TDCS+OT: Non-invasive Brain Stimulation and Occupational Therapy To Enhance Stroke Recovery
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a non-painful, non-invasive, brain-stimulation technique called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with traditional physical-occupational therapy (OT) will improve motor function in patients with chronic stroke. The aim is to determine the effect of applying real (anodal and/or cathodal) - in a dual configuration - vs sham (pretend) tDCS to the motor brain regions on both hemispheres - in a dual configuration - to improve motor function in chronic stroke patients. Our research in normal subjects has shown that motor skills can be enhanced if tDCS is applied to the brain's motor region during motor learning. The effects after a single session of tDCS can last for up to 30 minutes, effects of multiple sessions (one session per day) can last for weeks. Furthermore, single sessions of tDCS applied to the motor regions in stroke patients have shown that improvements in motor functions can be seen and that effects may last for at least 30 minutes. Patients enrolled in this trial will be randomized to receive either real tDCS or sham tDCS in combination with PT-OT once a day for 5 days. Assessments will be done about 3 days and 7 days after the end of the experimental treatment by investigators who are blinded to the intervention. Patients are also blinded as to whether they are receiving real or sham tDCS. We hypothesize that real tDCS applied to the motor regions in combination with PT-OT results in a subsequent improvement in motor function of the recovering hand over sham tDCS in combination with PT-OT.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Real-tDCS + PT-OT Each subject will receive up to 5 days of traditional physical-occupational therapy for at least 1 hour per day in the stroke recovery laboratory in combination with real transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the motor region for up to 30 min. |
Device: Real Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
A direct current runs between two electrode positions and affects the excitability of the underlying brain tissue
Other Names:
|
Sham Comparator: Sham-tDCS + PT-OT Each subject will receive up to 5 days of traditional physical-occupational therapy for at least 1 hour per day in the stroke recovery laboratory in combination with sham (pretend) tDCS for up to 30 min. over the motor region. |
Device: Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
A sham current runs between two electrode positions and might affect the underlying brain tissue.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity Motor Impairment [Baseline Assessment; 3 days after 5 treatment days; 7 days after 5 treatment days]
This scale goes from 0 to 66 (max). Higher values are considered to be a better outcome.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Wolf-Motor-Function-Test [Baseline Assessment; 3 days after 5 treatment days; 7 days after 5 treatment days]
The Wolf-Motor-Function-Test (time) is the average time in seconds taken to perform each of 15 functional tasks ranging in difficulty from putting one's forearm on a table to stacking checkers. Participants are given 120 seconds to perform a task and if they fail, they are scored 120 for that task," or similar as accurate. The average time in seconds is then log10 transformed.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
First time clinical ischemic stroke or cerebrovascular accident
-
At least 5 months out from first ischemic stroke prior to study enrollment
Exclusion Criteria:
-
More than 1 stroke (older strokes)
-
Significant pre-stroke disability
-
A terminal medical illness or disorder with survival of less than 1 year
-
Co-existent major neurological or psychiatric diseases (e.g., epilepsy)
-
Use of psychoactive drugs/medications - such as antidepressants,antipsychotic, stimulating agents
-
Active participation in other stroke recovery trials testing interventions
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center / Harvard Medical School | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02215 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gottfried Schlaug, MD, PhD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center / Harvard Medical School
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Nair DG, Hutchinson S, Fregni F, Alexander M, Pascual-Leone A, Schlaug G. Imaging correlates of motor recovery from cerebral infarction and their physiological significance in well-recovered patients. Neuroimage. 2007 Jan 1;34(1):253-63. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
- Vines BW, Cerruti C, Schlaug G. Dual-hemisphere tDCS facilitates greater improvements for healthy subjects' non-dominant hand compared to uni-hemisphere stimulation. BMC Neurosci. 2008 Oct 28;9:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-9-103.
- Vines BW, Nair D, Schlaug G. Modulating activity in the motor cortex affects performance for the two hands differently depending upon which hemisphere is stimulated. Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Oct;28(8):1667-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06459.x.
- Vines BW, Nair DG, Schlaug G. Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroreport. 2006 Apr 24;17(6):671-4.
