HHLS: Hand Holding During Light Sedation for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Improves Outcomes

Sponsor
Rhode Island Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05058079
Collaborator
(none)
154
1
2
15.3
10

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The investigators want to determine whether handholding improves patient satisfaction and reduce patient's anxiety during minimally invasive outpatient spine surgery with monitored anesthesia care.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Intraoperative Hand Held
N/A

Detailed Description

Minimally invasive spine interventions have emerged as a treatment options for patients with previous spine surgery and patients who have never before been operated upon. These procedures can be done safely in patients with advanced comorbid conditions, previous failed major spine procedures, and in patients who have decided to try the least invasive approach to address their lumbo-sacral spine condition in hopes of avoiding more major and potentially morbid procedures. These endoscopic procedures are typically done as outpatients with light sedation, ideally rendering the patient calm but completely cooperative and able to respond in real-time to questions from the surgeon during the procedure. This has implications for the progress and success of the procedure, the safety of the procedure and allows for a short ambulatory hospital stay.

Hand holding has been shown to improve outcomes such as compliance, procedural success and patient comfort with patients undergoing light sedation for a variety of procedures. The purpose of this study is to determine whether adding hand holding to light sedation for minimally invasive spine procedures has a positive impact on patient satisfaction and perioperative outcomes.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
154 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Care Provider)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
The Effect of Hand Holding on Patient Satisfaction During for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Under Monitored Anesthesia Care. A Single Blinded, Single Center Randomized Controlled Trial
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Sep 20, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Hand-held group

Patients hand will be held by the anesthesia provider during the procedure. A folded blanket will be over the patient's hand during the procedure and the anesthesia provider will have their hand under the folded blanket holding the patient's hand.

Behavioral: Intraoperative Hand Held
Intraoperative hand holding

No Intervention: No hand holding group

No physical contact for comfort or reassurance during the procedure. A folded blanket will be over the patient's hand during the procedure and the anesthesia provider will be next to the patient's hand.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS) [24 hours after the procedure]

    11-item questionnaire designed to measure the satisfaction with monitored anesthesia care. The Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS) score is the mean of responses to all 11questions. The score can range from a min of -3 to a maximum of +3. The responses are : -3 = disagree very much, -2 = disagree moderately, -1 = disagree slightly, 1 = agree slightly, 2 = agree moderately, and 3 = agree very much. A score of +3 would imply a totally satisfied patient.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Pain Score [Through study completion up to 24 hours after procedure.]

    Numerical pain score (0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable)

  2. State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) [Before and 24 hours after the procedure]

    The 6-item version of the Spielberger 20-item State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) is a validated short form and correlates well with the standard inventory. It measures state anxiety (how one feels at the moment: "feel questions") and trait anxiety (how one generally feels: "am questions"). It contains six questions with a Likert scale from 1 to 4 (1=not at all, 2=somewhat, 3=moderately so, 4=very much so) The score range is from a minimum of 6 to a maximum of 24. A low score represents no to low anxiety where as a high score represents high anxiety.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • American Society of Anesthesiology physical status 1 to 3

  • Outpatient endoscopic spine procedures under light sedation

Exclusion Criteria:
  • American Society of Anesthesiology physical status 4 or greater

  • Pre-existing neuropathy

  • Infection at the site

  • Pregnancy

  • Patient's refusal or inability to consent

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Rhode Island Hospital Providence Rhode Island United States 02903

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Rhode Island Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joseph Caiati, MD, Rhode Island Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Rhode Island Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05058079
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 1678933
First Posted:
Sep 27, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Sep 27, 2021
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 27, 2021