Abraxane in Combination With Carboplatin, Erbitux and IMRT for Locally Advanced Squamous Cancer of the Head and Neck

Sponsor
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Other)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT00570674
Collaborator
Celgene Corporation (Industry)
29
5
71

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of the Phase I part of this research study is to determine the safest and most effective dose of Abraxane when given in combination with carboplatin and Erbitux during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. The purpose of the Phase II part of this study is to determine the effects of the treatment on head and neck cancers, as well as to further study the safety of this treatment.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 1/Phase 2

Detailed Description

Primary Objectives

  1. Phase I-To identify the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of Abraxane given with carboplatin plus concurrent IMRT (AC-RT)

  2. Phase II-To evaluate efficacy in the phase II portion of the study by evaluating 2-year disease-free survival

Secondary Objectives

  1. To evaluate the safety and tolerability

  2. To estimate the overall response rate

  3. To estimate 2-year overall survival

  4. To evaluate functional outcome at 2 years with respect to speech, swallowing and overall quality of life (QoL), by determining mean duration of PEG-dependence and change in FACT-HN scores from baseline to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.

STATISTICAL DESIGN:

The Phase I study followed a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. Four potential dose levels of Abraxane ultimately were under evaluation including a de-escalation dose level -1. [Note: Erbitux was originally planned to be given with carboplatin and Abraxane, but removed due to toxicity experienced at dose level 1.] The DLT observation period is the 7 weeks of treatment. The Phase I incorporated a10-patient expansion cohort to ensure that the toxicity at the MTD for AC-RT was acceptable. Planned enrollment for the Phase II study was 34 patients primarily to test whether 2-year disease-free survival was consistent with 75% rate as opposed to the null hypothesis of 53.5% based on prior research (RTOG 99-14).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
29 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Phase I/II Trial of Abraxane in Combination With Carboplatin, Erbitux and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)for Treatment of Locally Advanced Squamous Cancer of the Head and Neck
Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Phase I Dose Level 1: ACE-RT

Phase I Dose Level 1 participants received Abraxane 20mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. One dose (400 mg/m2 IV) of Erbitux was given prior to start of radiation, then weekly at 250 mg/m2 IV. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions.

Drug: Abraxane
Other Names:
  • paclitaxel
  • Drug: Erbitux
    Other Names:
  • cetuximab
  • Drug: Carboplatin
    Other Names:
  • paraplatin
  • Radiation: Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Other Names:
  • IMRT
  • Experimental: Phase I Dose Level -1: AC-RT

    Phase I Dose Level -1 participants received Abraxane 20mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 weekly IV during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions.

    Drug: Abraxane
    Other Names:
  • paclitaxel
  • Drug: Carboplatin
    Other Names:
  • paraplatin
  • Radiation: Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Other Names:
  • IMRT
  • Experimental: Phase I Dose Level 2: AC-RT

    Phase I Dose Level 2 participants received Abraxane 30mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 weekly IV during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions.

    Drug: Abraxane
    Other Names:
  • paclitaxel
  • Drug: Carboplatin
    Other Names:
  • paraplatin
  • Radiation: Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Other Names:
  • IMRT
  • Experimental: Phase I Dose Level 3: AC-RT

    Phase I Dose Level 3 participants received Abraxane 40mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions.

    Drug: Abraxane
    Other Names:
  • paclitaxel
  • Drug: Carboplatin
    Other Names:
  • paraplatin
  • Radiation: Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Other Names:
  • IMRT
  • Experimental: Phase I Dose Level 4: AC-RT

    Phase I Dose Level 4 participants received Abraxane 50mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions.

    Drug: Abraxane
    Other Names:
  • paclitaxel
  • Drug: Carboplatin
    Other Names:
  • paraplatin
  • Radiation: Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Other Names:
  • IMRT
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Abraxane Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) [Phase I] [Adverse event assessments occurred weekly on treatment; The observation period for MTD evaluation incorporated the 7 weeks of treatment.]

