Sit-to-stand Training in Stroke Patient
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Background: It is unknown whether the self-initiated sit-to-stand training with assistive device is effective to regain the independence of sit-to-stand in stroke patients.
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of self-initiated sit-to-stand training by assistive device, with manual sit-to-stand training.
Design: Parallel randomised controlled and assessor blinded trial between Jan 2015 and May 2018. Randomisation was performed by drawing lots to allocate treatment to patient.
Setting: A rehabilitation hospital in Hong Kong
Participants: 69 patients in medical wards with unilateral hemiparetic stroke. 52 patients fulfilled the study requirements.
Intervention: Ten sessions of intervention with conventional physiotherapy program followed, by self-initiated sit-to-stand training with assistive device, or by manual sit-to-stand training.
Main outcome measure: Number of patients regained the independence of sit-to-stand, Sit-to-stand test from the balance master® and Five-repetitions sit-to-stand test.
Results: 69 patients (intervention n=36; control n=33) were randomized (mean age 69.8 (SD, 10.6), mean post stroke days 18.6 (SD 16.0)) for intention to treat analysis. 17 patients were excluded because of dropout before 10 sessions of training, leaving 52 (n=26; n=26) patients for per protocol analysis. 18 patients in intervention group and 10 patients in control group had regained the independence of sit-to-stand (Phil and Cramer's V: -0.31 and 0.31). The patients in intervention group were faster to complete the Five-repetition sit-to-stand test than the control group (32.7 secs (SD, 1.93) v 48.4 secs (SD, 6.8); 95% confidence interval, -30.8 to -0.7; p<0.05). No adverse side effects occurred during and after the training across groups.
Conclusions: Self-initiated sit-to-stand training by assistive device can help more stroke patients regain the independence of sit-to-stand.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Intervention group The sit-to-stand training is assisted by mechanical device |
Device: Mechanical assisted sit-to-stand training group
Mechanical assisted sit-to-stand training 100 repetitions or 10 mins / session 10 sessions
Other Names:
|
| Active Comparator: Control group The sit-to-stand training is assisted by manual device |
Other: Manual assisted sit-to-stand training group
Manual assisted sit-to-stand training 100 repetitions or 10 mins / session 10 sessions
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of patients regained the independence of sit-to-stand [After 10 sessions of training]
To compare how many patients can regain the independence of sit-to-stand between groups
- Sit-to-Stand Test (SST) from the Balance Master® [After 10 sessions of training]
To assess the quality of sit-to-stand of patient
- Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test [After 10 sessions of training]
To assess the functional strength of lower limb, balance and transition move of patient
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
first episode of unilateral stroke with hemiparesis,
-
able to understand and follow simple verbal instructions,
-
able to sit unsupported for at least two minutes
-
require lifting assistance to stand up from a 18 inches high plinth
Exclusion Criteria:
-
severe pain in the lower extremities when weight bearing or performing movement
-
any other acute comorbid diseases such as unstable angina, recent myocardial infarction
-
unstable medical / psychological condition
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Tai Po Hospital
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ng Chee Man, Joey, Master, Tai Po Hospital
- Study Director: Woo Ka Ho, Marc, Master, Prince of Wales Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 2014.427