Palliative Care Intervention in Improving Quality of Life, Psychological Distress, and Communication in Patients With Solid Tumors Receiving Treatment
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This pilot randomized clinical trial studies palliative care intervention in improving quality of life, psychological distress, and communication in patients with solid tumors receiving treatment on phase I trials. Cancer patients experience many symptoms related to treatment and the cancer itself that can be distressing and impact quality of life. Palliative care focuses on managing these symptoms and may help patients with solid tumors live more comfortably.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
-
Test the effects of a palliative care intervention (PCI) on patients' quality of life (QOL), psychological distress and satisfaction with communication, comparing the experimental versus control groups.
-
Test the effects of a PCI on patients' symptom intensity and symptom interference with daily activities, comparing the experimental versus control groups.
-
Test the effects of a PCI on patients' hospital and palliative care resource utilization and clinical trial retention rates, comparing the experimental versus control groups.
-
Test the effects of the timing of PCI initiation (early versus delayed) on patient outcomes, comparing the experimental versus control groups.
-
Describe patients' satisfaction with the PCI.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients receive part I of the PCI comprising quantitative surveys, comprehensive palliative care assessment by the Research Nurses, and goals of care discussions beginning prior to administration of the first dose of phase I treatment. Patients then receive part II of the PCI comprising recommendations from the interdisciplinary team, patient educational sessions, and supportive care referrals following the first dose of phase I treatment and is completed within one month of the first treatment.
ARM II: Patients receive usual care until 12 weeks post-treatment initiation. Patients then receive both part I and II of the PCI.
After completion of study, patients are followed up for 5 years.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Arm I (early PCI) Patients receive part I of the PCI comprising quantitative surveys, comprehensive palliative care assessment by the Research Nurses, and goals of care discussions beginning prior to administration of the first dose of phase I treatment. Patients then receive part II of the PCI comprising recommendations from the interdisciplinary team, patient educational sessions, and supportive care referrals following the first dose of phase I treatment and is completed within one month of the first treatment. |
Other: palliative care
Receive early PCI
Procedure: quality-of-life assessment
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
Other: survey administration
Ancillary studies
|
| Experimental: Arm II (delayed PCI) Patients receive usual care until 12 weeks post-treatment initiation. Patients then receive both part I and II of the PCI. |
Other: palliative care
Receive delayed PCI
Procedure: quality-of-life assessment
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
Other: survey administration
Ancillary studies
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change in overall QOL scores, assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spirituality (FACIT-Sp) [Baseline to 12 weeks]
To control for inflation of experimentwise error caused by analyzing four different QOL subscales, alpha will be set to .01. A 2x2 multiply repeated measures ANCOVA (in which the within groups variables are QOL subscale scores at 4 and 12 weeks, the between groups measure is treatment group (control vs. PCI), and the covariate is baseline QOL) might be employed if the correlation between the four FACT-G subscale scores are high enough to warrant such an analysis. The overall QOL score derived from the FACT-G will be tested individually using alpha=.05. If subscale correlations are not high, outcome will be analyzed using four 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVAs in which the within groups variable is each QOL subscale, the between groups measure is group (PCI vs. control), and the covariate is the appropriate baseline QOL subscale (Physical well-being, emotional well-being, social well-being, and functional well-being).
- Change in psychological distress, assessed using the Psychological Distress Thermometer [Baseline to 12 weeks]
Analyzed using a 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVA to test for differences in psychological distress (Psychological Distress Thermometer scores), at 4 and 12-week between the PCI and control groups, controlling for baseline psychological distress.
- Satisfaction with communication, measured by the Family Satisfaction with Advanced Cancer Care (FAMCARE) [12 weeks]
Analyzed using a 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVA to test for differences in satisfaction (Family Satisfaction with Advanced Cancer Care scores), at 4 and 12-week between the PCI and control groups, controlling for baseline satisfaction.
- Patients' symptom intensity and symptom interference with daily activities [12 weeks]
Analyzed using a 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVA to test for differences in symptom intensity and symptom interference with daily activities (using Psychological Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO - CTCAE) scores), at 4 and 12-week between the PCI and control groups, controlling for baseline symptom intensity and symptom interference.
- Total numbers of supportive care referrals (social work, dietitian, chaplaincy, psychologist/psychiatrist) [12 weeks]
Contingency table analysis and the chi square statistic will be used to examine the association between group and referral to various support services. In addition, total number of referrals will be counted and an independent student's t-test will be used to test for significant differences in number of total referrals between groups.
- Total number of unscheduled outpatient encounters and inpatient admissions [12 weeks]
Total number of encounters and admissions will be counted and an independent student's t-test for each variable will be used to test for significant differences in number of total encounters and number of unscheduled admissions between groups.
- Total number of hospice referrals [12 weeks]
Contingency table analysis with the chi square statistic to examine the association between group and hospice referral.
- Retention on the Phase I trial [12 weeks]
Contingency table analysis with the chi square statistic to examine the association between group and Phase I trial retention.
