Water Flosser vs String Floss vs Manual Toothbrush Safety
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Evaluation of the Safety of a Water Flosser on Gingival and Epithelial Tissue at Different Pressure Settings
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
This study is designed to add to the safety data by measuring, Oral Soft tissue, Clinical Attachment Levels and Probing Pocket Depths on different pressure settings at different time points over a 6 week period. Data will be collected at Baseline, 2 week, 4 week and 6 week time frames.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Water Flosser Power interdental Cleaning Device |
Device: Water Flosser
Power interdental cleaner
|
Active Comparator: String floss Manual interdental cleaning device |
Device: String Floss
Mechanical interdental cleaner
|
Active Comparator: Manual Toothbrush ADA standard manual toothbrush |
Device: Manual Toothbrush
ADA standard soft bristle toothbrush
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Clinical Attachment Levels [6 weeks]
Measurement from the junction Epithelium to the cemento enamel junction
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Probing pocket depth [6 weeks]
Measurement from the junction Epithelium to the free gingival margin
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Written consent prior to participation
-
Good general health and non smoker
-
Have scorable Ramfjord's teeth
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Probing depth >4mm on Ramfjord's teeth
-
Moderate to severe gingivitis
-
Advanced periodontitis
-
Medications that impact soft tissue.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- All Sum Research Center Ltd.
- Water Pik, Inc.
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 2017-WP-1