A Randomized Study Comparing the Effectiveness and Security of the Use of Two Stentrievers Simultaneously Versus One Stentriever as a Primary Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Several studies have demonstrated that simultaneous treatment with two stentrievers (STs) as rescue treatment is very effective, with high recanalization rates even in this group of patients where other revascularization techniques have failed. There has been no observed increase in hemorrhagic complications. Recently, a prospective study has been published where treatment with two ST has been shown to be effective and safe if used as a first-choice treatment (not as rescue) with a successful recanalization rate (eTICI 2c/3) after the first pass of 69%. These results have been reinforced after the publication of a randomized study that confirms, in vitro, the superiority of using two ST over one.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Several studies have demonstrated that simultaneous treatment with two stentrievers (STs) as rescue treatment is very effective, with high recanalization rates even in this group of patients where other revascularization techniques have failed. There has been no observed increase in hemorrhagic complications. Recently, a prospective study has been published where treatment with two ST has been shown to be effective and safe if used as a first-choice treatment (not as rescue) with a successful recanalization rate (eTICI 2c/3) after the first pass of 69%. These results have been reinforced after the publication of a randomized study that confirms, in vitro, the superiority of using two ST over one.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Double stentriever technique Patients treated with thrombectomy with a proximal balloon guiding catheter using two stentrievers simultaneously (one of 6 mm x 50 mm and another of 6 mm x 50 mm or 4 mm x 35 mm) |
Device: Double stentriever
Double stentriever technique
|
Active Comparator: Single stentriever technique Patients treated with thrombectomy with a proximal balloon guiding catheter using one stentriever (6 mm x 50 mm). |
Device: Single stentriever
Single stentriever technique
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- EFFECTIVENESS OBJECTIVE [90 days]
First pass effect understood as complete recanalization on the first pass . Comparison of the complete recanalization rate in the first pass in the double stent group compared to the single stent group, defined as TICI (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction) greater than 2c on the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale (eTICI scale).
- SAFETY OBJECTIVE [90 days]
no statistically significant differences in the percentage of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (neurological deterioration in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] >4) at 24h observed between both groups and, fundamentally, evaluated by CT.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Intervention success. [90 days]
ability to position both STs in the indicated location.
- Complications during the intervention. [90 days]
arterial perforation, angiographic extravasation of contrast, arterial dissection, arterial vasospasm.
- Embolism to an artery not involved in the initially affected territory. [90 days]
Embolism to an artery not involved in the initially affected territory.
- Number of passes with the devices. [90 days]
Number of passes with the devices.
- Time from symptom onset to arterial puncture, time from symptom onset to arterial recanalization, or if not achieved, until the end of the intervention. [90 days]
Time from symptom onset to arterial puncture, time from symptom onset to arterial recanalization, or if not achieved, until the end of the intervention.
- Recanalization rates (eTICI scale): eTICI 3 on the first pass, eTICI 2c/3 on the first pass, eTICI e2b/3 on the first pass, eTICI 3 final, eTICI e2c/3 final, eTICI e2b/3 final. [90 days]
Recanalization rates (eTICI scale): eTICI 3 on the first pass, eTICI 2c/3 on the first pass, eTICI e2b/3 on the first pass, eTICI 3 final, eTICI e2c/3 final, eTICI e2b/3 final.
- Any type of intracranial hemorrhage on the 24-hour control computed tomography (CT) scan (subarachnoid hemorrhage and hemorrhage according to the classification used in the ECASS study). [90 days]
Any type of intracranial hemorrhage on the 24-hour control computed tomography (CT) scan (subarachnoid hemorrhage and hemorrhage according to the classification used in the ECASS study).
- Early neurological improvement defined as a decrease of 10 points or more on the NIHSS scale or complete recovery during the first 24 hours. [90 days]
Early neurological improvement defined as a decrease of 10 points or more on the NIHSS scale or complete recovery during the first 24 hours.
- Clinical evolution according to the NIHSS scale at 24 hours, on day 5, or at discharge. [90 days]
Clinical evolution according to the NIHSS scale at 24 hours, on day 5, or at discharge.
