Trial of Combined Radiotherapy and Vertebroplasty for Patients With Painful Metastatic Spinal Lesions

Sponsor
AHS Cancer Control Alberta (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04242589
Collaborator
Cross Cancer Institute (Other)
64
1
2
46
1.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Since patients with spinal metastases are living longer, durable palliation with long-term tumor control are becoming increasingly important.

EBRT results in durable local control of bone metastasis. However, about 25 % of patients with spinal metastases only achieved complete pain relief following EBRT for a median duration of less than 4 months. This could be partly due to spinal instability. In addition, almost half of the patients who receive EBRT will subsequently develop VCFs . Hence, RT does not stabilize the spine secondary to VCFs and is not effective in preventing imminent VCFs. Vertebroplasty has rapidly reduced pain and improved function in patients with VCFs. However, vertebroplasty does not provide local tumor control similar to EBRT.

It is theorized that combining vertebroplasty with EBRT will stabilize the spine, relieve the pain, prevent imminent VCFs and minimize or avoid the need for opioids. It is hypothesized that combining a spine stabilization procedure such as vertebroplasty with RT will be the most effective management for patients with spinal metastases than RT alone for patients with spinal metastases. Combined vertebroplasty and radiotherapy is not a standard treatment option at present. This study is designed to quantify the advantage of adding vertebroplasty to radiotherapy for patients with spinal metastases. If the study is proven to be significant, it could become the standard of care for patients with spinal metastases.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Radiation: Radiotherapy
  • Procedure: Vertebropladty
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
64 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Phase II Randomized Trial of Combined Radiotherapy and Vertebroplasty to Improve the Quality of Life of Patients With Painful Metastatic Localized Spinal Lesions
Anticipated Study Start Date :
May 1, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy dose: 20 Gy/5 fractions/1 week or 8 Gy/1 fraction (at the discretion of the Radiation Oncologist)

Radiation: Radiotherapy
External beam radiation therapy is a type of radiation therapy used for cancer treatment. A machine is used to aim high-energy rays from outside the body into tumor
Other Names:
  • External Beam Radiation Therapy
  • Experimental: Vertebroplasty + Radiotherapy

    Vertebroplasty followed by radiotherapy within 2-3 weeks Radiotherapy dose: 20 Gy/5 fractions/1 week or 8 Gy/1 fraction (at the discretion of the Radiation Oncologist)

    Radiation: Radiotherapy
    External beam radiation therapy is a type of radiation therapy used for cancer treatment. A machine is used to aim high-energy rays from outside the body into tumor
    Other Names:
  • External Beam Radiation Therapy
  • Procedure: Vertebropladty
    Vertebroplasty is a procedure for stabilizing compression fractures in the spine. Bone cement is injected into vertebrae that have cracked or broken. The cement hardens, stabilizing the fractures and supporting your spine.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Improvement in Pain Score based on the Visual Analog Scale [1,3,6 and 12 months post treatment]

      The primary end point is the improvement in pain score of at least 2 points (a decrease of 2 points) on the visual analogue Scale (VAS) without concurrent increase in opioids.

    2. Improvement in Pain Score based on the Brief Pain Inventory [1,3,6 and 12 months post treatment]

      The primary end point is the improvement in pain score of at least 2 points (a decrease of 2 points) on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) without concurrent increase in opioids.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Changes in back-specific physical functioning [1,3,6 and 12 months post treatment]

      The improvement in back-specific physical functioning is evaluated by the change in Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RDQ) score.

    2. Incidence of vertebral compression fractures post treatment. [Baseline, 6 months and 12 months]

      The incidence of vertebral compression fractures will be evaluated by standing lateral spine radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae.

    3. Prospectively quantify pain response using the Visual Analog Scale [1,3,6 and 12 months post treatment]

      Pain response will be assessed by VAS and evaluated using a patient diary based on the International Bone Metastases Working Party Criteria. Based on intake of analgesics, the daily oral morphine equivalent dose (OMED) will be calculated.

    4. Prospectively quantify pain response using the Brief Pain Inventory. [1,3,6 and 12 months post treatment]

      Pain response will be assessed by BPI and evaluated using a patient diary based on the International Bone Metastases Working Party Criteria. Based on intake of analgesics, the daily oral morphine equivalent dose (OMED) will be calculated.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Participants capable of giving informed consent, or if appropriate, participants having an acceptable individual capable of giving consent on the participant's behalf

    2. Patients must be 18 years of age or older

    3. Spinal vertebral metastases confirmed by CT, MRI or bone scan.

    4. Patients with painful (VAS of at least ≥ 2) vertebral spinal metastases in the thoracic and /or lumbar spine (not cervical).

    5. Patients must be willing and able to comply with schedule visits, treatment plan, tests and other study procedures

    6. Life expectancy > 6 months. Life expectancy will be evaluated by the study investigator both clinically and by using Linden model. Patient should be in the group B or C of the Linden model.

    7. Patients with an ECOG score 0-2 or Karnofsky performance status of ≥ 60% will be eligible for enrolment (see appendix 1).

    8. No prior EBRT to the target +/-1 vertebral body level

    9. Women of child bearing potential (WOCBP) must have a negative serum (or urine) pregnancy test at the time of screening. WOCBP is defined as any female who has experienced menarche and who has not undergone surgical sterilization (hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral salpingectomy) and is not postmenopausal. Menopause is defined as 12 months of amenorrhea in a woman over age 45 years in the absence of other biological or physiological causes. In addition, females under the age of 55 years must have a serum follicle stimulating hormone, (FSH) level > 40 mIU/mL to confirm menopause

    10. Patients of childbearing / reproductive potential should use highly effective birth control methods, as defined by the investigator, during the study treatment period. A highly effective method of birth control is defined as those that result in low failure rate (i.e. less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly (Note: abstinence is acceptable if this is established and preferred contraception for the patient and is accepted as a local standard) .

    11. Females must not breastfeed during study treatment.

    12. Male patients should agree to not donate sperm during study treatment.

    13. Absence of any condition hampering compliance with study protocols and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be reviewed with the patient prior to trial registration

    Exclusion Criteria

    1. Patient cannot provide consent

    2. Prior radiotherapy to the target +/-1 vertebral body level

    3. Life expectancy < 6 months (assessed both clinically and using Linden model)

    4. Karnofsky performance status of < 60%

    5. Primary bone tumors

    6. Plasmacytoma

    7. Communicated fracture

    8. Associated Impending cord compression or spinal cord compression

    9. Epidural involvement

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Cross Cancer Institute Edmonton Alberta Canada T6G 1Z2

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • AHS Cancer Control Alberta
    • Cross Cancer Institute

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    AHS Cancer Control Alberta
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04242589
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • IIT-0008
    First Posted:
    Jan 27, 2020
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 13, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2020
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Keywords provided by AHS Cancer Control Alberta
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 13, 2020