Ankle Robot to Reduce Foot Drop in Stroke
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Deficits in ankle control after stroke can lead to foot drop, resulting in inefficient, aberrant gait and an elevated falls risk. Using a novel ankle robot and newly invented adaptive control system, this study tests whether robotic-assisted treadmill training will improve gait and balance functions in chronic stroke survivors with foot drop impairment. It is hypothesized that, compared to treadmill training alone, integrating adaptive ankle robotics with treadmill training will reduce drop foot during independent overground walking, resulting in greater mobility, improved postural control, and reduced fall risk.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
This proposal investigates a novel ankle robot (anklebot) adaptive control approach integrated with treadmill training to reduce foot drop and improve mobility function in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Currently, stroke survivors with foot drop are trained to live with a cane or other assistive device, and often ankle foot orthotics (AFOs) for safety. Neither mediates task-practice or neuromotor recovery.
The investigators have developed an adaptive anklebot controller that detects gait cycle sub-events for precise timing of graded robotics assistance to enable deficit severity-adjusted ankle motor learning in the context of walking. The investigators' pilot findings show that 6 weeks treadmill training with anklebot (TMR) timed to assist swing phase dorsiflexion only is more effective than treadmill alone (TM) to improve free-walking swing dorsiflexion at foot strike, floor-walking speed, and the benefits are retained at 6 weeks post-training. Notably, swing-phase TMR training improved paretic leg push-off, and reduced center-of-pressure sway on standing balance, indicating potential benefits to other elements of gait and balance, beyond those robotically targeted toward foot drop.
This randomized study investigates the hypothesis that 6 weeks TMR is more effective to improve durably gait biomechanics, static, and dynamic balance, and mobility function in chronic stroke survivors with dorsiflexion deficits, compared to TM alone. Aims are to determine the compare effectiveness of 6 weeks TMR vs. TM alone on:
-
Independent gait function indexed by gait velocity, swing-phase DF (dorsiflexion), terminal stance push-off.
-
Balance function indexed by measures of postural sway (CoP), asymmetric loading in quiet standing, peak paretic A-P forces in non-paretic gait initiation, and standardized scales for balance and fall risk.
-
Long-term mobility outcomes, assessed by repeated measures of all key gait and balance outcomes at 6 weeks and 3 months after formal training cessation.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Treadmill+anklebot This group will receive gait training on a treadmill while wearing the anklebot with the adaptive control system. |
Device: Treadmill plus anklebot
This intervention employs the use of the adaptive anklebot control system to complement treadmill exercise training over a 6-week intervention period.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Treadmill only This group will receive gait training on a treadmill, without use of the anklebot. |
Behavioral: Treadmill only
This intervention employs the use of a treadmill for gait exercise training over a 6-week intervention period
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Gait Velocity During Self-selected Overground Walking [Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months after completion]
Gait velocity during self-selected overground walking measured in cm/sec
- Anterior-posterior Propulsion Forces of Paretic Side During Gait [Change from baseline to: Post 6-weeks training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months]
Newtons: anterior-posterior force generated during push-off phase of the gait cycle
- Peak Dorsiflexion Angle During Swing Phase of Gait [Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months after completion]
Degrees; extent of ankle dorsiflexion to enable foot clearance
- Postural Sway Areas During Quiet Standing [Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months]
cm^2; extent of postural deviations to assess static postural control
- Ratio of Asymmetric Loading in Quiet Standing [Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months]
Ratio of Newtons of force per each leg (paretic/nonparetic) while standing quietly
- Peak Paretic Push Off Forces During Gait Initiation [Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months]
Newtons; magnitude of forward ground reaction forces
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke > 2 months prior in men or women
-
Residual hemiparesis of the lower extremity that includes symptoms of foot drop
-
Capable of ambulating on a treadmill with handrail support
-
Already completed all conventional physical therapy
-
Adequate language and cognitive function to provide informed consent and participate in testing and training
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Cardiac history of:
-
Unstable angina
-
Recent (< 3 months) myocardial infarction
-
Congestive heart failure (NYHA category II or higher)
-
Hemodynamic valvular dysfunction
-
Hypertension that is a contraindication for a bout of treadmill training (>160/100 mmHg on two assessments)
-
Medical history of:
-
Recent hospitalization (< 3 months) for any serious condition leading to significant bed-rest or reduction in mobility function
-
Symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease
-
Orthopedic or chronic pain conditions restricting exercise
-
Pulmonary failure requiring oxygen
-
Uncompensated renal failure
-
Active cancer
-
Neurological history and exam consistent with:
-
Dementia
-
Receptive or global aphasia that confounds testing and training, operationally defined as unable to follow 2-point commands
-
Non-stroke neurological disorder restricting exercise (e.g. Parkinson's Syndrome, myopathy)
-
Untreated major depression
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD | Baltimore | Maryland | United States | 21201 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- VA Office of Research and Development
