SASS: Single-incision Versus Retropubic Mid-Urethral Sling (Solyx) for SUI During Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
SASS (Single-incision Versus Retropubic Mid-Urethral Sling (Solyx) for SUI During Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy) will be a multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind non-inferiority trial.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
SASS aims to compare the efficacy of a single-incision (SIS) versus a retropubic mid-urethral sling (RP) placed at the time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy in women with pelvic organ prolapse and objectively confirmed stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: RP Sling Group Participants assigned to the retropubic (RP) sling group will have the RP sling placement procedure |
Device: RP Sling
Participants assigned to the retropubic (RP) sling group will have the RP sling placement procedure.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: SIS Group Participants assigned to the single-incision sling (SIS) group will have the SIS placement procedure |
Device: SIS
Participants assigned to the single-incision sling (SIS) group will have the SIS placement procedure.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of participants with subjectively bothersome stress incontinence [6 weeks after surgery]
Measured by a positive response of > 1 to Question 17 on Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form-20 (PFDI-20). Response scale from 0 to 4. Symptoms Not Present = NO 0 = not present Symptoms Present = YES, scale of bother: 1 = not at all, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit
- Number of participants with subjectively bothersome stress incontinence [1 year after surgery]
Measured by a positive response of > 1 to Question 17 on Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form-20 (PFDI-20). Response scale from 0 to 4. Symptoms Not Present = NO 0 = not present Symptoms Present = YES, scale of bother: 1 = not at all, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit
- Number of participants with subjectively bothersome stress incontinence [3 years after surgery]
Measured by a positive response of > 1 to Question 17 on Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form-20 (PFDI-20). Response scale from 0 to 4. Symptoms Not Present = NO 0 = not present Symptoms Present = YES, scale of bother: 1 = not at all, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit
- Number of participants with subjectively bothersome stress incontinence [5 years after surgery]
Measured by a positive response of > 1 to Question 17 on Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form-20 (PFDI-20). Response scale from 0 to 4. Symptoms Not Present = NO 0 = not present Symptoms Present = YES, scale of bother: 1 = not at all, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit
Secondary Outcome Measures
- VAS (Visual Analogue Scale Surgeon ease of Use) [Baseline, Surgery, Post Op: week 2, week 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, and year 5]
This will be assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS). The score is 0-10, with higher scores denoting a greater degree of satisfaction.
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Functioning Short Form (PISQ-IR) [Baseline, Surgery, Post Op: week 2, week 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, and year 5]
Questionnaire consists of 20 questions regarding sexual functioning. PISQ-IR consists of two parts. Part 1, for not Sexually Active (NSA) women, and par 2 for SA women. Response value varies from 1 to 5. Part 1, for not SA (NSA) women, where higher scores indicate a greater impact of the condition on sexual inactivity. Part 2, for SA women, with higher scores indicating better sexual function.
- Pelvic Floor Impact (PFIQ-SF7) [Baseline, Surgery, Post Op: week 2, week 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, and year 5]
Consists of 3 scales with each 7 questions and will be used to assess quality of life regarding pelvic floor related quality of life. The total score is the sum of the three scale score with a range of 0-300. Higher values indicate a greater degree of bother
- Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) [Baseline, Surgery, Post Op: week 2, week 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, and year 5]
7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative baseline - lower scores denote improvement - 1= Very much better to 7 = Very much worse
- Assessment of post-void residual (PVR) volume [Baseline, Surgery, Post Op: week 2, week 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, and year 5]
Post Void Residual/PVR measurement - (collected via bladder scan or CIC) (Clean Intermittent Catheterization). PVR can be as minimum as 0ml of an average bladder capacity of 400ml
- Number of Participants needing Retreatment [6 month up to 5 year post-surgery]
Surgical intervention for urinary retention (sling lysis) at any time point after surgery
- Number of Participants needing bladder drainage [beyond 6 weeks post-surgery]
Requirement of urinary catheter due to incontinence or retention
- Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-SF20) [Baseline, Surgery, Post Op: week 2, week 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, and year 5]
The PFDI-20 has a total of 20 questions and 3 scales (Urinary Distress Inventory, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory, and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory). The outcomes of this questionnaire will be evaluated stratified by compartment. Each item produces a response of 0 to 4, the average response in each scale is multiplied by 25 to obtain the scale score (range 0 to 100). The total score is the sum of the three scale score with a range of 0-300. Higher values indicate a greater degree of bother.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
At least 21 years of age
-
Vaginal bulge symptoms as indicated by an affirmative response of >1 to question 3 of the PFDI-SF20
-
POP ≥ stage II according to the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system45, with evidence of apical descent
-
Women being considered for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (with or without concomitant hysterectomy)
-
Objective SUI: positive standardized cough stress test on clinical examination or on urodynamic study with reduced prolapse
-
Understanding and acceptance of the need to return for all scheduled follow-up visits and willing to complete study questionnaires
-
Able to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Prior surgery for stress urinary incontinence including mid-urethral sling; Burch/MMK; fascial pubovaginal sling (autologous, xenograft or allograft); and urethral bulking injection
-
Any serious disease, or chronic condition, that could interfere with the study compliance
-
Unwilling to have a synthetic sling
-
Untreated and unresolved urinary tract infection
-
Poorly-controlled diabetes mellitus (HgbA1c > 9 within 3 months of surgery date)
-
Neurogenic bladder/ pre-operative self-catheterization
-
Elevated post-void residual/PVR (>150 ml) that does not resolve with prolapse reduction testing (pessary, prolapse reduced uroflow or micturition study)
-
Prior pelvic radiation
-
Inflammatory bowel disease
-
Current genitourinary fistula or urethral diverticulum
-
Planned concomitant bowel related surgery including sphincteroplasty and perineal rectal prolapse surgery, rectovaginal fistula repair, hemorrhoidectomy
-
Pregnant or Planning to Conceive
-
Incarcerated
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Florida Robotic and Minimally Invasive Urogynecology | Coconut Creek | Florida | United States | 33073 |
2 | Augusta University | Augusta | Georgia | United States | 30912 |
3 | Northwestern Medicine | Chicago | Illinois | United States | 60611 |
4 | Boston Urogynecology Associates | Cambridge | Massachusetts | United States | 02138 |
5 | Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | United States | 27101 |
6 | Pelvic Floor Foundation of South Africa, University of Cape Town | Cape Town | South Africa | 8001 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Boston Scientific Corporation
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Catherine A Matthews, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- IRB00068839