(1.26)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 200 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | Diff in LSM, and its 90% CI were from ANCOVA model adjusted by baseline segmental MaRIA score, concomitant use of oral, systemically absorbed corticosteroids at baseline, concomitant use of immunomodulators at baseline, prior exposure to biologics, and treatment group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least Squares Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | -1.6 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -3.9 to 0.7 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 1.38 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 100 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | Diff in LSM, and its 90% CI were from ANCOVA model adjusted by baseline segmental MaRIA score, concomitant use of oral, systemically absorbed corticosteroids at baseline, concomitant use of immunomodulators at baseline, prior exposure to biologics, and treatment group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least Squares Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | -1.0 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -3.2 to 1.2 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 1.32 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change From Baseline in Jejunum Segmental MaRIA Score at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | MRE is an imaging technique to evaluate disease activity in CD. MaRIA is an MRE-based scoring system.The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at Screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for the jejunum segment of the small bowel. A segmental score of ≥ 7 indicates active inflammation and a score of ≥ 11 indicates the presence of an ulcer. Segmental scores less than 7 indicate remission in that segment. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Diff in LSM were from ANCOVA model. A positive change from baseline indicates disease worsening. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 27 weeks. | Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 26.3 weeks. | PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 28.7 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 28 | 32 | 18 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [score on scale] |
0.4
(1.00)
|
0.6
(0.95)
|
0.5
(1.12)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 200 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | Diff in LSM, and its 90% CI were from ANCOVA model adjusted by baseline segmental MaRIA score, concomitant use of oral, systemically absorbed corticosteroids at baseline, concomitant use of immunomodulators at baseline, prior exposure to biologics, and treatment group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least Squares Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | -0.1 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -2.2 to 2.0 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 1.24 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 100 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | Diff in LSM, and its 90% CI were from ANCOVA model adjusted by baseline segmental MaRIA score, concomitant use of oral, systemically absorbed corticosteroids at baseline, concomitant use of immunomodulators at baseline, prior exposure to biologics, and treatment group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least Squares Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | 0.1 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -1.9 to 2.0 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 1.18 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MaRIA Remission in Terminal Ileum Segment at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for the terminal ileum segment of the small bowel. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. MaRIA remission was defined as a segmental MaRIA score < 7 in terminal ileum segment at Week 24 among participants with MaRIA score ≥ 7 in the same segment at baseline. A segmental score of ≥ 7 indicates active inflammation and a score of ≥ 11 indicates the presence of an ulcer. |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Full Analysis Set with active disease (segmental MaRIA score ≥ 7) in terminal ileum segment at baseline, were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 27 weeks. | Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 26.3 weeks. | PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 28.7 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 22 | 30 | 16 |
Number (90% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
4.5
16.1%
|
6.7
20.9%
|
6.3
35%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 200 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | -1.7 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -28.6 to 25.5 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 100 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | 0.4 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -24.5 to 26.2 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MaRIA Remission in Distal Ileum Segment at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for the distal ileum segment of the small bowel. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. MaRIA remission was defined as a segmental MaRIA score < 7 in distal ileum segment at Week 24 among participants with MaRIA score ≥ 7 in the same segment at baseline. A segmental score of ≥ 7 indicates active inflammation and a score of ≥ 11 indicates the presence of an ulcer. |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Full Analysis Set with active disease (segmental MaRIA score ≥ 7) in distal ileum segment at baseline, were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 27 weeks. | Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 26.3 weeks. | PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 28.7 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 8 | 6 |
Number (90% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
10.0
35.7%
|
0
0%
|
16.7
92.8%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 200 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | -6.7 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -47.3 to 37.0 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 100 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | -16.7 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -58.2 to 30.0 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MaRIA Remission in Jejunum Segment at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for the jejunum segment of the small bowel. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. MaRIA remission was defined as a segmental MaRIA score < 7 in jejunum segment at Week 24 among participants with MaRIA score ≥ 7 in the same segment at baseline. A segmental score of ≥ 7 indicates active inflammation and a score of ≥ 11 indicates the presence of an ulcer. |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Full Analysis Set with active disease (segmental MaRIA score ≥ 7) in jejunum segment at baseline, were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 27 weeks. | Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 26.3 weeks. | PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 28.7 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 6 | 8 | 3 |
