Central Neck Dissection in Patients With Clinical Node Negative Thyroid Cancer
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This phase II trial studies how well thyroid gland removal with or without central lymph node dissection works in treating patients with thyroid cancer or suspected thyroid cancer that has not spread to the lymph nodes (randomized into Arms I and II). Arms I and II are compared to a standard of care (SOC) Arm III to enable comparison of quality of life among various surgical treatments. Currently, the standard treatment for thyroid cancer is total thyroidectomy, or complete removal of the thyroid. The lymph nodes in the central part of the neck may also be surgically removed, called central lymph node dissection. Prophylactic removal of the lymph nodes may increase the risk of life-threatening complications, and may reduce post-surgery quality of life. It may also prevent the cancer from returning and reduce the need for additional surgery. It is not yet known whether recurrence rates and complication levels are lower after thyroid gland removal alone or with central lymph node dissection.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- To determine the rate of transient and permanent hypocalcemia
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
-
To determine the rate of voice and swallowing problems.
-
To determine the degree to which quality of life (QOL) is compromised.
-
To determine the degree to which accurate quality of life measures can be extracted from patient interview narratives using natural language processing techniques.
-
To determine clinical recurrence rates.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms, if ineligible into a SOC arm.
Arm I: Patients undergo total thyroidectomy alone.
Arm II: Patients undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic central neck dissection (CND).
Arm III: Patients ineligible to be randomized into Arm I or II, Standard of Care (SOC) comparator receiving same follow up.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at day 1, 2 and 6 weeks, and 6 and 12 months.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Arm I (no CND) Patients undergo total thyroidectomy alone. |
Procedure: Thyroidectomy
Undergo total thyroidectomy
Other: Quality-of-life assessment
Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies
|
Experimental: Arm II (CND) Patients undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND. |
Procedure: Thyroidectomy
Undergo total thyroidectomy
Procedure: entral lymph node dissection (CLND)
Undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND
Other: Quality-of-life assessment
Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies
|
Active Comparator: Arm III (SOC) Patients who are not eligible for randomization into Arm I or Arm II, Standard of Care (SOC) group. No specific trial intervention, treated as per patient and physician preference |
Other: Quality-of-life assessment
Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Percentage of Participants With Transient Hypoparathyroidism, as Defined by a Day 1 Serum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) Level of < 10 pg/ml [Post-operative day 1]
Rate of transient hypoparathyroidism will be assessed in terms of percentage of participants with day 1 serum PTH level of < 10 pg/ml.
- Post-operative Serum Calcium (mg/dL) at Day 12 [At day 12]
Post-operative serum calcium (mg/dL) at Day 12
- Total Calcium Consumption in First 2 Weeks [2 weeks after surgery]
Total calcium consumption in first 2 weeks (total mg). Participants were given calcium symptom logs in which to record their calcium consumption between surgery and their first preoperative follow up appointment, approximately two week.
- Number of Participants With Hypocalcemia Symptoms in First 2 Weeks [2 weeks]
Number of participants with hypocalcemia symptoms and symptom severity in first two weeks, as defined by presence of clinically significant symptoms of hypocalcemia. Clinically significant symptoms defined as 1 or more episodes of symptoms of hypocalcemia per day for multiple days, symptoms leading to calls to provider for assistance with managing and/or symptoms leading to escalation of dosage of prescribed medications to treat symptoms of hypocalcemia
- Hypocalcemia Symptom Severity Scale (Range of 1-5) [2 weeks post surgery]
Mean number of occurrences of mild (severity 1 - 2) and severe (severity 3 - 5) hypocalcemia symptoms. Participants were asked to record hypocalcemia symptoms between surgery and first postoperative follow-up at approximately two weeks in their provided calcium symptom logs and rank severity on scale of 1 (mild) to 5 (severe).