      The Abraxane MTD in combination with carboplatin and concurrent IMRT is determined by the number of participants who experience a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). See subsequent primary outcome measure for the DLT definition. The MTD is defined as the highest dose at which fewer than one-third of participants experience a DLT. If no DLTs are observed then the MTD is not reached but the highest dose may then be the recommended phase II dose.

    2. Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) [Phase I] [Adverse event assessments occurred weekly on treatment; The observation period for DLT evaluation incorporated the 7 weeks of treatment.]

      Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were defined as treatment-related: 1) grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity excluding untreated nausea, vomiting and diarrhea; dysphagia, esophagitis, mucositis/stomatitis, dermatitis/rash, 2) Grade 3 or greater febrile neutropenia occurring during chemoradiotherapy, 3) Grade 4 neutropenia lasting >/= 7 days and 4) Grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Grade 4 toxicities resulting in a treatment breaks > 7 days were considered DLTs.

    3. 2-Year Disease-Free Survival [Phase II] [Disease assessments occurred 8-10 weeks following treatment end then every 4-6 weeks (yr 1), every 8-10 weeks (yr 2), quarterly (yr 3) and semiannually up to 2 yrs since last pt enrolled.]

      Disease-free survival (DFS) is defined as the time from registration to the earlier of disease recurrence or death from any cause. Patients alive without a recurrence are censored at the date of last disease evaluation. 2-year disease-free survival is the probability of patients remaining alive and progression-free at 2-years from study entry estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or equivocal progression of non-target.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Overall Response Rate [Phase I] [The primary re-staging assessment for response occurred 8-10 weeks following completion of treatment. Treatment duration was a mean (range) of 7.8 weeks (6.6-10.1).]

      Overall response (OR) rate was defined as achieving partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) based on RECIST 1.0 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. To be assigned a status of CR or PR, changes in tumor measurements must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the response criteria are first met. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions.

    2. 2-Year Overall Survival [Phase I] [All patients were followed for survival for a minimum of 2 years. Median survival follow-up was 44.7 months (range 10-70) in this study cohort.]

      2-year overall survival is the proportion of patients alive at 2-years from study entry.

    3. Duration PEG Therapy [Assessed until time of PEG removal which was up to 18.4 months in this study cohort.]

      Estimated as the time from registration to the date of PEG removal.

    4. Change in FACT-H&N Score From Baseline to 4 Months [baseline and 4 months]

      The FACT-H&N is a multidimensional, self-report QoL instrument specifically designed for use with head and neck cancer patients. It is comprised of 27 core items from the FACT-G (Version 4), an established survey which assesses the impact of cancer therapy in four domains: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional. [Cella, D, et al. JCO 1993(11)]. It is supplemented with a validated measure of 12 site specific items to assess for head and neck related symptoms. [D'Antonio L, Zimmerman G, et al. Cancer 1996 (77)] Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score (range: 0-156). Higher scores represent better QoL. The change score is calculated as post-baseline less baseline; therefore, a negative value indicates a decrease in score and correspondingly a decrease in QoL.

    5. Change in FACT-H&N Score From Baseline to 6 Months [Baseline and 6 months]

      he FACT-H&N is a multidimensional, self-report QoL instrument specifically designed for use with head and neck cancer patients. It is comprised of 27 core items from the FACT-G (Version 4), an established survey which assesses the impact of cancer therapy in four domains: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional. [Cella, D, et al. JCO 1993(11)]. It is supplemented with a validated measure of 12 site specific items to assess for head and neck related symptoms. [D'Antonio L, Zimmerman G, et al. Cancer 1996 (77)] Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score (range: 0-156). Higher scores represent better QoL. The change score is calculated as post-baseline less baseline; therefore, a negative value indicates a decrease in score and correspondingly a decrease in QoL.