Number (90% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
33.3
118.9%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 200 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | 33.3 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -32.4 to 86.5 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MaRIA Response in Terminal Ileum Segment at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for the terminal ileum segment of the small bowel. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. MaRIA response was defined as a segmental MaRIA score < 11 with baseline score ≥ 11, or a segmental MaRIA score < 7 with baseline score < 11, or ≥ minimum detectable difference (MDD) units decrease from baseline score for segments with baseline MaRIA score ≥ 7 in the terminal ileum. For segments with baseline MaRIA score ≥ 15, the MDD is 6.5 units and for baseline MaRIA score < 15, the MDD is 4.0 units. |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Full Analysis Set with active disease (segmental MaRIA score ≥ 7) in terminal ileum segment at baseline, were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 27 weeks. | Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 26.3 weeks. | PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 28.7 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 22 | 30 | 16 |
Number (90% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
22.7
81.1%
|
10.0
31.3%
|
25.0
138.9%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 200 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | -2.3 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -28.6 to 24.3 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 100 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | -15.0 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -39.4 to 11.3 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MaRIA Response in Distal Ileum Segment at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for the distal ileum segment of the small bowel. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. MaRIA response was defined as a segmental MaRIA score < 11 with baseline score ≥ 11, or a segmental MaRIA score < 7 with baseline score < 11, or ≥ MDD units decrease from baseline score for segments with baseline MaRIA score≥ 7 in the distal ileum. For segments with baseline MaRIA score ≥ 15, the minimum detectable difference (MDD) is 6.5 units and for baseline MaRIA score < 15, the MDD is 4.0 units. |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Full Analysis Set with active disease (segmental MaRIA score ≥ 7) in distal ileum segment at baseline, were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 27 weeks. | Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 26.3 weeks. | PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 28.7 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 8 | 6 |
Number (90% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
20.0
71.4%
|
12.5
39.1%
|
16.7
92.8%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 200 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | 3.3 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -38.9 to 45.7 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 100 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | -4.2 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -47.5 to 40.8 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MaRIA Response in Jejunum Segment at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for the jejunum segment of the small bowel. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. MaRIA response was defined as a segmental MaRIA score < 11 with baseline score ≥ 11, or a segmental MaRIA score < 7 with baseline score < 11, or ≥ MDD units decrease from baseline score for segments with baseline MaRIA score ≥ 7 in the jejunum. For segments with baseline MaRIA score ≥ 15, the MDD is 6.5 units and for baseline MaRIA score < 15, the MDD is 4.0 units. |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Full Analysis Set with active disease (segmental MaRIA score ≥ 7) in jejunum segment at baseline, were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 27 weeks. | Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 26.3 weeks. | PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 28.7 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 6 | 8 | 3 |
Number (90% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
50.0
178.6%
|
12.5
39.1%
|
0
0%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 200 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | 50.0 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -16.8 to 89.5 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 100 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | 12.5 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -46.1 to 63.3 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Participant Level Small Bowel MaRIA Remission at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for each of the 3 small bowel segments. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Small bowel MaRIA remission was defined as MaRIA score < 7 at Week 24 in each of the 3 small bowel segments, among participants with MaRIA score ≥ 7 in at least 1 small bowel segment at baseline. |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Full Analysis Set with active disease (segmental MaRIA score ≥ 7) in at least 1 small bowel segment at baseline, were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 27 weeks. | Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 26.3 weeks. | PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 28.7 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 25 | 32 | 18 |
Number (90% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
8.0
28.6%
|
6.3
19.7%
|
0
