Piloting GETCare: A Remote Goal-based Education and Skills Training Program for Caregivers Poststroke

Sponsor
University of Utah (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05403021
Collaborator
Utah Occupational Therapy Association (Other)
28
1
1
11.6
2.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the GETCare program, a Goal-based Education and skills Training program for Caregivers poststroke.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: GETCare Intervention
N/A

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study was to utilize a single-arm mixed method pilot trial to evaluate the5-week GETCare program with the following study aims: (1) explore feasibility and acceptability, (2) assess knowledge acquisition and goal attainment, and (3) test preliminary effects on key caregiver outcomes. This remote program included guided goal setting, individualized resource recommendations, and education modules.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
28 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
single-arm mixed method pilot trialsingle-arm mixed method pilot trial
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
Piloting GETCare: A Remote Goal-based Education and Skills Training Program for Caregivers Poststroke
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 31, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Aug 17, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Aug 20, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: GETCare Intervention

Behavioral: GETCare Intervention
This 5-week intervention was administered remotely and individually to caregivers utilizing phone, email, and a secure online platform. The GETCare program was mostly self-led and included five weekly module education topics: basics of stroke, caregiver skills, caregiver changes, meaningful participation, and community resources. Each module incorporated (1) individualized education, (2) goal setting, (3) skills training, and (4) community resource recommendations. The program was led by a licensed occupational therapist who is a certified stroke rehabilitation specialist. The occupational therapist conducted weekly check-ins via email or phone focused on answering questions, tracking goal progress, and assisting in problem solving.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Perceived Stress Scale [Baseline]

    Scores range 0-40, higher score indicates higher perceived stress

  2. Perceived Stress Scale [Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)]

    Scores range 0-40, higher score indicates higher perceived stress

  3. Revised Scale for Caregiving Self-efficacy [Baseline]

    Scores range 0-100, higher score indicates higher self-efficacy

  4. Revised Scale for Caregiving Self-efficacy [Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)]

    Scores range 0-100, higher score indicates higher self-efficacy

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Modified Caregiver Strain Index [Baseline]

    Scores range 0-26, higher score indicates higher caregiver strain

  2. Modified Caregiver Strain Index [Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)]

    Scores range 0-26, higher score indicates higher caregiver strain

  3. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-43 Profile v2.1 [Baseline]

    43 items across seven domains: physical function, anxiety, fatigue, depression, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and pain interference; Scores range 6-30 for each subscale. For subscales of anxiety, depression, fatigue, and sleep disturbance, higher scores indicate worse symptoms. For subscale of social participation, higher scores indicate improved symptoms. Subscales of physical function and pain interference were not included in analyses, since they were not expected to change through this intervention.

  4. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-43 Profile v2.1 [Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)]

    43 items across seven domains: physical function, anxiety, fatigue, depression, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and pain interference; Scores range 6-30 for each subscale. For subscales of anxiety, depression, fatigue, and sleep disturbance, higher scores indicate worse symptoms. For subscale of social participation, higher scores indicate improved symptoms. Subscales of physical function and pain interference were not included in analyses, since they were not expected to change through this intervention.

  5. Neuro-Quality of Life (Neuro-QOL) Positive Affect and Well-being v1.0 [Baseline]

    9 items; Scores range 9-45, higher score indicates higher positive affect and well-being

  6. Neuro-Quality of Life (Neuro-QOL) Positive Affect and Well-being [Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)]

    9 items; Scores range 9-45, higher score indicates higher positive affect and well-being

  7. Knowledge assessment [Baseline]

    Evaluate knowledge acquisition of weekly education topics; Scores range 0-35, higher score indicates higher knowledge

  8. Knowledge assessment [Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)]

    Evaluate knowledge acquisition of weekly education topics; Scores range 0-35, higher score indicates higher knowledge

  9. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure [Baseline]

    Assesses importance of goal, current performance of goal, and satisfaction with current performance of goal; Scores range 0-10, higher score indicates higher importance, performance, and satisfaction with performance

  10. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure [Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)]

    Assesses importance of goal, current performance of goal, and satisfaction with current performance of goal; Scores range 0-10, higher score indicates higher importance, performance, and satisfaction with performance

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Feedback survey [Post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)]

    Included a variety of questions (no/yes, Likert scales, and open-ended questions) regarding feedback of the intervention. For example, "Please indicate how helpful the additional handouts and videos were for you" (0 = not at all helpful, 1 = a little helpful, 2 = somewhat helpful, 3 = quite helpful, 4 = extremely helpful).

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • self-identification as a primary caregiver (direct care involvement) of someone who had a stroke (no restriction on stroke duration)

  • ≥ 18 years old

  • access to internet/telephone throughout the study

  • able to speak, read, and understand English

  • person with stroke expected to discharge within 1 month if still in the hospital

Exclusion Criteria:
  • unable to read and follow basic instructions

  • indicated the individual with stroke had no deficits poststroke

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah United States 84112

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Utah
  • Utah Occupational Therapy Association

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jackie Einerson, MOT, University of Utah

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Jackie Einerson, Principal Investigator, University of Utah
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05403021
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 00129713
  • 00112906
First Posted:
Jun 2, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jun 2, 2022
Last Verified:
May 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Jackie Einerson, Principal Investigator, University of Utah

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 2, 2022