Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Training Using Brain-Machine Interface Biofeedback in Stroke Patients With Hemiplegia

Sponsor
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04290377
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
2
33.2
1.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a study to evaluate the efficacy of upper extremity rehabilitation using Brain-Machine Interface (BMI) on individuals with hemiplegia due to stroke. BMI is a device that can record and analyze human brain signals (in this study Functional near-infrared spectroscopy was used) and also provide live feedback (by pneumatic glove movement) to the individual wearing it. This device hypothetically enables more accurate training by reinforcing the correctly activated brain signal repeatedly then conventional therapy.

In phase 1 study investigators will evaluate the feasibility of BMI on chronic stroke participants. 5 sessions of BMI-assisted occupational therapy (OT) will be performed and the Fugl Meyer Assessment-Upper Limb (FMA-UL) score change between the pre-treatment and post-treatment will be analyzed by paired t-test.

In phase 2 study, a randomized controlled study will be performed by randomly allocating participants to either control (OT plus OT) or experimental group (BMI-assisted OT plus OT) and the difference of FMA-UL score change between the two groups will be analyzed by Student's t-test.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: BMI-assisted motor imagery OT
  • Other: Motor imagery OT
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Phase1 (chronic stroke): with-in group (one group) multiple measurements Phase2 (subacute stroke): Randomized controlled study. Control (OT plus OT) vs Experimental (OT plus BMI-assisted OT)Phase1 (chronic stroke): with-in group (one group) multiple measurements Phase2 (subacute stroke): Randomized controlled study. Control (OT plus OT) vs Experimental (OT plus BMI-assisted OT)
Masking:
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Impossible to mask participants and care providers due to using a device that is so obvious.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Study on the Effectiveness of Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Training Using Brain-Machine Interface Biofeedback in Stroke Patients With Hemiplegia
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 25, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional OT + Motor Imagery OT

Conventional OT (30 minutes/day) plus Motor Imagery OT (30 minutes/day) for 10 days.

Other: Motor imagery OT
In Motor imagery OT, Subjects try to extend their fingers (imagine) without BMI assistance. All other setting is equal to BMI-assisted motor imagery OT.

Experimental: Conventional OT + BMI-assisted Motor Imagery OT

Conventional OT (30 minutes/day) plus BMI-assisted motor imagery OT (30 minutes/day) for 10 days.

Device: BMI-assisted motor imagery OT
As the goal of the intervention is to promote finger extension in participants who are unable to extend his/her finger due to stroke, the pneumatic glove provides extension assist when appropriate brain activity is present. The brain activity is obtained by Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS). Hypothetically, this will repeatedly induce brain activation that is related to finger extension.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change of Fugl Meyer Assessment-Upper Limb (FMA-UL) Score [Baseline evaluation (T0), Evaluation after 2 weeks of therapy (T1 [immediately or 1 day after treatment termination]), Evaluation after 1 month of T1 (T2), Evaluation after 3 month of T2 (T3).]

    Impairment measurement

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change of Finger Tapping Test Score (taps/minute) [Baseline evaluation (T0), Evaluation after 2 weeks of therapy (T1 [immediately or 1 day after treatment termination]), Evaluation after 1 month of T1 (T2), Evaluation after 3 months of T2 (T3).]

    The number of finger tapping on I-pad screen per 10 seconds for 1 session. Total : 3 sessions

  2. Change of Finger Extension (Metarcapophalangeal [MCP] joint) Range of Motion (degree) [Baseline evaluation (T0), Evaluation after 2 weeks of therapy (T1 [immediately or 1 day after treatment termination]), Evaluation after 1 month of T1 (T2), Evaluation after 3 month of T2 (T3).]

    Range of motion of 2nd finger is measured with Goniometer.

  3. Change of Hand grasp power (lb) [Baseline evaluation (T0), Evaluation after 2 weeks of therapy (T1 [immediately or 1 day after treatment termination]), Evaluation after 1 month of T1 (T2), Evaluation after 3 month of T2 (T3).]

