Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-flap Technique Versus Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With Roux-en-Y Reconstruction for Proximal Early Gastric Cancer

Sponsor
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05890339
Collaborator
First Hospital of China Medical University (Other), Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (Other), Liaoning Tumor Hospital & Institute (Other), Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital (Other), Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University (Other), Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Other), First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Other), First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (Other), Zunyi Medical College (Other), Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute (Other), Gansu Provincial Hospital (Other), Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University (Other), The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Other), Qinghai Province Cancer Hospital (Other), LanZhou University (Other)
216
1
2
119
1.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Proximal early gastric cancer can choose radical total gastrectomy or proximal gastrectomy. But if use simple esophagogastric anastomosis for proximal gastrectomy, the incidence of postoperative reflux esophagitis is up to 62%, which seriously affects the quality of life, and the short-term outcome is poorer than the total gastrectomy. If the incidence of postoperative reflux esophagitis can be reduced, proximal gastrectomy would be the treatment choice for proximal early gastric cancer, which may more improve both quality of life and nutritional status than total gastrectomy.

Double-flap technique is a new surgical procedure for the reconstruction between esophagus and remnant stomach, which was started to be applied to digestive tract reconstruction in patients with proximal early gastric cancer in 2016. It can reduce the occurrence of reflux oesophagitis. At present, the studies for double-flap technique in China and other countries are mostly retrospective studies, and there are short of large-scale prospective studies and evidence of evidence-based medicine.

The applicant has initiated a phase II, single center, single arm study and the results suggested that the laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap reconstruction technique was safe and effective for treating proximal early gastric cancer. To further validate the short and long-term outcomes of this procedure, a multicentre, open label, prospective, superiority and randomised controlled clinical trial was set up to compare laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique with laparoscopic total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for proximal early gastric cancer. It include 216 patients with proximal early gastric cancer. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients who develop reflux esophagitis within 12 months after surgery. The short and long-term oncological outcomes are also explored. This trial can provide high-grade evidence of evidence-based medicine for double-flap technique's clinical applications .

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-flap Technique
  • Procedure: Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With Roux-en-Y Reconstruction
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
216 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-flap Technique Versus Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With Roux-en-Y Reconstruction for Proximal Early Gastric Cancer: a Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jun 10, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 10, 2029
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
May 10, 2033

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-flap Technique

Procedure: Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-flap Technique
Patients in this group receive laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with D1+/D2 lymph node dissection(D1+ for stage IA:Nos.1, 2, 3a, 4 sa, 4 sb, 7, 8a, 9, 11p;D2 for stage IB: Nos.1, 2, 3a, 4 sa, 4 sb, 7, 8a, 9, 11p and 11d). The double-flap technique is used for the esophagogastric reconstruction.

Active Comparator: Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With Roux-en-Y Reconstruction

Procedure: Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With Roux-en-Y Reconstruction
Patients in this group receive laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D1+/D2 lymph node dissection(D1+ for stage IA:Nos.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8a, 9, 11p;D2 for stage IB: Nos.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8a, 9, 11p and 11d, 12a). The Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy method is used for the esophagojejunal reconstruction.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. The Proportion of Patients With Reflux Esophagitis Within 12 Months Postoperatively [12 months postoperatively]

    During follow-up endoscopy 1 year after surgery, reflux esophagitis are graded according to the Los Angeles (LA) classification.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Quality of Life after Surgery [Follow-up evaluations are performed 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively]

    Quality of life(QoL) is evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 30-item core QoL (QLQ-C30 ver.3.0). Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  2. Gastrointestinal Symptoms after Surgery [Follow-up evaluations are performed 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively]

    gastrointestinal symptoms are assessed by Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) questionnaires. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

  3. Changes in hemoglobin levels at Follow-up [Follow-up evaluations are performed 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.]

    blood hemoglobin(g/L) levels

  4. Changes in Vitamin B12 levels at Follow-up [Follow-up evaluations are performed 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.]

    blood Vitamin B12(μg/ml) levels

  5. Changes in total protein levels at Follow-up [Follow-up evaluations are performed 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.]

    blood total protein(g/L) levels

  6. Changes in serum albumin levels at Follow-up [Follow-up evaluations are performed 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.]

    blood serum albumin(g/L) levels

  7. Changes in prealbumin levels at Follow-up [Follow-up evaluations are performed 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.]

    blood prealbumin(g/L) levels

  8. Late Postoperative Morbidity [Follow-up evaluations are performed 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.]

    adhesive ileus, anastomosis stenosis, malnutrition, dumping syndrome. All postoperative complications are classified according to the Clavien-Dindo(CD) classification standard.

