Screening and Brief Advice to Reduce Teen Substance Use
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of a brief intervention for alcohol and drug use in adolescents that a primary care doctor can give in his/her office. The study will be conducted in nine primary care offices in three New England states, and in ten pediatric offices in Prague, Czech Republic (CZR).
We hypothesize that:
-
Among 12-18 year old well care patients who screen positive for drug/alcohol use, the experimental intervention administered by trained primary care providers will be more effective than standard care in decreasing drug and alcohol use;
-
Among 12-18 year old well care patients who screen negative for drug/alcohol use, the experimental intervention administered by trained primary care providers will be more effective than standard care in decreasing initiation of drug and alcohol use as measured by self-reports of substance use;
-
Among 12-18 year old well care patients who are at risk for riding with an impaired driver or driving while impaired, the experimental intervention administered by trained primary care providers will be more effective than standard care in decreasing Riding/Driving risk behavior as measured by a standardized scale.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
We are trying to find out the best way for doctors to talk with their adolescent patients about alcohol and drug use. Adolescents 12-18 who are coming to their doctor's office for a routine well-care or follow-up visit will be invited to participate in the study. Participants do not have to have ever used alcohol or drugs. All participants will answer a computerized questionnaire about alcohol and drug use three times. The first one will be at the time of a doctor's visit. The second time will be three months later and the third time a year later. Adolescents who agree to be in the study during the first year will be in the 'control' group. Their doctor will talk to them about drugs and alcohol the same as he/she usually does for all his/her patients. Those who agree to be in the study during the second year will be in the 'intervention' group. Everyone in the 'intervention' group will receive some advice on the computer about their alcohol and drug use. Their doctor will also give them some specific advice about drug and alcohol use. The researchers have chosen what that advice will be, and all doctors involved in the study will give advice according to the study protocol. Participants and their parents will also be given educational information about alcohol and drugs. We will test the effectiveness of the intervention by comparing drug and alcohol use between those who are in the 'control' group, and those who are in the 'intervention' group.
We we will also validate the Czech version of the CRAFFT screen before conducting the effectiveness trial outlined above in the Czech Republic.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Control - New England, USA Control participants will receive "care as usual" from their provider |
|
Experimental: cSBA - New England, USA Participants who are in the experimental arm will complete the CRAFFT screen on the computer and receive information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider will be given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which they will use to guide a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. Participants and their families will also receive educational brochures about substance use. |
Behavioral: cSBA - New England, USA
Participants who are in the experimental arm will complete the CRAFFT screen on the computer and receive information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider will be given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking point" which they will use to guide a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. Participants and their families will also receive educational brochures about substance use.
Other Names:
|
No Intervention: Control - Prague, CZR Control participants will receive "care as usual" from their provider |
|
Experimental: cSBA - Prague, CZR Participants who are in the experimental arm will complete the CRAFFT screen on the computer and receive information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider will be given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which they will use to guide a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. Participants and their families will also receive educational brochures about substance use. |
Behavioral: cSBA - Prague, CZR
Participants who are in the experimental arm will complete the CRAFFT screen on the computer and receive information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider will be given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking point" which they will use to guide a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. Participants and their families will also receive educational brochures about substance use.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Past-90-day Substance Use at 3 Months Among Baseline Substance Users - New England, USA [Past-90-days at 3 months post-baseline]
Among the 12-18 year old primary care patients who reported past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline in New England, USA, this analysis reports the number who subsequently reported past-90-day drug or alcohol use at the 3 months post-baseline assessment.
- Past-90-day Substance Use at 3 Months Among Baseline Substance Non-Users, New England, USA [Past-90-days at 3 months post-baseline]
Among the 12-18 year old primary care patients who did NOT report past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline in New England, USA, this analysis reports the number who subsequently reported past-90-day drug or alcohol use at the 3 months post-baseline assessment.