- Clinical evolution according to the mRS scale [90 days]
Clinical evolution according to the mRS scale
- Rate of satisfactory reperfusion at the end of procedure, defined as the achievement of a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction - mTICI ( Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction)≥2b in the target vessel in 3 passes and at the end of the procedure. [4 months]
Rate of satisfactory reperfusion at the end of procedure, defined as the achievement of a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction - mTICI ≥2b in the target vessel in 3 passes and at the end of the procedure.
- Procedure time, defined as the time from puncture to obtaining mTICI ≥2b or, if not obtained, to final angiography. [4 months]
Procedure time, defined as the time from puncture to obtaining mTICI ≥2b or, if not obtained, to final angiography.
- Percentage of functionally independent patients (mRS <=2) at day 5 or discharge [90 days]
Percentage of functionally independent patients (mRS <=2) at day 5 or discharge
- Mortality rate [90 days]
Mortality rate
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
A new disabling focal neurological deficit compatible with acute cerebral ischemia.
-
Any age. Informed consent obtained from the patient or representative.
-
NIHSS score ≥ 6.
-
Pre-existing functional clinical status less than or equal to 2 according to the mRS clinical scale.
-
Maximum time of 24 hours from symptom onset to arterial puncture. • TICI 0-1 in the diagnosed TICA (terminal internal carotid artery) , MCA (middle cerebral artery), and BA( basilar artery confirmed by angioCT and angiography).
-
ASPECTs score on baseline CT greater than or equal to 6.
-
In cases where it is indicated, prior intravenous fibrinolysis will be administered according to the protocols of each center.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Those described in the usual protocols for mechanical thrombectomy of each hospital.
-
Pre-existing functional clinical status greater than 2 according to the mRS clinical scale
-
Patients with tandem lesions of dissection or arteriosclerotic origin located in the extracranial internal carotid artery.
-
Initiation of treatment with a different technique than the one described.
-
Inability to use a proximal balloon guide catheter.
-
Use of aspiration catheter.
-
Intracranial atherosclerotic plaque as the cause of occlusion.
-
Advanced or terminal disease with a life expectancy of less than 6 months.
-
Patient who is participating in another study that may affect this one.
-
ASPECTS score less than or equal to 6 on baseline CT.
-
Evidence of significant hemorrhage or mass effect with midline shift on baseline CT.
-
Patients with occlusions in multiple vascular territories.
-
Evidence of intracranial tumor (except for small meningiomas)
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Cabral LS, Mont'Alverne F, Silva HC, Passos Filho PE, Magalhaes PSC, Bianchin MM, Nogueira RG. Device size selection can enhance Y-stentrieving efficacy and safety as a rescue strategy in stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Jun;14(6):558-563. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017751. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
- Li J, Tiberi R, Canals P, Vargas D, Castano O, Molina M, Tomasello A, Ribo M. Double stent-retriever as the first-line approach in mechanical thrombectomy: a randomized in vitro evaluation. J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Jan 10:jnis-2022-019887. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019887. Online ahead of print.
- Li Z, Liu P, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Fang Y, Xing P, Huang Q, Yang P, Liu J. Y-Stent Rescue Technique for Failed Thrombectomy in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion: A Case Series and Pooled Analysis. Front Neurol. 2020 Aug 27;11:924. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00924. eCollection 2020.
- Okada H, Matsuda Y, Chung J, Crowley RW, Lopes DK. Utility of a Y-configured stentriever technique as a rescue method of thrombectomy for an intractable rooted thrombus located on the middle cerebral artery bifurcation: technical note. Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Apr;42(4):E17. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.FOCUS16511.
- Vega P, Murias E, Jimenez JM, Chaviano J, Rodriguez J, Calleja S, Delgado M, Benavente L, Castanon M, Puig J, Cigarran H, Arias F, Chapot R. First-line Double Stentriever Thrombectomy for M1/TICA Occlusions : Initial Experiences. Clin Neuroradiol. 2022 Dec;32(4):971-977. doi: 10.1007/s00062-022-01161-2. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
- PA 2023.156