Novel Wrist Sensor System to Promote Hemiparetic Arm Use in Home Daily Life of Chronic Stroke Survivors

Sponsor
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05626894
Collaborator
BioSensics (Industry), MGH Institute of Health Professions (Other), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) (NIH)
32
1
2
30
1.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The proposed study is a two-arm randomized clinical trial designed to assess the effects of the StrokeWear system on clinical outcomes over a period of 6-months in chronic stroke survivors. The Intervention group will use StrokeWear system in combination to a motor and behavioral home intervention whereas the Control group will follow usual care which consists of a home-exercise plan (HEP).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Combination Product: StrokeWear Motor and Behavioral Intervention
  • Other: Usual Care
Phase 2

Detailed Description

The proposed study is a two-arm randomized clinical trial designed to assess the effects of the StrokeWear system on clinical outcomes over a period of 6-months in chronic stroke survivors. The Intervention group will use StrokeWear system in combination to a motor and behavioral home intervention whereas the Control group will follow usual care which consists of a home-exercise plan (HEP).

Study participants will be asked to take part in 4 evaluation study visits: one screening and enrollment visit, and three evaluation visits (at baseline, at 3 months and at 6 months - at the intervention completion). Subject upper-extremity motor function will be assessed across domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model. Groups will be stratified by baseline motor impairment and stroke chronicity.

Subjects randomized to the intervention group will take part of weekly coaching sessions during the first month, bi-weekly sessions during the months 2 and 3, and monthly sessions during months 4-6. These sessions will be held in-person or remotely, based on the study participant preference.

Subjects randomized to the control group will take part of monthly visits, held in-person or remotely (based on study participant preference), to re-evaluate the home-exercise plan and prescribe an update list of exercises for the following month.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
32 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Novel Wrist Wearable Sensor System to Promote Hemiparetic Upper Extremity Use in Home Daily Life of Chronic Stroke Survivors
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2025
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: StrokeWear Motor and Behavioral Intervention

Combination Product: StrokeWear Motor and Behavioral Intervention
The intervention will consist of 1) the use of StrokeWear for goal directed movements (GDM) feedback and goal setting, 2) use of daily activity action planning (DAAP) to foster planned hemiparetic UE use during daily activities in the home and community, and 3) patient empowerment. Patient empowerment in this study will occur over 6-months as patients gain the ability to use the StrokeWear technology independently and develop skills to manage their GDM and DAAP.

Sham Comparator: Usual Care

Other: Usual Care
The intervention will consist in a sham version of the StrokeWear system and usual clinical care under the direction of a clinician. The sham version of the StrokeWear system will include sensing and recording technology to detect GDMs. However, study participants will not receive feedback from the system regarding the GDM counts.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in Motor Activity Log-Amount of Use [Change from baseline Motor Activity Log-Amount of Use score at 6 months]

    Self-reported measure of upper-extremity performance. Score from 0 (worst) to 5 (best)

  2. Change in Fugl-Meyer Upper-Extremity [Change from baseline Fugl-Meyer Upper-Extremity score at 6 months]

    Observed measure of upper-extremity motor impairment following a stroke. Score from 0 (worst) to 66 (best)

  3. Change in Upper-Extremity Activity Counts [Change from baseline Upper-Extremity Activity Counts score at 6 months]

    Activity of the hemiparetic upper-extremity in the home setting as measured with wrist-worn accelerometers

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in Motor Activity Log-Quality of Use [Change from baseline Motor Activity Log-Quality of Use score at 6 months]

    Self-reported measure of upper-extremity quality of use. Score from 0 (worst) to 5 (best)

  2. Change in Wolf-Motor Function Test - Time subscale [Change from baseline Wolf-Motor Function Test - Time subscale score at 6 months]

    Observed (timed) measure of upper-extremity function. Time from 0 to 120 seconds (maximum time allowed to attempt to perform a motor task)

  3. Change in Wolf-Motor Function Test - Functional ability subscale [Change from baseline Wolf-Motor Function Test - Functional ability subscale score at 6 months]

    Measure of upper-extremity quality of movement based on visual observation. Score from 0 (worst) to 5 (best)

  4. Change in Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) [Change from baseline Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) score at 6 months]

    Self-reported measure of quality of life after a stroke. Score from 0 (best) to 42 (worst)

  5. Change in Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SSEQ) - Activity subscale [Change from baseline Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SSEQ) - Activity subscale score at 6 months]

    Self-reported measure of upper-extremity efficacy in activities of daily living. Score from 0 (worst) to 10 (best).

  6. Change in Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SSEQ) - Self-management subscale [Change from baseline Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SSEQ) - Self-management subscale score at 6 months]

    Self-reported measure of upper-extremity efficacy in activities of daily living. Score from 0 (worst) to 10 (best).

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Change in Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) [Change from baseline Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) score at 6 months]

    Semi-structured interview to assess outcomes in the areas of self-care, productivity and leisure. Score from 0 (worst) to 10 (best).

  2. Number of times the activity goals are reached [At 6 months]

    Number of times the activity goals set are reached over the study duration

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Male or female, 18-85 years of age at the time of enrollment;

  • Anterior circulation ischemic stroke at least 6 months and up to 5 years prior to study enrollment;

  • Unilateral upper extremity hemiparesis as characterized by initial scores on upper limb subtest of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) between 20 and 45;

  • Intact cognitive function to understand the study procedures and goal setting (MMSE score above 23 and able to follow 3 step command);

  • Being familiar and comfortable with the use of a tablet or smartphone.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Severe spasticity (defined as a Modified Ashworth scale score of 3 or more) that would prevent safe performance of UE tasks;

  • Visual impairments as assessed by the NIH Stroke Scale Visual Field subscale (only subjects with no visual loss will participate in the study); or hemispatial neglect that would impair the subject ability to see feedback on the app screen (as assessed with the star cancellation test);

  • Individuals with open wounds or recent fracture (less than 3 months) in the UE, fragile skin or active infection as evaluated by the study therapist;

  • Individuals currently enrolled in a UE rehabilitation program (i.e., OT, research study)

  • Upper-extremity orthopedic injuries or severe pain resulting in movement limitations;

  • Diagnosis of other neurological disease (i.e., Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, ...);

  • Severe proprioceptive deficits that impair the ability to process the vibration feedback, as assessed by physical examination during screening as assessed by the study therapist;

  • Not understanding spoken or written English;

  • Recent (less than 3 months) Botox injection in the UE or plan to undergo injections during the study timeline;

  • Contralateral motor deficits as assessed by clinical examination;

  • Brainstem and cerebellar stroke.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston Boston Massachusetts United States 02129

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
  • BioSensics
  • MGH Institute of Health Professions
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paolo Bonato, PhD, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Paolo Bonato, Director, Motion Analysis Laboratory, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05626894
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2022P002943
  • R44HD084035
First Posted:
Nov 25, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Dec 2, 2022
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Keywords provided by Paolo Bonato, Director, Motion Analysis Laboratory, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 2, 2022