ATTAACH: Anticoagulation Therapy Timing in Atrial Fibrillation After Acute and Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Sponsor
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05472766
Collaborator
(none)
120
1
2
30
4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Subdural hematoma (SDH) is a common disorder that typically results from head trauma and has increased in prevalence in recent decades. Acute subdural hematomas (aSDH) are found in up to one-third of patients with severe traumatic brain injury and are associated with an unfavorable outcome in the majority of cases. Chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) commonly occur in the elderly population which has highest risk for developing cSDH with or without minor head injuries. The combination of the aging population, higher incidence of disease in progressively older patients, and high morbidity and mortality renders SDH a growing problem within Canada with significant health-systems burden. SDH commonly recurs even after successful surgical drainage. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common medical comorbidities in patients with cSDH, especially in the elderly, with an expected doubling of its prevalence by the year 2030. Patients with AF are at recognized risk for stroke, so anticoagulation is indicated for almost all patients. Anticoagulation is held prior to SDH drainage to minimize the risk of intraoperative and early postoperative bleeding. After surgery, the risk of SDH recurrence must be balanced against the risk of thromboembolic events such as stroke when deciding the timing of resuming anticoagulation. Currently the decision on when to restart anticoagulation after SDH is made by clinicians on an individual patient basis without any high-quality evidence to guide this decision. The two most common approaches are: 1) early resumption of anticoagulation after 30 days of diagnosis or surgery; and 2) delayed resumption of anticoagulation after 90 days of diagnosis or surgery. However, which of these approaches leads to the best functional outcomes for patients is unclear. Our pilot RCT will test the feasibility of comparing these 2 approaches in a larger multicenter RCT.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulant starting at Day 30
  • Drug: Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulant starting at Day 90
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
120 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Anticoagulation Therapy Timing in Atrial Fibrillation After Acute and Chronic Subdural Hematoma (ATTAACH)
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Early resumption of anticoagulation

The standard of care DOAC at appropriate standard dose assigned by the MRP will start at day 30 +/- 5 after diagnosis of acute or chronic subdural hematoma.

Drug: Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulant starting at Day 30
Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, Apixaban or Endoxaban at standard dose as recommended by the MRP

Active Comparator: Delayed resumption of anticoagulation

The standard of care DOAC at appropriate standard dose assigned by the MRP will start at day 90 +/- 7 after diagnosis of acute or chronic subdural hematoma.

Drug: Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulant starting at Day 90
Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, Apixaban or Endoxaban at standard dose as recommended by the MRP

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Recruitment rate [1 year]

    The number of participants enrolled for each participating institution, measured as the rate of consent for patients meeting eligibility criteria in one year per institution. Reasons for non-enrollment of eligible patients will be recorded

  2. Implementation of study protocol [Study completion ~2.5 years]

    The proportion of enrolled participants who have completed follow-up measures at 90 days with complete recording of the functional outcome degree of disability

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Functional outcome - Degree of disability [90 days]

    Level of disability measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The mRS is a core instrument used for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in activities of daily living that is sensitive to thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. It is a clinician-reported measure and widely applied for evaluating stroke patient outcomes. It is a 7-level ordered categorical scale with scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms/disability) to 6 (death). The analysis will be categorized as favourable outcome (scores 0-3) versus unfavourable outcome (scores 4-6)

  2. Functional outcome - Degree of disability [180 days]

    Level of disability measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The mRS is a core instrument used for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in activities of daily living that is sensitive to thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. It is a clinician-reported measure and widely applied for evaluating stroke patient outcomes. It is a 7-level ordered categorical scale with scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms/disability) to 6 (death). The analysis will be categorized as favourable outcome (scores 0-3) versus unfavourable outcome (scores 4-6)

  3. Functional outcome - Stroke-related neurologic deficit [90 days]

    Measured using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) which is a 15-item impairment scale. It groups scores into categories based on severity, ranging from mild to very severe, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of impairment

  4. Functional outcome - Stroke-related neurologic deficit [180 days]

    Measured using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) which is a 15-item impairment scale. It groups scores into categories based on severity, ranging from mild to very severe, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of impairment

  5. Incidence of intracranial hemorrhage [Continuous, baseline to 180 days]

    The composite outcome of clinically-important intracranial hemorrhage defined by: 1) any increase in volume of blood in the CT of at least 33%; 2) need for surgical evacuation of SDH or repeat surgical evacuation; 3) death directly related to enlarging SDH or new parenchymal bleed; 4) symptomatic bleeding in a critical non-intracranial region

  6. Incidence of thromboembolic events [Continuous, baseline to 180 days]

    Composite outcome of clinically-important thromboembolic events defined as any of: 1) symptomatic TIA; 2) symptomatic objectively-confirmed ischemic stroke; 3) symptomatic, objectively-confirmed non-CNS systemic embolism; 4) objectively proven VTE; 5) all death directly or indirectly caused by a thrombotic event

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. ≥18 years of age

  2. Any SDH, defined as either acute or encapsulated partially liquefied hematoma in the subdural space diagnosed on a CT scan

  3. Can have surgical drainage (either burr hole or craniotomy) for aSDH and cSDH

  4. On therapeutic anticoagulation (DOAC or warfarin) as standard of care therapy prior to presentation for stroke prophylaxis secondary to AF

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. aSDH requiring decompressive craniectomy

  2. Mechanical heart valve or moderate to severe mitral stenosis

  3. Known chronic coagulopathy (elevated INR >1.5 or PTT>40s after anticoagulant reversal, thrombocytopenia with platelet count <50x109/L) that is not amenable to reversal

  4. 35 days has elapsed since initial diagnosis without recruitment into the trial

  5. Active gastroduodenal ulcer, urogenital or respiratory tract hemorrhage

  6. Known pregnancy or breastfeeding

  7. Indication for therapeutic anticoagulation other than AF

  8. Pre-randomization brain CT at 2-4 weeks after initial diagnosis or surgery date reveals significant recurrence requiring surgical drainage

  9. Known to be non-compliant with prior anticoagulant

  10. MRP decides to restart Warfarin (as opposed to DOACs) as prophylactic anticoagulant as part of standard therapy for the patient after cSDH or aSDH

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto Ontario Canada M4N 3M5

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Farhad Pirouzmand, MD, MSc, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05472766
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 3998
First Posted:
Jul 25, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jul 29, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 29, 2022