RISCIS: Riluzole in Spinal Cord Injury Study

Sponsor
AOSpine North America Research Network (Other)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT01597518
Collaborator
AO Foundation, AO Spine (Other), United States Department of Defense (U.S. Fed), Rick Hansen Institute (Other), Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation (Other)
193
29
2
84.2
6.7
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of riluzole in the treatment of patients with acute SCI. The primary objective is to evaluate the superiority of riluzole, at a dose of 2 x 100 mg the first 24 hours followed by 2 x 50 mg for the following 13 days after injury, as compared to placebo, in change between 180 days and baseline in motor outcomes as measured by International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Examination (ISNCSCI) Motor Score, in patients with acute traumatic SCI, presenting to the hospital less than 12 hours after injury. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the effects of riluzole on overall neurologic recovery, sensory recovery, functional outcomes, quality of life outcomes, health utilities, mortality, and adverse events. The working hypothesis is that the riluzole treated subjects will experience superior motor, sensory, functional, and quality of life outcomes as compared to those receiving placebo, with an acceptable safety profile.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2/Phase 3

Detailed Description

At present there are over 1 million people living with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) in North America alone, with annual costs for the acute treatment and chronic care of these patients totaling four billion dollars USD. The worldwide prevalence of SCI is unknown, with estimates ranging up to 250 million individuals. The incidence of SCI in developed countries has been estimated to be between 10 - 40 cases per million inhabitants. In spite of the immense impact of SCI at a personal and societal level, an effective and safe pharmacologic treatment for SCI, shown to improve neurological and functional outcomes at long-term follow-up, remains absent.

The final degree of neurological tissue destruction that occurs after traumatic SCI is a product of both primary and secondary injury mechanisms. The primary mechanical injury to the cord initiates a subsequent signaling cascade of deleterious down-stream events, known collectively as secondary injury mechanisms. These secondary injury mechanisms include ischemia, interstitial and cellular ionic imbalance, free radical formation, glutamatergic excitotoxicity, lipid peroxidation and generation of arachidonic acid metabolites. Although little can be done from a therapeutic standpoint to correct damage sustained during the primary injury, by mitigating the evolution of secondary injury events there is opportunity to preserve remnant viable neurological tissue and improve neurologic outcomes. There is convincing evidence from the preclinical realm that the pharmacologic agent riluzole attenuates certain aspects of the secondary injury cascade leading to diminished neurological tissue destruction in animal SCI models. Riluzole, a sodium channel blocking benzothiazole anticonvulsant, specifically exerts its neuroprotective effect by helping to maintain neuronal cellular ionic balance and by reducing the release of excitotoxic glutamate in the post-SCI setting. Several preclinical studies in the rodent SCI model have associated administration of riluzole with increased neural tissue preservation at the site of injury, in addition to improved behavioral outcomes, in comparison to administration of placebo or other sodium channel blocking drugs. In the clinical realm, while riluzole has not been studied extensively in the context of SCI, it has been widely used in the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). A 2007 Cochrane review, summarizing the findings of 4 placebo-controlled randomized trials, concluded that at a dose of 100 mg daily, riluzole is safe and improves median survival by 2-3 months in patients with ALS. In regards to adverse events (AEs), riluzole was well tolerated, although treated patients were 2.6 times more likely to experience a three-fold increase in serum alanine transaminase (ALT) as compared to patients treated with placebo. However, this effect was found to be uniformly reversible with cessation of riluzole therapy and was only reported after several months of medication administration. Recently, the clinical safety and pharmacokinetic profile of riluzole have been studied in a multi-center pilot study in the context of traumatic SCI. A total of 36 patients received an oral dose of riluzole 50 mg twice daily for 2 weeks, with treatment initiated within 12 hours of injury for all patients. The 12 hour dosing window, as well as the 2 week duration of therapy, was chosen to match the period of medication administration to the known period of glutamatergic excitotoxicity after SCI (several minutes after injury until 2 weeks after injury). With the final analysis currently undergoing peer review, completion of this study has confirmed the acceptable safety profile of riluzole administration previously documented in the ALS literature, and has established the feasibility of conducting a large-scale efficacy trial investigating this therapy.

At present, there is no specific pharmacological therapy that is given uniformly to all patients with traumatic SCI. As a result, a placebo-controlled comparison group is ethical and justifiable.

The aim of the current trial is to evaluate efficacy and safety of riluzole in the treatment of patients with acute SCI.

The primary objective of the current Phase II/III trial is to evaluate the superiority of riluzole, at a dose of 2 x 100 mg the first 24 hours followed by 2 x 50 mg for the following 13 days after injury, as compared to placebo, in change between 180 days and baseline in motor outcomes as measured by International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Examination (ISNCSCI) Motor Score, in patients with acute traumatic SCI, presenting to the hospital less than 12 hours after injury.