- Percentage of Participants That Required Calcium and Calcitriol at Month 6 [At Month 6]
Requirement for calcium and calcitriol at Month 6 (or, if laboratory values at visit reveal calcium < 8 mg/dL and PTH <15 pg/ml)
- Post-operative Serum PTH (pg/ml) at Month 6 [At Month 6]
- Post-operative Serum Calcium Level at Month 6 [At Month 6]
Post-operative serum calcium (mg/dL) at Month 6
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Rate of Transient and Permanent Hypocalcemia [Post-operative day 1 - Month 6]
The rate of transient and permanent hypocalcemia will be determined by assessing the following: I. Post-operative serum calcium (mg/dl) and PTH (pg/ml) at Day 12 and Month 6 II. Total calcium consumption in first 2 weeks (total gm) III. Hypocalcemia symptoms in first 2 weeks (average episodes/day) IV. Hypocalcemia symptom severity scale (range 1-5) V. Requirement for calcium and calcitriol at Month 6 (or, if laboratory values at visit reveal calcium < 8 mg/dL and PTH < 15 pg/ml Data will be analyzed using the methods described above.
- Rate of Voice and Swallowing Problems [Post operative day 1 - up to 1 year]
The rate of voice and swallowing problems will be determined by assessing the following: I. Phonation threshold pressure, in centimeters of water II. Dysphonia severity index (DSI) score (+5 to -5) III. Grade Roughness Breathiness Asthenia Strain (GRBAS) score (0-3) IV. Voice quality parameters as measured by Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) (0-100 on visual analog scale) V. Vocal fold vibratory and movement parameters as measured by stroboscopy assessment (1-4) VI. Glottal function index score VII. Penetration-Aspiration score as measured by videofluoroscopic swallow study (0-8) Data will be analyzed using the methods described above.
- Degree to Which Quality of Life (QOL) is Compromised [Post-operative day 1 - up to 1 year]
The degree to which quality (QOL) is compromised will be determined by assessing the following: I. Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Composite Scale (MCS) score II. Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Composite Scale (PCS) score III. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) Core-30 (C30) score IV. Thyroid Cancer Specific Quality of Life (ThyCA-QOL) score V. 10-item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) dysphagia inventory score VI. Voice Handicap Index (VHI) score VII. Themes and codes from interview transcripts assessed using qualitative research methods Data will be analyzed using the methods described above.
- Clinical Recurrence Rates [Week 6 - up to 5 years]
Clinical recurrence rates will be determined by assessing the following: I. Percent of patients with a recombinant thyroid-stimulating hormone (rTSH) stimulated thyroglobulin level < 1 ng/ml one year after surgery II. Unstimulated thyroglobulin level prior to beginning week 6 radioactive iodine treatment III. Stimulated thyroglobulin at the time of week 6 radioactive iodine treatment IV. Incidence of unstimulated thyroglobulin > 1 ng/mL at 6 months V. Incidence of stimulated thyroglobulin > 2 ng/mL at 1 year VI. Incidence of biopsy-proven disease identification on neck ultrasound or iodine-131 (I-131) uptake up to 5 years post-surgery Data will be analyzed using the methods described above.
