Phase II Trial of Abaloparatide vs. Placebo in Post-Menopausal Women Receiving Initial Spinal Fusion Surgery

Sponsor
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03841058
Collaborator
(none)
72
1
2
52.6
1.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2, 12-month pilot to study the efficacy of abaloparatide in postmenopausal women needing lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Seventy-two women with low bone mass who are scheduled to undergo spinal fusion surgery will be randomized 2:1 in a blinded fashion to receive either 80 mcg of abaloparatide subcutaneously (SC) every day or an identical-appearing placebo SC for 6 months. Outcomes include surgical outcome at one year, pain, and fusion bone mass volume (FBMV) as a marker of bone union at 6 months and 1 year.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Detailed Description

This is a prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2, 12-month pilot to study the efficacy of abaloparatide in postmenopausal women needing lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Seventy-two women with low bone mass who are scheduled to undergo spinal fusion surgery will be randomized 2:1 in a blinded fashion to receive either 80 mcg of abaloparatide subcutaneously (SC) every day or an identical-appearing placebo SC for 6 months. This study has 3 objectives:

  1. In this pilot study we will evaluate surgical outcomes at one year and the primary outcome will be fusion based on CT exam with categories of Fusion/ Indeterminate/ Not fused and this will be compared between groups receiving 6 months of abaloparatide vs. placebo. Secondary outcomes for surgical success will be evidence of pedicle screw loosening, adjacent segment fracture and proximal junctional kyphosis. This data will be used to determine effect sizes and variance to power the next larger clinical trial.

  2. To determine if abaloparatide/Tymlos versus placebo leads to a faster reduction in pain as assessed by both the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for low back pain at 6 months.

  3. As an exploratory proof of concept objective we will determine if abaloparatide/Tymlos versus placebo results in greater fusion bone mass volume (FBMV) as a marker of bone union at 6 months and 1 year to see whether at one year post lumbar spinal fusion surgery, greater FBMV is associated with improved spinal surgery outcomes including: enhanced bone union, reduced pedicle screw loosening, adjacent segment fracture and proximal junctional kyphosis. This would serve as evidence that FBMV can be used as an early validated marker of fusion surgery success.

All analyses will be two-sided and the alpha level will be set at 0.05. FBMV, pain and function will be compared by drug (Abaloparatide vs. placebo) at 6 months. Compliance will be considered as taking 80% of the study drug. For the primary analysis we will evaluate bone union and reduced pedicle screw loosening, adjacent segment fracture, and proximal junctional kyphosis as dichotomous variables at 12 months using logistic regression and comparing the placebo group to the abaloparatide group. We will also evaluate FBMV as a continuous variable and evaluate differences in this outcome between abaloparatide and placebo groups at 6 months as an exploratory outcome variable. We will determine if FBMV differs in those with or without markers of surgical success for validity of FBMV, regardless of prior treatment group. In addition, these data will be used to determine effect sizes and variance to power the next larger clinical trial.

We will evaluate NRS and ODI score by using repeated measures of these variables over time by treatment group and evaluate NRS at 6 months in the placebo versus abaloparatide group. Comorbidity, age, prior fracture, prior use of bisphosphonates and other covariates will be evaluated, via multivariable regression, as to whether they lead to a change in the estimate of effect in order to be considered for inclusion in the models.

If abaloparatide can improve outcomes following lumbar spine fusion surgery, this pilot study could lead to the requisite two year trial that may have an impact on the treatment of fusion surgery patients.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
72 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Randomized controlled trialRandomized controlled trial
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Placebo will be used that will be identical to active drug in appearance
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Phase II Trial of Abaloparatide vs. Placebo in Post-Menopausal Women Receiving Initial Spinal Fusion Surgery
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 14, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Abaloparatide

Abaloparatide 80 mcg dose administered subcutaneously with a pen once daily for 6 months

Drug: Abaloparatide
80 mcg delivered SC by a pen
Other Names:
  • Tymlos
  • Placebo Comparator: Placebo

    Placebo administered subcutaneously with a pen once daily for 6 months

    Drug: Placebo
    A pen to deliver a SC dose of placebo
    Other Names:
  • placebo pen
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Difference in measure of fusion mass bridging from transverse process to transverse process [one year]

      CT assessment of fusion mass using a qualitative five-point scale to assess fusion quality (1 = unfused, 2 = partial unilateral fusion, 3 = partial bilateral fusion, 4 = complete unilateral fusion, 5 = complete bilateral fusion)

    2. Difference in incidence of adverse surgical outcomes [one year]

      Adverse outcomes include pedicle screw loosening, adjacent segment fracture and proximal junctional kyphosis will be evaluated on CT images

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Pain assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale [6 months]

      Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating more pain.

    2. Pain assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index [6 months]

      Oswestry Disability Index for low back pain with a score of 0 to 50 points or 0 to 100%. Higher scores indicate more pain.

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. CT evaluation of Fusion bone mass volume [6 months and 1 year]

      fusion bone mass volume (FBMV) as a marker of bone union will be assessed on CT images

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    50 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Postmenopausal women (defined as >12 months since last menstrual cycle)

    • Age of 50 years or older,

    • Requiring posterolateral lumbar spine fusion surgery (L1-2; L2-3; L3-4; L4-5, L5-S1) with single or multi-level fusion for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine (including lumbar degenerative disk disease, severe instability, high grade spondylolisthesis, deformity, degenerative scoliosis, pseudoarthrosis, and spinal stenosis) under the care of spine surgeons at the Hospital for Special Surgery.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Hypersensitivity to abaloparatide

    2. Patients with increased risk of osteosarcoma: Paget's disease, prior radiation therapy

    3. Patients with active hypercalcemia or current diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism

    4. History of multiple renal calculi or renal calculus within 2 years

    5. Unexplained elevations in alkaline phosphatase

    6. Evidence of metastatic cancer or multiple myeloma.

    7. Patients unwilling to take placebo or abaloparatide.

    8. Patients whose surgery is for a revision to a prior lumbar spinal fusion surgery

    9. Chronic oral steroids (>= 7.5 mg prednisone/d currently and for more than 1 month) for an inflammatory comorbid diagnosis

    10. Patients who cannot understand and sign the informed consent

    11. Patients who are unable to meet the proposed follow-up schedule

    12. Patients with >1 year of prior cumulative treatment with Forteo and/or Tymlos, or any use of Forteo or Tymlos within the 6 months prior to enrollment.

    13. Patients who have received bisphosphonate treatment of >1 year in past 5 years

    14. Patients who are current smokers

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York United States 10021

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Emily Stein, MD, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03841058
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2018-0287
    First Posted:
    Feb 15, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 31, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Mar 31, 2022