Informal Caregivers ANSWERS-VA

Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development (U.S. Fed)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02398409
Collaborator
(none)
143
2
2
52.9
71.5
1.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the ANSWERS- VA intervention (Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths for Veterans) while also determining it's cost effectiveness in the stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) populations.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: ANSWERS - Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths
  • Other: Control
N/A

Detailed Description

Background: Stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) are leading causes of long-term disability among Veterans and result in the need for care from informal caregivers in the home setting. There are very few evidence-based, easy-to-deliver follow-up programs to train Veterans and caregivers across multiple domains post injury. The "Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths for Veterans (ANSWERS-VA)" intervention aims to provide the Veteran and caregiver dyad with a set of practical skills that each can use in coping with and managing symptoms of a brain injury, applying a strength-based approach.

Objectives: The objectives of this study are to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate (a) the efficacy of the ANSWERS-VA dyadic intervention with Veterans who have sustained a stroke and/or TBI and their informal caregivers, and (b) estimate effect sizes for the ANSWERS-VA intervention. The ANSWERS-VA intervention will be compared with an educational intervention that will serve as an attention control group.

Specific Aim 1: To tailor the implementation of the ANSWERS-VA intervention to dyads of Veterans post stroke and/or TBI and their informal caregivers (n=10) and modify the implementation processes for the RCT.

Specific Aim 2: To test the short-term (immediately post-intervention) and long-term, sustained (12 and 24 weeks, and at 1 year) efficacy of the ANSWERS-VA intervention for improving: (a) the primary outcomes of the caregivers' quality of life and unhealthy days, and (b) the caregiver mediators of task difficulty, threat appraisal, self-efficacy for caregiving, and optimism.

Specific Aim 3: To evaluate program delivery costs for the ANSWERS-VA intervention and the educational attention control procedures, and to assess the cost-effectiveness of the ANSWERS-VA intervention in terms of noncaregiving hours and unhealthy days in caregivers of Veterans post stroke and/or TBI.

Exploratory Aim 1: To estimate the effect sizes for the ANSWERS-VA intervention for the caregiver and Veteran on the secondary outcomes of depressive symptoms, social participation, and quality of the dyadic relationship.

Methods: The investigators propose to conduct a RCT to evaluate the ANSWERS-VA intervention among Veterans with stroke or TBI and their caregivers (dyads). Veterans with stroke (N = 222) or TBI (N = 108) and their informal caregivers, who have received care at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Houston or the Richard L. Roudebush VAMC in Indianapolis, will be randomized to the ANSWERS-VA intervention or to an attention control group. Both the intervention and control procedures involve 8 telephone sessions delivered over 8 weeks, with a booster session at 12 weeks. Data collections will occur at baseline, 8 weeks (short-term intervention effect), 12 weeks (after booster), 24 weeks, and 1 year after baseline (long-term sustainability of intervention effect). Linear mixed models will be applied to the repeated-measures data to test efficacy of the program in stroke caregivers and to estimate effect sizes in TBI caregivers. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be employed to address the comparative costs and outcomes for the ANSWERS-VA intervention and attention control groups.

Status: Essential modifications for this project were requested and approved via VA Central Office. Institutional Review Board approval has been obtained for these modifications in Indianapolis and in Houston. Graduate students from multiple disciplines have been hired and have received two days of onsite training specific to the ANSWERS-VA intervention and control procedures, screening, recruitment, and data collection processes. The REDCap database has been updated for the project modifications and has been further tested. The investigators are currently working with frontline providers at both sites to recruit potential participants for this RCT. Enrollment of first subject dyads began November, 2014. At this time, the investigators have completed recruitment of new dyads. We continue to complete outcomes assessments on some dyads. We plan to submit an abstract to the International Stroke Conference in January 2019.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
143 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Health Services Research
Official Title:
Telephone Assessment and Skill-Building Intervention for Informal Caregivers
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 3, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 31, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: ANSWERS-VA

8 week telephone intervention with nurse case manager using "Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths" (ANSWERS)

Behavioral: ANSWERS - Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths
Randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of the telephone intervention "Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths"in informal caregivers of Veterans with stroke and TBI.

