HAL-RCT: A Comparison Between the Exoskeleton Hybrid Assistive Limb and Conventional Gait Training Early After Stroke

Sponsor
Danderyd Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02410915
Collaborator
University of Tsukuba (Other)
32
1
2
38.9
0.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Overall aim is to evaluate HAL for gait training early after stroke and the effect of HAL on short- and long-term functioning, disability and health compared to conventional gait training as part of an inpatient rehabilitation program early after stroke.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL); gait training
  • Other: Control Group; Conventional gait training
N/A

Detailed Description

To compare outcome after 4 weeks of gait training with HAL vs. 4 weeks of conventional gait training as part of a regular inpatient rehabilitation program for hemiparetic patients with severely limited mobility early after stroke.

Study design: Randomized, controlled study with blinded outcome assessment.

Conventional gait training is individualized and performed according to current practice (approximately 30-60 minutes/session, 5 days a week) and may include standing, weight shifting, stepping, over ground walking with assistance and/or assistant devices as well as the use of a treadmill and body weight support. Conventional gait training is offered to both study groups.

Training with HAL is performed in 1 session per day, 4 days per week during 4 weeks. Time for each session is individualised but does not exceed 60 minutes/session (effective time). Training with HAL is performed in combination with body-weight support system and on a treadmill. The training program is performed by 2 physiotherapists, who have been trained in the HAL method.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
32 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Gait Training Early After Stroke - a Comparison Between Training With the Exoskeleton Hybrid Assistive Limb and Conventional Gait Training
Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Study Group

Intervention: Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL); gait training in combination with conventional training. Training with the exosceleton Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) is performed in 1 session per day, 4 days per week during 4 weeks. Time for each session is individualised but does not exceed 60 minutes/session (effective time). Training with HAL is performed in combination with body-weight support system and on a treadmill. The training program is performed by 2 physiotherapists, who have been trained in the HAL method.

Device: Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL); gait training
Training with HAL is performed in 1 session per day, 4 days per week during 4 weeks. Time for each session is individualised but does not exceed 60 minutes/session (effective time). Training with HAL is performed in combination with body-weight support system and on a treadmill. The training program is performed by 2 physiotherapists, who have been trained in the HAL method.
Other Names:
  • Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL)
  • Active Comparator: Control Group

    Intervention: Conventional gait training is individualized and performed according to current practice (approximately 30-60 minutes/session, 5 days a week) and may include standing, weight shifting, stepping, over ground walking with assistance and/or assistant devices as well as the use of a treadmill and body weight support. Conventional gait training is offered to both study groups.

    Other: Control Group; Conventional gait training
    Conventional gait training is individualized and performed according to current practice (approximately 30-60 minutes/session, 5 days a week) and may include standing, weight shifting, stepping, over ground walking with assistance and/or assistant devices as well as the use of a treadmill and body weight support. Conventional gait training is offered to both study groups.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC) [Assessed at baseline, after 4 weeks of training and 6 months after stroke]

      Level of independence in walking, range 0-5

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Change in Gait Deviation Index (GDI) [After 4 weeks of training and 6 months after stroke]

      Gait pattern function will be assessed using a motion capture system (Vicon MX40, Oxford, UK) with two force plates (Kistler, Winterthur, Switzerland) and wireless surface electromyography (EMG, Noraxon, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA). Markers will be placed according to a conventional full-body model (Vicon Plug-in-Gait) and surface EMGs, according to standardized electrode placement (www.seniam.org).

    2. Change in GDI-kinetic. [After 4 weeks of training and 6 months after stroke]

      Gait pattern function will be assessed using a motion capture system (Vicon MX40, Oxford, UK) with two force plates (Kistler, Winterthur, Switzerland) and wireless surface electromyography (EMG, Noraxon, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA). Markers will be placed according to a conventional full-body model (Vicon Plug-in-Gait) and surface EMGs, according to standardized electrode placement (www.seniam.org).

    3. Change in Barthel Index [Assessed at baseline, after 4 weeks of training and 6 months after stroke]

      Independence in mobility and personal care

    4. Change in Fugl-Meyer for Lower extremities [Assessed at baseline, after 4 weeks of training and 6 months after stroke]

      Sensory and motor function in lower extremities

    5. Change in Berg Balance scale [Assessed at baseline, after 4 weeks of training and 6 months after stroke]

      Balance

    6. Change in Modified Aschworth scale [Assessed at baseline, after 4 weeks of training and 6 months after stroke]

      Spasticity

    7. Change in 2 minutes walk test [Assessed at baseline, after 4 weeks of training and 6 months after stroke]

      Walking

    8. Change in Alberts test [Assessed at baseline, after 4 weeks of training and 6 months after stroke]

      Neglect

    9. Change in EQ5D [Assessed at baseline, after 4 weeks of training and 6 months after stroke]

      Health outcome

    10. Stroke impact scale [6 months after stroke]

      Functioning and disability

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 67 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • less than 8 weeks since stroke onset; inability to walk independently due to lower extremity paresis (i.e. FAC score 0-1), able to sit on a bench with or-without supervision at least five minutes; sufficient postural control to allow upright position in standing with aids and/or manual support; ability to understand training instructions as well as written and oral study information and to express informed consent; body size compatible with the HAL suit.
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • contracture restricting gait movements at any lower limb joint; cardiovascular or other somatic condition incompatible with intensive gait training; and severe, contagious infections.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd Hospital Danderyd Stockholm Sweden 18288

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Danderyd Hospital
    • University of Tsukuba

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Jörgen Borg, Professor, Department of Rehabilitation medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institute

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Susanne Palmcrantz, PhD, Reg. Physiotherapist, Danderyd Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02410915
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2013/1807-31/2
    First Posted:
    Apr 8, 2015
    Last Update Posted:
    May 18, 2017
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2017
    Keywords provided by Susanne Palmcrantz, PhD, Reg. Physiotherapist, Danderyd Hospital
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 18, 2017