My Journey: A Brief Contextual Behavioural Intervention Based on Strengths, Meaning, Hope and Connection
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The present study will explore the underlying mechanisms of problematic Internet and smartphone use by focusing on how and when environmental factors affect the positive psychological intervention factors. Hence, the present study will provide scientific empirical evidence to design and formulate follow-up intervention strategies.
Aims:
-
Apply the dynamic system model of addictive behavior execution in Chinese adolescents with problematic Internet and smartphone use and use longitudinal data to track and explore the underlying mechanisms of environmental factors and personal factors on problematic Internet and smartphone use.
-
Identify positive psychological intervention factors that effectively prevent and reduce problematic Internet and smartphone use according to the interview and provide empirical evidence for other intervention designs.
-
Conducting a positive psychological intervention in an adolescent population to verify the protective effect of positive psychology factors on problematic Internet and smartphone use.
Hypotheses:
- Environmental factors (e.g., child abuse and trauma, parenting behaviors, teachers' encouragement, peer support) will affect the problematic Internet and smartphone use through personal characteristics (e.g., meaning in life); II. The effect of environmental factors on problematic Internet and smartphone use through personal characteristics will be moderated by other positive psychological intervention factors (e.g., character strengths); III. Positive psychological intervention (e.g., meaning-based intervention, strengths-based intervention) is an effective intervention strategy to prevent and reduce problematic Internet and smartphone use.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Problematic Internet and smartphone use are a psychosocial phenomenon in which individuals pay too much attention to and rely on the Internet, negatively affecting their mental and physical health, lives, and work. Many studies have shown that problematic Internet and smartphone use can bring adverse psychological effects (e.g., depression, anxiety, and negative emotions) and unfavorable physiological conditions (e.g., poor sleep quality and memory loss). The negative psychological and physiological effects can result in adverse academic and work performance outcomes. Many existing studies mainly explore the underlying mechanism of problematic Internet and smartphone use from personal factors such as mental health, metacognition, coping strategies, personality traits, motivation, and attachment styles. However, more and more studies have begun to focus on the effects of environmental factors, such as peer relationships and parenting styles, on problematic Internet and smartphone use. To fill the literature gaps, formulate effective preventive and remedial interventions, and explore whether, when, and how environmental factors (e.g., child abuse and trauma, parenting behaviors, teachers' encouragement, and peer support) affect problematic Internet and smartphone use is crucial.
The previous psychological interventions for problematic Internet and smartphone use focused on cognitive behavioral therapy, sand-play therapy, family programming, group programming, counseling programming, and educational programming. Different types of interventions reduced the severity of problematic Internet and smartphone use to varying degrees. However, the existing intervention strategies ignore the perspective of positive psychology. In the country, some scholars proposed to discuss the self-regulation of addicts from the perspective of positive psychology and especially proposed a meaning-centered approach as an essential supplement to mainstream addiction therapy. Besides, some scholars have also noticed the role of positive psychological intervention factors, such as meaning in life and the formation and development of problematic Internet and smartphone use. Therefore, exploring the positive psychological intervention factors, especially the meaning in life and the construction and development of problematic Internet and smartphone use, is the starting point for developing evidence-based intervention strategies.
According to the Dynamic System Model of Developmental Psychopathology and the Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution model, the present study will explore the underlying mechanisms from environmental factors (e.g., child abuse and trauma, parenting behaviors, teachers' encouragement, peer support) to problematic Internet and smartphone use by testing the mediator role and moderator role of personal factors (e.g., the meaning of life, social media flow), predominantly positive psychological intervention factors (e.g., character strengths). Therefore, the present study integrated positive psychological intervention factors into the dynamic system model of addictive behavior execution and applies it to explore the formation and development mechanisms of problematic Internet and smartphone use (see Figure 1 and Figure 2). In addition, this study will implement an interview and meaning-centered intervention program among middle school students to validate the validity of the dynamic system model of addictive behavior execution from the interpretation of qualitative material and intervention practices.
Given the research variables' diversity and complexity, the present study intends to include at least 500 adolescents over 12 years of age. The present study uses convenience and snowball sampling in mainland China and Hong Kong. The present study will also invite participants to accept longitudinal tracking. Participants willing to participate in the subsequent two surveys will provide their contact information. Before the research, the parents' and children's online informed consent forms will be obtained for the minors' sample. This questionnaire survey was completed in the preliminary stage of this study (approved: 2020-21-CIR8-3), and the intervention directions and techniques for problematic Internet and smartphone use were determined based on the questionnaire survey results.
