Antiplatelet and Anti-inflammatory Effects of Statins and Ezetimibe

Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00474123
Collaborator
(none)
78
1
2
43
1.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Among patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), it is not clear if the pleiotropic effects of cholesterol reduction differ between high-dose simvastatin alone and combined ezetimibe/simvastatin.

The investigators sought to compare the anti-inflammatory and anti-platelet effects of ezetimibe 10 mg / simvastatin 20 mg (E10/S20) to simvastatin 80 mg (S80).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Simvastatin 80 mg/day for 6 weeks
  • Drug: Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg
N/A

Detailed Description

Introduction

Among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), a robust evidence base supports the beneficial effects of statin therapy on mortality and other adverse cardiovascular outcomes . Recently, two large trials , have demonstrated that compared to standard dose statin therapy, high statin doses reduced Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) to extremely low levels and decreased coronary events, even in patients with normal levels of Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C). Subsequently, recent guidelines have suggested an Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) treatment goal of <70 mg/dL in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Achieving such low Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) levels frequently demands an intensive Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) reduction, often above 50%. Ezetimibe, an intestinal cholesterol absorption inhibitor, can be used as an additional therapy if statin monotherapy fails to reduce Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) below the treatment goal.

Furthermore, anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic pleiotropic effects of statins might explain, at least in part, the large benefits demonstrated in randomized trials , . For example, in hypercholesterolemic patients treated with statins, a decrease in inflammation-associated markers such as the C-reactive protein (CRP) has been described , although it is debated whether this effect is clearly independent of Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C).

Moreover, although inhibition of platelets by statin therapy is a well established effect , , it has not yet been clarified whether platelet inhibition by statin therapy depends on the reduction of Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) or on the inhibition of intracellular signal pathways accompanied by disaggregating effects.

Two alternative pharmacologic strategies are equally effective in reducing Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C): high-dose statin alone and combined treatment with ezetimibe plus moderate-dose statin . It is not known whether these two strategies have different cholesterol-independent pleiotropic effects on inflammation and platelets. We therefore compared the anti-inflammatory and antiplatelet effects of two intensive pharmacologic strategies to reduce cholesterol: 80 mg of simvastatin (S80) versus 10 mg ezetimibe/ 20 mg of simvastatin (E10/S20). Anti-inflammatory effects were assessed by performing serial measurements of the following biomarkers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, oxidized Low-density lipoprotein-C (oxLDL), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM)-1. Platelet aggregation was also compared between the two strategies.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
78 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of Antiplatelet and Anti-inflammatory Effects of High Dose Statin Monotherapy Versus Moderate Dose Statin Plus Ezetimibe
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2006
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2009
Actual Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2009

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Simvastatin 80 mg

Patients were treated with simvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks

Drug: Simvastatin 80 mg/day for 6 weeks
Simvastatin 80 mg/day, single dose, for 6 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Simvastatin 80 mg (Zocor)
  • Active Comparator: Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg

    Patients were treated with daily Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg for 6 weeks

    Drug: Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg
    Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg Patients were treated with daily Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg for 6 weeks
    Other Names:
  • Vytorin
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. C-reactive Protein [Change from baseline at 6 weeks]

      Serum was separated by centrifugation from the blood samples. For high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein measurement, whole venous blood was collected in tubes without anticoagulant and centrifuged at room temperature. Serum C-Reactive Protein was assessed with a high-sensitivity, latex microparticle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay (Behring Nephelometer Analyzer System; Behring Diagnostics, Somerville, NJ).

    2. Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol [Change from baseline at 6 weeks]

      Serum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting oxLDL (Mercodia, USA) were applied.

    3. Platelet Function Analyzer [PFA]-100 [Change from baseline at 6 weeks]

      Samples were collected in 3.8% sodium citrate (buffered, pH 5.5, Vacutainer, Becton Dickinson, Plymouth, UK) for platelet function tests. Platelet function assays were processed within 2 hours of blood collection. The PFA-100 records the closure time (CT), witch means the time in seconds (s) from the start of the test until the platelet plug occludes the aperture.

    4. Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein (MCP)-1 [Change from baseline at 6 weeks]

      Serum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting MCP-1/ICAM-1 (R&D Systems, Europe, Abingdon, UK).

    5. Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM)-1 [Change from baseline at 6 weeks]

      serum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting MCP-1/ICAM-1 (R&D Systems, Europe, Abingdon, UK)

    6. Soluble CD40 Ligand [Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and after at the conclusions of the six weeks study period.]

      A commercial ELISA assay detecting sCD40L (R&D Systems, USA) was applied. Detection limits and intra-assay variability was respectively, as follows: sCD-40L 15.6 pg/mL (intra-assay variability not available).

