Conventional vs. Distal Radial Access Outcomes in STEMI Patients Treated by PCI
Sponsor
Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06013813
Collaborator
(none)
2,922
1
2
17.1
171.4
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This clinical trial aims to compare conventional radial access versus distal radial access in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI. The main question it aims to answer is:
• Mayor adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days in STEMI patients treated by PCI are not inferior when comparing the distal radial approach versus the conventional radial approach ?
Participants will:
-
sign the informed consent to enroll in the clinical trial.
-
will agree to be treated by PCI
-
will be randomized 1:1 to perform PCI by conventional radial or distal radial approach.
If there is a comparison group:
Researchers will compare conventional radial access vs distal radial access to see if the distal approach is not inferior compared to the conventional radial access in order to offer less or equal MACE and a similar rate of a successful procedure.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment
:
2922 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Adverse Clinical Outcomes Associated With Conventional Versus Distal Radial Access in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome With ST-segment Elevation Treated by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Anticipated Study Start Date
:
Sep 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date
:
Dec 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date
:
Feb 1, 2025
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Active Comparator: conventional radial access STEMI interventional treatment via conventional radial access |
Procedure: percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Conventional vs distal radial access will be selected with computer randomization 1:1
|
| Active Comparator: distal radial access STEMI interventional treatment via distal radial access |
Procedure: percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Conventional vs distal radial access will be selected with computer randomization 1:1
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- composite of adverse events of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular event, BARC 3 (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) [30 days after PCI]
death, myocardial infarction and cerebral vascular event at 30 days (yes / no), bleeding measure will be with BARC classification.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years
and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
-
STEMI patients underwent PCI.
-
Patent radial access (distal and conventional)
-
Patients who agree to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Cardiogenic shock.
-
Previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
-
Absence of palpable radial pulse.
-
Arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis.
-
Previous radial artery occlusion.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez | Mexico City | Mexico |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez
Investigators
- Study Chair: Guering Eid Lidt, PhD, Guering Eid-Lidt
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
- Aminian A, Sgueglia GA, Wiemer M, Kefer J, Gasparini GL, Ruzsa Z, van Leeuwen MAH, Ungureanu C, Leibundgut G, Vandeloo B, Kedev S, Bernat I, Ratib K, Iglesias JF, Al Hage E, Posteraro GA, Pascut D, Maes F, Regazzoli D, Kakonyi K, Meijers TA, Colletti G, Krivoshei L, Lochy S, Zafirovska B, Horak D, Nolan J, Degrauwe S, Tobita K, Saito S. Distal Versus Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: The DISCO RADIAL Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun 27;15(12):1191-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.032. Epub 2022 May 17.
- Bernat I, Aminian A, Pancholy S, Mamas M, Gaudino M, Nolan J, Gilchrist IC, Saito S, Hahalis GN, Ziakas A, Louvard Y, Montalescot G, Sgueglia GA, van Leeuwen MAH, Babunashvili AM, Valgimigli M, Rao SV, Bertrand OF; RAO International Group. Best Practices for the Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Diagnostic Angiography and Intervention: An International Consensus Paper. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 25;12(22):2235-2246. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.07.043.
- Eid-Lidt G, Reyes-Carrera J, Farjat-Pasos JI, Saenz AL, Bravo CA, Rangel SN, Salido DZ, Vega Servin NS, Soto-Lopez ME, Gaspar J. Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion of 3 Hemostatic Methods in Transradial Intervention for Coronary Angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 May 23;15(10):1022-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.03.011.
- Eid-Lidt G, Rivera Rodriguez A, Jimenez Castellanos J, Farjat Pasos JI, Estrada Lopez KE, Gaspar J. Distal Radial Artery Approach to Prevent Radial Artery Occlusion Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 22;14(4):378-385. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.013.
- Ferrante G, Condello F, Rao SV, Maurina M, Jolly S, Stefanini GG, Reimers B, Condorelli G, Lefevre T, Pancholy SB, Bertrand O, Valgimigli M. Distal vs Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and/or Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov 28;15(22):2297-2311. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.09.006.
- Ferrante G, Rao SV, Juni P, Da Costa BR, Reimers B, Condorelli G, Anzuini A, Jolly SS, Bertrand OF, Krucoff MW, Windecker S, Valgimigli M. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul 25;9(14):1419-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
- Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemela K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Niemela M, Valentin V, Lewis BS, Avezum A, Steg PG, Rao SV, Gao P, Afzal R, Joyner CD, Chrolavicius S, Mehta SR; RIVAL trial group. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011 Apr 23;377(9775):1409-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2. Epub 2011 Apr 4. Erratum In: Lancet. 2011 Apr 23;377(9775):1408. Lancet. 2011 Jul 2;378(9785):30.
- Mamas MA, Anderson SG, Carr M, Ratib K, Buchan I, Sirker A, Fraser DG, Hildick-Smith D, de Belder M, Ludman PF, Nolan J; British Cardiovascular Intervention Society; National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research. Baseline bleeding risk and arterial access site practice in relation to procedural outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 14;64(15):1554-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.075.
- Mason PJ, Shah B, Tamis-Holland JE, Bittl JA, Cohen MG, Safirstein J, Drachman DE, Valle JA, Rhodes D, Gilchrist IC; American Heart Association Interventional Cardiovascular Care Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; and Council on Genomic and Precision Medicine. An Update on Radial Artery Access and Best Practices for Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e000035. doi: 10.1161/HCV.0000000000000035.
- Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, Kaul S, Wiviott SD, Menon V, Nikolsky E, Serebruany V, Valgimigli M, Vranckx P, Taggart D, Sabik JF, Cutlip DE, Krucoff MW, Ohman EM, Steg PG, White H. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449. No abstract available.
- Mehta SR, Jolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, Rao SV, Cheema AN, Steg PG, Cantor WJ, Dzavik V, Budaj A, Rokoss M, Valentin V, Gao P, Yusuf S; RIVAL Investigators. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 18;60(24):2490-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.050. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
- Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabro P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T, Rubartelli P, Briguori C, Ando G, Repetto A, Limbruno U, Cortese B, Sganzerla P, Lupi A, Galli M, Colangelo S, Ierna S, Ausiello A, Presbitero P, Sardella G, Varbella F, Esposito G, Santarelli A, Tresoldi S, Nazzaro M, Zingarelli A, de Cesare N, Rigattieri S, Tosi P, Palmieri C, Brugaletta S, Rao SV, Heg D, Rothenbuhler M, Vranckx P, Juni P; MATRIX Investigators. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2465-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
Responsible Party:
Guering Eid Lidt,
Director of Cardiac Catheterization Lab,
Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06013813
Other Study ID Numbers:
- 23-1367
First Posted:
Aug 28, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Aug 28, 2023
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Guering Eid Lidt,
Director of Cardiac Catheterization Lab,
Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez
Additional relevant MeSH terms: