Sugammadex vs Neostigmine/Glycopyrrolate on Urinary Retention After Spine Surgery
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This is an active-comparator controlled study to evaluate the effect of sugammadex compared to neostigmine/glycopyrrolate for reversal of rocuronium on the incidence of urinary retention after subjects undergo elective ambulatory spine surgery.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 4 |
Detailed Description
Subjects requiring elective ambulatory posterior lumbar laminectomy, will receive either an intravenous infusion bolus of Sugammadex (2 mg/kg dosed by actual body weight) or intravenous infusion bolus of Neostigmine (50 μg/kg, up to 5 mg maximum dose) plus Glycopyrrolate (10 μg/kg, up to 1 mg maximum dose). Additionally, all subjects will receive hospital standard of care therapy for their surgery and hospital stay.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Sugammadex 2 mg/kg Sugammadex 2 mg/kg administered as a single intravenous (IV) dose. |
Drug: Sugammadex
Sugammadex will be used to reverse rocuronium neuromuscular blockade (NMB). Dose will be according to participant actual body weight.
Other Names:
Drug: Rocuronium
To achieve NMB, participants will receive the steroidal neuromuscular blocking agent Rocuronium Bromide administered via IV infusion and dosed according to participant actual body weight. It will be used per label to maintain muscle relaxation as an adjunct to general anesthesia.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Neostigmine + Glycopyrrolate Neostigmine 50 μg/kg (up to 5 mg maximum dose) plus glycopyrrolate 10 μg/kg (up to 1 mg maximum dose) administered as a single IV dose. |
Drug: Neostigmine
Neostigmine will be used to reverse rocuronium NMB. Dose will be according to participant actual body weight.
Other Names:
Drug: Glycopyrrolate
Glycopyrrolate will be co-administered with neostigmine during reversal of rocuronium NMB. Dose will be according to participant actual body weight.
Other Names:
Drug: Rocuronium
To achieve NMB, participants will receive the steroidal neuromuscular blocking agent Rocuronium Bromide administered via IV infusion and dosed according to participant actual body weight. It will be used per label to maintain muscle relaxation as an adjunct to general anesthesia.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Incidence of urinary retention [Up to 6 hours after administration of study intervention]
The difference between sugammadex and neostigmine/glycopyrrolate on the incidence of urinary retention defined as no void more than 6 hours after posterior lumbar spine surgery in ambulatory/short stay patients.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Micturition [Up to 1 day after administration of study intervention]
Between patients who received sugammadex and neostigmine/glycopyrrolate. To compare actual times of micturition we will analyze the proportion of patients (percentages) voided at 6, 9, 12 and 24 hours.
- Bladder urine volume [Up to 6 hours after administration of study intervention]
Between patients who received sugammadex and neostigmine/glycopyrrolate. To compare bladder urine volumes in milliliters (mL) we will perform bladder ultrasound scan at 6 hours postoperatively if patients did not void.
- Urinary retention symptoms [Up to 1 day after administration of study intervention]
Between patients who received sugammadex and neostigmine/glycopyrrolate. To compare urinary retention symptoms, we will administer a questionnaire at 6 hours postoperatively and on postoperative day 1.
- Bladder catheterization [Up to 1 Day after administration of study intervention]
Between patients who received sugammadex and neostigmine/glycopyrrolate. To compare need for bladder catheterization (straight or Foley).
- Length of hospital stay [Up to 7 Days after administration of study intervention]
Between patients who received sugammadex and neostigmine/glycopyrrolate. To compare length of hospital stay.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Age ≥ 18 years
-
ASA Physical Status I-III
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Inability to obtain written informed consent
-
Allergy to medications used in the protocol
-
Known or suspected neuromuscular disorders
-
Significant renal disease with a serum creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dL
-
Significant liver disease
-
A family history of malignant hyperthermia
-
History of genitourinary surgery, cancer, or radiation within the last year
-
Currently prescribed urological medications or diuretics
-
BPH or symptoms of BPH (interrupted or weak urine stream or wake up to urinate more than two times per night)
-
History or diagnosis of urinary incontinence or urinary retention
-
History of PONV with use of scopolamine
-
Use of Foley catheter pre- or intra- operatively
-
Perioperative medications that influence micturition (e.g., diuretics or intraoperative anticholinergic medication use other than NMB reversal)
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Missouri-Columbia
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Boris Mraovic, MD, FASA, University of Missouri-Columbia
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Baldini G, Bagry H, Aprikian A, Carli F. Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):1139-57. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819f7aea.
- Cha JE, Park SW, Choi YI, et al. Sugammadex use can decrease the incidence of post-operative urinary retention by avoiding anticholinergics: a retrospective study. Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2018;13(1):40-46.
- Chang Y, Chi KY, Tai TW, Cheng YS, Lee PH, Huang CC, Lee JS. Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention following elective spine surgery: a meta-analysis. Spine J. 2021 Nov;21(11):1802-1811. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 May 18.
- Cremins M, Vellanky S, McCann G, Mancini M, Sanzari L, Yannopoulos A. Considering healthcare value and associated risk factors with postoperative urinary retention after elective laminectomy. Spine J. 2020 May;20(5):701-707. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.01.012. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
- McLain RF, Kalfas I, Bell GR, Tetzlaff JE, Yoon HJ, Rana M. Comparison of spinal and general anesthesia in lumbar laminectomy surgery: a case-controlled analysis of 400 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 Jan;2(1):17-22. doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.1.0017.
- Zakaria HM, Lipphardt M, Bazydlo M, Xiao S, Schultz L, Chedid M, Abdulhak M, Schwalb JM, Nerenz D, Easton R, Chang V; MSSIC Investigators. The Preoperative Risks and Two-Year Sequelae of Postoperative Urinary Retention: Analysis of the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC). World Neurosurg. 2020 Jan;133:e619-e626. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.107. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
- 2096001
- MISP Database number 101357