    7. Interleukin-6 [Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and after at the conclusions of the six weeks study period.]

      A commercial ELISA assay detecting IL-6 (Siemens, USA) was applied.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. LDL Cholesterol [Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period.]

    2. Triglyceride [Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period.]

    3. Endothelial Progenitor Cells [Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period.]

      Endothelial progenitor cells were evaluated by flow cytometry. Selected cells were positive for CD31, CD34 and VEGFR receptors.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 80 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Stable angina

    • Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol 70-160 mg/dl

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Renal failure

    • Age>80

    • Simvastatin current treatment>20mg

    • Hepatic disease

    • Inflammatory diseases

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Heart Institute (InCor) HOSPITAL DAS CLINICAS DA FACULDADE DE MEDICINA DA UNIVERSIDADE DE SAO PAULO (HCFMUSP) Sao Paulo Brazil 05403-000

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Sao Paulo

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: CARLOS V SERRANO, PHD, Heart Institute (InCor) HOSPITAL DAS CLINICAS DA FACULDADE DE MEDICINA DA UNIVERSIDADE DE SAO PAULO (HCFMUSP)

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    , ,
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00474123
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 893/05
    First Posted:
    May 16, 2007
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Keywords provided by , ,
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details From July 2006 to January 2009, we randomized 78 patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) with LDL-C > 70 mg/dl, Angiographically documented CAD, stable angina, and age between 18 and 80 years. Patients were assigned randomly to two groups. The one group received Ezetimibe 10 mg/Simvastatin 20 mg the one other received Simvastatin 80 mg.
    Pre-assignment Detail No wash-out period.
    Arm/Group Title Simvastatin 80 mg Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Patients were treated with simvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks Patients were treated with Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgfor 6 weeks
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 38 40
    COMPLETED 38 40
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Simvastatin 80 mg Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg Total
    Arm/Group Description Patients were treated with simvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks Patients were treated with Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgfor 6 weeks Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 38 40 78
    Age (Count of Participants)
    <=18 years
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Between 18 and 65 years
    35
    92.1%
    37
    92.5%
    72
    92.3%
    >=65 years
    3
    7.9%
    3
    7.5%
    6
    7.7%
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    61.7
    (10)
    64.5
    (9)
    63.2
    (10)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    18
    47.4%
    15
    37.5%
    33
    42.3%
    Male
    20
    52.6%
    25
    62.5%
    45
    57.7%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    Brazil
    38
    100%
    40
    100%
    78
    100%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title C-reactive Protein
    Description Serum was separated by centrifugation from the blood samples. For high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein measurement, whole venous blood was collected in tubes without anticoagulant and centrifuged at room temperature. Serum C-Reactive Protein was assessed with a high-sensitivity, latex microparticle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay (Behring Nephelometer Analyzer System; Behring Diagnostics, Somerville, NJ).
    Time Frame Change from baseline at 6 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    per protocol
    Arm/Group Title Simvastatin 80 mg Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Patients were treated with simvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks Patients were treated with Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgfor 6 weeks
    Measure Participants 38 40
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [Percentage]
    -16
    -11
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Simvastatin 80 mg, Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Comments The sample size was determined as 78 patients. Continuous data were presented as means ± SD, or median (interquartile range) when the distribution was non-normal. For qualitative variables, we presented counts and relative frequencies. For between-group comparison we used multiple regression with adjustment for baseline values of the outcome variable (ANCOVA), or Wilcoxon rank-sum test when the variable had a non-normal distribution.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Comments
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
    Description Serum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting oxLDL (Mercodia, USA) were applied.
    Time Frame Change from baseline at 6 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    per protocol
    Arm/Group Title Simvastatin 80 mg Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Patients were treated with simvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks Patients were treated with Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgfor 6 weeks
    Measure Participants 38 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Percentage]
    -18
    (47)
    -15
    (33)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Simvastatin 80 mg, Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Comments The sample size was determined as 78 patients. Continuous data were presented as means ± SD, or median (interquartile range) when the distribution was non-normal. For qualitative variables, we presented counts and relative frequencies. For between-group comparison we used multiple regression with adjustment for baseline values of the outcome variable (ANCOVA), or Wilcoxon rank-sum test when the variable had a non-normal distribution.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.65
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    3. Primary Outcome
    Title Platelet Function Analyzer [PFA]-100
    Description Samples were collected in 3.8% sodium citrate (buffered, pH 5.5, Vacutainer, Becton Dickinson, Plymouth, UK) for platelet function tests. Platelet function assays were processed within 2 hours of blood collection. The PFA-100 records the closure time (CT), witch means the time in seconds (s) from the start of the test until the platelet plug occludes the aperture.
    Time Frame Change from baseline at 6 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    per protocol
    Arm/Group Title Simvastatin 80 mg Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Patients were treated with simvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks Patients were treated with Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgfor 6 weeks