- Degree to Which Accurate Quality of Life (QOL) Measures Can be Extracted From Patient Interview Narratives Using Natural Language Processing Techniques [Post-operative day 1 - up to 1 year]
The degree to which accurate quality of life (QOL) measures can be extracted from patient interview narratives using natural language process techniques will allow for the development of computer algorithms that convert patient narrative text into simple quality of life measures. Data will be analyzed using the methods described above.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Pre-operative diagnosis or suspicion of papillary thyroid cancer, usually by fine needle aspiration (FNA)
-
No pre-operative evidence of cervical lymph node metastases on neck ultrasound (randomization arms only)
-
No evidence of distant metastases
-
Ability to read and write in English
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Largest papillary thyroid carcinoma < 1 cm in size on ultrasound
-
Previous thyroid surgery
-
Concurrent active malignancy of another type
-
Inability to give informed consent or lacks decision making capacity
-
T4 tumor
-
Pre-existing vocal cord paralysis
-
Chronic neurologic condition which affects voice or swallow (for instance, multiple sclerosis or Parkinson disease)
-
Baseline laryngeal pathology that would warrant intervention that could affect voice or swallow function
-
Becomes pregnant before surgery or at any time while on study
INTRA-OPERATION EXCLUSION CRITERIA (randomization arms only)
-
Evidence of nodal involvement identified in the operating room (OR)
-
Failure to confirm diagnosis of cancer in participant
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University of Wisconsin | Madison | Wisconsin | United States | 53792 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Wisconsin, Madison
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Rebecca Sippel, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
None provided.- UW13115
- NCI-2014-00833
- UW13115
- R01CA176911
- 2014-0391
- A539700
- SMPH\SURGERY\SURGERY
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | 117 participants consented. 27 participants were excluded from the study before assignment to arms (15 participants withdrew before surgery, 12 participants did not meet intraoperative inclusion criteria). 90 participants were allocated in 3 arms |
Arm/Group Title | Arm I (no CND) | Arm II (CND) | Arm III (SOC) |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy alone. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Central lymph node dissection: Undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | Patients who are not eligible for randomization into Arm I or Arm II, Standard of Care (SOC) group. No specific trial intervention, treated as per patient and physician preference Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies |
Period Title: Overall Study | |||
STARTED | 30 | 30 | 30 |
Analyzed for Baseline Measures | 30 | 29 | 30 |
COMPLETED | 30 | 26 | 26 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Arm I (no CND) | Arm II (CND) | Arm III (SOC) | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy alone. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Central lymph node dissection: Undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | Patients who are not eligible for randomization into Arm I or Arm II, Standard of Care (SOC) group. No specific trial intervention, treated as per patient and physician preference Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 30 | 29 | 30 | 89 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
46.10
(1.47)
|
50.07
(2.38)
|
43.17
(2.68)
|
46.40
(1.47)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||
Female |
23
76.7%
|
21
72.4%
|
27
90%
|
71
79.8%
|
Male |
7
23.3%
|
8
27.6%
|
3
10%
|
18
20.2%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | ||||
Hispanic or Latino |
1
3.3%
|
0
0%
|
2
6.7%
|
3
3.4%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
29
96.7%
|
29
100%
|
28
93.3%
|
86
96.6%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | ||||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
2
6.7%
|
2
2.2%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
1
3.4%
|
0
0%
|
1
1.1%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
White |
30
100%
|
28
96.6%
|
27
90%
|
85
95.5%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
3.3%
|
1
1.1%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | ||||
United States |
30
100%
|
29
100%
|
30
100%
|
89
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Percentage of Participants With Transient Hypoparathyroidism, as Defined by a Day 1 Serum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) Level of < 10 pg/ml |
---|---|
Description | Rate of transient hypoparathyroidism will be assessed in terms of percentage of participants with day 1 serum PTH level of < 10 pg/ml. |