    Measured with Dynamometer

  4. Change of Brunnstrom Stage [Baseline evaluation (T0), Evaluation after 2 weeks of therapy (T1 [immediately or 1 day after treatment termination]), Evaluation after 1 month of T1 (T2), Evaluation after 3 month of T2 (T3).]

    Observational evaluation of the stage of recovery of a stroke patient. There are six stages (1: flaccid, 2: spasticity appears, 3: pronounced spasticity, 4: start of deviation from spasticity, 5: spasticity decreased more than 4 and complex movement combinations are possible, 6: No more spasticity present, near normal to normal movement

  5. Change of muscle strength (Medical Research Council)-Upper extremity [Baseline evaluation (T0), Evaluation after 2 weeks of therapy (T1 [immediately or 1 day after treatment termination]), Evaluation after 1 month of T1 (T2), Evaluation after 3 month of T2 (T3).]

    Manual measurement of muscle strength. Range from 0 to 5. When there is absolute no movement of muscle it scored as 0. When muscle activation is felt by palpation but no movement is present it is scored as 1. If full range of motion is possible with gravity removed it is scored as 2. If one can move his/her joint to full range of motion against gravity but without other resistance it is scored as 3. If one can resist mild resistance it is score as 4. If one's muscle strength is normal it is scored as 5.

  6. Change of Box and Block Test (BBT) Score (boxes/60 second) [Baseline evaluation (T0), Evaluation after 2 weeks of therapy (T1 [immediately or 1 day after treatment termination]), Evaluation after 1 month of T1 (T2), Evaluation after 3 months of T2 (T3).]

    An observational measurement on manual dexterity. The observer counts the number of boxes that participant can move across the mid-line dissection board in a limited time (60 seconds).

  7. Change of Functional near-infrared spectroscopy Connectivity [Baseline evaluation (T0), Evaluation after 2 weeks of therapy (T1 [immediately or 1 day after treatment termination]), Evaluation after 1 month of T1 (T2), Evaluation after 3 months of T2 (T3).]

    Near infrared spectroscopy is a tool that can measure the brain activity and subsequently analyze connectivity between each recording spot. The connectivity will be reported as an illustration or image

  8. Change of Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) of upper extremity [Baseline evaluation (T0), Evaluation after 2 weeks of therapy (T1 [immediately or 1 day after treatment termination]), Evaluation after 1 month of T1 (T2), Evaluation after 3 months of T2 (T3).]

    Measures resistance during passive muscle stretching and is used as a simple measure of spasticity. 0: No increase in muscle tone, 1: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension. 2: More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved. 3: Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult. 4: Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension.

  9. Change of range of motion of finger extension (degrees) measured with Camera and marker [Baseline evaluation (T0), Evaluation after 2 weeks of therapy (T1 [immediately or 1 day after treatment termination]), Evaluation after 1 month of T1 (T2), Evaluation after 3 months of T2 (T3).]

    Markers (stickers) are placed on finger joints (Proximal phalangeal joint, Distal phalangeal joint) and finger tip of the 2nd finger. The camera will recognize the marker and measure the range of 2nd finger extension.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Subcortical stroke with hemiplegia

  • 1st stroke

  • Time since onset is less than 3 months

  • Brunnstrom stage 2,3

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Recurred stroke

  • MMSE score below 10

  • Delirium

  • Unstable medical condition

  • Pregnancy

  • Cannot sustain sitting position for 30 minutes

  • Pain that limits upper extremity exercise

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seongnam-si Gyeonggi-do Korea, Republic of 463-707

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Nam-Jong Paik, Professor, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04290377
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • B-1908-559-301
First Posted:
Feb 28, 2020
Last Update Posted:
May 5, 2022
Last Verified:
May 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Nam-Jong Paik, Professor, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 5, 2022