    Measure Participants 38 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Percentage]
    27
    (43)
    8
    (33)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Simvastatin 80 mg, Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Comments The sample size was determined as 78 patients. Continuous data were presented as means ± SD, or median (interquartile range) when the distribution was non-normal. For qualitative variables, we presented counts and relative frequencies. For between-group comparison we used multiple regression with adjustment for baseline values of the outcome variable (ANCOVA), or Wilcoxon rank-sum test when the variable had a non-normal distribution.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.02
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    4. Primary Outcome
    Title Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein (MCP)-1
    Description Serum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting MCP-1/ICAM-1 (R&D Systems, Europe, Abingdon, UK).
    Time Frame Change from baseline at 6 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    per protocol
    Arm/Group Title Simvastatin 80 mg Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Patients were treated with simvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks Patients were treated with Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgfor 6 weeks
    Measure Participants 38 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage]
    11
    (47)
    10
    (21)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Simvastatin 80 mg, Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Comments The sample size was determined as 78 patients. Continuous data were presented as means ± SD, or median (interquartile range) when the distribution was non-normal. For qualitative variables, we presented counts and relative frequencies. For between-group comparison we used multiple regression with adjustment for baseline values of the outcome variable (ANCOVA), or Wilcoxon rank-sum test when the variable had a non-normal distribution.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.85
    Comments
    Method ANCOVA
    Comments
    5. Primary Outcome
    Title Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM)-1
    Description serum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting MCP-1/ICAM-1 (R&D Systems, Europe, Abingdon, UK)
    Time Frame Change from baseline at 6 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    per protocol
    Arm/Group Title Simvastatin 80 mg Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Patients were treated with simvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks Patients were treated with Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgfor 6 weeks
    Measure Participants 38 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage]
    10
    (14)
    10
    (16)
    6. Primary Outcome
    Title Soluble CD40 Ligand
    Description A commercial ELISA assay detecting sCD40L (R&D Systems, USA) was applied. Detection limits and intra-assay variability was respectively, as follows: sCD-40L 15.6 pg/mL (intra-assay variability not available).
    Time Frame Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and after at the conclusions of the six weeks study period.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Simvastatin 80 mg Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Patients were treated with simvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks Patients were treated with Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgfor 6 weeks
    Measure Participants 38 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage]
    6
    (43)
    6
    (34)
    7. Primary Outcome
    Title Interleukin-6
    Description A commercial ELISA assay detecting IL-6 (Siemens, USA) was applied.
    Time Frame Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and after at the conclusions of the six weeks study period.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Simvastatin 80 mg Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Patients were treated with simvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks Patients were treated with Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgfor 6 weeks
    Measure Participants 38 40
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [percentage]
    0
    0
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title LDL Cholesterol
    Description
    Time Frame Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Simvastatin 80 mg Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Patients were treated with simvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks Patients were treated with Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgfor 6 weeks
    Measure Participants 38 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage]
    -28
    (30)
    -29
    (13)
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Triglyceride
    Description
    Time Frame Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Simvastatin 80 mg Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Patients were treated with simvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks Patients were treated with Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgfor 6 weeks
    Measure Participants 38 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage]
    -4
    (32)
    -14
    (31)
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Endothelial Progenitor Cells
    Description Endothelial progenitor cells were evaluated by flow cytometry. Selected cells were positive for CD31, CD34 and VEGFR receptors.
    Time Frame Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    [Not Specified]
    Arm/Group Title Simvastatin 80 mg Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Patients were treated with simvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks Patients were treated with Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgfor 6 weeks
    Measure Participants 38 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage]
    0.4
    (1.7)
    0.1
    (2.1)

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Simvastatin 80 mg Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Patients were treated with simvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks Patients were treated with Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mgfor 6 weeks
    All Cause Mortality
    Simvastatin 80 mg Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Simvastatin 80 mg Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/38 (0%) 0/40 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Simvastatin 80 mg Simvastatin 20mg/Ezetimibe 10 mg
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/38 (0%) 0/40 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    Adverse Events were assessed, but none were observed.

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Comparison of Antiplatelet and Anti-inflammatory Effects of High Dose Statin Monotherapy Versus Mode
    Organization Heart Institute (InCor) Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (HCFMUSP)
    Phone 55-11-30695058
    Email eduardopesaro@hotmail.com
    Responsible Party:
    , ,
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00474123
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 893/05
    First Posted:
    May 16, 2007
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 14, 2010
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2010