OPTIMAS: OPtimal TIMing of Anticoagulation After Acute Ischaemic Stroke : a Randomised Controlled Trial

Sponsor
University College, London (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03759938
Collaborator
(none)
3,478
44
2
39.4
79
2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

OPTIMAS is a large, prospective, partially blinded randomised controlled trial of early (within ≤4 days [96hrs]) or standard (between day 7 and day 14 after stroke onset) initiation of anticoagulation after stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), using any licensed dose of a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). The trial will use a non-inferiority gatekeeper approach to test for non-inferiority of early anticoagulation followed by a test for superiority, if non-inferiority is established.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)
N/A

Detailed Description

Current guidelines do not provide clear recommendations on the timing of OAC after acute AF-related stroke. Current United Kingdom (UK) guidelines for anticoagulation state that "delay for an arbitrary 2-week period is recommended" for "disabling" stroke and that anticoagulation can be started "no later than 14 days" for other strokes, at the prescriber's discretion.

OPTIMAS will investigate whether early initiation of DOAC treatment, within 4 days (96hrs) of onset, in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and AF is as effective as, or better than, standard initiation of DOAC treatment, no sooner than day 7 (>144hrs) and no later than day 14 (<336hrs) after onset, in preventing recurrent ischaemic stroke, systemic embolism and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH)? Participants will be randomised 1:1 to the intervention or control. The exact timing of initiating treatment within each group is at the discretion of the treating clinician.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
3478 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to intervention or control arms of the study. Participants and their physicians will not be blinded to study arm allocation.The exact timing of anticoagulation within the period specified for the allocated study arm is at the discretion of the treating physician, as is the choice of DOAC. Apart from the timing of DOAC initiation, the DOAC should be prescribed in accordance with usual clinical practicePatients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to intervention or control arms of the study. Participants and their physicians will not be blinded to study arm allocation.The exact timing of anticoagulation within the period specified for the allocated study arm is at the discretion of the treating physician, as is the choice of DOAC. Apart from the timing of DOAC initiation, the DOAC should be prescribed in accordance with usual clinical practice
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
The Event Adjudication Committee is a study group (of at least three members) responsible for the review of clinical events to ensure consistent, standardized, objective and unbiased results throughout all participating sites and minimise the likelihood of discrepant interpretations. This group consists of a panel of experts who have the relevant therapeutic area expertise, are experienced in clinical trials, and have been trained on the specific study protocol. The Event Adjudication Committee will centrally review events reported using all available clinical and imaging data and evaluate efficacy and/ or safety endpoints in a blinded and unbiased manner on a regular basis to ensure accurate, consistent and standardized assessments of important study events such as recurrent symptomatic ischaemic stroke, systemic embolism and death.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
OPtimal TIMing of Anticoagulation After Acute Ischaemic Stroke: a Randomised Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 18, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Early initiation of DOAC

Early initiation of any direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) at a dose licensed for stroke prevention in AF, within four days (96hrs) of onset of acute ischaemic stroke

Drug: Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)
Any of the DOACs listed above may be used for treatment in either study arm. The DOAC will be supplied from normal hospital stock, using local hospital prescriptions.
Other Names:
  • dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban
  • Active Comparator: Standard Initiation of DOAC

    Standard initiation of any DOAC at a dose licensed for stroke prevention in AF, no sooner than day 7 and no later than day 14 after the onset of acute ischaemic stroke (i.e. between 144hrs and 336hrs from onset).

    Drug: Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)
    Any of the DOACs listed above may be used for treatment in either study arm. The DOAC will be supplied from normal hospital stock, using local hospital prescriptions.
    Other Names:
  • dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Composite outcome of the combined incidence of:recurrent symptomatic ischaemic stroke,symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and systemic embolism [At 90 days from randomisation]

      OPTIMAS will investigate whether early initiation of DOAC treatment in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation is as effective as, or better than, standard initiation of DOAC treatment in preventing recurrent ischaemic stroke, systemic embolism and sICH.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. All-cause mortality [At 90 days from randomisation]

      All cause mortality reported in both arms

    2. Incidence of vascular death [At 90 days from randomisation]

      Any incidence of vascular death reported in both arms

    3. Incidence of recurrent ischaemic stroke [At 90 days from randomisation]

      Any incidence of recurrent ischaemic stroke reported in both arms

    4. Incidence of systemic embolism [At 90 days from randomisation]

      Any incidence of incidence of systemic embolism reported in both arms

    5. Incidence of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis [DVT], pulmonary embolism [PE], cerebral venous thrombosis [CVT]) [At 90 days from randomisation]

      Any of Incidence of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis [DVT], pulmonary embolism [PE], cerebral venous thrombosis [CVT]) reported in both arms

    6. Functional status assessed by the modified Rankin scale (mRS) in both arms [At 90 days from randomisation]

      The Modified Rankin Scale measures the degree of disability and dependence following a stroke. The scale consists of 7 category descriptions, where 0 means no symptoms, 1 means no significant disability, 2 means slight disability, 3 means moderate disability, 4 means moderately severe disability, 5 means severe disability and 6 means death. The assessment is carried out by asking the participant or their carer about their activities of daily living.

