Provoked Craving Assessment
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Evaluation of the ability of a nicotine mini lozenge to provide early relief of craving for a cigarette in smokers
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Nicotine Polacrilex mint mini lozenge
|
Drug: oral nicotine
oral nicotine replacement product
|
Placebo Comparator: placebo mint mini lozenge with no active |
Drug: Placebo
no active
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 5 Minutes [Post-cue baseline,5 minutes]
Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 1 Minute [Post-cue baseline, 1 minute post treatment administration]
Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured.
- Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 3 Minutes [Post-cue Baseline, 3 minutes post treatment administration]
Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured.
- Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 7 Minutes [Post-Cue Baseline, 7 minutes post treatment administration]
Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured.
- Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 10 Minutes [Post-Cue Baseline, 10 minutes post treatment administration]
Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured.
- Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment Related AEs, and Serious AEs (SAEs) [Baseline to Day 5 post treatment administration]
AE was defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment/s. Treatment related AE was defined as any AE considered to be possibly, probably or highly probably related to study medication. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death; is life threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization results in disability/ incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/ birth defect.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Current cigarette smokers who have smoked regularly, and smoke more than 20 cigarettes per day on a regular basis for at least a year;
-
Good general health with (in the opinion of the investigator) no clinically significant and relevant abnormalities of medical history.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Any disease that may interfere with the absorption, metabolism or excretion of the study product.
-
A medical condition that might jeopardise the safety of the subject or the validity of the study results. For example, recent myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular incident (within 12 weeks of the screening visit), phenylketonuria, unstable or worsening angina pectoris, Prinzmetals angina or severe cardiac arrhythmia
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Los Angeles Clinical Trials | Burbank | California | United States | 91505 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
Investigators
- Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials, GlaxoSmithKline
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- S7121359
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Participants were recruited at the clinical site. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | Of 423 screened participants, 323 were randomized while 94 did not meet the study criterion and remaining 6 discontinued due to other reasons. All randomized participants had a history of smoking more than 20 cigarettes per day. |
Arm/Group Title | Nicotine Lozenge 4 Milligrams (mg) | Matched Placebo |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single dose of 4 mg nicotine polacrilex mint lozenge, through oral route. | Participants received a single dose of matched placebo mint lozenge, through oral route. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 162 | 161 |
COMPLETED | 161 | 161 |
NOT COMPLETED | 1 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg | Matched Placebo | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single dose of 4 mg nicotine polacrilex mint lozenge, through oral route. | Participants received a single dose of matched placebo mint lozenge, through oral route. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 162 | 161 | 323 |
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years] |
43.69
(12.13)
|
44.45
(11.64)
|
44.07
(11.88)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
75
46.3%
|
74
46%
|
149
46.1%
|
Male |
87
53.7%
|
87
54%
|
174
53.9%
|
Body Mass Index (Kilograms (kg)/ meter (m)^2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Kilograms (kg)/ meter (m)^2] |
27.79
(3.73)
|
27.56
(4.05)
|
27.67
(3.89)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 5 Minutes |
---|---|
Description | Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured. |
Time Frame | Post-cue baseline,5 minutes |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention to Treat (ITT) population: All randomized participants who had at least one cravings assessment measurement post dose. The imputation of missing craving score was based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) technique. |
Arm/Group Title | Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg | Matched Placebo |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single dose of 4 mg nicotine polacrilex mint lozenge, through oral route. | Participants received a single dose of matched placebo mint lozenge, through oral route. |
Measure Participants | 162 | 161 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Score on a scale] |
-41.8
|
-25.9
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg, Matched Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis considered the population's change from post-cue baseline in craving score mean to be equal in both treatment groups at 5 minutes | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least squares means difference |
Estimated Value | -15.9 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -21.6 to -10.2 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Treatment comparisons were made between 4 mg nicotine lozenge and placebo lozenge at 5% significance level. |
Title | Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 1 Minute |
---|---|
Description | Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured. |
Time Frame | Post-cue baseline, 1 minute post treatment administration |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population: All randomized participants who had at least one cravings assessment measurement post dose. The imputation of missing craving score was based on LOCF technique. |
Arm/Group Title | Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg | Matched Placebo |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single dose of 4 mg nicotine polacrilex mint lozenge, through oral route. | Participants received a single dose of matched placebo mint lozenge, through oral route. |
Measure Participants | 162 | 161 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Score on a scale] |
-17.2
|
-12.9
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg, Matched Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis considered the population's change from post-cue baseline in craving score mean to be equal in both treatment groups at 1 minute. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0511 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least squares means difference |
Estimated Value | -4.2 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -8.4 to 0.0 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Treatment comparisons were made between 4 mg nicotine lozenge and placebo lozenge at 5% significance level. |
Title | Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 3 Minutes |
---|---|
Description | Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured. |
Time Frame | Post-cue Baseline, 3 minutes post treatment administration |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population: All randomized participants who had at least one cravings assessment measurement post dose. The imputation of missing craving score was based on LOCF technique. |