Semi-structured Interviews:
The investigators will use a method of semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions to collect data. Individual interviews, lasting between 45 and 60 minutes, will be conducted and recorded. All participants should provide consent to participate before being interviewed. The interviews were conducted in Mandarin. All the materials used in the study (e.g., the recruitment information and questionnaires) were presented in Chinese. Thirty adolescents will be recruited to participate in the interviews.
Randomized Controlled Trial:
The investigators will pilot test the proposed meaning-focused intervention using a randomized (1:1) parallel-group controlled, single-blind trial in middle school students. The middle school collaborators will help launch the advertisement regarding this study, brief potential participants, prescreen potential participants according to recruitment criteria, and recruit participants using the opportunity sampling method. The participants' written informed consent will be obtained before conducting the intervention. One hundred adolescents will be recruited to participate in a randomized controlled trial. Four sessions will be delivered to the intervention group 1 week apart, with around 90 minutes per session.
Descriptive analysis and latent profile analysis will be adopted to present the overall situation of the research sample; psychology measurement attributes of the measures will be tested using confirmatory factor analysis; the correlation and regression analysis will be used to explore the relationships between environmental factors, personal factors, and problematic Internet and smartphone use. The structural equation modeling will be conducted to verify the mediator or moderator roles of positive psychological intervention factors in the relationship between environmental factors and problematic Internet and smartphone use.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Contextual Behavioural Intervention Based on Strengths, Meaning, Hope and Connection The current intervention involves the identification of character strengths (the first week, 90 minutes of intervention), the perception of the meaning of life (the second week, 90 minutes of intervention), the learning of strategies to develop hope (the third week, 90 minutes of intervention), and the understanding of emotion regulation strategies (the fourth week, 90 minutes of intervention). |
Behavioral: A Brief Contextual Behavioural Intervention Based on Strengths, Meaning, Hope and Connection
The intervention strategy combines acceptance and commitment therapy, contextual behavioral science, and positive psychology interventions (strengths, meaning, hope) in the form of a single intervention set (each topic is a single 90-minute intervention, four single intervention combinations).
|
| Other: Waiting list group The waiting list group will receive the same intervention at the end of the 6-month follow-up test. |
Behavioral: A Brief Contextual Behavioural Intervention Based on Strengths, Meaning, Hope and Connection
The intervention strategy combines acceptance and commitment therapy, contextual behavioral science, and positive psychology interventions (strengths, meaning, hope) in the form of a single intervention set (each topic is a single 90-minute intervention, four single intervention combinations).
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change of Problematic Social Media Use [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
The 6-item Bergen Social media Addiction Scale will measure the severity of problematic social media use. Bergen Social media Addiction Scale is a self-report measure designed to assess the symptoms of problematic social media use, with a higher total score suggesting more severe problematic use symptoms. Scores range from 6 to 30.
- Change of Problematic Smartphone Use [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
The 6-item Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale will measure the severity of problematic smartphone use. Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale is a self-report measure designed to assess the symptoms of problematic smartphone use, with a higher total score suggesting more severe problematic use symptoms. Scores range from 6 to 36.
- Change of Internet Gaming Disorder [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
The 9-item Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form will measure the severity of internet gaming. Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form is a self-report measure designed to assess the symptoms of internet gaming disorder, with a higher total score suggesting more severe internet gaming symptoms. Scores range from 9 to 45.
- Change of Quality of Life [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
Quality of life will be measured by the 7-item Mini Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire. Mini Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire is a self-report measure designed to assess the level of quality of life and well-being, with a higher mean score suggesting a higher level of quality of life and well-being. Scores range from 1 to 6. (Rush et al., 2019)
- Change of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
Anxiety and depressive symptoms will be measured by the 4-item Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression and Anxiety (PHQ-4). PHQ-4 is a self-report measure designed to assess the severity of depression and anxiety symptoms, with a higher total score suggesting higher levels of depression and anxiety symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 12.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change of Strengths Use [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
Strengths use will be measured by three items in the 14-item Strengths Use Scale, namely "I am able to use my strengths in lots of different situations ", "Using my strengths is something I am familiar with ", and "I am able to use my strengths in lots of different ways ". Strengths Use Scale is a self-report measure designed to assess the extent to which people use their strengths, with a higher mean score suggesting a higher degree of strengths use. Scores range from 1 to 7.
- Change of Meaning in Life [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
The 24-item State of Meaning in Life Scale will be used to measure the meaning in life. State of Meaning in Life Scale is a self-report measure designed to assess the six dimensions (need for meaning, meaning avoidance, meaning anxiety, meaning confusion, search for meaning, and presence of meaning) of meaning in life, with a higher mean score suggesting a higher levels of that state of meaning in life. Scores range from 1 to 7.
