Provoked Craving Assessment

Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01506908
Collaborator
(none)
323
1
2
3
108

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Evaluation of the ability of a nicotine mini lozenge to provide early relief of craving for a cigarette in smokers

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: oral nicotine
  • Drug: Placebo
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
323 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Evaluation of the Nicotine Mini Lozenge in Relief of Provoked Acute Craving
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2011
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2011

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Nicotine Polacrilex mint mini lozenge

Drug: oral nicotine
oral nicotine replacement product

Placebo Comparator: placebo

mint mini lozenge with no active

Drug: Placebo
no active

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 5 Minutes [Post-cue baseline,5 minutes]

    Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 1 Minute [Post-cue baseline, 1 minute post treatment administration]

    Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured.

  2. Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 3 Minutes [Post-cue Baseline, 3 minutes post treatment administration]

    Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured.

  3. Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 7 Minutes [Post-Cue Baseline, 7 minutes post treatment administration]

    Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured.

  4. Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 10 Minutes [Post-Cue Baseline, 10 minutes post treatment administration]

    Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured.

  5. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment Related AEs, and Serious AEs (SAEs) [Baseline to Day 5 post treatment administration]

    AE was defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment/s. Treatment related AE was defined as any AE considered to be possibly, probably or highly probably related to study medication. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death; is life threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization results in disability/ incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/ birth defect.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Current cigarette smokers who have smoked regularly, and smoke more than 20 cigarettes per day on a regular basis for at least a year;

  • Good general health with (in the opinion of the investigator) no clinically significant and relevant abnormalities of medical history.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Any disease that may interfere with the absorption, metabolism or excretion of the study product.

  • A medical condition that might jeopardise the safety of the subject or the validity of the study results. For example, recent myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular incident (within 12 weeks of the screening visit), phenylketonuria, unstable or worsening angina pectoris, Prinzmetals angina or severe cardiac arrhythmia

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Los Angeles Clinical Trials Burbank California United States 91505

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • GlaxoSmithKline

Investigators

  • Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials, GlaxoSmithKline

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01506908
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • S7121359
First Posted:
Jan 10, 2012
Last Update Posted:
Aug 28, 2019
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Keywords provided by GlaxoSmithKline
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details Participants were recruited at the clinical site.
Pre-assignment Detail Of 423 screened participants, 323 were randomized while 94 did not meet the study criterion and remaining 6 discontinued due to other reasons. All randomized participants had a history of smoking more than 20 cigarettes per day.
Arm/Group Title Nicotine Lozenge 4 Milligrams (mg) Matched Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of 4 mg nicotine polacrilex mint lozenge, through oral route. Participants received a single dose of matched placebo mint lozenge, through oral route.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 162 161
COMPLETED 161 161
NOT COMPLETED 1 0

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg Matched Placebo Total
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of 4 mg nicotine polacrilex mint lozenge, through oral route. Participants received a single dose of matched placebo mint lozenge, through oral route. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 162 161 323
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years]
43.69
(12.13)
44.45
(11.64)
44.07
(11.88)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
75
46.3%
74
46%
149
46.1%
Male
87
53.7%
87
54%
174
53.9%
Body Mass Index (Kilograms (kg)/ meter (m)^2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Kilograms (kg)/ meter (m)^2]
27.79
(3.73)
27.56
(4.05)
27.67
(3.89)

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 5 Minutes
Description Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured.
Time Frame Post-cue baseline,5 minutes

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Intention to Treat (ITT) population: All randomized participants who had at least one cravings assessment measurement post dose. The imputation of missing craving score was based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) technique.
Arm/Group Title Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg Matched Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of 4 mg nicotine polacrilex mint lozenge, through oral route. Participants received a single dose of matched placebo mint lozenge, through oral route.
Measure Participants 162 161
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Score on a scale]
-41.8
-25.9
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg, Matched Placebo
Comments Null hypothesis considered the population's change from post-cue baseline in craving score mean to be equal in both treatment groups at 5 minutes
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Least squares means difference
Estimated Value -15.9
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-21.6 to -10.2
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Treatment comparisons were made between 4 mg nicotine lozenge and placebo lozenge at 5% significance level.
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 1 Minute
Description Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured.
Time Frame Post-cue baseline, 1 minute post treatment administration

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT population: All randomized participants who had at least one cravings assessment measurement post dose. The imputation of missing craving score was based on LOCF technique.
Arm/Group Title Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg Matched Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of 4 mg nicotine polacrilex mint lozenge, through oral route. Participants received a single dose of matched placebo mint lozenge, through oral route.
Measure Participants 162 161
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Score on a scale]
-17.2
-12.9
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg, Matched Placebo
Comments Null hypothesis considered the population's change from post-cue baseline in craving score mean to be equal in both treatment groups at 1 minute.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0511
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Least squares means difference
Estimated Value -4.2
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-8.4 to 0.0
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Treatment comparisons were made between 4 mg nicotine lozenge and placebo lozenge at 5% significance level.
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 3 Minutes
Description Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured.
Time Frame Post-cue Baseline, 3 minutes post treatment administration