0%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 200 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | 8.0 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -17.2 to 32.6 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 100 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | 6.3 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -18.1 to 30.2 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Participant Level Small Bowel MaRIA Response at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | The MaRIA scoring system is a composite index of 4 components. These components are edema, ulcers, gut wall thickness, and RCE. A segmental MaRIA score can be calculated at screening (used as the baseline) and Week 24 as a weighted sum of these 4 components for each of the 3 small bowel segments. The MaRIA score ranges from approximately 0 to 31, for any given segment. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participant level small bowel MaRIA response was defined as all small bowel segments with baseline MaRIA score ≥7 achieve segment level MaRIA response, with no segment level disease worsening in any other segment(s) at Week 24, among participants with MaRIA score ≥ 7 in at least 1 small bowel segment at baseline. |
Time Frame | Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Full Analysis Set with active disease (segmental MaRIA score ≥ 7) in at least 1 small bowel segment at baseline, were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 27 weeks. | Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 26.3 weeks. | PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 28.7 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 25 | 32 | 18 |
Number (90% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
20.0
71.4%
|
12.5
39.1%
|
16.7
92.8%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 200 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | 3.3 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -22.1 to 28.1 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 100 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | -4.2 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -28.1 to 20.3 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Early Clinical Remission by Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 10 |
---|---|
Description | The CDAI score is used to quantify the symptoms of participants with CD. The score ranges from 0 to 600. Clinical remission by CDAI was defined as a score of < 150. A higher score indicates more severe disease. |
Time Frame | Week 10 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Full Analysis Set were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 27 weeks. | Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 26.3 weeks. | PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 28.7 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 28 | 32 | 18 |
Number (90% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
39.3
140.4%
|
25.0
78.1%
|
22.2
123.3%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 200 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | 17.1 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -7.6 to 40.4 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 100 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Risk Difference in Proportions |
Estimated Value | 2.8 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -21.2 to 26.5 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change From Baseline in CDAI Scores at Week 10 |
---|---|
Description | The CDAI score is used to quantify the symptoms of participants with CD. The score ranges from 0 to 600. A score of < 150 indicates remission. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Difference in least squared means (Diff in LSM) were from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 10 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 27 weeks. | Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 26.3 weeks. | PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 28.7 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 28 | 32 | 18 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [score on scale] |
-105
(23.6)
|
-88
(22.3)
|
-57
(26.2)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 200 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | Diff in LSM, and its 90% CI were from ANCOVA model adjusted by baseline segmental MaRIA score, concomitant use of oral, systemically absorbed corticosteroids at baseline, concomitant use of immunomodulators at baseline, prior exposure to biologics, and treatment group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least Squares Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | -48 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -95 to -1 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 28.1 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 100 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | Diff in LSM, and its 90% CI were from ANCOVA model adjusted by baseline segmental MaRIA score, concomitant use of oral, systemically absorbed corticosteroids at baseline, concomitant use of immunomodulators at baseline, prior exposure to biologics, and treatment group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least Squares Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | -31 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -76 to 15 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 27.4 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change From Baseline in CDAI Scores at Week 24 |
---|---|
Description | The CDAI score is used to quantify the symptoms of participants with Crohn's Disease. The score ranges from 0 to 600. A score of < 150 indicates remission. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Diff in LSM were from ANCOVA model. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
Time Frame | Baseline; Week 24 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants in the Full Analysis Set with available data were analyzed. |
Arm/Group Title | Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 27 weeks. | Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 26.3 weeks. | PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 28.7 weeks. |
Measure Participants | 28 | 32 | 18 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [score on scale] |
-86
(24.1)
|
-71
(22.8)
|
-66