- Past-12-month Substance Use at 12 Months Among Baseline Substance Users, New England, USA [Past-12-months at 12 months post-baseline]
Of those participants who reported past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline,the number reporting past-90-day drug or alcohol use at 12 months post-baseline assessment in New England, USA
- Past-12-month Substance Use at 12 Months, Baseline Substance Non-Users, New England, USA [Past-12-months at 12 months post-baseline]
Of those participants who reported NO past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline,the number reporting past-90-day drug or alcohol use at 12 months post-baseline assessment in New England, USA
- Past-90-day Substance Use at 3 Months Among Baseline Substance Users - Prague, CZR [Past-90-days at 3 months post-baseline]
Of those participants who reported past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline,the number reporting past-90-day drug or alcohol use at 3 months post-baseline assessment in Prague, Czech Republic
- Past-90-day Substance Use at 3 Months Among Baseline Substance Non-Users - Prague, CZR [Past-90-days at 3 months post-baseline]
Of those participants who reported NO past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline,the number reporting past-90-day drug or alcohol use at 3 months post-baseline assessment in Prague, Czech Republic
- Past-12-Month Substance Use at 12 Months Among Baseline Substance Users - Prague, CZR [Past-12-months at 12 months post-baseline]
Of those participants who reported past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline,the number reporting past-12-month drug or alcohol use at 12 months post-baseline assessment in Prague, Czech Republic
- Past-12-Month Substance Use at 12 Months Among Baseline Substance Non-Users - Prague, CZR [Past-12-months at 12 months post-baseline]
Of those participants who reported past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline,the number reporting past-12-month drug or alcohol use at 12 months post-baseline assessment in Prague, Czech Republic
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Any Risky Riding or Driving at 3 Months - New England, USA [Past-90-days at 3 months post-baseline]
Any past-90-day self-reported Riding with a driver who had used alcohol or other drugs or Driving after having used alcohol or other drugs at 3 months post-baseline assessment - New England
- Any Risky Riding or Driving at 12 Months - New England, USA [Past-90-days at 12 months post-baseline]
Any past-90-day self-reported Riding with a driver who had used alcohol or other drugs or Driving after having used alcohol or other drugs at 12 months post-baseline assessment - New England
- Any Risky Riding or Driving at 3 Months - Prague, CZR [Past-90-days at 3 months post-baseline]
Any past-90-day self-reported Riding with a driver who had used alcohol or other drugs or Driving after having used alcohol or other drugs at 3 months post-baseline assessment - Prague, Czech Republic
- Any Risky Riding or Driving at 12 Months - Prague, CZR [Past-90-days at 12 months post-baseline]
Any past-90-day self-reported Riding with a driver who had used alcohol or other drugs or Driving after having used alcohol or other drugs at 12 months post-baseline assessment - Prague, Czech Republic
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
12-18 year old patients coming for well care or follow-up visits to one of the study sites, All levels of substance use, Able to read and understand English
Exclusion Criteria:
Will not be available for 12 month follow-up period, Medically unstable at the time of the visit
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tufts-New England Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02111 |
2 | Cambridge Pediatrics | Cambridge | Massachusetts | United States | 02139 |
3 | Fallon Clinic | Worcester | Massachusetts | United States | 01605 |
4 | Capital Region Family Health Center | Concord | New Hampshire | United States | 03301 |
5 | Milton Family Practice | Milton | Vermont | United States | 05468 |
6 | Center for the Evaluation, Prevention, and Research of Substance Abuse | Prague | Czechia |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Boston Children's Hospital
- Cambridge Health Alliance
- Concord Hospital
- Fallon Clinic
- Tufts Medical Center
- University of Vermont
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: John R Knight, M.D., Boston Children's Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
- Knight JR, Harris SK, Sherritt L, Van Hook S, Lawrence N, Brooks T, Carey P, Kossack R, Kulig J. Adolescents' preference for substance abuse screening in primary care practice. Subst Abus. 2007;28(4):107-17.
- Knight JR, Harris SK, Sherritt L, Van Hook S, Lawrence N, Brooks T, Carey P, Kossack R, Kulig J. Prevalence of positive substance abuse screen results among adolescent primary care patients. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Nov;161(11):1035-41.
