Robotic Gait Training VS.Conventional Rehabilitation in SCI

Sponsor
Prasat Neurological Institute (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT01432990
Collaborator
Mahidol University (Other)
16
1
2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Until now, there's still no any strong evidence supported "which is the best way to restoration walking ability" in spinal cord injury. Most of the evidence suggest that, there is somehow better after gait rehabilitation for ASIA classification C and D but not improved walking ability for ASIA classification A and B. There is an RCT showed the evidence of repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy could be improved walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke, these might be also really effect in SCI patients.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Robot gait training
  • Other: control
Phase 3

Detailed Description

This study aim to study the effectiveness of conventional rehabilitation compare with robotic gait training machine in subacute SCI patients.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
16 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Robotic Gait Training VS. Conventional Physical Therapy in Spinal Cord Injury Patients.
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2013
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: robotic gait training

conventional physical therapy plus robot gait training program for SCI patients.

Device: Robot gait training
Robotic gait training for 20 minute include preparing and rest time for 10 minute plus conventional physical therapy program for 30 minute, totally 60 minute per day for 5 working day per week.
Other Names:
  • Gait trainer GT1
  • No Intervention: control

    Conventional physical therapy program for 60 minute per day for 5 working day per week.

    Other: control
    Conventional physical therapy program for 60 minute per day for 5 working day per week.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Wernig scale [4 weeks.]

      Walking ability classification in spinal cord injury patients.

    2. Barthel index [4 weeks.]

      Measure activity of daily living

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Repas [4 weeks.]

      Spasticity measurement

    2. Manual muscle testing [4 weeks]

      Measure muscle power in each key muscle according to ASIA classification.

    3. 10 meter walking test [4 weeks.]

      If patients can walk, measure speed of walking with step length.

    4. 6 minute walking test [4 weeks]

      If patient can walk, measure endurance.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 80 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Subacute spinal cord injury ( C5-T12 level) patients.

    • ASIA classification C and D.

    • No previous joint contracture.

    • No severely active medical condition.

    • Can easily communicate with no obvious cognitive impairment.

    • Given signed inform consent.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Previous injury or other neurological condition that related to neurodeficit in key muscles.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Ratanapat Chanubol Bangkok Thailand 10400

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Prasat Neurological Institute
    • Mahidol University

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Ratanapat Chanubol, MD., PM&R department, Prasat Neurological Institute, Bangkok, Thailand. 10400

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Ratanapat Chanubol, Dr., Prasat Neurological Institute
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01432990
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • SCIstemcell
    First Posted:
    Sep 13, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 17, 2012
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2012
    Keywords provided by Ratanapat Chanubol, Dr., Prasat Neurological Institute
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jul 17, 2012