A Water-based Sequential Preparatory Approach and Stroke

Sponsor
I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04362202
Collaborator
(none)
33
1
2
9.9
3.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Many studies hypothesize that people who have suffered stroke could benefit from water-based exercises to improve their strength and ability to perform the activities of daily living.

A Cochrane Review systematically synthesized and compared the effects of aquatic and land-based therapies on the activities of daily living (ADL) of patients following stroke and found that water-based exercises improved strength and ADL. A recent review indicates that RCTs comparing aquatic methods in both environments are lacking. The same movements in water and on dry land that target postural stability and gait require different competences. For example, the postural instability that occurs while squatting in water was enacted on land by sitting on a therapy ball. Furthermore, land-based conventional rehabilitation is generally task oriented, customized and challenging and follows a specific preparatory sequence of exercises according to patients' disabilities. Therefore, the investigators believe that a sequential preparatory approach (SPA), based on increasing difficulty and following a specific sequence of preparatory exercises (from the simplest to the most complex), should also be used in an aquatic environment.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Water-based Sequential Preparatory Approach
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
33 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Water-based Sequential Preparatory Approach Versus Conventional Aquatic Training in Stroke Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial With a One-month Follow-up
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 30, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: experimental

8 individual experimental rehabilitation sessions as outpatients (2 days/week, 4 weeks), in a rehabilitation pool at Fondazione Santa Lucia Neurorehabilitation hospital. Each session lasted 45minutes. The water temperature was between 30°C and 32°C.

Other: Water-based Sequential Preparatory Approach
The experimental training consists of a sequential and a preparatory approach aimed at enhancing dynamic postural stability. The exercises followed a specific sequence starting from a kneeling position, proceeding to a sitting position and ending with a supine position. Step exercises preparatory for gait were performed using a step and two floating aids. Gait exercises were performed first with the upper limbs placed on two floating aids and then during a dual motor task (i.e., catching a ball thrown by the therapist). The control aquatic therapy consists of water-based exercises, in line with suggestions of the Hydrotherapy Association of Chartered Physiotherapists Guidance on Good Practice in Hydrotherapy. These consisted of warm-up exercises, stretching exercises for the lower limbs, recruitment exercises and walking exercises during each phase of gait (single stance, swing and double stance).

Active Comparator: control

8 individual of standard aquatic rehabilitation sessions as outpatients (2 days/week, 4 weeks), in a rehabilitation pool at Fondazione Santa Lucia Neurorehabilitation hospital. Each session lasted 45minutes. The water temperature was between 30°C and 32°C.

Other: Water-based Sequential Preparatory Approach
The experimental training consists of a sequential and a preparatory approach aimed at enhancing dynamic postural stability. The exercises followed a specific sequence starting from a kneeling position, proceeding to a sitting position and ending with a supine position. Step exercises preparatory for gait were performed using a step and two floating aids. Gait exercises were performed first with the upper limbs placed on two floating aids and then during a dual motor task (i.e., catching a ball thrown by the therapist). The control aquatic therapy consists of water-based exercises, in line with suggestions of the Hydrotherapy Association of Chartered Physiotherapists Guidance on Good Practice in Hydrotherapy. These consisted of warm-up exercises, stretching exercises for the lower limbs, recruitment exercises and walking exercises during each phase of gait (single stance, swing and double stance).

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in Berg Balance Scale at 2 months [at 2 months]

    Change of Berg Balance Scale (BBS) from baseline at 2 months. BBS values ranging from 0 to 56, where 0 means the lowest level of function and 56 the highest

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Stroke Specific Quality Of Life Scale (SS-QOL) [baseline, after 4 weeks of training, and 4 weeks after the end of training]

    Change of Stroke Specific Quality Of Life Scale (SS-QOL) from baseline at 4 weeks of training and at 4 weeks after the end of the training. SS-QOL values ranging from 0 to 245, where 0 means the worse outcome and 245 the best one.

  2. Modified Barthel Index (MBI) [baseline, after 4 weeks of training, and 4 weeks after the end of training]

    Change of Modified Barthel Index (MBI) from baseline at 4 weeks of training and at 4 weeks after the end of the training. MBI values ranging from 0 to 105, where 0 means the worse outcome and 105 the best one.

  3. Tinetti Balance and Gait Scale (TBG) [baseline, after 4 weeks of training, and 4 weeks after the end of training]

    Change of Tinetti Balance and Gait Scale (TBG) from baseline at 4 weeks of training and at 4 weeks after the end of the training. TBG values ranging from 0 to 28, where 0 means the worse outcome and 28 the best one.

  4. Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) [baseline, after 4 weeks of training, and 4 weeks after the end of training]

    Change of Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) from baseline at 4 weeks of the training and at 4 weeks after the end of the training. MAS values ranging from 0 to 5, where 0 means the best outcome and 5 the worse one.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
25 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Stroke with unilateral hemiplegia within the previous six months;

  • Ability to walk without any device or need of continuous physical assistance to support body weight or maintain balance (Functional Ambulation Classification ≥ 3);

  • Acclimatization to water.

Exclusion criteria:
  • Cognitive deficits affecting the ability to understand task instructions (Mini-Mental State Examination > 24);

  • Severe unilateral spatial neglect (diagnosed with a test battery that included the Letter Cancellation test, Barrage test, Sentence Reading test and the Wundt-Jastrow Area Illusion Test);

  • Severe aphasia (diagnosed by means of neuropsychological assessment);

  • Presence of other neurological diseases;

  • Presence of cutaneous and mycosis infections;

  • Presence of open wounds, eczema, skin ulcers, decubitus lesions, severe burns;

  • Presence of PEG (Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy);

  • Presence of tracheostomy;

  • Urinary incontinence;

  • Presence of otitis

  • Presence of orthopedic or cardiac comorbidities that would limit participation in the experimental and conventional training (all of which were clinically evaluated).

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Santa Lucia Foundation I.R.C.C.S. Roma Rm Italy 00179

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marco Tramontano, Santa Lucia Foundation I.R.C.C.S.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Marco Tramontano, Head of Rehabilitation Services, I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04362202
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • FSLCE/PROG.728
First Posted:
Apr 24, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Apr 24, 2020
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2020
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 24, 2020