    6. Change in FACT-H&N Score From Baseline to 12 Months [Baseline and 12 months]

      The FACT-H&N is a multidimensional, self-report QoL instrument specifically designed for use with head and neck cancer patients. It is comprised of 27 core items from the FACT-G (Version 4), an established survey which assesses the impact of cancer therapy in four domains: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional. [Cella, D, et al. JCO 1993(11)]. It is supplemented with a validated measure of 12 site specific items to assess for head and neck related symptoms. [D'Antonio L, Zimmerman G, et al. Cancer 1996 (77)] Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score (range: 0-156). Higher scores represent better QoL. The change score is calculated as post-baseline less baseline; therefore, a negative value indicates a decrease in score and correspondingly a decrease in QoL.

    7. Change in FACT-H&N Score From Baseline to 24 Months [Baseline and 24 months]

      The FACT-H&N is a multidimensional, self-report QoL instrument specifically designed for use with head and neck cancer patients. It is comprised of 27 core items from the FACT-G (Version 4), an established survey which assesses the impact of cancer therapy in four domains: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional. [Cella, D, et al. JCO 1993(11)]. It is supplemented with a validated measure of 12 site specific items to assess for head and neck related symptoms. [D'Antonio L, Zimmerman G, et al. Cancer 1996 (77)] Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score (range: 0-156). Higher scores represent better QoL. The change score is calculated as post-baseline less baseline; therefore, a negative value indicates a decrease in score and correspondingly a decrease in QoL.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Histologically or cytologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of th head and neck or its variants. Primary tumor sites eligible include nasopharynx, oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, or unknown primary SSCHN. Although they have squamous histology, tumors of the skin, nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses are excluded because their responsiveness to chemotherapy and radiotherapy may differ.

    • Stage III or IV disease, without evidence of distant metastasis, according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer.

    • Measurable disease, according to RECIST.

    • Treatment-naive SSCHN, i.e. no prior chemotherapy, radiotherapy or attempted complete resection.

    • < CTCAE v3.0 Grade 2 neuropathy

    • 18 years of age or older

    • ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1

    • No active alcohol addiction or other condition that, in the opinion of the study investigators, would interfere with the subject's ability to comply with the treatment plan.

    • Lab values as outlined in the protocol

    • Negative pregnancy test within 7 days of study entry

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Pregnant or breast-feeding women, or women and men of childbearing potential not willing to use adequate contraception while receiving treatment and for at least 6 months thereafter.

    • Symptomatic peripheral neuropathy Grade 2 or greater by CTCAE v3.0

    • History of other malignancy within the previous 5 years, except for non-melanoma skin cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, bladder or head and neck.

    • Prior therapeutic radiation to the head and neck

    • Other serious illness or medical conditions, including but not limited to: unstable cardiac disease or myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to study entry; history of significant neurologic disorder, including advanced dementia or uncontrolled seizure disorder; clinically significant uncontrolled infection; active peptic ulcer disease defined as unhealed or clinically active ulcer; hypercalcemia; active drug addiction including cocaine or intravenous drug use, defined as occuring within 6 months preceding diagnosis; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; autoimmune disease requiring active therapy; severe psoriasis; chronic uncontrolled diarrhea.

    • Patients who experienced involuntary weight loss of more than 20% of their body weight in the two months preceding study entry