Other: Control

8 week telephone usual care with education with nurse case manager

Other: Control
8 week telephone usual care with education with nurse case manager

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Caregiver's Depressive Symptoms by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) Scale [Baseline, Week 12, 6 months and 1 year]

    Depression scores are measured with the PHQ9 scale. Scores can range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depression.

  2. Mediators of Caregiver's Task Difficulty [Baseline, Week 12, 6 months and 1 year]

    Task difficulty is measured with the Oberst Caregiving Burden Scale. Scores on a Likert scale can range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating higher levels of burden.

  3. Mediators of Caregiver's Optimism Scale [Baseline, Week 12, 6 months and 1 year]

    Optimism is measured with the Life Orientation Test-Revised Scale. Scores can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating more optimism.

  4. Mediators of Caregiver's Threat Appraisal Scale [Baseline, Week 12, 6 months and 1 year]

    Threat appraisal is measured with the Appraisal of Caregiving Scale: Threat Subscale. Scores on a Likert scale can range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating less belief, feelings and ability to take care of a loved one with stroke or brain injury in the future.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Informal caregiver of a family member or friend (Veteran) with a stroke or TBI

  • Caregiver must express need or concerns in providing care

  • Plans to be providing care for 1 year or longer

  • Access to telephone

  • Willingness to participate in 9 call from a nurse and 5 data collection calls at designated timepoints

  • Veteran's stroke must be within past 3 years

  • Veteran's TBI must be since 9/11/01

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Caregiver or survivor age < 18 years

  • Caregiver denies that survivor has had a stroke or a TBI

  • Caregiver does not consider him or herself a caregiver, stating that the survivor is not impaired or is the same as before the stroke or TBI

  • Caregiver has low task difficulty (OCBS task difficulty score < 16)

  • Caregiver communication difficulties (e.g., hearing loss)

  • Caregiver not fluent in the English language

  • Caregiver with serious medical illness limiting ability to participate

  • Caregiver refuses to sign a HIPAA authorization allowing the VA to store personal health information (PHI) in a location outside the VA

  • Survivor residing in a nursing home or long-term care facility

  • Survivor or caregiver has a terminal illness (e.g., cancer, end of life condition with decreased life expectancy, renal failure requiring dialysis)

  • Survivor or caregiver history of hospitalization for alcohol or drug abuse

  • Survivor or caregiver history of Alzheimer's, dementia, suicidal tendencies, severe untreated depression or manic depressive disorder, or schizophrenia.

  • Survivor or caregiver pregnancy

  • Survivor or caregiver is a prisoner or on house arrest

  • Survivor had a Transient Ischemic Attack (rather than a hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke)

  • Survivor had a stroke more than 3 years ago

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis Indiana United States 46202-2884
2 Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX Houston Texas United States 77030

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • VA Office of Research and Development

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Virginia (Ginger) S. Wilder, PhD MSN RN, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
VA Office of Research and Development
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02398409
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • NRI 12-415
First Posted:
Mar 25, 2015
Last Update Posted:
Jun 17, 2020
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Keywords provided by VA Office of Research and Development
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details The number of recruited participants (143) is slightly different from the number of participants represented in the flow diagram (137) due to the fact there were 6 participants after recruitment and informed consent we were not able to reach them for data collection.
Pre-assignment Detail Veterans and Caregiver were enrolled as dyads. "Participants" refers to the Dyads.
Arm/Group Title ANSWERS-VA Control
Arm/Group Description 8 week telephone intervention with nurse case manager using "Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths" (ANSWERS) ANSWERS - Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths: Randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of the telephone intervention "Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths"in informal caregivers of Veterans with stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). 8 week telephone usual care with education with nurse case manager Control: 8 week telephone usual care with education with nurse case manager
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 69 68
COMPLETED 67 63
NOT COMPLETED 2 5

