Motor Coordination and Grip Strength of the Dominant and Non-dominant Hand and Wrist in Post-stroke Patients.

Sponsor
Anna Olczak (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04889612
Collaborator
(none)
120
1
1
2.2
55.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study aimed to assess how stabilization of the trunk and the upper extremity can change the parameters of hand/wrist motor coordination and grip strength in dominant and non-dominant paretic upper limb, in post-stroke patients and neurologically healthy subjects.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: hand motor coordination in a sitting positin
  • Procedure: hand motor coordination in a supine position
N/A

Detailed Description

The examination of the dominant and non-dominant paretic hand consisted of two motor tasks, carried out in two different starting positions: sitting and lying down (supine).

During the first examination, the subject sat on the therapeutic table (without back support), feet resting on the floor. The upper limb was examined in adduction of the humeral joint, with the elbow bent in the intermediate position between pronation and supination of the forearm, with free wrist and the hand.

In the supine position, the affected upper limb was stabilized at the subject's body (adduction in the humeral joint, elbow flexion in the intermediate position, wrist and hand free). The Hand Tutor device and an electronic hand dynamometer were used for the measurements. In each of the starting positions, after putting the glove on (using the Hand Tutor Device), the subject was asked to make moves as quickly and in as full a range as possible. Finally, the measurement of grip strength with a dynamometer was performed in both analyzed starting positions, after completing the range of motion and frequency tests.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
120 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Analysis of the Influence of the Position of the Trunk and the Affected Upper Limb on Motor Coordination and Grip Strength of the Dominant and Non-dominant Hand and Wrist in Post-stroke Patients Compared to Healthy Controls.
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 5, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 10, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 10, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: motor coordination and grip strength in dominant/non-dominant hand

Dominant and non-dominant hand motor coordination and grip strength were tested in the stable position of the trunk and the upper arm, in post-stroke patients (study group) and in healthy subjects (control group).

Procedure: hand motor coordination in a sitting positin
The subject sat on the therapeutic table (without back support), feet resting on the floor. The upper limb was to be examined in adduction of the humeral joint, with the elbow bent in the intermediate position between pronation and supination of the forearm, with free wrist and the hand. After putting the glove on, the subject was asked to make moves as quickly and in as full a range as possible. Finally, the measurement of grip strength with a dynamometer was performed.

Procedure: hand motor coordination in a supine position
In the supine position, the upper limb was stabilized at the subject's body (adduction in the humeral joint, elbow flexion in the intermediate position, wrist and hand free). After putting the Hand Tutor glove on, the subject was asked to make moves as quickly and in as full a range as possible. Finally, the measurement of grip strength with a dynamometer was performed.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Frequency of wrist movement (flexion to extension), cycles#/sec [up to 1 week]

    The Hand Tutor allows measurements the speed or frequency (i.e., the number of cycles per second, where one cycle represents the movement from flexion to contraction).

  2. Frequency of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th finger movement (flexion to extension), cycles#/sec [up to 1 week]

    The Hand Tutor allows measurements the speed or frequency (i.e., the number of cycles per second, where one cycle represents the movement from flexion to contraction).

  3. Wrist maximum range of motion (ROM) [mm] [up to 1 week]

    The Hand Tutor allows measurements of the maximum range of motion (ROM). ROM is a sum of the wrist flexion or extension angles (mm). ROM is a sum of all the finger flexion or extension angles (i.e. at the metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints), mm.

  4. 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th finger maximum range of motion (ROM), [mm] [up to 1 week]

    The Hand Tutor allows measurements of the maximum range of motion (ROM). ROM is a sum of the wrist flexion or extension angles (mm). ROM is a sum of all the finger flexion or extension angles (i.e. at the metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints), mm.

  5. Assessment of the grip strength [up to 1 week]

    Grip strength, kg (a manual electronic dynamometer (EH 101) was used for grip strength measurement (error of measurement, 0.5 kg/lb)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
20 Years to 91 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes

Stroke Inclusion Criteria:1) participants with ischemic stroke; 2) participants with hemiparesis after 5 to 7 week after stroke; 3) participants with stable trunk (the Trunk Control Test 70-100 points); 4) participants who were in a functional state allowing movements of the upper extremity (FMA-UE 40-66 motor function points); 5) muscle tension (MAS 0 -1+); 6) no severe deficits in communication, memory, or understanding what can impede proper measurement performance; Stroke Exclusion Criteria:1) stroke up to two weeks after the episode, 2) acute polyneuropathy and damage to peripheral nerves, 3) lack of trunk stability, 4) no wrist and hand movement, 5) muscle tension (˃2 MAS), 6) high or very low blood pressure, 7) dizziness, a malaise of the respondents.

Healthy Inclusion Criteria - 1) the control group consisted of participants free from the upper extremity motor coordination disorders; Healthy Exclusion Criteria: 1) participants with a history of neurologic or musculoskeletal disorders such as carpal tunnel syndrome, tendonitis, stroke, head injury, or other conditions that could affect their ability to active movement and grip hand; 2) with severe deficits in communication, memory, or understanding what can impede proper measurement performance;

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Military Institute of Medicine Warsaw Masovian District Poland 04-141

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Anna Olczak

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anna Olczak, PhD, Rehabilitation Clinic, Military Institute of Medicine

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Anna Olczak, PhD; Senior Specjalit of the Rehabilitation Clinc, Military Institute of Medicine, Poland
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04889612
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 7/KRN/2019
First Posted:
May 17, 2021
Last Update Posted:
May 19, 2021
Last Verified:
May 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Anna Olczak, PhD; Senior Specjalit of the Rehabilitation Clinc, Military Institute of Medicine, Poland
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 19, 2021