Time Frame | Post-operative day 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 participant in the Arm II(CND) was a screen failure. Arm III(SOC) data was not collected for this outcome measure as outcome is a comparison of complication rates between TT and CND arms and does not apply to SOC arm participants. The SOC arm was added later as comparison for the qualitative aims only. |
Arm/Group Title | Arm II (CND) | Arm I (no CND) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Central lymph node dissection: Undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy alone. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies |
Measure Participants | 29 | 30 |
Number [percentage of participants] |
24.1
80.3%
|
33.3
114.8%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Arm II (CND), Arm I (no CND) |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.567 |
Comments | p-value threshold for statistical significance is 0.05 | |
Method | Fisher Exact | |
Comments |
Title | Post-operative Serum Calcium (mg/dL) at Day 12 |
---|---|
Description | Post-operative serum calcium (mg/dL) at Day 12 |
Time Frame | At day 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 participant in the Arm II(CND) was a screen failure. Arm III(SOC) data was not collected for this outcome measure as outcome is a comparison of complication rates between TT and CND arms and does not apply to SOC arm participants. The SOC arm was added later as comparison for the qualitative aims only. |
Arm/Group Title | Arm II (CND) | Arm I (no CND) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Central lymph node dissection: Undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy alone. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies |
Measure Participants | 29 | 30 |
Mean (Standard Error) [mg/dL] |
9.39
(0.12)
|
9.13
(0.1)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Arm II (CND), Arm I (no CND) |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.110 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 2 sided | |
Comments |
Title | Total Calcium Consumption in First 2 Weeks |
---|---|
Description | Total calcium consumption in first 2 weeks (total mg). Participants were given calcium symptom logs in which to record their calcium consumption between surgery and their first preoperative follow up appointment, approximately two week. |
Time Frame | 2 weeks after surgery |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
19 participants in CND arm, 22 in 'no CND' arm returned their calcium symptom log to study staff at the end of the postoperative follow-up period. Missing data is due to participants losing/forgetting to return their calcium symptom logs/lack of clarity in their handwritten log entries. This may also have led to limited reliability/accuracy of the data we were able to collect. SOC arm data was not collected as outcome is a comparison of complication rates between TT and CND arms, N/A to SOC arm. |
Arm/Group Title | Arm II (CND) | Arm I (no CND) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Central lymph node dissection: Undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy alone. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies |
Measure Participants | 19 | 22 |
Mean (Standard Error) [mg] |
21876.63
(6353.42)
|
25470.19
(6592.60)
|
Title | Number of Participants With Hypocalcemia Symptoms in First 2 Weeks |
---|---|
Description | Number of participants with hypocalcemia symptoms and symptom severity in first two weeks, as defined by presence of clinically significant symptoms of hypocalcemia. Clinically significant symptoms defined as 1 or more episodes of symptoms of hypocalcemia per day for multiple days, symptoms leading to calls to provider for assistance with managing and/or symptoms leading to escalation of dosage of prescribed medications to treat symptoms of hypocalcemia |
Time Frame | 2 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
In Arm II (CND) 1 participant was lost to screen failure, 1 self-withdrew. Arm III(SOC) data was not collected for this outcome measure as outcome is a comparison of complication rates between TT and CND arms and does not apply to SOC arm participants. The SOC arm was added later as comparison for the qualitative aims only. |
Arm/Group Title | Arm II (CND) | Arm I (no CND) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Central lymph node dissection: Undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy alone. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies |
Measure Participants | 28 | 30 |
Number [participants] |
8
26.7%
|
6
20.7%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Arm II (CND), Arm I (no CND) |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.758 |
Comments | ||
Method | Fisher Exact | |
Comments |
Title | Hypocalcemia Symptom Severity Scale (Range of 1-5) |
---|---|
Description | Mean number of occurrences of mild (severity 1 - 2) and severe (severity 3 - 5) hypocalcemia symptoms. Participants were asked to record hypocalcemia symptoms between surgery and first postoperative follow-up at approximately two weeks in their provided calcium symptom logs and rank severity on scale of 1 (mild) to 5 (severe). |