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title ANSWERS-VA Control Total
Arm/Group Description 8 week telephone intervention with nurse case manager using "Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths" (ANSWERS) ANSWERS - Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths: Randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of the telephone intervention "Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths"in informal caregivers of Veterans with stroke and TBI. 8 week telephone usual care with education with nurse case manager Control: 8 week telephone usual care with education with nurse case manager Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 67 63 130
Age (Count of Participants)
<=18 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Between 18 and 65 years
57
85.1%
50
79.4%
107
82.3%
>=65 years
10
14.9%
13
20.6%
23
17.7%
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
61
91%
57
90.5%
118
90.8%
Male
6
9%
6
9.5%
12
9.2%
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants)
Count of Participants [Participants]
0
0%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Caregiver's Depressive Symptoms by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) Scale
Description Depression scores are measured with the PHQ9 scale. Scores can range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depression.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 12, 6 months and 1 year

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Not change data. One Intervention Caregiver and one Control Caregiver did not complete the PHQ9. Those data are missing.
Arm/Group Title ANSWERS-VA Control
Arm/Group Description 8 week telephone intervention with nurse case manager using "Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths" (ANSWERS) ANSWERS - Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths: Randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of the telephone intervention "Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths"in informal caregivers of Veterans with stroke and TBI. 8 week telephone usual care with education with nurse case manager Control: 8 week telephone usual care with education with nurse case manager
Measure Participants 66 62
Baseline
.56
(.53)
.68
(.61)
Week 12
.41
(.45)
.62
(.59)
6 Months
.20
(.25)
.57
(.56)
1 Year
.47
(.66)
.43
(.49)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ANSWERS-VA
Comments 12 weeks compared to Baseline (BL)
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .8407
Comments Adjusting for the covariates of diagnosis and baseline mean value in caregivers' depression.
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Net)
Estimated Value .016
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
to
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: .117
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ANSWERS-VA
Comments At 6 months compared to BL
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0150
Comments Adjusting for the covariates of diagnosis and baseline mean value in caregivers' depression.
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Median Difference (Net)
Estimated Value .201
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
to
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: .120
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ANSWERS-VA
Comments 1 year compared BL
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .8373
Comments adjusting for the covariates of diagnosis and baseline mean value in caregivers' depression
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Median Difference (Net)
Estimated Value .114
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
to
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: .188
Estimation Comments
2. Primary Outcome
Title Mediators of Caregiver's Task Difficulty
Description Task difficulty is measured with the Oberst Caregiving Burden Scale. Scores on a Likert scale can range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating higher levels of burden.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 12, 6 months and 1 year

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Not change data
Arm/Group Title ANSWERS-VA Control
Arm/Group Description 8 week telephone intervention with nurse case manager using "Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths" (ANSWERS) ANSWERS - Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths: Randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of the telephone intervention "Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths"in informal caregivers of Veterans with stroke and TBI. 8 week telephone usual care with education with nurse case manager Control: 8 week telephone usual care with education with nurse case manager
Measure Participants 67 63
Baseline
1.99
(.77)
1.83
(.68)
12 Week
1.73
(.70)
1.73
(.61)
6 Months
1.70
(.64)
1.63
(.57)
1 Year
1.78
(.62)
1.66
(.79)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ANSWERS-VA
Comments 12 weeks compared to BL
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .6445
Comments adjusting for the covariates of diagnosis and baseline mean value in caregivers' depression
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Median Difference (Net)
Estimated Value .016
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
to
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: .173
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ANSWERS-VA
Comments 6 months compared to BL
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .5247
Comments adjusting for the covariates of diagnosis and baseline mean value in caregivers' depression
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Median Difference (Net)
Estimated Value .033
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
to
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: .158
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ANSWERS-VA
Comments 1 year compared to BL
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .9974
Comments adjusting for the covariates of diagnosis and baseline mean value in caregivers' depression
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Median Difference (Net)
Estimated Value .1224
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
to
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: .187
Estimation Comments
3. Primary Outcome
Title Mediators of Caregiver's Optimism Scale
Description Optimism is measured with the Life Orientation Test-Revised Scale. Scores can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating more optimism.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 12, 6 months and 1 year