    7. Cognitive ability assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) questionnaire in both arms [At 90 days from randomisation]

      The Montreal Cognitive Assessment is a questionnaire widely used as a screening assessment for detecting cognitive impairment. It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. An abbreviated version of the MoCA assessing attention, verbal learning, memory, executive functions/language and orientation can be performed over the phone. MoCA scores range between 0 and 30. A score of 26 or over is considered to be normal. In a study and people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) scored an average of 22.1.

    8. Quality of life at 90 days assessed by EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 level questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L] in both arms [At 90 days from randomisation]

      The EQ-5D-5L includes 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. In instances in which the participant struggles with giving answers on their own, the participant's next-of-kin or a friend who knows the participant well will be asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L proxy version. The proxy is asked to rate how they think the participant would rate their own health-related quality of life, if the participant were able to communicate it. In case a proxy is not available, the research team member who was looking after the participant will complete it on their behalf.

    9. Patient reported outcomes assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health questionnaire (PROMIS-10) in both arms. [At 90 days from randomisation]

      The PROMIS Global-10 short form consists of 10 items that assess general domains of health and functioning including overall physical health, mental health, social health, pain, fatigue, and overall perceived quality of life. The scoring system of the PROMIS Global-10 allows each of the individual items to be examined separately to provide specific information about perceptions of physical function, pain, fatigue, emotional distress, social health and general perceptions of health where 0 means never experienced this problem or symptoms and 1 means always. The higher score for each response indicate better health.

    10. Ongoing anticoagulation [At 90 days from randomisation]

      Ongoing anticoagulation will be assessed based on patient self-reporting and follow up patient medical records if necessary in both arms

    11. Time to first incidence of primary outcome component (recurrent ischaemic stroke, systemic embolism, or sICH) [At 90 days from randomisation]

      Time to first incidence of primary outcome component (recurrent ischaemic stroke, systemic embolism, or sICH) reported in both arms

    12. Length of hospital stay for stroke-related care [At 90 days from randomisation]

      Length of hospital stay for stroke-related care in both arms

    13. Health and social care resource use [At 90 days from randomisation]

      Health and social care resources (assessed by a study specific questionnaire) in both arms

    14. Incidence of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) [At 90 days from randomisation]

      Incidence of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) classified according to site intracerebral haemorrhage (within the brain parenchyma); subdural haemorrhage; extradural haemorrhage; subarachnoid haemorrhage; and haemorrhagic transformation of a brain infarct, in both arms

    15. Incidence of major extracranial bleeding [At 90 days from randomisation]

      Incidence of major extracranial bleeding reported in both arms

    16. Incidence of all major bleeding (intracranial and extracranial) [At 90 days from randomisation]

      Incidence of all major bleeding (intracranial and extracranial) reported during the study period, in both arms

    17. Incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding [At 90 days from randomisation]

      Incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding reported in both arms

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Ongoing anticoagulation at 90 days [At 90 days from randomisation]

      Ongoing anticoagulation at 90 days assessed by patient self-reporting and/ or follow up patient medical records if necessary.

    2. Individual cognitive domain subscores [At 90 days from randomisation]

      Individual cognitive domain subscores measured using the MoCA questionnaire

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Aged 18 years or over

    2. Clinical diagnosis of acute ischaemic stroke

    3. AF, confirmed by any of:

    4. 12-lead ECG recording

    5. Inpatient ECG telemetry

    6. Other prolonged ECG monitoring technique (e.g. Holter monitor)

    7. Known diagnosis of atrial fibrillation verified by medical records (e.g. primary care records, letter from secondary care)

    8. Eligibility to commence DOAC in accordance with approved prescribing recommendations confirmed by treating physician

    9. Uncertainty on the part of the treating physician regarding early versus standard initiation of DOAC.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Contraindication to anticoagulation:

    2. Coagulopathy or current or recent anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) leading to INR ≥1.7 at randomisation.

    3. Thrombocytopenia (platelets < 75 x 10⁹/L)

    4. Other coagulopathy or bleeding tendency (based on clinical history or laboratory parameters) judged to contraindicate anticoagulation by treating clinician

    5. Contraindication to early anticoagulation

    6. Known presence of haemorrhagic transformation with parenchymal haematoma occupying >30% of the infarct volume and exerting significant mass effect (i.e. PH2) (NB: HI1, HI2 and PH1 are not considered contraindications)