- Knight JR, Sherritt L, Shrier LA, Harris SK, Chang G. Validity of the CRAFFT substance abuse screening test among adolescent clinic patients. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Jun;156(6):607-14.
- Knight JR, Shrier LA, Bravender TD, Farrell M, Vander Bilt J, Shaffer HJ. A new brief screen for adolescent substance abuse. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Jun;153(6):591-6.
- Van Hook S, Harris SK, Brooks T, Carey P, Kossack R, Kulig J, Knight JR; New England Partnership for Substance Abuse Research. The "Six T's": barriers to screening teens for substance abuse in primary care. J Adolesc Health. 2007 May;40(5):456-61. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
- NIDA-R01DA0118848
- NCT00592878
- NCT00592956
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Quasi-experimental, asynchronous study design with each site as its own control. From 2005 to 2008, 12- to 18-year-olds arriving for routine care at 9 medical offices in New England (n= 2096, 58% females) and 10 in Prague, Czech Republic (n = 589, 47% females) were recruited. Medically/emotionally stable, able to read, and available for follow-ups. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Control - New England | cSBA - New England | Control - Czech Republic | cSBA - Czech Republic |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Control participants received "care as usual" from their provider | Computer screen & brief physician advice: Participants in the experimental arm completed a computerized CRAFFT screen and received information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider was given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which guided a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. | Control participants received "care as usual" from their provider | Computer screen & brief physician advice: Participants in the experimental arm completed a computerized CRAFFT screen and received information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider was given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" to guide a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. |
Period Title: Pre-visit Assessment | ||||
STARTED | 1075 | 1031 | 297 | 292 |
COMPLETED | 1068 | 1028 | 297 | 292 |
NOT COMPLETED | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Period Title: Pre-visit Assessment | ||||
STARTED | 1068 | 1028 | 297 | 292 |
COMPLETED | 1044 | 1015 | 296 | 292 |
NOT COMPLETED | 24 | 13 | 1 | 0 |
Period Title: Pre-visit Assessment | ||||
STARTED | 1068 | 1028 | 297 | 292 |
COMPLETED | 755 | 761 | 245 | 271 |
NOT COMPLETED | 313 | 267 | 52 | 21 |
Period Title: Pre-visit Assessment | ||||
STARTED | 1068 | 1028 | 297 | 292 |
COMPLETED | 758 | 765 | 266 | 266 |
NOT COMPLETED | 310 | 263 | 31 | 26 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Control - New England | Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England | Control - Czech Republic | Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - Czech Republic | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Control participants will receive "care as usual" from their provider | Participants who are in the experimental arm will complete the CRAFFT screen on the computer and receive information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider will be given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which they will use to guide a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. Participants and their families will also receive educational brochures about substance use. Computer screen & brief physician advice: Participants who are in the experimental arm will complete the CRAFFT screen on the computer and receive information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider will be given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking point" which they will use to guide a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. Participants and their families will also receive educational brochures about substance use. | Control participants will receive "care as usual" from their provider | Participants who are in the experimental arm will complete the CRAFFT screen on the computer and receive information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider will be given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which they will use to guide a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. Participants and their families will also receive educational brochures about substance use. Computer screen & brief physician advice: Participants who are in the experimental arm will complete the CRAFFT screen on the computer and receive information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider will be given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking point" which they will use to guide a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. Participants and their families will also receive educational brochures about substance use. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 1068 | 1028 | 297 | 292 | 2685 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||||
Age |
15.9
(2.0)
|
15.6
(2.0)
|
15.0
(1.6)
|
15.0
(1.6)
|
15.8
(2.0)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||||
Female |
659
61.7%
|
561
54.6%
|
139
46.8%
|
139
47.6%
|
1498
55.8%
|
Male |
409
38.3%
|
467
45.4%
|
158
53.2%
|
153
52.4%
|
1187
44.2%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants) | |||||
White non-Hispanic |
689
64.5%
|
664
64.6%
|
297
100%
|
292
100%
|
1942
72.3%
|
Hispanic |
106
9.9%
|
124
12.1%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
230
8.6%
|
Asian non-Hispanic |
77
7.2%
|
74
7.2%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
151
5.6%
|
Black non-Hispanic |
100
9.4%
|
117
11.4%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
217
8.1%
|
Other non-Hispanic |
96
9%
|
49
4.8%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