(26.7)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 200 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | Diff in LSM, and its 90% CI were from ANCOVA model adjusted by baseline segmental MaRIA score, concomitant use of oral, systemically absorbed corticosteroids at baseline, concomitant use of immunomodulators at baseline, prior exposure to biologics, and treatment group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least Squares Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | -20 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -68 to 28 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 28.7 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Filgotinib 100 mg, Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | Diff in LSM, and its 90% CI were from ANCOVA model adjusted by baseline segmental MaRIA score, concomitant use of oral, systemically absorbed corticosteroids at baseline, concomitant use of immunomodulators at baseline, prior exposure to biologics, and treatment group. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least Squares Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | -5 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 90% -52 to 42 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 28.0 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | All-Cause Mortality: First dose date up to last dose date (maximum: 28.7 weeks) plus 59 days; Adverse Events: First dose date up to last dose date (maximum: 28.7 weeks) plus 30 days | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | All-Cause Mortality: All Randomized Analysis Set included all participants who were randomized in the study; Adverse Events: Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. | |||||
Arm/Group Title | Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo | |||
Arm/Group Description | Filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 27 weeks. | Filgotinib 100 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 26.3 weeks. | PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily for up to 28.7 weeks. | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/28 (3.6%) | 0/32 (0%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 4/28 (14.3%) | 7/32 (21.9%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||
Crohn's disease | 2/28 (7.1%) | 4/32 (12.5%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Ileus | 0/28 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Small intestinal obstruction | 2/28 (7.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Infections and infestations | ||||||
Anal abscess | 0/28 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Pneumonia | 0/28 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
Filgotinib 200 mg | Filgotinib 100 mg | Placebo | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 20/28 (71.4%) | 24/32 (75%) | 13/18 (72.2%) | |||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||||
Anaemia | 1/28 (3.6%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Ear and labyrinth disorders | ||||||
Ear pain | 0/28 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||
Abdominal distension | 2/28 (7.1%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Abdominal pain | 5/28 (17.9%) | 6/32 (18.8%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Anal incontinence | 0/28 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Crohn's disease | 4/28 (14.3%) | 6/32 (18.8%) | 2/18 (11.1%) | |||
Diarrhoea | 0/28 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Dyspepsia | 0/28 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Flatulence | 0/28 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease | 1/28 (3.6%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Nausea | 5/28 (17.9%) | 3/32 (9.4%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Proctalgia | 1/28 (3.6%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Rectal haemorrhage | 1/28 (3.6%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Vomiting | 1/28 (3.6%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 2/18 (11.1%) | |||
General disorders | ||||||
Asthenia | 1/28 (3.6%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Fatigue | 2/28 (7.1%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Influenza like illness | 0/28 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Pyrexia | 2/28 (7.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Infections and infestations | ||||||
Ear infection | 1/28 (3.6%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Gastroenteritis viral | 0/28 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Influenza | 3/28 (10.7%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Nasopharyngitis | 0/28 (0%) | 4/32 (12.5%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Sinusitis | 4/28 (14.3%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Tooth abscess | 0/28 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Upper respiratory tract infection | 0/28 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Urinary tract infection | 1/28 (3.6%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||
Fall | 2/28 (7.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||||
Decreased appetite | 2/28 (7.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Hypocalcaemia | 0/28 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Hypomagnesaemia | 0/28 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Malnutrition | 0/28 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||
Arthralgia | 0/28 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Back pain | 1/28 (3.6%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Muscle spasms | 0/28 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 2/18 (11.1%) | |||
Pain in extremity | 0/28 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Sacroiliitis | 1/28 (3.6%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||
Dizziness | 1/28 (3.6%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 2/18 (11.1%) | |||
Headache | 4/28 (14.3%) | 4/32 (12.5%) | 2/18 (11.1%) | |||
Paraesthesia | 0/28 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Tremor | 0/28 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||||
Anxiety | 1/28 (3.6%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||||
Dysuria | 0/28 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||
Oropharyngeal pain | 1/28 (3.6%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/18 (0%) | |||
Sinus congestion | 0/28 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||||
Dermatitis | 0/28 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/18 (5.6%) | |||
Vascular disorders | ||||||
Hypertension | 3/28 (10.7%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 1/18 (5.6%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
After conclusion of the study and without prior written approval from Gilead, investigators in this study may communicate, orally present, or publish in scientific journals or other media only after the following conditions have been met: The results of the study in their entirety have been publicly disclosed by or with the consent of Gilead in an abstract, manuscript, or presentation form; or The study has been completed at all study sites for at least 2 years
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Gilead Clinical Study Information Center |
---|---|
Organization | Gilead Sciences |
Phone | 1-833-445-3230 (GILEAD-0) |
GileadClinicalTrials@gilead.com |
- GS-US-419-4015
- 2016-003179-23