    7. Presence of clinically significant intracranial haemorrhage unrelated to qualifying infarct

    8. Any other contraindication to early anticoagulation as judged by the treating clinician

    9. Contraindication to use of DOAC:

    10. Known allergy or intolerance to both Factor Xa inhibitor and direct thrombin inhibitor

    11. Definite indication for VKA treatment e.g. mechanical heart valve, valvular AF, antiphospholipid syndrome

    12. Severe renal impairment with creatinine clearance (Cockcroft & Gault formula) <15 mL/min (i.e. 14 mL/min or less)

    13. Liver function tests ALT > 2x ULN

    14. Cirrhotic patients with Child Pugh score equating to grade B or C

    15. Patient is taking medication with significant interaction with DOAC, including:

    • Azole antifungals (e.g. ketoconazole, itraconazole)

    • HIV protease inhibitors (e.g. ritonavir)

    • Strong CYP3A4 inducers (e.g. rifampicin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital or St. John's Wort)

    • Dronedarone

    1. Pregnant or breastfeeding women

    2. Presence on acute brain imaging of non-stroke pathology judged likely to explain clinical presentation (e.g. mass lesion, encephalitis)

    3. Inability for patient to be followed up within 90 days of trial entry

    4. Patient or representative refusal to consent to study procedures, including the site informing GP and healthcare professional responsible for anticoagulation care of participants

    5. Any other reason that the PI considers would make the patient unsuitable to enter OPTIMAS.

    Note that current DOAC treatment is NOT an exclusion criterion, as long as the treating physician considers it appropriate to restart (or continue) according to the timings specified in the OPTIMAS trial protocol. Continuation of the DOAC would be recorded as a start time of zero hours.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Bronglais General Hospital, Hywel Dda University Health Board Aberystwyth United Kingdom SY23 1ER
    2 Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust Bath United Kingdom BA1 3NG
    3 Queen Elizabeth Hospital,University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Birmingham United Kingdom B15 2TH
    4 Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Bournemouth United Kingdom BH7 7DW
    5 Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Bradford United Kingdom BD9 6RJ
    6 Broomfield Hospital, Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust Broomfield United Kingdom CM1 7ET
    7 West Suffolk Hospital, West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust Bury Saint Edmunds United Kingdom IP33 2QZ
    8 Addenbrooke's Hospital NHS Trust Cambridge United Kingdom CB2 0QQ
    9 Glangwili General Hospita, Hywel Dda University Health Boardl Carmarthen United Kingdom SA31 2AF
    10 St Peter's Hospital, Ashford and St. Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Chertsey United Kingdom KT16 0PZ
    11 Royal Derby Hospital, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust Derby United Kingdom DE22 3NE
    12 Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust Exeter United Kingdom EX2 5DW
    13 Withybush General Hospital, Hywel Dda University Health Board Haverfordwest United Kingdom SA61 2PZ
    14 Wycombe Hospital, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust High Wycombe United Kingdom HP11 2TT
    15 Queen Elizabeth Hospital Kings Lynn NHS Trust King's Lynn United Kingdom PE30 4ET
    16 Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Leicester United Kingdom LE1 5WW
    17 Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust Liverpool United Kingdom L7 8XP
    18 Prince Philip Hospital, Hywel Dda University Health Board Llanelli United Kingdom SA14 8QF
    19 The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust London United Kingdom E1 1FR
    20 Northwick Park Hospital, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust London United Kingdom HA1 3UJ
    21 University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom NW1 2BU
    22 St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom SW17 0QT
    23 Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London United Kingdom W6 8RF
    24 Luton and Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Luton United Kingdom LU4 0DZ
    25 The James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Middlesbrough United Kingdom TS4 3BW
    26 Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Milton Keynes United Kingdom MK6 5LD
    27 Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Nottingham United Kingdom NG7 2UH
    28 Derriford Hospital University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust Plymouth United Kingdom PL6 8DH
    29 Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Poole United Kingdom BH15 2JB
    30 Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals Preston United Kingdom PR2 9HT
    31 Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust Reading United Kingdom RG1 5AN
    32 Salford Royal Hospital, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust Salford United Kingdom M6 8HD
    33 Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust Salisbury United Kingdom SP2 8BJ
    34 Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Sheffield United Kingdom S10 2JF
    35 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Southampton United Kingdom SO16 6YD
    36 Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Southend-on-Sea United Kingdom SS0 0RY
    37 Kings Mill Hospital, Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Sutton in Ashfield United Kingdom NG17 4JL
    38 Morriston Hospital, Swansea Bay University Health Board Swansea United Kingdom SA6 6NL
    39 Torbay Hospital, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Torquay United Kingdom TQ2 7AA
    40 Arrowe Park Hospital, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Upton United Kingdom CH49 5PE
    41 Watford General Hospital, West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust Watford United Kingdom WD18 0HB
    42 Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Winchester United Kingdom SO22 5DG
    43 Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board Wrexham United Kingdom LL 13 7TD
    44 York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust York United Kingdom YO31 8HE

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University College, London

    Investigators

    • Study Chair: David Werring, Prof, UCL

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    University College, London
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03759938
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 18/0316
    First Posted:
    Nov 30, 2018
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 9, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Nov 1, 2020
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by University College, London
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Nov 9, 2020