A Computer-Based Intervention for Distance Caregivers of Parents With Advanced Cancer

Sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center (Other)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT02128373
Collaborator
National Cancer Institute (NCI) (NIH)
7
1
2
37
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This pilot clinical trial studies the feasibility and effectiveness of a new computer-based communication intervention in supporting distance caregivers of patients with advanced lung or brain cancer. Unlike local caregivers, distance caregivers often receive little, if any, professional support and have limited communication with the oncology team. Using a computer-based communication intervention to allow distance caregivers the opportunity to participate in a physician visit, have questions and concerns addressed, and meet members of the oncology team may help reduce stress.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Usual care
  • Other: computer-assisted intervention
  • Other: Distress Thermometer
  • Other: Profile of Mood States (POMS-B)
  • Other: Quality of Life: Functional Assessment in Cancer Therapy - (FACT)
  • Other: Tension-Anxiety Subscale
N/A

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
  1. What is the relationship of primary stressors (type and stage/grade of cancer, and patient quality of life [QOL]) and structural factors/stressors (age, gender, race, and education) with patient and caregiver psychological outcomes at baseline? II. What are the effects of the Communication with Long Distance Caregivers Offering a Supportive Electronic Resource (CLOSER) intervention on distance caregiver psychological outcomes (anxiety and distress), controlling for primary stressors (type and stage/grade of cancer, and patient quality of life), distance caregiver structural factors/stressors (caregiver age, gender, race, and employment), and baseline anxiety and distress? III. What are the effects of the CLOSER intervention on patient psychological outcomes (anxiety and distress), controlling for primary stressors (type and stage/grade of cancer, and patient quality of life), distance caregiver structural factors/stressors (caregiver age, gender, race, and employment), and baseline anxiety and distress? IV. What is the feasibility (time, cost, resources and acceptability to patients, caregivers and clinicians) of using Adobe Connect, a computer-based web communication system, with the distance caregiver, the parent with advanced cancer, and the health care providers together in a routine follow-up oncology office visit? V. What is the experience of being a distance caregiver participating in the CLOSER intervention?

OUTLINE: Participants are assigned to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Participants receive usual care for 5 weeks. During the week 5 office visit, distance caregivers are not present.

ARM II: Participants receive usual care for 5 weeks. During the week 5 visit, distance caregivers virtually attend using the CLOSER intervention with computer video and audio connection.

After completion of study, participants are followed up within 48-96 hours.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
7 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
A Computer-Based Intervention for Distance Caregivers of Parents With Advanced Cancer
Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm I (usual care)

Participants receive usual care (care from physician, physician nurse, and social worker) for 5 weeks. During the week 5 office visit, distance caregivers are not present. In the pre-physician interview patients will verbally complete the FACT, POMS-B, Tension-Anxiety subscale, Distress Thermometer. Distance caregivers will verbally complete the POMS-B, Tension-Anxiety subscale, and Distress Thermometer

Procedure: Usual care
Health care provided by physician, physician's nurse, and social worker

Other: Distress Thermometer
Average score of a one item scale (range 0-10) where higher scores indicate more distress

Other: Profile of Mood States (POMS-B)
average score of five items scored 0-4 which describe how someone is feeling. Higher scores indicate increased discomfort

Other: Quality of Life: Functional Assessment in Cancer Therapy - (FACT)
Average score of FACT which quantitatively assesses brain cancer patient's physiological functional and quality of life. FACT questions are scored 0-4 with higher numbers indicating more functionality

Other: Tension-Anxiety Subscale
six item scale which asks to qualitatively describe which areas in you life are causing stress

Experimental: Arm II (usual care with CLOSER intervention)

Participants receive usual care (care from physician, physician nurse, and social worker) for 5 weeks. During the week 5 office visit, distance caregivers will use a computer-assisted intervention to be present electronically with video and audio feed to provide psychosocial support. In the pre-physician interview patients will verbally complete the FACT, POMS-B, Tension-Anxiety subscale, Distress Thermometer. Distance caregivers will verbally complete the POMS-B, Tension-Anxiety subscale, and Distress Thermometer. Up to 96 hours after the week 5 visit, patients and caregivers will be interviewed about their experience during the intervention

