NARLE1: Effects of Upper Limb Motor and Robotic Training Over Neuroplasticity and Function Capacity

Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT02700061
Collaborator
(none)
51
1
2
60
0.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects of upper limb training with Induced Constraint Therapy (ICT) or robotic therapy. No placebo therapy is used. Motor function, neurological evaluations and quality of life are assessed for the comparison of the therapies.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Robotic occupational therapy
  • Procedure: Induced Constraint Therapy - ICT
Phase 2

Detailed Description

The trial is being carried out in the Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation of the University of São Paulo since February 2012. The investigators are including patients with clinical diagnosis of Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke.

The patients are being randomized in blocks of four, six and eight, in two arms: ICT:

patients are undergoing 60 minutes physiotherapy and occupational therapy twice a week for ten consecutive weeks. Other therapeutic services as phonoaudiology, psychology, nutrition, physical conditioning are prescribed upon the patients' medical demands. After the 10 weeks, the patients are undergoing two whole weeks of daily ICT as to reach 90% of the time under constraint, including weekends. During this last period, no other therapeutic service is offered, but the occupational therapy under ICT. Patients are not allowed to undergo robotic therapy.

Robotic therapy: patients are undergoing robotic occupational therapy for 60 minutes, three times a week for twelve consecutive weeks. All other therapeutic services are prescribed upon the patients' medical demands. Patients are not allowed to undergo ICT.

The investigator and the raters are blind to treatment.

The evaluations are done prior to the beginning of the treatment and at the end of it. The follow up assessments are done at 3 and 12 months after the end of the treatment.

The sample size was estimated to be 62 patients in each arm, a total size of 124 patients

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
51 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Effects of Upper Limb Motor Training and Upper Limb Robotic Training Over Neuroplasticity and Function Capacity: A Single-blind Randomized Clinical Trial With Patients With Stroke Sequelae
Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2012
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2016
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Induced Constraint Therapy - ICT

Physical rehabilitation with Induced Constraint Therapy as part of the occupational therapy. Standard Occupational Therapy two times a week for ten weeks, followed by two whole weeks of Induced Constraint Therapy.

Procedure: Induced Constraint Therapy - ICT
Standard Occupational Therapy two times a week for ten weeks, followed by two whole weeks of Induced Constraint Therapy.
Other Names:
  • ICT
  • Experimental: Robotic occupational therapy

    Physical rehabilitation with Robotic occupational therapy. Robotic Occupational Therapy three times a week for twelve weeks.

    Procedure: Robotic occupational therapy
    Robotic Occupational Therapy three times a week for twelve weeks.
    Other Names:
  • Robotic therapy
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change on Motor Function assessed by Wolf Motor Function scale [Baseline and 12 weeks]

      Change from baseline in Wolf Motor Function scale.

    2. Change on Motor Function assessed by Fugl Meyer scale [Baseline and 12 weeks]

      Change from baseline in Fugl Meyer scale.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change on Motor Function assessed by Wolf Motor Function scale [Baseline, 3 months and 12 months]

      Multiple changes from baseline in Wolf Motor Function scale.

    2. Change on Motor Function assessed by Fugl Meyer scale [Baseline, 3 months and 12 months]

      Multiple changes from baseline in Fugl Meyer scale.

    3. Change on Motor Function assessed by Robotic scale [Baseline, 3 months and 12 months]

      Multiple changes from baseline in robotic scale.

    4. Change on Function ability and quality of movement assessed by Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT) [Baseline, 12 weeks, 3 months and 12 months]

      Multiple changes from baseline in AMAT scale.

    5. Change on Functional Independence Measure (FIM) as assessed by FIM scale [Baseline, 12 weeks, 3 months and 12 months]

      Multiple changes from baseline in FIM scale.

    6. Change on Quality of life assessed by Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) [Baseline, 12 weeks, 3 months and 12 months]

      Multiple changes from baseline in SIS.

    7. Change on Kinematic variables assessed by InMotion robots [Baseline, 12 weeks, 3 months and 12 months]

      Multiple motion changes from baseline in the Kinematic variables assessed by InMotion robots.

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Psychological Evaluation assessed by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) [Baseline, 12 weeks, 3 months and 12 months]

      Multiple changes from baseline in PSS-10.

    2. Neuroplasticity as assessed by Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) [Baseline, 12 weeks, 3 months and 12 months]

      Multiple changes from baseline in BDNF.

    3. Corticospinal excitability as assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) [Baseline, 12 weeks, 3 months and 12 months]

      Multiple changes from baseline in TMS.

    4. Neurologic evaluation as assessed by electroencephalography [Baseline, 12 weeks, 3 months and 12 months]

      Multiple changes from baseline in electroencephalography.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Clinical diagnosis of stroke;

    • Patients from 6 months after stroke up to 36 months after stroke;

    • Clinically stable;

    • Upper limb Brunnstrom scale III or IV;

    • Brunnstrom scale above V if clinician supports patients will benefit from treatment;

    • Minimum wrist extension of 20°, and minimum of 10° of metacarpophalangeal active extension.

    • Signed Informed Consent Form;

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Mini-Mental score lower than 20 points;

    • Previous multiple strokes;

    • Bone diseases and articulation injuries ;

    • Presence of psychological disturbances capable of diminishing adherence;

    • Articulation pain within the range of motion proposed by the therapies;

    • Participation in another study protocol for upper limbs therapies.

    • Previous treatment with robotic assisted therapies.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Centro de Pesquisa Clínica do Instituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação do HCFMUSP Sao Paulo Brazil 04116-040

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Linamara Rizzo Battistella, Md PhD, University of Sao Paulo

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02700061
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 0910.0.015.000-11
    First Posted:
    Mar 7, 2016
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 7, 2016
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2015
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Keywords provided by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Mar 7, 2016