    • Concurrent treatment with any other anticancer therapy

    • Prior therapy that targets the EGFR pathway

    • Participation in an investigational drug trial within 30 days of study entry

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    • Celgene Corporation

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Roy B. Tishler, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Roy B. Tishler, MD, Radiation Oncologist, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00570674
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 07-069
    First Posted:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 13, 2017
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2017
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Keywords provided by Roy B. Tishler, MD, Radiation Oncologist, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details 29 participants were enrolled between November 2007 and August 2011.
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Phase I Dose Level 1: ACE-RT Phase I Dose Level -1: AC-RT Phase I Dose Level 2: AC-RT Phase I Dose Level 3: AC-RT Phase I Dose Level 4: AC-RT Phase I Dose Level 4 Expansion Cohort: AC-RT All Phase II Participants
    Arm/Group Description Phase I Dose Level 1 participants received Abraxane 20mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. One dose (400 mg/m2 IV) of Erbitux was given prior to start of radiation, then weekly at 250 mg/m2 IV. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions. Phase I Dose Level -1 participants received Abraxane 20mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 weekly IV during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions. Phase I Dose Level 2 participants received Abraxane 30mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 weekly IV during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions. Phase I Dose Level 3 participants received Abraxane 40mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions. Phase I Dose Level 4 participants received Abraxane 50mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions. Phase I Dose Level 4 participants received Abraxane 50mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions. If no DLTs are observed at dose level 4 then ten additional participants (expansion cohort) will be enrolled at that dose level. Participants received Abraxane according to the established recommended Phase II dose of Abraxane (50mg/m2 IV) then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 6 3 4 3 3 10 0
    Treated 6 3 3 3 3 10 0
    PEG Evaluable 6 3 3 3 2 10 0
    COMPLETED 6 3 3 3 3 10 0
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title All Phase I Participants
    Arm/Group Description Participants received Abraxane according to the established dose escalation schedule 50mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. For Dose Level 1 participants, one dose (400 mg/m2 IV) of Erbitux was given prior to start of radiation, then weekly at 250 mg/m2 IV. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions.
    Overall Participants 28
    Age (years) [Median (Full Range) ]
    Median (Full Range) [years]
    60
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    6
    21.4%
    Male
    22
    78.6%
    Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants)
    United States
    28
    100%
    Primary Tumor Site (Count of Participants)
    Oral cavity
    3
    10.7%
    Oropharynx
    17
    60.7%
    Larynx
    4
    14.3%
    Unknown Primary
    2
    7.1%
    Other
    2
    7.1%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Abraxane Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) [Phase I]
    Description The Abraxane MTD in combination with carboplatin and concurrent IMRT is determined by the number of participants who experience a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). See subsequent primary outcome measure for the DLT definition. The MTD is defined as the highest dose at which fewer than one-third of participants experience a DLT. If no DLTs are observed then the MTD is not reached but the highest dose may then be the recommended phase II dose.
    Time Frame Adverse event assessments occurred weekly on treatment; The observation period for MTD evaluation incorporated the 7 weeks of treatment.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The MTD was not reached on this trial but the recommended phase II dose was the highest dose of Abraxane evaluated.
    Arm/Group Title All Phase I Participants