Procedure: Usual care
Health care provided by physician, physician's nurse, and social worker

Other: computer-assisted intervention
Caregiver will virtually attend visit using the CLOSER intervention

Other: Distress Thermometer
Average score of a one item scale (range 0-10) where higher scores indicate more distress

Other: Profile of Mood States (POMS-B)
average score of five items scored 0-4 which describe how someone is feeling. Higher scores indicate increased discomfort

Other: Quality of Life: Functional Assessment in Cancer Therapy - (FACT)
Average score of FACT which quantitatively assesses brain cancer patient's physiological functional and quality of life. FACT questions are scored 0-4 with higher numbers indicating more functionality

Other: Tension-Anxiety Subscale
six item scale which asks to qualitatively describe which areas in you life are causing stress

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Primary stressors (type and stage/grade of cancer, and patient QOL) [Baseline]

    Regression analysis will be run to explore the influence of primary stressors and structural factors on patient and caregiver outcomes (anxiety and distress).

  2. effect of CLOSER intervention on caregiver anxiety [Up to 96 hours after week 5 visit]

    A two sample t-test will be conducted to compare differences in baseline to post-treatment POMS-B scores between the usual care and intervention caregiver groups

  3. Frequency of technological errors [Up to 96 hours after week 5 visit]

    Will be used to determine the feasibility of using Adobe's computer-based web communication system.

  4. Length of time of physician office visit [Up to 96 hours after week 5 visit]

    Will be used to determine the feasibility of using Adobe's computer-based web communication system.

  5. Perceived ease of use [Up to 96 hours after week 5 visit]

    Will be used to determine the feasibility of using Adobe's computer-based web communication system.

  6. effect of CLOSER intervention on caregiver distress [Up to 96 hours after week 5 visit]

    A two sample t-test will be conducted to compare differences in baseline to post-treatment Distress Thermometer scores between the usual care and intervention caregiver groups

  7. effect of CLOSER intervention on patient distress [Up to 96 hours after week 5 visit]

    A two sample t-test will be conducted to compare differences in baseline to post-treatment Distress Thermometer scores between the usual care and intervention patient groups

  8. effect of CLOSER intervention on patient anxiety [Up to 96 hours after week 5 visit]

    A two sample t-test will be conducted to compare differences in baseline to post-treatment POMS-B scores between the usual care and intervention patient groups

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
INCLUSION CRITERIA FOR PATIENTS:
  • Having a diagnosis of advanced lung cancer or malignant brain tumor for two to six months

  • Receiving on-going care from the medical oncologist at the Seidman Cancer Center

  • Having a primary and distance caregiver involved in their care, support, and/or care planning

  • English as a primary language

  • Capacity to provide informed consent, as validated by the oncologist

INCLUSION CRITERIA FOR DISTANCE CAREGIVERS:
  • Family caregiver of a patient with advanced lung cancer or malignant brain tumor

  • Patient and distance caregiver perception that this caregiver's geographic location is such that precludes routine participation in medical appointments

  • English as primary language

  • Capable of providing informed consent

  • Computer ownership with internet access

Exclusion Criteria:
EXCLUSION CRITERIA FOR PATIENTS:
  • No primary caregiver

  • Enrolled in hospice

EXCLUSION CRITERIA FOR DISTANCE CAREGIVERS:
  • Those who routinely participate in most of the patient's medical appointments (once or more per month)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Case Comprehensive Cancer Center Cleveland Ohio United States 44106-5065

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sara Douglas, RN, PhD, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02128373
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CASE3Z11
  • NCI-2014-00812
  • CASE3Z11
  • CASE 3Z11
  • P30CA043703
First Posted:
May 1, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Feb 18, 2015
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2015
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 18, 2015