Secondary objectives are to evaluate the effects of riluzole on overall neurologic recovery, sensory recovery, functional outcomes, quality of life outcomes, health utilities, mortality, and adverse events. The working hypothesis is that the riluzole treated subjects will experience superior motor, sensory, functional, and quality of life outcomes as compared to those receiving placebo, with an acceptable safety profile.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
193 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double-Blinded, Trial of Efficacy and Safety of Riluzole in Acute Spinal Cord Injury
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 8, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 8, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Riluzole

Drug: Riluzole
100mg BID first 24 hours after the injury; 50mg BID 2--14 days following the injury

Placebo Comparator: Placebo

Drug: Placebo
Placebo 2x in first 24 hours; Placebo 2x day 2--14

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in ISNCSCI Total Motor Score between 180 days and baseline [180 Days]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
INCLUSION:
  • Age between 18 and 75 years inclusive

  • Able to cooperate in the completion of a standardized neurological examination by ISNCSCI standards (includes patients who are on a ventilator)

  • Willing and able to comply with the study Protocol

  • Signed Informed Consent Document (ICD) by patient, legal representative or witness

  • Able to receive the Investigational Drug within 12 hours of injury

  • ISNCSCI Impairment Scale Grade "A," "B" or "C" based upon first ISNCSCI evaluation after arrival to the hospital

  • Neurological Level of Injury between C4-C8 based upon first ISNCSCI evaluation after arrival to the hospital

  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) pregnancy test or a negative urine pregnancy test

EXCLUSION:
  • Injury arising from penetrating mechanism

  • Significant concomitant head injury defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale score < 14 with a clinically significant abnormality on a head CT (head CT required only for patients suspected to have a brain injury at the discretion of the investigator)

  • Pre-existent neurologic or mental disorder which would preclude accurate evaluation and follow-up (i.e. Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, unstable psychiatric disorder with hallucinations and/or delusions or schizophrenia)

  • Previous history of spinal cord injury

  • Recent history (less than 1 year) of chemical substance dependency or significant psychosocial disturbance that may impact the outcome or study participation, in the opinion of the investigator

  • Is a prisoner

  • Participation in a clinical trial of another Investigational Drug or Investigational Device within the past 30 days

  • Hypersensitivity to riluzole or any of its components

  • Neutropenia measured as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) measured in cells per microliter of blood of < 1500 at screening visit

  • Creatinine level of > 1.2 milligrams (mg) per deciliter (dL) in males or > 1.1 mg per dL in females at screening visit

  • Liver enzymes (ALT/SGPT or AST/SGOT) 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) at screening visit

  • Active liver disease or clinical jaundice

  • Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) or AIDS-related complex

  • Active malignancy or history of invasive malignancy within the last five years, with the exception of superficial basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been definitely treated. Patients with carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix treated definitely more than 1 year prior to enrollment may enter the study

  • Lactating at screening visit

  • Subject is currently using, and will continue to use for the next 14 days any of the following medications which are classified as CYP1A2 inhibitors or inducers*:

Inhibitors:
  • Ciprofloxacin

  • Enoxacin

  • Fluvoxamine

  • Methoxsalen

  • Mexiletine

  • Oral contraceptives

  • Phenylpropanolamine

  • Thiabendazole

  • Zileuton

Inducers:
  • Montelukast

  • Phenytoin

  • Note: no washout period required; if these medications are discontinued, subjects are eligible to be enrolled in the trial

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Barrow Neurological Institute Phoenix Arizona United States 85013
2 Santa Clara Valley Medical Center San Jose California United States 95128
3 University of Miami Miami Florida United States 33136
4 Emory University Atlanta Georgia United States 30303
5 Kansas University Medical Center Kansas City Kansas United States 66160
6 University of Louisville Louisville Kentucky United States 40202
7 Louisiana State University Baton Rouge Louisiana United States 70803
8 University of Maryland Baltimore Maryland United States 21201
9 Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota United States 55905
10 University of Missouri Columbia Missouri United States 65212
11 Washington University Saint Louis Missouri United States 63110
12 Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19104
13 Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19107
14 Brooke Army Medical Center Fort Sam Houston Texas United States 78234
15 UT Health Center Houston Texas United States 77030
16 University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah United States 84112
17 University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia United States 22908
18 Swedish Hospital Seattle Washington United States 98122
19 University of Wisconsin - Madison Madison Wisconsin United States 53706
20 Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee Wisconsin United States 53226
21 John Hunter Hospital Newcastle New South Wales Australia 2310
22 Prince of Wales Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia 2031
23 Royal Rehab Ryde New South Wales Australia 2112
24 Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards New South Wales Australia 2065
25 Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia 5000
26 University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada V5Z 1M9
27 Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto Ontario Canada M4N 3M5
28 St. Michael's Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada M5R 1C6
29 University of Toronto Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada M5T 2S8

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • AOSpine North America Research Network
  • AO Foundation, AO Spine
  • United States Department of Defense
  • Rick Hansen Institute
  • Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Fehlings, MD, PhD, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
  • Study Director: Branko Kopjar, MD, PhD, University of Washington

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

Responsible Party:
AOSpine North America Research Network
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01597518
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • SPN-12-001
First Posted:
May 14, 2012
Last Update Posted:
Apr 19, 2021
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2021
Keywords provided by AOSpine North America Research Network
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 19, 2021