Concurrent Treatment for Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy

Sponsor
University of Indianapolis (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT03636009
Collaborator
(none)
40
1
2
12
3.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the effectiveness of two treatment interventions in patients with cervical radiculopathy. One group will receive a concurrent approach using traction and neuromobilizations. The other group will receive the sequential approach of traction and neuromobilizations

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: concurrent traction and neuromobilization technique
  • Other: sequential traction and neuromobilization technique
  • Other: active exercise program
  • Other: manual therapy to cervical and thoracic spine
N/A

Detailed Description

Physical therapists routinely use cervical traction and manual therapy in patients with cervical radiculopathy. The standard of care is a sequential approach in which the patients receive interventions successively. This study will provide the standard of care approach for one group while the other group receives the concurrent approach in which the patient will have neuromobilizations while they are receiving mechanical traction. Both groups will also receive exercise and manual therapy to the cervical and thoracic spine.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
40 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Two groups receiving interventionsTwo groups receiving interventions
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The Concurrent Use of Intermittent Cervical Traction and Neuromobilization Techniques in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2018
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 31, 2019
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Concurrent traction

Concurrent traction and neuromobilization technique at each scheduled session Active exercise program (4-5 exercises) at each session Manual therapy to cervical and thoracic spine at each session

Other: concurrent traction and neuromobilization technique
participant will be on a mechanical traction machine with an on:off cycle. During the on cycle, the primary researcher will be performing a neuromobilization technique on the symptomatic arm. Patients will also receive exercise and manual therapy
Other Names:
  • Concurrent traction
  • Neurmobilization technique
  • Other: active exercise program
    Participants will have 4-5 exercises to perform at each session

    Other: manual therapy to cervical and thoracic spine
    Lateral glides to cervical spine and thoracic manipulations

    Active Comparator: Sequential traction

    Sequential traction and neuromobilization technique at each scheduled session Active exercise program (4-5 exercises) at each session Manual therapy to cervical and thoracic spine at each session

    Other: sequential traction and neuromobilization technique
    Participants will receive neuromobilzation techniques followed by supine cervical traction
    Other Names:
  • Sequential traction
  • Other: active exercise program
    Participants will have 4-5 exercises to perform at each session

    Other: manual therapy to cervical and thoracic spine
    Lateral glides to cervical spine and thoracic manipulations

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. changes in pain [after 4 weeks of intervention]

      Measured using the Numeric pain rating scale. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 10. 0 describes no pain and 10 describes worst pain imaginable.

    2. changes in function [After 4 weeks of intervention]

      Measured using the Neck Disability Index. The Neck Disability Index has a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 50. It is typically expressed as a percentage by multiplying the score by 2. Higher scores represent greater disability.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Difference in treatment time between the groups [4 weeks of intervention]

      average minutes in treatment in each group

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion criteria:
    • Participants that test positive on at least 3 out of 4 special tests.

    • Participants will score at least 10 on the Neck Disability Index

    • Participants will score at least 2 on the numeric pain rating scale

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Do not test positive on at least 3 of 4 special tests.

    • Signs of cervical trauma

    • Cervical myelopathy

    • Active pregnancy

    • Medical red flags (fracture, tumor, long term steroid use, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteoporosis)

    • Evidence of vascular compromise

    • Cervical spine surgery

    • Recent injections in the past six weeks

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Michiana Orthopaedics and Sports Physical Therapy Mishawaka Indiana United States 46544

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Indianapolis

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: James Bellew, EdD, University of Indianapolis

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    James W. Bellew, Professor, University of Indianapolis
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03636009
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 0924
    First Posted:
    Aug 17, 2018
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 19, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2018
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by James W. Bellew, Professor, University of Indianapolis
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Oct 19, 2018