COMPARE: Prasugrel vs. Ticagrelor on Myocardial Injury in STEMI

Sponsor
AORTICA Group (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03435133
Collaborator
(none)
61
1
2
37.3
1.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The investigators propose to perform a randomized clinical trial comparing prasugrel vs. ticagrelor in 60 patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The principal objective of the study would be analyzing the difference in myocardial infarction size measured by cardiac magnetic resonance at 6 months

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
N/A

Detailed Description

Dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of aspirin and one of the P2Y12 receptor inhibitors is the mainstay of treatment for patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Prasugrel or ticagrelor have actually shown to be superior to clopidogrel improving the prognosis of these patients. However, the industrial interest has avoided any direct comparison between these two antiplatelets. Comparison is of great interest considering that only ticagrelor has shown to significantly reduce mortality. As ticagrelor may exert off-target effects through adenosine-related mechanisms, the investigators aimed to investigate whether ticagrelor reduces myocardial injury to a greater extent than prasugrel in patients with revascularized STEMI.

Patients with acute STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary revascularization within 6 hours of chest pain, will be randomized to (1) prasugrel (a 60 mg oral loading and a 10-mg dailiy maintenance dose) or to (2) ticagrelor (a 180 mg loading dose and a 90 mg twice daily maintenance dose). The predefined primary end point is infarct sieze on magnetic resonance imaging at the end of the study (6 months). Magnetic resonance will be performed at day 1, day 7 and moth 6. Platelet reactivity, biomarkers and clinical outcomes will also be assesed.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
61 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of Prasugrel vs. Ticagrelor on Myocardial Injury in Revascularized ST Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 23, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 30, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Prasugrel

Drug: Prasugrel
60 mg oral bolus plus oral 10 mg once daily

Active Comparator: Ticagrelor

Drug: Ticagrelor
180 mg oral bolus plus oral 90 mg every 12 hours daily

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Infarct size [6 months]

    Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-assessed infarct size of left ventricular mass (%)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Infarct size [up to two weeks]

    Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-assessed infarct size of left ventricular mass (%)

  2. Myocardial salvage index [up to two weeks]

    Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-assessed myocardial salvage index

  3. Microvascular obstruction [up to two weeks]

    Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-assessed microvascular obstruction

  4. MACE [6 months]

    The rate of MACE defined as the composite of death, reinfarction, new-onset heart failure, or rehospitalization

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • age 18 years or older and equal or less than 75 years

  • symptom onset within 12 hours before random assignment

  • chest pain lasting more than 30 minutes

  • ST-segment elevation of at least 0.1 mV in at least 2 limb leads, ST-segment elevation of at least 0.2 mV in 2 or more contiguous precordial leads, or left bundle-branch block or paced rhythm

  • time from symptoms onset to randomization less than 6 hours

  • no severe heart failure (Killip class <3)

  • informed, written consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • history of myocardial infarction with Q wave

  • history of surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization

  • cardiogenic shock, defined as a systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg with no response to fluid administration or <100 mm Hg in patients with supportive treatment and no bradycardia

  • history of stroke

  • history of bronchial asthma

  • symtomatic sinusal bradicardia or advance AV block

  • history of hypersensitivity to aspirin, prasugrel or ticagrelor or contraindication to the doses established in the study

  • patients pretreated with 600 mg of clopidogrel or more

  • contraindication for the use of gadolinium during the magenitc resonance

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Pedro Dorado Salamanca Spain 37007

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • AORTICA Group

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pedro L Sanchez, MD, PhD, Hospital Universitario Salamanca

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Pedro L Sanchez, Head of Cardiology, PhD, MD, AORTICA Group
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03435133
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CARDIO2015.1
First Posted:
Feb 15, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Jun 10, 2019
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2019
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Pedro L Sanchez, Head of Cardiology, PhD, MD, AORTICA Group
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 10, 2019