Evaluation of Whether Functional Strength Training Can Enhance Recovery of Mobility After Stroke

Sponsor
St George's, University of London (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00322192
Collaborator
The Health Foundation (Other)
300
4
35
75
2.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that adding functional strength training to UK conventional therapy improves muscle function and walking than either UK conventional therapy alone or increased intensity of UK conventional therapy

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Conventional UK Physical therapy
  • Behavioral: Increased intensity of UK conventional physical therapy
  • Behavioral: UK conventional physical therapy plus functional strength training
Phase 2

Detailed Description

Neuromuscular weakness occurs frequently after stroke and the processes underlying recovery are still poorly understood. Accepted practice in UK physiotherapy is to avoid training of muscle strength after stroke but there is preliminary evidence that it might be effective.

An observer-blind randomised clinical trial. Subjects will be within 3 months of first stroke with some voluntary movement in the paretic lower limb. A power calculation estimated the sample size as 300. Research Physiotherapists, blinded to measurement, will recruit subjects, allocate subjects to one of the three intervention groups using sequentially numbered sealed envelopes containing previously randomised allocated intervention cards and provide interventions. The Research Assessors, blinded to intervention allocation will undertake all measurements. Conventional therapy (control) will be provided as normal for the clinical setting, the additional conventional therapy (experimental 1) or functional strength training (experimental 2) will be provided for one hour, four times a week, for six weeks. Subjects in the two experimental groups will also receive the conventional therapy standard in their clinical setting. Blinded measurement will be made before randomisation, at the end of intervention and 12-weeks thereafter. Primary outcomes are maximum torque around the knee joint, and gait velocity. The secondary outcomes include movement analysis, functional ability, corticospinal transmission (transcranial magnetic stimulation) and health related quality of life (Euroqol). The primary analysis will be analysis of covariance. A multiple comparison procedure (Gabriel's test) will be used to compare each pair of treatments. Euroqol data will be used to estimate the relative costs of the interventions and to calculate the incremental cost per QUALY gained. Every effort will be made to invite patients for assessment at outcome and follow-up even if they have withdrawn from therapy to allow the intention-to-treat principle to be applied.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
300 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The Effects of Functional Strength Training on Weakness and Function of the Lower Limb After Stroke
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2004
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2006

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Maximum torque around the knee joint []

  2. gait velocity []

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Modified Rivermead Mobility Index []

  2. Lower limb kinematics during standing up []

  3. Lower limb kinematics during sitting down []

  4. Lower limb kinematics during walking []

  5. timing and pattern of muscle activation during functional activity []

  6. EuroQuol for health related quality of life []

  7. Transmission in the corticospinal pathways for suitable subjects who provide additional written informed consent for TMS []

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects in this study will:
  • be aged over 50 years.

  • be between one week and three months after stroke when recruited to the study;

  • have been independently mobile indoors, with or without aids, before the stroke;

  • have some voluntary movement in the paretic lower limb i.e. score above 28/100 on the lower limb section of the Motricity Index43;

  • demonstrate adequate orientation and communication (be able to complete a one-stage command using the non-paretic upper limb e.g. point at the ceiling).

In addition those who agree to participate in TMS measurement will have no contraindications to TMS.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Epsom and St Helier NHS Trust Carshalton Surrey United Kingdom SM5 1AA
2 Ashford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Trust Chertsey Surrey United Kingdom KT16 0PZ
3 Mayday University Hospital NHS Trust Thornton Heath Surrey United Kingdom CR7 7YE
4 St George's Hospital NHS Trust London United Kingdom SW17 0RE

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • St George's, University of London
  • The Health Foundation

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Valerie M Pomeroy, PhD, St George's University London, UK
  • Principal Investigator: Emma V Cooke, MSc, St George's University London, UK
  • Study Director: Raymond C Tallis, FMedSci, University of Manchester

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00322192
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Health Foundation 224/1960
  • Health Foundation 224/1960
First Posted:
May 5, 2006
Last Update Posted:
Jun 10, 2015
Last Verified:
May 1, 2006
Keywords provided by , ,
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 10, 2015