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT population: All randomized participants who had at least one cravings assessment measurement post dose. The imputation of missing craving score was based on LOCF technique.
Arm/Group Title Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg Matched Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of 4 mg nicotine polacrilex mint lozenge, through oral route. Participants received a single dose of matched placebo mint lozenge, through oral route.
Measure Participants 162 161
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Score on a scale]
-31.1
-19.6
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg, Matched Placebo
Comments Null hypothesis considered the population's change from post-cue baseline in craving score mean to be equal in both treatment groups at 3 minutes.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Least squares means difference
Estimated Value -11.6
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-16.7 to -6.4
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Treatment comparisons were made between 4 mg nicotine lozenge and placebo lozenge at 5% significance level.
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 7 Minutes
Description Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured.
Time Frame Post-Cue Baseline, 7 minutes post treatment administration

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT population: All randomized participants who had at least one cravings assessment measurement post dose. The imputation of missing craving score was based on LOCF technique.
Arm/Group Title Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg Matched Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of 4 mg nicotine polacrilex mint lozenge, through oral route. Participants received a single dose of matched placebo mint lozenge, through oral route.
Measure Participants 162 161
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Score on a scale]
-48.2
-30.5
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg, Matched Placebo
Comments Null hypothesis considered the population's change from post-cue baseline in craving score mean to be equal in both treatment groups at 7 minutes.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Least squares means difference
Estimated Value -17.8
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-23.8 to -11.7
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Treatment comparisons were made between 4 mg nicotine lozenge and placebo lozenge at 5% significance level.
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 10 Minutes
Description Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured.
Time Frame Post-Cue Baseline, 10 minutes post treatment administration

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ITT population: All randomized participants who had at least one cravings assessment measurement post dose. The imputation of missing craving score was based on LOCF technique
Arm/Group Title Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg Matched Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of 4 mg nicotine polacrilex mint lozenge, through oral route. Participants received a single dose of matched placebo mint lozenge, through oral route.
Measure Participants 162 161
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Score on a scale]
-50.8
-32.9
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg, Matched Placebo
Comments Null hypothesis considered the population's change from post-cue baseline in craving score mean to be equal in both treatment groups at 10 minutes.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Least square mean difference
Estimated Value -17.9
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-24.4 to -11.4
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Treatment comparisons were made between 4 mg nicotine lozenge and placebo lozenge at 5% significance level.
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment Related AEs, and Serious AEs (SAEs)
Description AE was defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment/s. Treatment related AE was defined as any AE considered to be possibly, probably or highly probably related to study medication. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death; is life threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization results in disability/ incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/ birth defect.
Time Frame Baseline to Day 5 post treatment administration

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Safety population: All randomized participants who received the study treatments were considered evaluable for safety.
Arm/Group Title Matched Placebo Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of matched placebo mint lozenge, through oral route. Participants received a single dose of 4 mg nicotine polacrilex mint lozenge, through oral route.
Measure Participants 161 162
AEs
12
7.4%
54
33.5%
Treatment Related AEs
11
6.8%
54
33.5%
SAEs
0
0%
0
0%

Adverse Events

Time Frame All adverse events encountered or spontaneously reported following administration of any investigational product (including washout product), or for up to 5 days after the last administration of investigational product were recorded.
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg Placebo Lozenge
Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of 4 mg nicotine polacrilex mint lozenge, through oral route. Participants received a single dose of matched placebo mint lozenge, through oral route.
All Cause Mortality
Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg Placebo Lozenge
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg Placebo Lozenge
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/162 (0%) 0/161 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg Placebo Lozenge
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 54/162 (33.3%) 12/161 (7.5%)
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear Pain 0/162 (0%) 0 1/161 (0.6%) 1
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea 24/162 (14.8%) 24 1/161 (0.6%) 1
Dyspepsia 7/162 (4.3%) 7 0/161 (0%) 0
Abdominal Discomfort 3/162 (1.9%) 3 1/161 (0.6%) 1
Stomatitis 2/162 (1.2%) 2 1/161 (0.6%) 1
Glossodynia 0/162 (0%) 0 2/161 (1.2%) 2
Flatulence 1/162 (0.6%) 1 0/161 (0%) 0
Oral Discomfort 1/162 (0.6%) 1 0/161 (0%) 0
Investigations
Heart Rate Increased 1/162 (0.6%) 1 1/161 (0.6%) 1
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness 4/162 (2.5%) 4 1/161 (0.6%) 1
Headache 1/162 (0.6%) 1 1/161 (0.6%) 1
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety 1/162 (0.6%) 1 1/161 (0.6%) 1
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hiccups 13/162 (8%) 13 1/161 (0.6%) 1
Throat Irritation 5/162 (3.1%) 5 1/161 (0.6%) 1
Nasal Congestion 0/162 (0%) 0 1/161 (0.6%) 1
Oropharyngeal Pain 0/162 (0%) 0 1/161 (0.6%) 1

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title GSK Response Center
Organization GlaxoSmithKline
Phone 866-435-7343
Email
Responsible Party:
GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01506908
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • S7121359
First Posted:
Jan 10, 2012
Last Update Posted:
Aug 28, 2019
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2019