Evaluation of Splinting in Tetraplegia

Sponsor
Thomas Jefferson University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04523636
Collaborator
University of Maryland, Baltimore (Other), The Craig H. Neilsen Foundation (Other)
36
2
2
11.5
18
1.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study compared pre-fabricated and custom resting hand splints among people who were in inpatient rehabilitation after a cervical spinal cord injury.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Splinting
N/A

Detailed Description

This was randomized parallel group controlled clinical trial where arms, not patients were the unit of randomization. This trial was funded by the Craig H. Neilsen Allied Health Professional Development Award of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA). This research was conducted at a 32-bed spinal cord injury and multi-trauma rehabilitation unit in an urban center. Participants were recruited from an inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation unit. Eligible participants were 18 years or older and undergoing acute rehabilitation after a cervical spinal cord injury with hand function impairment, and the primary occupational therapist deemed splinting intervention was required. Each eligible extremity was randomized to receive a custom or pre-fabricated resting hand splint for night use.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
36 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Each extremity was randomized to receive a custom or pre-fabricated resting hand splint.Each extremity was randomized to receive a custom or pre-fabricated resting hand splint.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Evaluation of Splinting in Tetraplegia
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 4, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 20, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 20, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Custom Splint

Custom Splint- Thermoplastic device fabricated by occupational therapist

Device: Splinting
Pre-fabricated or custom resting hand splints

Active Comparator: Prefabricated Splint

Prefabricated Splint- Commercially available from Restorative Care of America, Inc (RCAI)

Device: Splinting
Pre-fabricated or custom resting hand splints

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in scores on The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensation and Prehension (GRASSP). [This assessment is completed within 5 days of initating the splinting intervention and within 3 days of discharge. Length of time between data collection was limited to 12 weeks.]

    This test is a hand function assessment for spinal cord injury consisting of four domains- upper extremity strength, sensation, qualitative prehension, and quantitative prehension. Total scores for each upper extremity are calculated 0-116. Assessment of the Hand in Tetraplegia Using the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): Impairment versus Function. Kalsi-Ryan S, Curt A, Fehlings, MG and Verrier MC. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil (2009); 14(4):34-46. - C

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Splint Perception Survey [This assessment was completed within 3 days of discharge and no more than 12 weeks after the intervention was initiated.]

    This survey gathered participant perceptions via a 5 point Likert scale on the participant's perceptions of the splint's comfort and impact on function and hand position. Additionally, participants were asked to provide their perceptions on challenges to using the splint and advice to future therapists and patients considering splinting.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Spinal Cord Injury

  • Inpatient Rehabilitation

  • Limited hand function

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Under 18

  • Full hand function

  • Orthopedic injury to hand

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of MD Rehabilitation & Orthopaedic Institute Baltimore Maryland United States 21207
2 Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19107

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Thomas Jefferson University
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore
  • The Craig H. Neilsen Foundation

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter Gorman, MD, University of Maryland, Baltimore
  • Principal Investigator: Paula Geigle, PhD, University of Maryland, Baltimore
  • Study Director: Sara Frye, MS, Thomas Jefferson University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Thomas Jefferson University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04523636
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • HP-00075158
First Posted:
Aug 21, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Aug 21, 2020
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 21, 2020