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Steven J Kittner, Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- N1699-R
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Treadmill+Anklebot | Treadmill Only |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill while wearing the anklebot with the adaptive control system. Treadmill plus anklebot: This intervention employs the use of the adaptive anklebot control system to complement treadmill exercise training over a 6-week intervention period. | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill, without use of the anklebot. Treadmill only: This intervention employs the use of a treadmill for gait exercise training over a 6-week intervention period |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 23 | 22 |
COMPLETED | 17 | 17 |
NOT COMPLETED | 6 | 5 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Treadmill+Anklebot | Treadmill Only | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill while wearing the anklebot with the adaptive control system. Treadmill plus anklebot: This intervention employs the use of the adaptive anklebot control system to complement treadmill exercise training over a 6-week intervention period. | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill, without use of the anklebot. Treadmill only: This intervention employs the use of a treadmill for gait exercise training over a 6-week intervention period | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 23 | 22 | 45 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
8
34.8%
|
10
45.5%
|
18
40%
|
>=65 years |
15
65.2%
|
12
54.5%
|
27
60%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Full Range) ] | |||
Mean (Full Range) [years] |
64
|
65
|
65
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
9
39.1%
|
8
36.4%
|
17
37.8%
|
Male |
14
60.9%
|
14
63.6%
|
28
62.2%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
2
8.7%
|
1
4.5%
|
3
6.7%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
15
65.2%
|
15
68.2%
|
30
66.7%
|
White |
6
26.1%
|
6
27.3%
|
12
26.7%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants) | |||
United States |
23
100%
|
22
100%
|
45
100%
|
Years since stroke (Count of Participants) | |||
<2 |
4
17.4%
|
2
9.1%
|
6
13.3%
|
2-4 |
7
30.4%
|
9
40.9%
|
16
35.6%
|
4-6 |
4
17.4%
|
7
31.8%
|
11
24.4%
|
6+ |
8
34.8%
|
4
18.2%
|
12
26.7%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Gait Velocity During Self-selected Overground Walking |
---|---|
Description | Gait velocity during self-selected overground walking measured in cm/sec |
Time Frame | Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months after completion |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Only 38 of patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, as we excluded patients who had no baseline or follow-up data on the primary outcomes. |
Arm/Group Title | Treadmill+Anklebot | Treadmill Only |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill while wearing the anklebot with the adaptive control system. Treadmill plus anklebot: This intervention employs the use of the adaptive anklebot control system to complement treadmill exercise training over a 6-week intervention period. | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill, without use of the anklebot. Treadmill only: This intervention employs the use of a treadmill for gait exercise training over a 6-week intervention period |
Measure Participants | 17 | 21 |
Baseline |
0.48
(0.21)
|
0.48
(0.34)
|
Post 6-week training |
0.54
(0.24)
|
0.56
(0.32)
|
6 weeks after completion |
0.53
(0.24)
|
0.55
(0.33)
|
3 (or 6) months after completion |
0.52
(0.23)
|
0.55
(0.33)
|
Title | Anterior-posterior Propulsion Forces of Paretic Side During Gait |
---|---|
Description | Newtons: anterior-posterior force generated during push-off phase of the gait cycle |
Time Frame | Change from baseline to: Post 6-weeks training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Only 38 are included in the intention-to-treat analysis, as we excluded patients with no baseline or follow-up data on the primary outcomes. |
Arm/Group Title | Treadmill+Anklebot | Treadmill Only |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill while wearing the anklebot with the adaptive control system. Treadmill plus anklebot: This intervention employs the use of the adaptive anklebot control system to complement treadmill exercise training over a 6-week intervention period. | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill, without use of the anklebot. Treadmill only: This intervention employs the use of a treadmill for gait exercise training over a 6-week intervention period |
Measure Participants | 17 | 21 |
Baseline |
2.22
(12.37)
|
2.22
(12.37)
|
Post 6-week training |
4.92
(10.99)
|
3.03
(10.99)
|
6 weeks after completion |
6.06
(8.92)
|
4.14
(8.92)
|
3 (or 6) months after completion |
4.88
(10.74)
|
3.98
(10.74)
|
Title | Peak Dorsiflexion Angle During Swing Phase of Gait |
---|---|
Description | Degrees; extent of ankle dorsiflexion to enable foot clearance |
Time Frame | Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months after completion |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Only 38 are included in the intention-to-treat analysis, as we excluded patients who had no baseline or follow-up data on the primary outcomes. |
Arm/Group Title | Treadmill+Anklebot | Treadmill Only |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill while wearing the anklebot with the adaptive control system. Treadmill plus anklebot: This intervention employs the use of the adaptive anklebot control system to complement treadmill exercise training over a 6-week intervention period. | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill, without use of the anklebot. Treadmill only: This intervention employs the use of a treadmill for gait exercise training over a 6-week intervention period |
Measure Participants | 17 | 21 |
Baseline |
3.95
(6.83)
|
3.95
(6.83)
|
Post 6-week training |
4.84
(6.83)
|
4.24
(6.83)
|
6 weeks after completion |
4.34
(6.26)
|
3.27
(6.26)
|
3 (or 6) months after completion |
3.33
(6.72)
|
3.43
(6.72)
|
Title | Postural Sway Areas During Quiet Standing |
---|---|
Description | cm^2; extent of postural deviations to assess static postural control |