    Arm/Group Description Participants received Abraxane according to the established dose escalation schedule then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. For Dose Level 1 participants, one dose (400 mg/m2 IV) of Erbitux was given prior to start of radiation, then weekly at 250 mg/m2 IV. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions.
    Measure Participants 28
    Number [mg weekly]
    50
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) [Phase I]
    Description Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were defined as treatment-related: 1) grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity excluding untreated nausea, vomiting and diarrhea; dysphagia, esophagitis, mucositis/stomatitis, dermatitis/rash, 2) Grade 3 or greater febrile neutropenia occurring during chemoradiotherapy, 3) Grade 4 neutropenia lasting >/= 7 days and 4) Grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Grade 4 toxicities resulting in a treatment breaks > 7 days were considered DLTs.
    Time Frame Adverse event assessments occurred weekly on treatment; The observation period for DLT evaluation incorporated the 7 weeks of treatment.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated patients in the dose escalation cohorts.While no DLTs were observed in the first 3 DL 1 patients, the cohort was expanded to 6 patients due to safety and tolerability concerns. Upon further review, it was resolved that the Abraxane dose should not be increased in the setting of concurrent Erbitux.
    Arm/Group Title Phase I Dose Level 1: ACE-RT Phase I Dose Level -1: AC-RT Phase I Dose Level 2: AC-RT Phase I Dose Level 3: AC-RT Phase I Dose Level 4: AC-RT
    Arm/Group Description Phase I Dose Level 1 participants received Abraxane 20mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. One dose (400 mg/m2 IV) of Erbitux was given prior to start of radiation, then weekly at 250 mg/m2 IV. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions. Phase I Dose Level -1 participants received Abraxane 20mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 weekly IV during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions. Phase I Dose Level 2 participants received Abraxane 30mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 weekly IV during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions. Phase I Dose Level 3 participants received Abraxane 40mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions. Phase I Dose Level 4 participants received Abraxane 50mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions.
    Measure Participants 6 3 3 3 3
    Number [Participants with DLT]
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    3. Primary Outcome
    Title 2-Year Disease-Free Survival [Phase II]
    Description Disease-free survival (DFS) is defined as the time from registration to the earlier of disease recurrence or death from any cause. Patients alive without a recurrence are censored at the date of last disease evaluation. 2-year disease-free survival is the probability of patients remaining alive and progression-free at 2-years from study entry estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or equivocal progression of non-target.
    Time Frame Disease assessments occurred 8-10 weeks following treatment end then every 4-6 weeks (yr 1), every 8-10 weeks (yr 2), quarterly (yr 3) and semiannually up to 2 yrs since last pt enrolled.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The phase II portion planned to enroll 34 participants including the phase I expansion cohort but the study did not continue beyond phase I.
    Arm/Group Title All Phase II Participants
    Arm/Group Description Participants received Abraxane according to the established recommended Phase II dose of Abraxane (50mg/m2 IV) then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions.
    Measure Participants 0
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Overall Response Rate [Phase I]
    Description Overall response (OR) rate was defined as achieving partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) based on RECIST 1.0 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. To be assigned a status of CR or PR, changes in tumor measurements must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the response criteria are first met. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions.
    Time Frame The primary re-staging assessment for response occurred 8-10 weeks following completion of treatment. Treatment duration was a mean (range) of 7.8 weeks (6.6-10.1).