  9. Early Postoperative Morbidity [From surgery to discharge, up to 30 days]

    operation wound with seroma, hematoma, infection, dehiscence, or evisceration, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, abdominal bleeding, abdominal abscess, intestinal obstruction morbidity, gastrointestinal bleeding, gastroparesis, postoperative pancreatitis, pancreatic fistula, chylous leakage, lung morbidity, cerebrovascular morbidity, cardiovascular morbidity, deep vein thrombosis, cholecystitis, liver dysfunction, kidney dysfunction. All postoperative complications are classified according to the Clavien-Dindo(CD) classification standard.

  10. Short-term Clinical Outcome After Surgery [From surgery to discharge, up to 30 days]

    time to pass gas(hours)

  11. Short-term Clinical Outcome After Surgery [From surgery to discharge, up to 30 days]

    time to oral intake(hours)

  12. Short-term Clinical Outcome After Surgery [From surgery to discharge, up to 30 days]

    time to indwell gastric tube(hours)

  13. Short-term Clinical Outcome After Surgery [From surgery to discharge, up to 30 days]

    length of postoperative hospitalisation(days)

  14. Surgical Characteristics [24 hours postoperatively]

    operative time(minutes)

  15. Surgical Characteristics [24 hours postoperatively]

    time for reconstruction the digestive tract(minutes) during surgery

  16. Surgical Characteristics [24 hours postoperatively]

    blood loss(ml) during surgery

  17. 3-year disease-free survival rate [3 years]

    3-year disease-free survival rate

  18. 3-year overall survival rate [3 years]

    3-year overall survival rate

  19. 3-year recurrence pattern [3 years]

    3-year recurrence pattern

  20. 5-year disease-free survival rate [5 years]

    5-year disease-free survival rate

  21. 5-year overall survival rate [5 years]

    5-year overall survival rate

  22. 5-year recurrence pattern [5 years]

    5-year recurrence pattern

  23. body mass index postoperatively [Follow-up evaluations are performed 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.]

    body mass index(kg/m^2)

  24. Quality of Life postoperatively [Follow-up evaluations are performed 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively]

    Quality of life(QoL) is evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) gastric cancer module (QLQ-STO22) questionnaire. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  25. Postoperative pain assessment [Day 1 postoperatively]

    We measured the pain score using visual analog scale(VAS) at 24 hours after the surgery is completed. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  26. Pathological Characteristics [1 week postoperatively]

    lymph nodes dissection extent for each patient in the surgery

  27. Pathological Characteristics [1 week postoperatively]

    number of dissected lymph nodes for each patient in the surgery

  28. Pathological Characteristics [1 week postoperatively]

    R0 resection rate. R0 resection represents complete resection of the tumor, meaning there is no residual tumor.

  29. Proportion of participants die after surgery [From surgery to discharge, up to 30 days]

    mortality rate

  30. Proportion of participants need to rehospitalized after surgery [From surgery to discharge, up to 30 days]

    rehospitalization rate.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
20 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. 20 years ≤ age ≤ 80 years

  2. The primary gastric lesions were located in the proximal third of the stomach

  3. histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma (by preoperative gastrofiberscopy)

  4. clinical stage IA (T1N0M0) or IB (T1N1M0 / T2N0M0) according to the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) staging system(Clinical stage was determined based on the finding of endoscopic ultrasonography and/or thoraco-abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography)

  5. scheduled for laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with D1+/D2 lymphadenectomy or laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D1+/D2 lymphadenectomy , and possible for R0 surgery by this procedures (Lymphadenectomy is performed on the basis of the criteria of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2021 (6th edition).).

  6. The preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status was I-III; The patient's cardiopulmonary function can tolerate laparoscopic surgery.

  7. The patients have signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. history of upper abdominal surgery (except laparoscopic cholecystectomy);

  2. the tumor invades the esophagus 3cm above gastro-esophageal junction (Z-line)

  3. with other malignant diseases or have suffered from other malignant diseases within 5 years

  4. require simultaneous surgery due to complicated with other diseases

  5. women are pregnant or in lactation period

  6. Suffering from serious mental illness

  7. history of continuous systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressive drug treatment within 1 month

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
  • First Hospital of China Medical University
  • Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
  • Liaoning Tumor Hospital & Institute
  • Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital
  • Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
  • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
  • Zunyi Medical College
  • Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute
  • Gansu Provincial Hospital
  • Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
  • Qinghai Province Cancer Hospital
  • LanZhou University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05890339
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • SYSKY-2022-276-02
First Posted:
Jun 6, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Jun 6, 2023
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 6, 2023