SASS: Single-incision Versus Retropubic Mid-Urethral Sling (Solyx) for SUI During Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy

Sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04586166
Collaborator
Boston Scientific Corporation (Industry)
180
6
2
95.3
30
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

SASS (Single-incision Versus Retropubic Mid-Urethral Sling (Solyx) for SUI During Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy) will be a multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind non-inferiority trial.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: RP Sling
  • Device: SIS
N/A

Detailed Description

SASS aims to compare the efficacy of a single-incision (SIS) versus a retropubic mid-urethral sling (RP) placed at the time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy in women with pelvic organ prolapse and objectively confirmed stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
180 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Masking Description:
Participants will be masked during the five-year follow-up period. Precautions will be taken to minimize unmasking the study groups. Since RP (retropubic) slings require two suprapubic stab incisions, identical sham incision will also be performed in the SIS (Single-Incision Sling) group.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
SASS: Randomized Trial of Single-incision Versus Retropubic Mid-Urethral Sling (Solyx) for Concomitant Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence During Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy
Actual Study Start Date :
Dec 23, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2028
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2028

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: RP Sling Group

Participants assigned to the retropubic (RP) sling group will have the RP sling placement procedure

Device: RP Sling
Participants assigned to the retropubic (RP) sling group will have the RP sling placement procedure.
Other Names:
  • Advantage RP Sling
  • Experimental: SIS Group

    Participants assigned to the single-incision sling (SIS) group will have the SIS placement procedure

    Device: SIS
    Participants assigned to the single-incision sling (SIS) group will have the SIS placement procedure.
    Other Names:
  • Solyx SIS System
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Number of participants with subjectively bothersome stress incontinence [6 weeks after surgery]

      Measured by a positive response of > 1 to Question 17 on Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form-20 (PFDI-20). Response scale from 0 to 4. Symptoms Not Present = NO 0 = not present Symptoms Present = YES, scale of bother: 1 = not at all, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit

    2. Number of participants with subjectively bothersome stress incontinence [1 year after surgery]

      Measured by a positive response of > 1 to Question 17 on Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form-20 (PFDI-20). Response scale from 0 to 4. Symptoms Not Present = NO 0 = not present Symptoms Present = YES, scale of bother: 1 = not at all, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit

    3. Number of participants with subjectively bothersome stress incontinence [3 years after surgery]

      Measured by a positive response of > 1 to Question 17 on Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form-20 (PFDI-20). Response scale from 0 to 4. Symptoms Not Present = NO 0 = not present Symptoms Present = YES, scale of bother: 1 = not at all, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit

    4. Number of participants with subjectively bothersome stress incontinence [5 years after surgery]

      Measured by a positive response of > 1 to Question 17 on Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form-20 (PFDI-20). Response scale from 0 to 4. Symptoms Not Present = NO 0 = not present Symptoms Present = YES, scale of bother: 1 = not at all, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. VAS (Visual Analogue Scale Surgeon ease of Use) [Baseline, Surgery, Post Op: week 2, week 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, and year 5]

      This will be assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS). The score is 0-10, with higher scores denoting a greater degree of satisfaction.

    2. Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Functioning Short Form (PISQ-IR) [Baseline, Surgery, Post Op: week 2, week 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, and year 5]

      Questionnaire consists of 20 questions regarding sexual functioning. PISQ-IR consists of two parts. Part 1, for not Sexually Active (NSA) women, and par 2 for SA women. Response value varies from 1 to 5. Part 1, for not SA (NSA) women, where higher scores indicate a greater impact of the condition on sexual inactivity. Part 2, for SA women, with higher scores indicating better sexual function.

    3. Pelvic Floor Impact (PFIQ-SF7) [Baseline, Surgery, Post Op: week 2, week 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, and year 5]

      Consists of 3 scales with each 7 questions and will be used to assess quality of life regarding pelvic floor related quality of life. The total score is the sum of the three scale score with a range of 0-300. Higher values indicate a greater degree of bother

    4. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) [Baseline, Surgery, Post Op: week 2, week 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, and year 5]

      7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative baseline - lower scores denote improvement - 1= Very much better to 7 = Very much worse

    5. Assessment of post-void residual (PVR) volume [Baseline, Surgery, Post Op: week 2, week 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, and year 5]

      Post Void Residual/PVR measurement - (collected via bladder scan or CIC) (Clean Intermittent Catheterization). PVR can be as minimum as 0ml of an average bladder capacity of 400ml

    6. Number of Participants needing Retreatment [6 month up to 5 year post-surgery]

      Surgical intervention for urinary retention (sling lysis) at any time point after surgery

    7. Number of Participants needing bladder drainage [beyond 6 weeks post-surgery]

      Requirement of urinary catheter due to incontinence or retention

    8. Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-SF20) [Baseline, Surgery, Post Op: week 2, week 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, and year 5]

      The PFDI-20 has a total of 20 questions and 3 scales (Urinary Distress Inventory, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory, and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory). The outcomes of this questionnaire will be evaluated stratified by compartment. Each item produces a response of 0 to 4, the average response in each scale is multiplied by 25 to obtain the scale score (range 0 to 100). The total score is the sum of the three scale score with a range of 0-300. Higher values indicate a greater degree of bother.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    21 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • At least 21 years of age

    • Vaginal bulge symptoms as indicated by an affirmative response of >1 to question 3 of the PFDI-SF20

    • POP ≥ stage II according to the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system45, with evidence of apical descent

    • Women being considered for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (with or without concomitant hysterectomy)

    • Objective SUI: positive standardized cough stress test on clinical examination or on urodynamic study with reduced prolapse

    • Understanding and acceptance of the need to return for all scheduled follow-up visits and willing to complete study questionnaires

    • Able to give informed consent

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Prior surgery for stress urinary incontinence including mid-urethral sling; Burch/MMK; fascial pubovaginal sling (autologous, xenograft or allograft); and urethral bulking injection

    • Any serious disease, or chronic condition, that could interfere with the study compliance

    • Unwilling to have a synthetic sling

    • Untreated and unresolved urinary tract infection

    • Poorly-controlled diabetes mellitus (HgbA1c > 9 within 3 months of surgery date)

    • Neurogenic bladder/ pre-operative self-catheterization

    • Elevated post-void residual/PVR (>150 ml) that does not resolve with prolapse reduction testing (pessary, prolapse reduced uroflow or micturition study)

    • Prior pelvic radiation

    • Inflammatory bowel disease

    • Current genitourinary fistula or urethral diverticulum

    • Planned concomitant bowel related surgery including sphincteroplasty and perineal rectal prolapse surgery, rectovaginal fistula repair, hemorrhoidectomy

    • Pregnant or Planning to Conceive

    • Incarcerated

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Florida Robotic and Minimally Invasive Urogynecology Coconut Creek Florida United States 33073
    2 Augusta University Augusta Georgia United States 30912
    3 Northwestern Medicine Chicago Illinois United States 60611
    4 Boston Urogynecology Associates Cambridge Massachusetts United States 02138
    5 Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center Winston-Salem North Carolina United States 27101
    6 Pelvic Floor Foundation of South Africa, University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa 8001

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    • Boston Scientific Corporation

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Catherine A Matthews, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04586166
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • IRB00068839
    First Posted:
    Oct 14, 2020
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 28, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    Yes
    Keywords provided by Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jul 28, 2022