Arm/Group Title | Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg | Matched Placebo |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single dose of 4 mg nicotine polacrilex mint lozenge, through oral route. | Participants received a single dose of matched placebo mint lozenge, through oral route. |
Measure Participants | 162 | 161 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Score on a scale] |
-31.1
|
-19.6
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg, Matched Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis considered the population's change from post-cue baseline in craving score mean to be equal in both treatment groups at 3 minutes. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least squares means difference |
Estimated Value | -11.6 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -16.7 to -6.4 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Treatment comparisons were made between 4 mg nicotine lozenge and placebo lozenge at 5% significance level. |
Title | Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 7 Minutes |
---|---|
Description | Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured. |
Time Frame | Post-Cue Baseline, 7 minutes post treatment administration |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population: All randomized participants who had at least one cravings assessment measurement post dose. The imputation of missing craving score was based on LOCF technique. |
Arm/Group Title | Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg | Matched Placebo |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single dose of 4 mg nicotine polacrilex mint lozenge, through oral route. | Participants received a single dose of matched placebo mint lozenge, through oral route. |
Measure Participants | 162 | 161 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Score on a scale] |
-48.2
|
-30.5
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg, Matched Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis considered the population's change from post-cue baseline in craving score mean to be equal in both treatment groups at 7 minutes. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least squares means difference |
Estimated Value | -17.8 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -23.8 to -11.7 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Treatment comparisons were made between 4 mg nicotine lozenge and placebo lozenge at 5% significance level. |
Title | Change From Post-cue Baseline in Nicotine Craving Score at 10 Minutes |
---|---|
Description | Participants completed a nicotine craving assessment consisting of following five items: I have a desire for a cigarette right now, if it were possible I would smoke right now, All I want right now is a cigarette, I have an urge for a cigarette, I crave a cigarette right now. All participants indicated their craving intensity on a pre-drawn 100 mm scale ranging from 0 (disagree) to 100 (agree). At the end of the craving assessment period, mean VAS score was measured. |
Time Frame | Post-Cue Baseline, 10 minutes post treatment administration |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population: All randomized participants who had at least one cravings assessment measurement post dose. The imputation of missing craving score was based on LOCF technique |
Arm/Group Title | Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg | Matched Placebo |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single dose of 4 mg nicotine polacrilex mint lozenge, through oral route. | Participants received a single dose of matched placebo mint lozenge, through oral route. |
Measure Participants | 162 | 161 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Score on a scale] |
-50.8
|
-32.9
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg, Matched Placebo |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis considered the population's change from post-cue baseline in craving score mean to be equal in both treatment groups at 10 minutes. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Least square mean difference |
Estimated Value | -17.9 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -24.4 to -11.4 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Treatment comparisons were made between 4 mg nicotine lozenge and placebo lozenge at 5% significance level. |
Title | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment Related AEs, and Serious AEs (SAEs) |
---|---|
Description | AE was defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment/s. Treatment related AE was defined as any AE considered to be possibly, probably or highly probably related to study medication. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death; is life threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization results in disability/ incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/ birth defect. |
Time Frame | Baseline to Day 5 post treatment administration |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Safety population: All randomized participants who received the study treatments were considered evaluable for safety. |
Arm/Group Title | Matched Placebo | Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single dose of matched placebo mint lozenge, through oral route. | Participants received a single dose of 4 mg nicotine polacrilex mint lozenge, through oral route. |
Measure Participants | 161 | 162 |
AEs |
12
7.4%
|
54
33.5%
|
Treatment Related AEs |
11
6.8%
|
54
33.5%
|
SAEs |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | All adverse events encountered or spontaneously reported following administration of any investigational product (including washout product), or for up to 5 days after the last administration of investigational product were recorded. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg | Placebo Lozenge | ||
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a single dose of 4 mg nicotine polacrilex mint lozenge, through oral route. | Participants received a single dose of matched placebo mint lozenge, through oral route. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg | Placebo Lozenge | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg | Placebo Lozenge | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/162 (0%) | 0/161 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Nicotine Lozenge 4 mg | Placebo Lozenge | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 54/162 (33.3%) | 12/161 (7.5%) | ||
Ear and labyrinth disorders | ||||
Ear Pain | 0/162 (0%) | 0 | 1/161 (0.6%) | 1 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Nausea | 24/162 (14.8%) | 24 | 1/161 (0.6%) | 1 |
Dyspepsia | 7/162 (4.3%) | 7 | 0/161 (0%) | 0 |
Abdominal Discomfort | 3/162 (1.9%) | 3 | 1/161 (0.6%) | 1 |
Stomatitis | 2/162 (1.2%) | 2 | 1/161 (0.6%) | 1 |
Glossodynia | 0/162 (0%) | 0 | 2/161 (1.2%) | 2 |
Flatulence | 1/162 (0.6%) | 1 | 0/161 (0%) | 0 |
Oral Discomfort | 1/162 (0.6%) | 1 | 0/161 (0%) | 0 |
Investigations | ||||
Heart Rate Increased | 1/162 (0.6%) | 1 | 1/161 (0.6%) | 1 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Dizziness | 4/162 (2.5%) | 4 | 1/161 (0.6%) | 1 |
Headache | 1/162 (0.6%) | 1 | 1/161 (0.6%) | 1 |
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Anxiety | 1/162 (0.6%) | 1 | 1/161 (0.6%) | 1 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Hiccups | 13/162 (8%) | 13 | 1/161 (0.6%) | 1 |
Throat Irritation | 5/162 (3.1%) | 5 | 1/161 (0.6%) | 1 |
Nasal Congestion | 0/162 (0%) | 0 | 1/161 (0.6%) | 1 |
Oropharyngeal Pain | 0/162 (0%) | 0 | 1/161 (0.6%) | 1 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | GSK Response Center |
---|---|
Organization | GlaxoSmithKline |
Phone | 866-435-7343 |
- S7121359