145
5.4%
|
Parents at Home (Count of Participants) | |||||
Two parents |
703
65.8%
|
721
70.1%
|
184
62%
|
195
66.8%
|
1803
67.2%
|
One parent or Other |
341
31.9%
|
294
28.6%
|
107
36%
|
97
33.2%
|
839
31.2%
|
Parents Highest Education Level (Count of Participants) | |||||
College/university degree or higher |
451
42.2%
|
522
50.8%
|
92
31%
|
100
34.2%
|
1165
43.4%
|
High school/Secondary school graduate |
427
40%
|
405
39.4%
|
111
37.4%
|
106
36.3%
|
1049
39.1%
|
Did not complete high school/secondary school |
46
4.3%
|
33
3.2%
|
44
14.8%
|
46
15.8%
|
169
6.3%
|
Don't know |
99
9.3%
|
42
4.1%
|
43
14.5%
|
38
13%
|
222
8.3%
|
Visit type (Count of Participants) | |||||
Yes |
851
79.7%
|
968
94.2%
|
297
100%
|
292
100%
|
2408
89.7%
|
No |
199
18.6%
|
51
5%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
250
9.3%
|
Yes |
115
10.8%
|
105
10.2%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
220
8.2%
|
No |
930
87.1%
|
914
88.9%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1844
68.7%
|
Yes |
663
62.1%
|
684
66.5%
|
263
88.6%
|
259
88.7%
|
1869
69.6%
|
No |
391
36.6%
|
335
32.6%
|
33
11.1%
|
33
11.3%
|
792
29.5%
|
Parent Substance Use (Count of Participants) | |||||
Count of Participants [Participants] |
170
15.9%
|
152
14.8%
|
32
10.8%
|
32
11%
|
386
14.4%
|
Sibling Substance Abuse (Count of Participants) | |||||
Count of Participants [Participants] |
205
19.2%
|
187
18.2%
|
41
13.8%
|
36
12.3%
|
469
17.5%
|
Peer substance abuse (Count of Participants) | |||||
Count of Participants [Participants] |
658
61.6%
|
607
59%
|
204
68.7%
|
192
65.8%
|
1661
61.9%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Past-90-day Substance Use at 3 Months Among Baseline Substance Users - New England, USA |
---|---|
Description | Among the 12-18 year old primary care patients who reported past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline in New England, USA, this analysis reports the number who subsequently reported past-90-day drug or alcohol use at the 3 months post-baseline assessment. |
Time Frame | Past-90-days at 3 months post-baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
12-18 year old primary care patients who report past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline in New England, USA |
Arm/Group Title | Control - New England, USA | Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England, USA |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Control participants received "care as usual" from their providers | Participants in the experimental arm completed the CRAFFT screen on the computer and received information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their providers were given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which they used to guide a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. Participants and their families also received educational brochures about substance use. |
Measure Participants | 260 | 222 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
162
15.2%
|
121
11.8%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Control - New England, USA, Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England, USA |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | Group Conditional Risk Ratio adjusting for the multi-site sample design using GEE logistic regression (SUDAAN 10.0) | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Adjusted Relative Risk Ratio |
Estimated Value | 1.39 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 1.08 to 1.80 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: .18 |
|
Estimation Comments | Risk Ratio: (Intervention Cessation)/(Control Cessation) controlling for age; gender; parent education; number of parents in home; visit type; perceived parent, sibling, and peer substance use; provider gender; and connectedness to provider. |
Title | Past-90-day Substance Use at 3 Months Among Baseline Substance Non-Users, New England, USA |
---|---|
Description | Among the 12-18 year old primary care patients who did NOT report past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline in New England, USA, this analysis reports the number who subsequently reported past-90-day drug or alcohol use at the 3 months post-baseline assessment. |
Time Frame | Past-90-days at 3 months post-baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
12-18 year old primary care patients who did not report past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline in New England, USA |
Arm/Group Title | Control - New England, USA | cSBA - New England, USA |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Control participants received "care as usual" from their provider | Computer Screen & Brief physician Advice: Participants in the experimental arm completed a computerized CRAFFT screen and received information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider was given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which guided a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. |
Measure Participants | 494 | 539 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
24
2.2%
|
15
1.5%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Control - New England, USA, Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England, USA |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .32 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | Group Conditional Risk Ratio adjusting for the multi-site sample design using GEE logistic regression (SUDAAN 10.0) | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Adjusted Relative Risk Ratio |
Estimated Value | 0.70 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.34 to 1.42 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 0.25 |
|
Estimation Comments | Risk Ratio: (Intervention Initiation)/(Control Initiation) controlling for age; gender; parent education; number of parents in home; visit type; perceived parent, sibling, and peer substance use; provider gender; and connectedness to provider. |
