PRUE: Premedication With Simethicone or Simethicone Plus N-acetylcysteine in Improving Visibility During Upper Endoscopy

Sponsor
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01653171
Collaborator
(none)
230
1
5
16
14.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether premedication with Simethicone or Simethicone plus N-acetylcysteine are effective improving visibility during Upper endoscopy compared with use of water or no preparation.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Water (Placebo)
  • Drug: Simethicone
  • Drug: N-acetylcysteine 500 mg
  • Drug: N-acetylcysteine 1000 mg
Phase 4

Detailed Description

While globally there has been a downward trend in the incidence of gastric cancer, it remains the second leading cause of cancer mortality in the world. In Chile is the leading cause of death from malignant tumors in both sexes, and is recognized as a problem and public health priority in our country. Detection of gastric cancer in early stages has a huge impact on healing and therefore the prognosis of patients. In countries like Japan, where the incidence of this neoplasm is one of the highest in the world, mass screening programs have failed to demonstrate significant impact at the population level, there is a body of evidence to support endoscopic screening especially with the advent of new minimally invasive procedures such as endoscopic mucosal resection for gastric cancers detected in early stages. In our country, it is estimated that about half of the patients already have lymph node metastases or involvement of adjacent organs at diagnosis. The best way to reduce disease burden from this disease would be through primary prevention interventions or effective early detection. For this purpose the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is the method of choice to examine the gastric mucosa in search of early lesions, and this is the point where adequate visibility of the mucosa is overriding. Mucus, foam and bubbles accumulated in the gastrointestinal tract mucosa interfere with adequate endoscopic visualization and thus represent risk of failing to diagnose early lesions. For this reason is that various anti-foam agents, anti-bubbles are widely used in endoscopic centers mainly in Japan, where its use is almost a rule, unlike the West where its use is limited by the theoretical risk of aspiration. Simethicone has been proven as a good anti-foam agent prior to endoscopy to remove mucus and bubbles. It has also been studied in other scenarios such as colonoscopy as an additive in the preparation of the colon to eliminate bubbles in endoscopic capsule for small bowel preparation as well as Endoscopic Ultrasound which reduces artifacts and increases the accuracy of the study. Currently N-acetylcysteine, a mucolytic agent, either alone or in combination with Simethicone has proven effective in removing mucus and gastric bubbles when used 20 minutes prior to the upper endoscopy, improving the visualization of the gastric mucosa. Other agents such as pronase have also been described as useful in this task are not yet available in our area. In the context of the relevance of gastric cancer in our environment, our low rate of early cancer detection and the absence of national policies on the preparation and agents that may improve visualization of the mucosa, this study aims to compare the effect of products available in our country in preparation for an endoscopy in order to improve visualization of the mucosa and increase the chance of recognizing early lesions.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
230 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Effectiveness of Premedication With Simethicone or Simethicone Plus N-acetylcysteine vs. Placebo in Improving Visibility During Upper Endoscopy.
Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: Control

Standard upper endoscopy withouth premedication

Placebo Comparator: Water

100 mL of water, 20 minutes before upper endoscopy

Drug: Water (Placebo)
Water 100 mL
Other Names:
  • (Placebo)
  • Experimental: Simethicone

    Simethicone 200 mg, in water for up to 100 mL, to take 20 minutes prior to examination

    Drug: Simethicone
    200 mg (5 mL) in water for up to 100 mL, to take 20 minutes prior to examination
    Other Names:
  • Flapex, Andromaco, Chile
  • Experimental: N-acetylcysteine 500 mg + Simethicone

    N-acetylcysteine 500 mg + Simethicone 200 mg in water for up to 100 mL, to take 20 minutes prior to examination

    Drug: Simethicone
    200 mg (5 mL) in water for up to 100 mL, to take 20 minutes prior to examination
    Other Names:
  • Flapex, Andromaco, Chile
  • Drug: N-acetylcysteine 500 mg
    500 mg + Simethicone 200 mg in water for up to 100 mL, to take 20 minutes prior to examination
    Other Names:
  • MucolĂ­tico, Sanitas, Chile
  • Experimental: N-acetylcysteine 1000 mg + Simethicone

    N-acetylcysteine 1000 mg + Simethicone 200 mg in water for up to 100 mL, to take 20 minutes prior to examination

    Drug: Simethicone
    200 mg (5 mL) in water for up to 100 mL, to take 20 minutes prior to examination
    Other Names:
  • Flapex, Andromaco, Chile
  • Drug: N-acetylcysteine 1000 mg
    1000 mg + Simethicone 200 mg in water for up to 100 mL, to take 20 minutes prior to examination
    Other Names:
  • MucolĂ­tico, Sanitas, Chile
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Visibility at upper endoscopy [During diagnostic upper endoscopy]

      The antrum, proximal part of the greater curvature, distal part of the greater curvature and the gastric fundus were assessed separately in terms of visibility mucosa. He scored from 1 to 4 each zone according to a score of visibility, as defined in previous publications by Chang et al. The sum of the scores from the four locations was defined as the total mucosal visibility score (TMVS) for each patient

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Diagnostic upper endoscopy performed for medical indications
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Upper gastrointestinal surgery

    • Gastric Cancer

    • Deep sedation with propofol

    • Indication of therapeutic endoscopy

    • Emergency endoscopy

    • Patients with a history of

    • Upper gastrointestinal bleeding

    • Caustic ingestion

    • Pregnancy

    • Diabetes mellitus

    • Asthma

    • Allergic reactions to medication

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Hospital Clinico Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile Santiago Region Metropolitana Chile 833-0024

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Adolfo Parra-Blanco, MD, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
    • Principal Investigator: Esteban Glasinovic, MD, Pontificia Universidad Catolica
    • Principal Investigator: Hugo Monrroy, MD, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
    • Principal Investigator: Roberto Candia, MD, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Hugo Monrroy, Internal Medicine Physician, Gastroenterology Residency Training Program, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01653171
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 12-221
    First Posted:
    Jul 30, 2012
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 10, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2018
    Keywords provided by Hugo Monrroy, Internal Medicine Physician, Gastroenterology Residency Training Program, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 10, 2018