- 2005P000346
- R01NS045049
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | We advertised in local media, on Craig's list, and informed neurology colleagues and rehabilitation specialists about our trial. Stroke patients had to be at least 5 months out from their stroke and had to have a moderate impairment in their upper extremity weakness. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | There were no significant events that occurred after participant enrollment, prior to assignment. |
Arm/Group Title | Real-tDCS + PT-OT | Sham-tDCS + PT-OT |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Each subject will receive up to 5 days of traditional physical-occupational therapy for at least 1 hour per day in the stroke recovery laboratory in combination with real transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the motor region for up to 30 min. Real Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A direct current runs between two electrode positions and affects the excitability of the underlying brain tissue | Each subject will receive up to 5 days of traditional physical-occupational therapy for at least 1 hour per day in the stroke recovery laboratory in combination with sham (pretend) tDCS for up to 30 min. over the motor region. Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A sham current runs between two electrode positions and might affect the underlying brain tissue. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 10 | 10 |
COMPLETED | 10 | 10 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Real-tDCS + PT-OT | Sham-tDCS + PT-OT | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Each subject will receive up to 5 days of traditional physical-occupational therapy for at least 1 hour per day in the stroke recovery laboratory in combination with real transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the motor region for up to 30 min. Real Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A direct current runs between two electrode positions and affects the excitability of the underlying brain tissue | Each subject will receive up to 5 days of traditional physical-occupational therapy for at least 1 hour per day in the stroke recovery laboratory in combination with sham (pretend) tDCS for up to 30 min. over the motor region. Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A sham current runs between two electrode positions and might affect the underlying brain tissue. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 10 | 10 | 20 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
61.7
(14.7)
|
55.8
(12.9)
|
58.7
(13.8)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
2
20%
|
3
30%
|
5
25%
|
Male |
8
80%
|
7
70%
|
15
75%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
White |
10
100%
|
10
100%
|
20
100%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity Motor Impairment |
---|---|
Description | This scale goes from 0 to 66 (max). Higher values are considered to be a better outcome. |
Time Frame | Baseline Assessment; 3 days after 5 treatment days; 7 days after 5 treatment days |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Real-tDCS + PT-OT | Sham-tDCS + PT-OT |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects are receiving real tDCS in a dual configuration centered over the motor region on both hemispheres for 30 minutes while they are also receiving PT-OT for 60 minutes total. | Subjects are receiving sham tDCS in a dual configuration centered over the motor region on both hemispheres for 30 minutes while they are also receiving PT-OT for 60 minutes total. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Pre-treatment (Baseline) |
38.2
(13.3)
|
39.8
(11.5)
|
Post-treatment1 (3 days after 5 days of treatment) |
43.8
(12.3)
|
41.0
(11.8)
|
Post-treatment2 (7 days after 5 days of treatment) |
44.3
(11.5)
|
40.9
(11.7)
|
Title | Wolf-Motor-Function-Test |
---|---|
Description | The Wolf-Motor-Function-Test (time) is the average time in seconds taken to perform each of 15 functional tasks ranging in difficulty from putting one's forearm on a table to stacking checkers. Participants are given 120 seconds to perform a task and if they fail, they are scored 120 for that task," or similar as accurate. The average time in seconds is then log10 transformed. |
Time Frame | Baseline Assessment; 3 days after 5 treatment days; 7 days after 5 treatment days |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Real-tDCS + PT-OT | Sham-tDCS + PT-OT |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects are receiving real tDCS in a dual configuration centered over the motor region on both hemispheres for 30 minutes while they are also receiving PT-OT for 60 minutes total. | Subjects are receiving sham tDCS in a dual configuration centered over the motor region on both hemispheres for 30 minutes while they are also receiving PT-OT for 60 minutes total. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Pre-treatment (baseline) |
0.87
(0.55)
|
0.83
(0.48)
|
Post-treatment1 (3 days after 5 days of treatment) |
0.74
(0.49)
|
0.79
(0.47)
|
Post-treatment2 (7 days after 5 days of treatment) |
0.73
(0.49)
|
0.78
(0.46)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Over the 5 days of experimental treatment and during the 1 week follow-up. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Real-tDCS + PT-OT | Sham tDCS + PT-OT | ||
Arm/Group Description | Subjects are receiving real tDCS in a dual configuration centered over the motor region on both hemispheres for 30 minutes while they are also receiving PT-OT for 60 minutes total. | Subjects are receiving sham tDCS in a dual configuration over both motor regions for 30 minutes while they are also receiving PT-OT for 60 minutes | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Real-tDCS + PT-OT | Sham tDCS + PT-OT | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Real-tDCS + PT-OT | Sham tDCS + PT-OT | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Real-tDCS + PT-OT | Sham tDCS + PT-OT | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Gottfried Schlaug, MD, PhD |
---|---|
Organization | Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center |
Phone | 617-632-8917 |
gschlaug@bidmc.harvard.edu |
- 2005P000346
- R01NS045049