Title | Past-12-month Substance Use at 12 Months Among Baseline Substance Users, New England, USA |
---|---|
Description | Of those participants who reported past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline,the number reporting past-90-day drug or alcohol use at 12 months post-baseline assessment in New England, USA |
Time Frame | Past-12-months at 12 months post-baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
12-18 year old primary care patients who reported past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline in New England, USA |
Arm/Group Title | Control - New England, USA | Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England, USA |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Control participants received "care as usual" from their providers | Participants in the experimental arm completed the CRAFFT screen on the computer and received information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their providers were given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which they used to guide a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. Participants and their families also received educational brochures about substance use. |
Measure Participants | 257 | 209 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
214
20%
|
172
16.7%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Control - New England, USA, Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England, USA |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | Group Conditional Risk Ratio adjusting for the multi-site sample design using GEE logistic regression (SUDAAN 10.0) | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Adjusted Relative Risk Ratio |
Estimated Value | 1.80 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% .99 to 3.27 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 0.55 |
|
Estimation Comments | ||
Other Statistical Analysis | Risk Ratio: (Intervention Cessation)/(Control Cessation) controlling for age; gender; parent education; number of parents in home; visit type; perceived parent, sibling, and peer substance use; provider gender; and connectedness to provider. |
Title | Past-12-month Substance Use at 12 Months, Baseline Substance Non-Users, New England, USA |
---|---|
Description | Of those participants who reported NO past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline,the number reporting past-90-day drug or alcohol use at 12 months post-baseline assessment in New England, USA |
Time Frame | Past-12-months at 12 months post-baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
12-18 year old primary care patients who did not report past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline in New England, USA |
Arm/Group Title | Control - New England, USA | cSBA - New England, USA |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Control participants received "care as usual" from their provider | Computer Screen & Brief physician Advice: Participants in the experimental arm completed a computerized CRAFFT screen and received information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider was given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which guided a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. |
Measure Participants | 500 | 556 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
83
7.8%
|
73
7.1%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Control - New England, USA, Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England, USA |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.23 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | Group Conditional Risk Ratio adjusting for the multi-site sample design using GEE logistic regression (SUDAAN 10.0) | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Adjusted Relative Risk Ratio |
Estimated Value | .79 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% .53 to 1.16 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: .16 |
|
Estimation Comments | Risk Ratio: (Intervention Initiation)/(Control Initiation) controlling for age; gender; parent education; number of parents in home; visit type; perceived parent, sibling, and peer substance use; provider gender; and connectedness to provider. |
Title | Past-90-day Substance Use at 3 Months Among Baseline Substance Users - Prague, CZR |
---|---|
Description | Of those participants who reported past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline,the number reporting past-90-day drug or alcohol use at 3 months post-baseline assessment in Prague, Czech Republic |
Time Frame | Past-90-days at 3 months post-baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
12-18 year old primary care patients who reported past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline in Prague, CZR |
Arm/Group Title | Control - Prague, CZR | cSBA - Prague, CZR |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Control participants received "care as usual" from their provider | Computer Screen & Brief physician Advice: Participants in the experimental arm completed a computerized CRAFFT screen and received information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider was given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which guided a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. |
Measure Participants | 157 | 161 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
118
11%
|
114
11.1%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Control - New England, USA, Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England, USA |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .07 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | Group Conditional Risk Ratio adjusting for the multi-site sample design using GEE logistic regression (SUDAAN 10.0) | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Adjusted Relative Risk Ratio |