Time Frame | 2 weeks post surgery |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Missing data is due to participants losing/forgetting to return their calcium symptom logs/lack of clarity in their handwritten log entries. This may also have led to limited reliability/accuracy of the data we were able to collect. SOC arm data was not collected as outcome is a comparison of complication rates between TT and CND arms, not applicable (N/A) to SOC arm. |
Arm/Group Title | Arm II (CND) | Arm I (no CND) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Central lymph node dissection: Undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy alone. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies |
Measure Participants | 13 | 19 |
mild symptoms (severity 1 - 2) |
3
(1.49)
|
2.50
(0.81)
|
severe symptoms (severity 3 - 5) |
3.36
(1.59)
|
1.42
(0.73)
|
Title | Percentage of Participants That Required Calcium and Calcitriol at Month 6 |
---|---|
Description | Requirement for calcium and calcitriol at Month 6 (or, if laboratory values at visit reveal calcium < 8 mg/dL and PTH <15 pg/ml) |
Time Frame | At Month 6 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
In Arm II (CND) 1 participant was lost to screen failure, 1 self-withdrew, 1 was lost to follow up. Arm III(SOC) data was not collected for this outcome measure as outcome is a comparison of complication rates between TT and CND arms and does not apply to SOC arm participants. The SOC arm was added later as comparison for the qualitative aims only. |
Arm/Group Title | Arm II (CND) | Arm I (no CND) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Central lymph node dissection: Undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy alone. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies |
Measure Participants | 27 | 30 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
0
0%
|
3
10.3%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Arm II (CND), Arm I (no CND) |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.236 |
Comments | ||
Method | Fisher Exact | |
Comments |
Title | Post-operative Serum PTH (pg/ml) at Month 6 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | At Month 6 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
In Arm II (CND) 1 participant was lost to screen failure, 1 self-withdrew, 1 was lost to follow up. Arm III(SOC) data was not collected for this outcome measure as outcome is a comparison of complication rates between TT and CND arms and does not apply to SOC arm participants. The SOC arm was added later as comparison for the qualitative aims only. |
Arm/Group Title | Arm II (CND) | Arm I (no CND) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Central lymph node dissection: Undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy alone. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies |
Measure Participants | 27 | 30 |
Mean (Standard Error) [pg/mL] |
45.62
(4.6)
|
44.24
(4.97)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Arm II (CND), Arm I (no CND) |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.759 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 2 sided | |
Comments |
Title | Post-operative Serum Calcium Level at Month 6 |
---|---|
Description | Post-operative serum calcium (mg/dL) at Month 6 |
Time Frame | At Month 6 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
In Arm II (CND) 1 participant was lost to screen failure, 1 self-withdrew, 1 was lost to follow up. Arm III(SOC) data was not collected for this outcome measure as outcome is a comparison of complication rates between TT and CND arms and does not apply to SOC arm participants. The SOC arm was added later as comparison for the qualitative aims only. |
Arm/Group Title | Arm II (CND) | Arm I (no CND) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Central lymph node dissection: Undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy alone. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies |
Measure Participants | 27 | 30 |
Mean (Standard Error) [mg/dL] |
9.12
(0.08)
|
8.98
(0.13)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Arm II (CND), Arm I (no CND) |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.400 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 2 sided | |
Comments |
Title | Rate of Transient and Permanent Hypocalcemia |
---|---|
Description | The rate of transient and permanent hypocalcemia will be determined by assessing the following: I. Post-operative serum calcium (mg/dl) and PTH (pg/ml) at Day 12 and Month 6 II. Total calcium consumption in first 2 weeks (total gm) III. Hypocalcemia symptoms in first 2 weeks (average episodes/day) IV. Hypocalcemia symptom severity scale (range 1-5) V. Requirement for calcium and calcitriol at Month 6 (or, if laboratory values at visit reveal calcium < 8 mg/dL and PTH < 15 pg/ml Data will be analyzed using the methods described above. |
Time Frame | Post-operative day 1 - Month 6 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Rate of Voice and Swallowing Problems |
---|---|