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated phase I patients. Reporting within dose cohorts is not preferred given the small sample sizes.
    Arm/Group Title All Phase I Participants
    Arm/Group Description Participants received Abraxane according to the established dose escalation schedule then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. For Dose Level 1 participants, one dose (400 mg/m2 IV) of Erbitux was given prior to start of radiation, then weekly at 250 mg/m2 IV. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions.
    Measure Participants 28
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [proportion of participants]
    .964
    3.4%
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title 2-Year Overall Survival [Phase I]
    Description 2-year overall survival is the proportion of patients alive at 2-years from study entry.
    Time Frame All patients were followed for survival for a minimum of 2 years. Median survival follow-up was 44.7 months (range 10-70) in this study cohort.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated phase I patients. Reporting within dose cohorts is not preferred given the small sample sizes.
    Arm/Group Title All Phase I Participants
    Arm/Group Description Participants received Abraxane according to the established dose escalation schedule then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. For Dose Level 1 participants, one dose (400 mg/m2 IV) of Erbitux was given prior to start of radiation, then weekly at 250 mg/m2 IV. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions.
    Measure Participants 28
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [proportion of participants]
    .929
    3.3%
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Duration PEG Therapy
    Description Estimated as the time from registration to the date of PEG removal.
    Time Frame Assessed until time of PEG removal which was up to 18.4 months in this study cohort.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The analysis dataset is comprised of all patients with date of PEG removal (evaluable). Reporting within dose cohorts is not preferred given the small sample sizes.
    Arm/Group Title All Phase I Participants
    Arm/Group Description Participants received Abraxane according to the established dose escalation schedule then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. For Dose Level 1 participants, one dose (400 mg/m2 IV) of Erbitux was given prior to start of radiation, then weekly at 250 mg/m2 IV. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions.
    Measure Participants 27
    Mean (Full Range) [months]
    5.4
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in FACT-H&N Score From Baseline to 4 Months
    Description The FACT-H&N is a multidimensional, self-report QoL instrument specifically designed for use with head and neck cancer patients. It is comprised of 27 core items from the FACT-G (Version 4), an established survey which assesses the impact of cancer therapy in four domains: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional. [Cella, D, et al. JCO 1993(11)]. It is supplemented with a validated measure of 12 site specific items to assess for head and neck related symptoms. [D'Antonio L, Zimmerman G, et al. Cancer 1996 (77)] Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score (range: 0-156). Higher scores represent better QoL. The change score is calculated as post-baseline less baseline; therefore, a negative value indicates a decrease in score and correspondingly a decrease in QoL.
    Time Frame baseline and 4 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The analysis dataset is comprised of patients with evaluable data at the 2 assessment timepoints: baseline and 4 months.
    Arm/Group Title All Phase I Participants
    Arm/Group Description Participants received Abraxane according to the established dose escalation schedule 50mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. For Dose Level 1 participants, one dose (400 mg/m2 IV) of Erbitux was given prior to start of radiation, then weekly at 250 mg/m2 IV. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions.
    Measure Participants 15
    Median (Full Range) [units on a scale]
    -21
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection All Phase I Participants
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.01
    Comments
    Method Sign test
    Comments
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in FACT-H&N Score From Baseline to 6 Months
    Description he FACT-H&N is a multidimensional, self-report QoL instrument specifically designed for use with head and neck cancer patients. It is comprised of 27 core items from the FACT-G (Version 4), an established survey which assesses the impact of cancer therapy in four domains: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional. [Cella, D, et al. JCO 1993(11)]. It is supplemented with a validated measure of 12 site specific items to assess for head and neck related symptoms. [D'Antonio L, Zimmerman G, et al. Cancer 1996 (77)] Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score (range: 0-156). Higher scores represent better QoL. The change score is calculated as post-baseline less baseline; therefore, a negative value indicates a decrease in score and correspondingly a decrease in QoL.
    Time Frame Baseline and 6 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The analysis dataset is comprised of patients with evaluable data at the 2 assessment timepoints: baseline and 6 months.
    Arm/Group Title All Phase I Participants
