Electronic Monitoring Device of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Function in Improving Patient-Centered Care in Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer Undergoing Surgery

Sponsor
City of Hope Medical Center (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02511821
Collaborator
National Cancer Institute (NCI) (NIH)
22
1
1
12.3
1.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This pilot clinical trial studies an electronic monitoring device of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and function in improving patient-centered care in patients with gastrointestinal cancer undergoing surgery. Electronic monitoring is a technology-based way of asking patients about the quality of life, symptoms, and activity using online surveys and an activity tracking watch may make it easier for patients to tell their doctors and nurses about any issues before and after surgery. Electronic systems of assessing PROs may increase the depth and accuracy of available clinical data, save administrative time, prompt early intervention that improves the patient experience, foster patient-provider communication, improve patient safety, and enhance the consistency of data collection across multiple sites.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
  1. To determine the feasibility of administration of electronic patient-reported outcomes and functional assessment in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer surgery (gastric, colorectal, liver, pancreas).

  2. Determine percentage of patients able to complete > 80% of MD. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and European Quality of LIfe-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) web-based surveys.

  3. Determine percentage of patients able to wear the wristband device at least 1 week post-operatively.

  4. Determine length of time to complete the web-based surveys.

  5. Determine length of time patients are able to wear the wristband device, before and after surgery.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
  1. Determine the percentage of patients who did not enroll in the study and analyze the reasons why. This will be accomplished using: 1) the number of patients asked to participate;
  1. the number of patients who declined to participate, and 3) reasons for declining participation.
  1. Responses from the Satisfaction Tool will be used to assess: 1) ease of use of web-based surveys and wristband device; 2) feedback on items in the web-based surveys that are distressing or difficult to comprehend; 3) feedback on length of surveys and timing of administration; and 4) suggestions for items that were not covered but should be added.

  2. Calculate the mean number of missing items within each questionnaire to identify individual or subsets of questions that are difficult to answer.

OUTLINE:

Patients complete online surveys comprising questions about quality of life, symptoms, and activity level, and wear a wristband device (Vivofit watch) 3-7 days prior to and after surgery. After going home, patients complete the symptom survey three times a week and quality of life survey once a week for 2 weeks post-surgery.

After completion of study, patients are followed up for 1 month.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
22 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Device Feasibility
Official Title:
Electronic Monitoring of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Function in GI Cancer Surgery: A Feasibility Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 22, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 31, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 31, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Supportive Care (Vivofit watch, online surveys)

Patients complete online surveys comprising questions about quality of life, symptoms, and activity level, and wear a wristband device (Vivofit watch) 3-7 days prior to and after surgery. After going home, patients complete the symptom survey three times a week and quality of life survey once a week for 2 weeks post-surgery.

Other: Computer-Assisted Intervention
Complete online surveys

Device: Vivofit watch
Wear Vivofit watch
Other Names:
  • Monitor
  • Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment
    Ancillary studies
    Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
  • Other: Questionnaire Administration
    Ancillary studies

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Mean time patients are able to tolerate wearing the wristband device, both before and after surgery [Up to 1 month]

      Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the distribution of time (before and after surgery) a patient is able to wear the wristband device.

    2. Mean time to complete the web based questionnaires MDASI and EQ-5D, as well as the Self Geriatric Assessment Measure [Up to 1 month]

      Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the distribution of time to complete each assessment.

    3. Median time patients are able to tolerate wearing the wristband device, both before and after surgery [Up to 1 month]

      Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the distribution of time (before and after surgery) a patient is able to wear the wristband device.

    4. Median time to complete the web based questionnaires MDASI and EQ-5D, as well as the Self Geriatric Assessment Measure [Up to 1 month]

      Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the distribution of time to complete each assessment.

    5. Percentage of patients who are able to complete the web-based questionnaires MDASI and EQ-5D [Up to 1 month]

      Descriptive statistics will be reported. Patients who complete at least 80% of all scheduled MDASI and EQ-5D questionnaires will be indicated as able to complete the web-based questionnaires. The true population proportion will be estimated with 95% confidence interval of half-width no more than 0.16.

    6. Percentage of patients who are able to wear the wristband device for at least 1 week post-operatively [Up to 1 week post-operatively]

      Estimated with 95% confidence interval of half-width no more than 16%.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Ease of use of web-based surveys and wristband device, as measured by responses from Satisfaction Tool [Up to 1 month]

    2. Feedback on items in the web-based surveys that are distressing or difficult to comprehend, as measured by responses from Satisfaction Tool [Up to 1 month]

    3. Feedback on length of surveys and timing of administration, as measured by responses from Satisfaction Tool [Up to 1 month]

    4. Mean number of missing items within each questionnaire [Up to 1 month]

      Mean number of missing items within each questionnaire will be calculated to identify individual or subsets of questions that are difficult to answer.

    5. Percentage of patients who did not enroll in the study-composite outcome of multiple measure listed [Up to 1 month]

      Percentage of patients who did not enroll in the study will be determined and the reasons why will be analyzed. This will be accomplished using: i) the number of patients asked to participate, ii) the number of patients who declined to participate, and iii) reasons for declining participation.

    6. Suggestions for items that were not covered but should be added, as measured by responses from Satisfaction Tool [Up to 1 month]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    21 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Scheduled to undergo surgery for primary or secondary gastric, colorectal, liver, or pancreas cancer

    • Able to read and understand English

    • Patients across all stages of disease

    • There are no restrictions related to performance status or life expectancy

    • This protocol is eligible for waiver of informed consent documentation; all subjects must have the ability to understand and the willingness to provide verbal informed consent

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Research participants who have no computer and internet access and/or do not use a computer even if one is present in the household

    • Subjects, who in the opinion of the investigator, may not be able to comply with the safety monitoring requirements of the study

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 City of Hope Medical Center Duarte California United States 91010

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • City of Hope Medical Center
    • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Virginia Sun, City of Hope Medical Center

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    City of Hope Medical Center
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02511821
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 15051
    • NCI-2015-01061
    • 15051
    • P30CA033572
    First Posted:
    Jul 30, 2015
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 7, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2021

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jan 7, 2021