- Patient satisfaction with the PCI [12 weeks]
Descriptive statistics and comparisons between the two groups will be conducted for overall satisfaction with intervention content and timing of the intervention.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change in overall QOL scores, assessed by FACT-G and FACIT-Sp [Baseline to 4 weeks]
To control for inflation of experimentwise error caused by analyzing four different QOL subscales, alpha will be set to .01. A 2x2 multiply repeated measures ANCOVA (in which the within groups variables are QOL subscale scores at 4 weeks, the between groups measure is treatment group (control vs. PCI), and the covariate is baseline QOL) might be employed if the correlation between the four FACT-G subscale scores are high enough to warrant such an analysis. The overall QOL score derived from the FACT-G will be tested individually using alpha=.05. If subscale correlations are not high, outcome will be analyzed using four 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVAs in which the within groups variable is each QOL subscale, the between groups measure is group (PCI vs. control), and the covariate is the appropriate baseline QOL subscale (Physical well-being, emotional well-being, social well-being, and functional well-being).
- Change in overall QOL scores, assessed by FACT-G and FACIT-Sp [Baseline to 24 weeks]
To control for inflation of experimentwise error caused by analyzing four different QOL subscales, alpha will be set to .01. A 2x2 multiply repeated measures ANCOVA (in which the within groups variables are QOL subscale scores at 24 weeks, the between groups measure is treatment group (control vs. PCI), and the covariate is baseline QOL) might be employed if the correlation between the four FACT-G subscale scores are high enough to warrant such an analysis. The overall QOL score derived from the FACT-G will be tested individually using alpha=.05. If subscale correlations are not high, outcome will be analyzed using four 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVAs in which the within groups variable is each QOL subscale, the between groups measure is group (PCI vs. control), and the covariate is the appropriate baseline QOL subscale (Physical well-being, emotional well-being, social well-being, and functional well-being).
- Change in psychological distress, assessed using the Psychological Distress Thermometer [Baseline to 4 weeks]
Analyzed using a 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVA to test for differences in psychological distress (Psychological Distress Thermometer scores), at 4 weeks, between the PCI and control groups, controlling for baseline psychological distress.
- Change in psychological distress, assessed using the Psychological Distress Thermometer [Baseline to 24 weeks]
Analyzed using a 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVA to test for differences in psychological distress (Psychological Distress Thermometer scores), at 24 weeks, between the PCI and control groups, controlling for baseline psychological distress.
- Satisfaction with communication, measured by FAMCARE [4 weeks]
Analyzed using a 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVA to test for differences in satisfaction (Family Satisfaction with Advanced Cancer Care scores), at 4 weeks, between the PCI and control groups, controlling for baseline satisfaction.
- Satisfaction with communication, measured by FAMCARE [Up to 24 weeks]
Analyzed using a 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVA to test for differences in satisfaction (Family Satisfaction with Advanced Cancer Care scores), up to 24 weeks, between the PCI and control groups, controlling for baseline satisfaction.
- Patients' symptom intensity and symptom interference with daily activities [Up to 24 weeks]
Analyzed using a 2x2 repeated measures ANCOVA to test for differences in symptom intensity and symptom interference with daily activities (Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO - CTCAE) scores), up to 24 weeks, between the PCI and control groups, controlling for baseline satisfaction.
- Total numbers of supportive care referrals (social work, dietitian, chaplaincy, psychologist/psychiatrist) [Up to 24 weeks]
Contingency table analysis and the chi square statistic will be used to examine the association between group and referral to various support services for up to 24 weeks. In addition, total number of referrals will be counted and an independent student's t-test will be used to test for significant differences in number of total referrals between groups.
- Total number of unscheduled outpatient encounters and inpatient admissions [Up to 24 weeks]
Total number of encounters and admissions will be counted and an independent student's t-test for each variable will be used to test for significant differences in number of total encounters and number of unscheduled admissions between groups for up to 24 weeks.
- Total number of hospice referrals [Up to 24 weeks]
Contingency table analysis with the chi square statistic to examine the association between group and hospice referral for up to 24 weeks.
- Retention on the Phase I trial [Up to 24 weeks]
Contingency table analysis with the chi square statistic to examine the association between group and Phase I trial retention for up to 24 weeks.
- Patient satisfaction with the PCI [Up to 24 weeks]
Descriptive statistics and comparisons between the two groups will be conducted for overall satisfaction with intervention content and timing of the intervention for up to 24 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients diagnosed with solid tumors who are eligible for participation in Phase I clinical trials of investigational cancer therapies
-
Patients who have signed an informed consent for participation in Phase I clinical trials
-
Able to read or understand English-this is included because the intervention and study materials (including outcome measures) are only in English
-
Ability to read and/or understand the study protocol requirements, and provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients diagnosed with hematologic (as a population distinct from solid tumors and different trials) cancers.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of Hope Medical Center | Duarte | California | United States | 91010 |
| 2 | Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital | Baltimore | Maryland | United States | 21231 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- City of Hope Medical Center
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Betty Ferrell, City of Hope Medical Center
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 13193
- NCI-2013-00731
- 1R01CA177562-01A1