    Arm/Group Description Participants received Abraxane according to the established dose escalation schedule then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. For Dose Level 1 participants, one dose (400 mg/m2 IV) of Erbitux was given prior to start of radiation, then weekly at 250 mg/m2 IV. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions.
    Measure Participants 19
    Median (Full Range) [units on a scale]
    -9
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection All Phase I Participants
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.01
    Comments
    Method Sign test
    Comments
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in FACT-H&N Score From Baseline to 12 Months
    Description The FACT-H&N is a multidimensional, self-report QoL instrument specifically designed for use with head and neck cancer patients. It is comprised of 27 core items from the FACT-G (Version 4), an established survey which assesses the impact of cancer therapy in four domains: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional. [Cella, D, et al. JCO 1993(11)]. It is supplemented with a validated measure of 12 site specific items to assess for head and neck related symptoms. [D'Antonio L, Zimmerman G, et al. Cancer 1996 (77)] Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score (range: 0-156). Higher scores represent better QoL. The change score is calculated as post-baseline less baseline; therefore, a negative value indicates a decrease in score and correspondingly a decrease in QoL.
    Time Frame Baseline and 12 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The analysis dataset is comprised of patients with evaluable data at the 2 assessment timepoints: baseline and 12 months.
    Arm/Group Title All Phase I Participants
    Arm/Group Description Participants received Abraxane according to the established dose escalation schedule 50mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. For Dose Level 1 participants, one dose (400 mg/m2 IV) of Erbitux was given prior to start of radiation, then weekly at 250 mg/m2 IV. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions.
    Measure Participants 17
    Median (Full Range) [units on a scale]
    -4.2
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection All Phase I Participants
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.52
    Comments
    Method Sign test
    Comments
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change in FACT-H&N Score From Baseline to 24 Months
    Description The FACT-H&N is a multidimensional, self-report QoL instrument specifically designed for use with head and neck cancer patients. It is comprised of 27 core items from the FACT-G (Version 4), an established survey which assesses the impact of cancer therapy in four domains: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional. [Cella, D, et al. JCO 1993(11)]. It is supplemented with a validated measure of 12 site specific items to assess for head and neck related symptoms. [D'Antonio L, Zimmerman G, et al. Cancer 1996 (77)] Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as a global QoL score (range: 0-156). Higher scores represent better QoL. The change score is calculated as post-baseline less baseline; therefore, a negative value indicates a decrease in score and correspondingly a decrease in QoL.
    Time Frame Baseline and 24 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The analysis dataset is comprised of patients with evaluable data at the 2 assessment timepoints: baseline and 24 months.
    Arm/Group Title All Phase I Participants
    Arm/Group Description Participants received Abraxane according to the established dose escalation schedule 50mg/m2 IV then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. For Dose Level 1 participants, one dose (400 mg/m2 IV) of Erbitux was given prior to start of radiation, then weekly at 250 mg/m2 IV. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions.
    Measure Participants 12
    Median (Full Range) [units on a scale]
    4.3
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection All Phase I Participants
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.39
    Comments
    Method Sign test
    Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Participants were assessed weekly on treatment and at weeks 4 and 8 post treatment. Treatment duration was a mean (range) of 7.8 weeks (6.6-10.1).
    Adverse Event Reporting Description Maximum grade toxicity by type was first calculated including adverse events with treatment-attribution of possibly, probably or definitely related to either chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Serious and Other AEs were defined as grades 3-5 and grades 1-2, respectively, per CTCAEv3.
    Arm/Group Title All Phase I Participants
    Arm/Group Description Participants received Abraxane according to the established dose escalation schedule then carboplatin AUC 1.5 IV weekly during the period of radiotherapy for a total of 7 weeks. For Dose Level 1 participants, one dose (400 mg/m2 IV) of Erbitux was given prior to start of radiation, then weekly at 250 mg/m2 IV. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered 5 days per week with the prescribed dose of 70 Gy to the gross tumor volume, given in 2 Gy daily fractions for a total of 35 fractions.
    All Cause Mortality
    All Phase I Participants
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    All Phase I Participants