Time Frame | Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Only 38 are included in the intention-to-treat analysis, as we excluded patients who had no baseline or follow-up data on the primary outcomes. |
Arm/Group Title | Treadmill+Anklebot | Treadmill Only |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill while wearing the anklebot with the adaptive control system. Treadmill plus anklebot: This intervention employs the use of the adaptive anklebot control system to complement treadmill exercise training over a 6-week intervention period. | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill, without use of the anklebot. Treadmill only: This intervention employs the use of a treadmill for gait exercise training over a 6-week intervention period |
Measure Participants | 17 | 21 |
Baseline |
1.16
(0.64)
|
1.16
(0.64)
|
Post 6-week training |
1.51
(0.82)
|
1.33
(0.82)
|
6 weeks after completion |
1.44
(0.57)
|
1.13
(0.52)
|
3 (or 6) months after completion |
1.59
(0.52)
|
1.14
(0.52)
|
Title | Ratio of Asymmetric Loading in Quiet Standing |
---|---|
Description | Ratio of Newtons of force per each leg (paretic/nonparetic) while standing quietly |
Time Frame | Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
This data was not recorded during the study nor calculated as part of the analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Treadmill+Anklebot | Treadmill Only |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill while wearing the anklebot with the adaptive control system. Treadmill plus anklebot: This intervention employs the use of the adaptive anklebot control system to complement treadmill exercise training over a 6-week intervention period. | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill, without use of the anklebot. Treadmill only: This intervention employs the use of a treadmill for gait exercise training over a 6-week intervention period |
Measure Participants | 0 | 0 |
Title | Peak Paretic Push Off Forces During Gait Initiation |
---|---|
Description | Newtons; magnitude of forward ground reaction forces |
Time Frame | Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Only 38 are included in the intention-to-treat analysis, as we excluded patients who had no baseline or follow-up data on the primary outcomes. The results should be interpreted with extreme caution as there was inconsistent use of AFO's (ankle-foot orthosis) during evaluations and/or the training focus was on dorsiflexion assistance. |
Arm/Group Title | Treadmill+Anklebot | Treadmill Only |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill while wearing the anklebot with the adaptive control system. Treadmill plus anklebot: This intervention employs the use of the adaptive anklebot control system to complement treadmill exercise training over a 6-week intervention period. | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill, without use of the anklebot. Treadmill only: This intervention employs the use of a treadmill for gait exercise training over a 6-week intervention period |
Measure Participants | 17 | 21 |
Baseline |
64.7
(28.5)
|
64.7
(28.5)
|
Post 6-week training |
63.5
(27)
|
62.8
(27)
|
6 weeks after completion |
65.4
(30.6)
|
69.8
(30.6)
|
3 (or 6) months after completion |
66.1
(29.9)
|
70.9
(29.9)
|
Title | Dorsiflexion Angle at Foot Strike |
---|---|
Description | Degrees, extent of ankle dorsiflexion at initial foot contact with the floor |
Time Frame | Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months after completion |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Only 38 are included in the intention-to-treat analysis, as we excluded patients who had no baseline or follow-up data on the primary outcomes. |
Arm/Group Title | Treadmill+Anklebot | Treadmill Only |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill while wearing the anklebot with the adaptive control system. Treadmill plus anklebot: This intervention employs the use of the adaptive anklebot control system to complement treadmill exercise training over a 6-week intervention period. | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill, without use of the anklebot. Treadmill only: This intervention employs the use of a treadmill for gait exercise training over a 6-week intervention period |
Measure Participants | 17 | 21 |
Baseline |
-1.83
(5.03)
|
-1.83
(7.31)
|
Post 6-week training |
-0.70
(6.55)
|
-0.46
(5.7)
|
6 weeks after completion |
-2.18
(6.27)
|
-2.15
(6.16)
|
3 (or 6) months after completion |
-2.99
(5.96)
|
-1.58
(6.71)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 24 to 36 weeks for each subject; 6 week training + 6 weeks post training + 12 or 24 weeks follow up | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Treadmill+Anklebot | Treadmill Only | ||
Arm/Group Description | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill while wearing the anklebot with the adaptive control system. Treadmill plus anklebot: This intervention employs the use of the adaptive anklebot control system to complement treadmill exercise training over a 6-week intervention period. | This group will receive gait training on a treadmill, without use of the anklebot. Treadmill only: This intervention employs the use of a treadmill for gait exercise training over a 6-week intervention period | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Treadmill+Anklebot | Treadmill Only | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/23 (0%) | 0/22 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Treadmill+Anklebot | Treadmill Only | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/23 (0%) | 0/22 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Treadmill+Anklebot | Treadmill Only | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 4/23 (17.4%) | 2/22 (9.1%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Weakness | 0/23 (0%) | 0 | 2/22 (9.1%) | 2 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Pre-existing Medical Condition | 2/23 (8.7%) | 2 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Pain | 2/23 (8.7%) | 2 | 0/22 (0%) | 0 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Steven Kittner |
---|---|
Organization | Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System |
Phone | 410-706-0414 |
skittner@som.umaryland.edu |
- N1699-R