Estimated Value | 1.52 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% .97 to 2.36 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 0.34 |
|
Estimation Comments | Risk Ratio: (Intervention Cessation)/(Control Cessation) controlling for age and gender. |
Title | Past-90-day Substance Use at 3 Months Among Baseline Substance Non-Users - Prague, CZR |
---|---|
Description | Of those participants who reported NO past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline,the number reporting past-90-day drug or alcohol use at 3 months post-baseline assessment in Prague, Czech Republic |
Time Frame | Past-90-days at 3 months post-baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
12-18 year old primary care patients who did not report past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline in Prague, CZR |
Arm/Group Title | Control - Prague, CZR | cSBA - Prague, CZR |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Control participants received "care as usual" from their provider | Computer Screen & Brief physician Advice: Participants in the experimental arm completed a computerized CRAFFT screen and received information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider was given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which guided a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. |
Measure Participants | 88 | 110 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
10
0.9%
|
13
1.3%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Control - New England, USA, Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England, USA |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .93 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Adjusted Relative Risk Ratio |
Estimated Value | .96 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% .42 to 2.21 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: .41 |
|
Estimation Comments | Risk Ratio: (Intervention Initiation)/(Control Initiation) controlling for age and gender. |
Title | Past-12-Month Substance Use at 12 Months Among Baseline Substance Users - Prague, CZR |
---|---|
Description | Of those participants who reported past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline,the number reporting past-12-month drug or alcohol use at 12 months post-baseline assessment in Prague, Czech Republic |
Time Frame | Past-12-months at 12 months post-baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
12-18 year old primary care patients who reported past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline in Prague, CZR |
Arm/Group Title | Control - Prague, CZR | cSBA - Prague, CZR |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Control participants received "care as usual" from their provider | Computer Screen & Brief physician Advice: Participants in the experimental arm completed a computerized CRAFFT screen and received information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider was given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which guided a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. |
Measure Participants | 163 | 153 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
154
14.4%
|
148
14.4%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Control - New England, USA, Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England, USA |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .78 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | Group Conditional Risk Ratio adjusting for the multi-site sample design using GEE logistic regression (SUDAAN 10.0) | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Adjusted Relative Risk Ratio |
Estimated Value | .85 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% .27 to 2.70 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: .50 |
|
Estimation Comments | Risk Ratio: (Intervention Cessation)/(Control Cessation) controlling for age and gender. |
Title | Past-12-Month Substance Use at 12 Months Among Baseline Substance Non-Users - Prague, CZR |
---|---|
Description | Of those participants who reported past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline,the number reporting past-12-month drug or alcohol use at 12 months post-baseline assessment in Prague, Czech Republic |
Time Frame | Past-12-months at 12 months post-baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
12-18 year old primary care patients who did not report past-12-month drug or alcohol use at baseline in Prague, CZR |
Arm/Group Title | Control - Prague, CZR | cSBA - Prague, CZR |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Control participants received "care as usual" from their provider | Computer Screen & Brief physician Advice: Participants in the experimental arm completed a computerized CRAFFT screen and received information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider was given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which guided a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. |
Measure Participants | 103 | 111 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
48
4.5%
|
38
3.7%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Control - New England, USA, Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England, USA |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .13 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | Group Conditional Risk Ratio adjusting for the multi-site sample design using GEE logistic regression (SUDAAN 10.0) | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Adjusted Relative Risk Ratio |
Estimated Value | .74 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% .51 to 1.09 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: .15 |
|
Estimation Comments | Risk Ratio: (Intervention Initiation)/(Control Initiation) controlling for age and gender. |
Title | Any Risky Riding or Driving at 3 Months - New England, USA |
