FADeS: Fractional Laser Assisted Delivery of Sculptra® for the Treatment of Striae

Sponsor
Henry Ford Health System (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03858543
Collaborator
Galderma R&D (Industry)
10
1
2
18.6
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the efficacy of treatment of striae distensae using the combined modality of fractional laser and poly-L lactic acid (Sculptra).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Poly-L Lactic Acid
  • Device: Fractional laser treatment
Early Phase 1

Detailed Description

Striae Distensae (SD) is a form of scarring that can oftentimes be quite disfiguring and emotionally distressing to individuals.

Fractional laser therapy has been used by doctors to treat stretch marks by stimulating collagen growth.

Poly-L lactic acid also promotes collagen growth in the areas injected.

The combination of laser and poly-L lactic acid might provide the optimal treatment modality for SD by decreasing the appearance of atrophic scars.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
10 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Fractional Laser Assisted Delivery of Sculptra® for the Treatment of Striae: FADeS Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 15, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 31, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 31, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Fractional laser treatment & Poly-L Lactic Acid (Sculptra)

One Fractional laser treatment on half of the body with Sciton Laser and Scluptra

Drug: Poly-L Lactic Acid
After initial treatment, reassessment will be conducted at 3 follow-up visits. Photographs will be taken for blinded evaluators to compare post-treatment to the original pre-treatment photographs. At final visit, a questionnaire will be administered to rate treatment satisfaction.
Other Names:
  • Sculptra
  • Device: Fractional laser treatment
    After initial treatment, reassessment will be conducted at 3 follow-up visits. Photographs will be taken for blinded evaluators to compare post-treatment to the original pre-treatment photographs. At final visit, a questionnaire will be administered to rate treatment satisfaction.
    Other Names:
  • Sciton Laser
  • Active Comparator: Fractional laser treatment

    One Fractional laser treatment on half of the body with Sciton Laser

    Device: Fractional laser treatment
    After initial treatment, reassessment will be conducted at 3 follow-up visits. Photographs will be taken for blinded evaluators to compare post-treatment to the original pre-treatment photographs. At final visit, a questionnaire will be administered to rate treatment satisfaction.
    Other Names:
  • Sciton Laser
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in Stretch Mark Size [Baseline (Pre-treatment) vs. 3 Months, 4 Months, 5 Months, 6 Months]

      Modified Manchester Scar Scale was used to assess stretch mark reduction compared to pre-treatment photographs. The range of each subscale is between 4-26. A higher value represents a worse outcome. A value of 26 is the maximum score and represents the worst outcome. A value of 4 is the minimum score and represents the best outcome. Subscales are then summed to compute a total score.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Treatments Superiority Assessment [3 Months]

      Modified Manchester Scar Scale was used to assess and judge whether erbium-YAG fractionated laser therapy plus Sculptra is superior to laser therapy alone. The range of each subscale is between 4-26. A higher value represents a worse outcome. A value of 26 is the maximum score and represents the worst outcome. A value of 4 is the minimum score and represents the best outcome. Subscales are then summed to compute a total score.

    2. Treatments Superiority Assessment [4 Months]

      Modified Manchester Scar Scale was used to assess and judge whether erbium-YAG fractionated laser therapy plus Sculptra is superior to laser therapy alone. The range of each subscale is between 4-26. A higher value represents a worse outcome. A value of 26 is the maximum score and represents the worst outcome. A value of 4 is the minimum score and represents the best outcome. Subscales are then summed to compute a total score.

    3. Treatments Superiority Assessment [5 Months]

      Modified Manchester Scar Scale was used to assess and judge whether erbium-YAG fractionated laser therapy plus Sculptra is superior to laser therapy alone. The range of each subscale is between 4-26. A higher value represents a worse outcome. A value of 26 is the maximum score and represents the worst outcome. A value of 4 is the minimum score and represents the best outcome. Subscales are then summed to compute a total score.

    4. Treatments Superiority Assessment [6 Months]

      Modified Manchester Scar Scale was used to assess and judge whether erbium-YAG fractionated laser therapy plus Sculptra is superior to laser therapy alone. The range of each subscale is between 4-26. A higher value represents a worse outcome. A value of 26 is the maximum score and represents the worst outcome. A value of 4 is the minimum score and represents the best outcome. Subscales are then summed to compute a total score.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Subject has bilateral striae alba

    • Subject has stable body weight for at least 6 months with Fitzpatrick skin type 1-4

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Subject has striae rubra

    • Pregnant

    • History of adverse effects to phototherapy

    • Subject has single sided lesions

    • Subject has immunosuppression

    • Subject has radiation therapy to the study area

    • Subject has topical or oral steroid use or chemotherapy within the last 6 months

    • History of keloids or hypertrophic scar

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Henry Ford Health System Detroit Michigan United States 48202

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Henry Ford Health System
    • Galderma R&D

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    aamir siddiqui, Division Head - Plastic & Reconstruction Surgery, Henry Ford Health System
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03858543
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 11951
    First Posted:
    Feb 28, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 26, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2021
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Keywords provided by aamir siddiqui, Division Head - Plastic & Reconstruction Surgery, Henry Ford Health System
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Aug 26, 2021