- Change of Hope [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
The 6-item Children's Hope Scale will be used to measure the hope. Children's Hope Scale is a self-report measure. Participants rated items using a Likert-type format from 1 (none of the time) to 6 (all of the time), with a higher total score denoted a higher level of hope. Scores range from 6 to 36.
- Change of Difficulties in Emotion Regulation [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
The 18-item Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form (DERS-SF) will be used to measure the difficulties in regulating emotions. DERS-SF is a self-report measure designed to six factors of difficulties in regulating emotions (regulation strategies, non-acceptance of emotional responses, impulse control difficulties, goal-directed difficulties, awareness difficulties, emotional clarity difficulties), with a higher total score denoted a higher level of difficulties in regulating emotions. Scores range from 18 to 90.
- Change of Social Connectedness [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
The self-reported 8t-item Social Connectedness Scale will be used to assess participants' sense of emotional distance or connectedness toward the social world. All items will be reverse coded and then averaged to obtain an overall scale score. A higher average score indicates a higher level of social connection. Scores range from 1 to 6.
- Change of Mindfulness [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
Mindfulness will be measured by the 6-item short scale of Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). MAAS is a self-report measure designed to assess the frequency of open and receptive attention to and awareness of ongoing events and experience. All item scores were reverse-coded making higher scores indicate a greater degree of mindfulness. Scores range from 1 to 6.
- Change of Psychological Inflexibility [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
Psychological inflexibility will be measured by the 8-item Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQY-8). AFQY-8 is a self-report measure designed to assess the psychological inflexibility, with a higher total score suggesting a higher level of psychological inflexibility. Scores range from 8 to 40.
- Change of Self-Control [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
Self-control will be measured by the 8-item Brief Self-Control Scale (BSCS). BSCS is self-report measure designed to assess the restraint dimension and non-impulsivity dimension of self-control, with a higher mean score suggesting a higher level of self-control. Scores range from 1 to 5.
- Change of Forgiveness [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
Forgiveness will be measured by the 4-item Tendency to Forgive Scale. Tendency to Forgive Scale is a self-reported instrument for measuring dispositional forgiveness, with a higher mean score suggesting a higher level of dispositional forgiveness. Scores range from 1 to 7.
- Change of Gratitude [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
Gratitude will be measured by the 5-item Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ-5). GQ-5 is a self-reported instrument for measuring disposition toward gratitude, with a higher mean score suggesting a higher level of gratitude. Scores range from 1 to 7.
Other Outcome Measures
- Change of Intolerance of Uncertainty [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
Intolerance of uncertainty will be measured by the 12-item Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS). IUS is a self-reported instrument for measuring negative beliefs about and reactions to uncertainty, with a higher total score suggesting a higher degree of intolerance of uncertainty. Scores range from 12 to 60.
- Change of Body Appreciation [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
Body appreciation will be measured by the 10-item Body Appreciation Scale-2. Body Appreciation Scale-2 is a self-reported instrument for measuring body appreciation, body acceptance and love, and adaptive appearance investment, with a higher mean score suggesting a higher level of positive body image. Scores range from 1 to 5.
- Change of Peer Phubbing [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
Peer phubbing will be measured by the 12-item Generic Scale of Being Phubbed. Generic Scale of Being Phubbed is a self-reported instrument for measuring the phenomenon that individuals ignore others because they are focused on their phones, with a higher total score indicating a higher perceived level of phubbing behavior of others. Scores range from 12 to 84.
- Change of Perceived Encouragement [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
Perceived encouragement will be measured by the revised 10-item Academic Encouragement Scale. There are two subscales (i.e., challenge-focused encouragement and potential-focused encouragement), and each scale contains five items. A higher average score suggests a higher level of encouragement received from others in an educational setting. Scores range from 1 to 6.
- Change of Childhood Emotional Abuse and Neglect [baseline, week 5, 3-, and 6-month follow up]
Childhood emotional abuse and neglect will be measured by the emotional neglect (e.g., "felt loved," "felt close to each other") and emotional abuse (e.g., "called stupid、lazy or ugly by family," "felt emotional abused") subscales in the 28-item Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form. It is designed for measuring child maltreatment, with a higher total score indicates a higher level of perceived emotional abuse and neglect. Each subscale is varied from 5 to 25 scores, and the total scores of the two subscales range from 10 to 50.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Children or adolescents with experience in using technology.
-
Older than 12 years and younger than 20 years.
-
Native Chinese speakers.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Young people with no experience in using technology.
-
Aged under 12 or over 20.
-
Non-native speakers of Chinese.
-
People who have undergone similar interventions within the past year.
-
Persons with major mental or physical illnesses.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- City University of Hong Kong
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yumei LI, Department of Social & Behavioural Sciences, City University of Hong Kong
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- 2021-22-CIR5-1