Description | The rate of voice and swallowing problems will be determined by assessing the following: I. Phonation threshold pressure, in centimeters of water II. Dysphonia severity index (DSI) score (+5 to -5) III. Grade Roughness Breathiness Asthenia Strain (GRBAS) score (0-3) IV. Voice quality parameters as measured by Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) (0-100 on visual analog scale) V. Vocal fold vibratory and movement parameters as measured by stroboscopy assessment (1-4) VI. Glottal function index score VII. Penetration-Aspiration score as measured by videofluoroscopic swallow study (0-8) Data will be analyzed using the methods described above. |
Time Frame | Post operative day 1 - up to 1 year |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Degree to Which Quality of Life (QOL) is Compromised |
---|---|
Description | The degree to which quality (QOL) is compromised will be determined by assessing the following: I. Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Composite Scale (MCS) score II. Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Composite Scale (PCS) score III. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) Core-30 (C30) score IV. Thyroid Cancer Specific Quality of Life (ThyCA-QOL) score V. 10-item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) dysphagia inventory score VI. Voice Handicap Index (VHI) score VII. Themes and codes from interview transcripts assessed using qualitative research methods Data will be analyzed using the methods described above. |
Time Frame | Post-operative day 1 - up to 1 year |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Clinical Recurrence Rates |
---|---|
Description | Clinical recurrence rates will be determined by assessing the following: I. Percent of patients with a recombinant thyroid-stimulating hormone (rTSH) stimulated thyroglobulin level < 1 ng/ml one year after surgery II. Unstimulated thyroglobulin level prior to beginning week 6 radioactive iodine treatment III. Stimulated thyroglobulin at the time of week 6 radioactive iodine treatment IV. Incidence of unstimulated thyroglobulin > 1 ng/mL at 6 months V. Incidence of stimulated thyroglobulin > 2 ng/mL at 1 year VI. Incidence of biopsy-proven disease identification on neck ultrasound or iodine-131 (I-131) uptake up to 5 years post-surgery Data will be analyzed using the methods described above. |
Time Frame | Week 6 - up to 5 years |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Title | Degree to Which Accurate Quality of Life (QOL) Measures Can be Extracted From Patient Interview Narratives Using Natural Language Processing Techniques |
---|---|
Description | The degree to which accurate quality of life (QOL) measures can be extracted from patient interview narratives using natural language process techniques will allow for the development of computer algorithms that convert patient narrative text into simple quality of life measures. Data will be analyzed using the methods described above. |
Time Frame | Post-operative day 1 - up to 1 year |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title |
---|
Arm/Group Description |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 1 year | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||||
Arm/Group Title | Arm I (no CND) | Arm II (CND) | Arm III (SOC) | |||
Arm/Group Description | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy alone. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Central lymph node dissection: Undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | Patients who are not eligible for randomization into Arm I or Arm II, Standard of Care (SOC) group. No specific trial intervention, treated as per patient and physician preference Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
Arm I (no CND) | Arm II (CND) | Arm III (SOC) | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/30 (0%) | 0/29 (0%) | 0/30 (0%) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
Arm I (no CND) | Arm II (CND) | Arm III (SOC) | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/30 (0%) | 0/29 (0%) | 0/30 (0%) | |||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
Arm I (no CND) | Arm II (CND) | Arm III (SOC) | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 23/30 (76.7%) | 25/29 (86.2%) | 9/30 (30%) | |||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||
biochemical hypopcalcemia | 2/30 (6.7%) | 2 | 0/29 (0%) | 0 | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
symptomatic hypoparathyroidism | 2/30 (6.7%) | 2 | 4/29 (13.8%) | 4 | 1/30 (3.3%) | 1 |
nerve injury | 12/30 (40%) | 12 | 7/29 (24.1%) | 7 | 3/30 (10%) | 3 |
significant voice changes not otherwise characterized | 11/30 (36.7%) | 11 | 7/29 (24.1%) | 7 | 2/30 (6.7%) | 2 |
biochemical hypoparathyroidism | 9/30 (30%) | 9 | 8/29 (27.6%) | 8 | 3/30 (10%) | 3 |
symptomatic hypocalcemia | 4/30 (13.3%) | 4 | 6/29 (20.7%) | 6 | 2/30 (6.7%) | 2 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Rebecca Sippel |
---|---|
Organization | University of Wisconsin, Madison |
Phone | 608-263-1387 |
sippel@surgery.wisc.edu |
- UW13115
- NCI-2014-00833
- UW13115
- R01CA176911
- 2014-0391
- A539700
- SMPH\SURGERY\SURGERY