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 26/28 (92.9%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Febrile neutropenia 1/28 (3.6%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Distention/bloating, abdominal 1/28 (3.6%)
    Dry mouth 1/28 (3.6%)
    Dysphagia 17/28 (60.7%)
    Muco/stomatitis by exam, oral cavity 18/28 (64.3%)
    Nausea 2/28 (7.1%)
    Salivary 1/28 (3.6%)
    Vomiting 1/28 (3.6%)
    Abdomen, pain 1/28 (3.6%)
    Oral cavity, pain 3/28 (10.7%)
    General disorders
    Fatigue 1/28 (3.6%)
    Edema head and neck 1/28 (3.6%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Chemoradiation dermatitis 8/28 (28.6%)
    Investigations
    Leukocytes 1/28 (3.6%)
    Weight loss 1/28 (3.6%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness 1/28 (3.6%)
    Syncope 1/28 (3.6%)
    Psychiatric disorders
    Confusion 1/28 (3.6%)
    Anxiety 1/28 (3.6%)
    Depression 1/28 (3.6%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Voice changes/dysarthria 1/28 (3.6%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Rash: acne/acneiform 1/28 (3.6%)
    Skin-other 1/28 (3.6%)
    Vascular disorders
    Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism 1/28 (3.6%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    All Phase I Participants
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 28/28 (100%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Hemoglobin 5/28 (17.9%)
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    External ear, pain 2/28 (7.1%)
    Hearing w/w-o audiogr in monitor prg 1/28 (3.6%)
    Middle ear, pain 4/28 (14.3%)
    Otitis, middle ear (non-infectious) 1/28 (3.6%)
    Eye disorders
    Keratitis 1/28 (3.6%)
    Tearing 1/28 (3.6%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdomen, pain 6/28 (21.4%)
    Constipation 23/28 (82.1%)
    Diarrhea w/o prior colostomy 19/28 (67.9%)
    Dry mouth 26/28 (92.9%)
    Dyspepsia 8/28 (28.6%)
    Dysphagia 9/28 (32.1%)
    Esophagitis 1/28 (3.6%)
    Fistula, Pancreas 1/28 (3.6%)
    Flatulence 1/28 (3.6%)
    GI-other 3/28 (10.7%)
    Hemorrhoids 1/28 (3.6%)
    Muco/stomatitis by exam, oral cavity 9/28 (32.1%)
    Muco/stomatitis by exam, stomach 1/28 (3.6%)
    Nausea 25/28 (89.3%)
    Oral cavity, pain 21/28 (75%)
    Salivary 21/28 (75%)
    Ulcer, duodenum 1/28 (3.6%)
    Ulcer, small bowel NOS 1/28 (3.6%)
    Vomiting 16/28 (57.1%)
    General disorders
    Edema head and neck 14/28 (50%)
    Edema limb 1/28 (3.6%)
    Edema trunk/genital 1/28 (3.6%)
    Fatigue 20/28 (71.4%)
    Fever w/o neutropenia 5/28 (17.9%)
    Injection site reaction 1/28 (3.6%)
    Pain-other 4/28 (14.3%)
    Rigors/chills 1/28 (3.6%)
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Fistula, Biliary Treet 1/28 (3.6%)
    Immune system disorders
    Allergy-other 1/28 (3.6%)
    Infections and infestations
    Infection Gr0-2 neut, lung 1/28 (3.6%)
    Infection Gr0-2 neut, oral cavity 3/28 (10.7%)
    Infection Gr0-2 neut, skin 2/28 (7.1%)
    Infection-other 16/28 (57.1%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Bruising 1/28 (3.6%)
    Chemoradiation dermatitis 18/28 (64.3%)
    Radiation dermatitis 1/28 (3.6%)
    Investigations
    Leukocytes 2/28 (7.1%)
    Neutrophils 4/28 (14.3%)
    Platelets 3/28 (10.7%)
    Weight loss 7/28 (25%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Anorexia 4/28 (14.3%)
    Dehydration 18/28 (64.3%)
    Hyperglycemia 1/28 (3.6%)
    Hyperkalemia 2/28 (7.1%)
    Hypokalemia 1/28 (3.6%)
    Hypomagnesemia 1/28 (3.6%)
    Hyponatremia 1/28 (3.6%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Back, pain 2/28 (7.1%)
    Extremity-limb, pain 1/28 (3.6%)
    Lymphedema-related fibrosis 1/28 (3.6%)
    Neck, pain 1/28 (3.6%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness 1/28 (3.6%)
    Head/headache 2/28 (7.1%)
    Neuropathy CN IX pharynx ear tongue 1/28 (3.6%)
    Taste disturbance 25/28 (89.3%)
    Psychiatric disorders
    Agitation 1/28 (3.6%)
    Anxiety 5/28 (17.9%)
    Confusion 4/28 (14.3%)
    Depression 5/28 (17.9%)
    Insomnia 3/28 (10.7%)
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Urinary frequency/urgency 1/28 (3.6%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Aspiration 1/28 (3.6%)
    Cough 3/28 (10.7%)
    Edema, larynx 1/28 (3.6%)
    Pleura, pain 1/28 (3.6%)
    Stenosis (incl anastomotic) pharynx 1/28 (3.6%)
    Throat/pharynx/larynx, pain 7/28 (25%)
    Voice changes/dysarthria 6/28 (21.4%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Alopecia 3/28 (10.7%)
    Dry skin 3/28 (10.7%)
    Erythema multiforme 5/28 (17.9%)
    Nail changes 4/28 (14.3%)
    Pruritus/itching 1/28 (3.6%)
    Rash/desquamation 4/28 (14.3%)
    Rash: acne/acneiform 5/28 (17.9%)
    Skin breakdown/decubitus ulcer 1/28 (3.6%)
    Skin-other 2/28 (7.1%)
    Ulceration 1/28 (3.6%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension 1/28 (3.6%)
    Hypotension 1/28 (3.6%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    The phase II portion planned to enroll 34 participants including the expansion cohort but the study did not continue beyond phase I given the importance of HPV status as a prognostic factor to guide treatment decisions.

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Roy B. Tishler, MD
    Organization Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Phone 617.632.5734
    Email RTISHLER@LROC.HARVARD.EDU
    Responsible Party:
    Roy B. Tishler, MD, Radiation Oncologist, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00570674
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 07-069
    First Posted:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 13, 2017
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2017