Comparison of Intracoronary Versus Intravenous Abciximab in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (CICERO)

Sponsor
University Medical Center Groningen (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT00927615
Collaborator
(none)
534
1
2
30.9
17.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether intracoronary bolus administration of abciximab is superior to intravenous bolus administration in improving myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
N/A

Detailed Description

The contemporary management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) consists of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) including thrombus aspiration and stenting. There is, however, still a high incidence of impaired post-procedural myocardial perfusion, which is associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Intravenous (IV) administration of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab during primary PCI plays an important role in the treatment of patients with STEMI. With higher local drug concentrations, abciximab may have additional anti-platelet, anti-thrombotic and anti-inflammatory features. These possible benefits may be obtained by intracoronary (IC) administration of abciximab. Recent small- to medium-scaled studies have suggested that IC administration of abciximab instead of the (IV) route is associated with improved post-procedural myocardial perfusion and a clinically relevant reduction of major adverse cardiac events.

Because of the limited number of patients included in these studies, a larger randomized clinical trial is needed to evaluate the effect of IC abciximab in patients with STEMI. Furthermore, the combined strategy of PCI with thrombus aspiration and IC use of abciximab has not been investigated.

Therefore, the investigators intend to evaluate the effect of IC bolus administration of abciximab compared to IV bolus administration on post-procedural myocardial perfusion as assessed by the extent of ST-segment elevation resolution in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. The study is a single-center, prospective, randomized trial with blinded evaluation of endpoints.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
534 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Coronary Versus Intravenous abCiximab Administration During Emergency Reperfusion Of ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction - the CICERO Trial
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2010
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2011

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: intracoronary abciximab

intracoronary administration of abciximab (0.25 mg/kg body weight)

Drug: abciximab
0.25 mg/kg body weight (intracoronary)
Other Names:
  • ReoPro
  • Active Comparator: intravenous abciximab

    intravenous administration of abciximab (0.25 mg/kg body weight)

    Drug: abciximab
    0.25 mg/kg body weight (intravenous)
    Other Names:
  • ReoPro
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. incidence of ST-segment resolution >70% [30 to 60 minutes post-PCI]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Bleeding complications [in-hospital]

    2. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow [post-PCI]

    3. Myocardial Blush Grade (MBG) [post-PCI]

    4. Incidence of distal embolization [post-PCI]

    5. persistent residual ST-segment deviation [30 to 60 minutes post-PCI]

    6. enzymatic infarct size [in-hospital]

    7. Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) [30 days]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:

    a diagnosis of STEMI defined by

    • chest pain suggestive for myocardial ischemia for at least 30 minutes before hospital admission

    • time from onset of symptoms of less than 12 hours

    • ECG with ST-segment deviation of more than 0.1 mV in 2 or more leads

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • rescue PCI after thrombolytic therapy

    • need for emergency coronary artery bypass grafting

    • presence of cardiogenic shock

    • known existence of a life-threatening disease with a life expectancy of less than 6 months

    • inability to provide informed consent

    • contra-indications for the use of abciximab (active internal bleeding, history of stroke within 2 years, recent major surgery or intracranial or intraspinal trauma or surgery within 2 months, intracranial neoplasm, arteriovenous malformation or aneurysm, bleeding diathesis, severe uncontrolled hypertension, thrombocytopenia, vasculitis, hypertensive or diabetic retinopathy, severe liver or kidney failure, and hypersensitivity to murine proteins)

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University Medical Centre Groningen Groningen Netherlands 9713 GZ

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University Medical Center Groningen

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Felix Zijlstra, MD PhD, University Medical Center Groningen

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    , ,
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00927615
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 200807
    First Posted:
    Jun 25, 2009
    Last Update Posted:
    Sep 8, 2010
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2010

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Sep 8, 2010