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Not change data. One Control Caregiver did not complete the Life Orientation Test-Revised Scale. Those data are missing.
Arm/Group Title ANSWERS-VA Control
Arm/Group Description 8 week telephone intervention with nurse case manager using "Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths" (ANSWERS) ANSWERS - Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths: Randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of the telephone intervention "Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths"in informal caregivers of Veterans with stroke and TBI. 8 week telephone usual care with education with nurse case manager Control: 8 week telephone usual care with education with nurse case manager
Measure Participants 67 62
Baseline
2.29
(.35)
2.33
(.39)
12 Week
2.19
(.40)
2.29
(.27)
6 Months
2.31
(.34)
2.29
(.31)
1 Year
2.25
(.27)
2.28
(.37)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ANSWERS-VA
Comments 12 weeks compared to BL
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .1918
Comments adjusting for the covariates of diagnosis and baseline mean value in caregivers' depression
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Median Difference (Net)
Estimated Value .054
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
to
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: .087
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ANSWERS-VA
Comments 6 months compared to BL
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .9212
Comments adjusting for the covariates of diagnosis and baseline mean value in caregivers' depression
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Median Difference (Net)
Estimated Value .046
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
to
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: .078
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ANSWERS-VA
Comments 1 year compared to BL
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .2358
Comments adjusting for the covariates of diagnosis and baseline mean value in caregivers' depression
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Median Difference (Net)
Estimated Value .026
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
to
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: .083
Estimation Comments
4. Primary Outcome
Title Mediators of Caregiver's Threat Appraisal Scale
Description Threat appraisal is measured with the Appraisal of Caregiving Scale: Threat Subscale. Scores on a Likert scale can range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating less belief, feelings and ability to take care of a loved one with stroke or brain injury in the future.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 12, 6 months and 1 year

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Not change data. One Control Caregivers did not complete the Threat Subscale. Those data are missing.
Arm/Group Title ANSWERS-VA Control
Arm/Group Description 8 week telephone intervention with nurse case manager using "Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths" (ANSWERS) ANSWERS - Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths: Randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of the telephone intervention "Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths"in informal caregivers of Veterans with stroke and TBI. 8 week telephone usual care with education with nurse case manager Control: 8 week telephone usual care with education with nurse case manager
Measure Participants 67 62
Baseline
2.73
(.86)
2.66
(.78)
12 Week
2.56
(.83)
2.49
(.68)
6 Months
2.38
(.95)
2.69
(.67)
1 Year
2.58
(1.0)
2.44
(.61)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ANSWERS-VA
Comments 12 weeks compared to BL
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments adjusting for the covariates of diagnosis and baseline mean value in caregivers' depression
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .1107
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Median Difference (Net)
Estimated Value .008
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
to
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: .168
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ANSWERS-VA
Comments 6 months compared to BL
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments adjusting for the covariates of diagnosis and baseline mean value in caregivers' depression
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .0562
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Median Difference (Net)
Estimated Value .251
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
to
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: .211
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection ANSWERS-VA
Comments 1 year compared to BL
Type of Statistical Test Superiority
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value .8579
Comments adjusting for the covariates of diagnosis and baseline mean value in caregivers' depression
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Median Difference (Net)
Estimated Value .226
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) %
to
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: .218
Estimation Comments

Adverse Events

Time Frame Baseline to 12 month follow up.
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title ANSWERS-VA Control
Arm/Group Description 8 week telephone intervention with nurse case manager using "Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths" (ANSWERS) ANSWERS - Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths: Randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of the telephone intervention "Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths"in informal caregivers of Veterans with stroke and TBI. 8 week telephone usual care with education with nurse case manager Control: 8 week telephone usual care with education with nurse case manager
All Cause Mortality
ANSWERS-VA Control
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/67 (0%) 0/63 (0%)
Serious Adverse Events
ANSWERS-VA Control
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/67 (0%) 0/63 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
ANSWERS-VA Control
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 2/67 (3%) 0/63 (0%)
Cardiac disorders
Adverse Event 1/67 (1.5%) 1 0/63 (0%) 0
adverse event 1/67 (1.5%) 1 0/63 (0%) 0

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Dr. Virginia (Daggett) Wilder
Organization VHA
Phone 307-675-3659
Email virginia.wilder@va.gov
Responsible Party:
VA Office of Research and Development
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02398409
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • NRI 12-415
First Posted:
Mar 25, 2015
Last Update Posted:
Jun 17, 2020
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2020