---|---|
Description | Any past-90-day self-reported Riding with a driver who had used alcohol or other drugs or Driving after having used alcohol or other drugs at 3 months post-baseline assessment - New England |
Time Frame | Past-90-days at 3 months post-baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
12-18 year old primary care patients in New England, USA |
Arm/Group Title | Control - New England, USA | cSBA - New England, USA |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Control participants received "care as usual" from their provider | Computer Screen & Brief physician Advice: Participants in the experimental arm completed a computerized CRAFFT screen and received information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider was given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which guided a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. |
Measure Participants | 754 | 758 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
150
14%
|
88
8.6%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Control - New England, USA, Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England, USA |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .66 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | Group Conditional Risk Ratio adjusting for the multi-site sample design using GEE logistic regression (SUDAAN 10.0) | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Adjusted Relative Risk Ratio |
Estimated Value | .66 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% .48 to .91 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: .11 |
|
Estimation Comments | Risk Ratio: (Intervention)/(Control) controlling for age; gender; parent education; number of parents in home; visit type; provider gender; connectedness to provider, and baseline DRWI risk. |
Title | Any Risky Riding or Driving at 12 Months - New England, USA |
---|---|
Description | Any past-90-day self-reported Riding with a driver who had used alcohol or other drugs or Driving after having used alcohol or other drugs at 12 months post-baseline assessment - New England |
Time Frame | Past-90-days at 12 months post-baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
12-18 year old primary care patients in New England, USA |
Arm/Group Title | Control - New England, USA | cSBA - New England, USA |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Control participants received "care as usual" from their provider | Computer Screen & Brief physician Advice: Participants in the experimental arm completed a computerized CRAFFT screen and received information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider was given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which guided a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. |
Measure Participants | 756 | 765 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
161
15.1%
|
125
12.2%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Control - New England, USA, Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England, USA |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .35 |
Comments | Group Conditional Risk Ratio adjusting for the multi-site sample design using GEE logistic regression (SUDAAN 10.0) | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Adjusted Relative Risk Ratio |
Estimated Value | .87 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% .64 to 1.17 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: .13 |
|
Estimation Comments | Risk Ratio: (Intervention)/(Control) controlling for age; gender; parent education; number of parents in home; visit type; provider gender; connectedness to provider, and baseline DRWI risk. |
Title | Any Risky Riding or Driving at 3 Months - Prague, CZR |
---|---|
Description | Any past-90-day self-reported Riding with a driver who had used alcohol or other drugs or Driving after having used alcohol or other drugs at 3 months post-baseline assessment - Prague, Czech Republic |
Time Frame | Past-90-days at 3 months post-baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
12-18 year old primary care patients in Prague, CZR |
Arm/Group Title | Control - Prague, CZR | cSBA - Prague, CZR |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Control participants received "care as usual" from their provider | Computer Screen & Brief physician Advice: Participants in the experimental arm completed a computerized CRAFFT screen and received information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider was given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which guided a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. |
Measure Participants | 245 | 269 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
245
22.9%
|
269
26.2%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Control - New England, USA, Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England, USA |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <.01 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Adjusted Relative Risk Ratio |
Estimated Value | .63 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% .46 to .87 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: .10 |
|
Estimation Comments | Risk Ratio: (Intervention)/(Control) controlling for age; gender; connectedness to provider, and baseline DRWI risk. |
Title | Any Risky Riding or Driving at 12 Months - Prague, CZR |
---|---|
Description | Any past-90-day self-reported Riding with a driver who had used alcohol or other drugs or Driving after having used alcohol or other drugs at 12 months post-baseline assessment - Prague, Czech Republic |
Time Frame | Past-90-days at 12 months post-baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
12-18 year old primary care patients in Prague, CZR |
Arm/Group Title | Control - Prague, CZR | cSBA - Prague, CZR |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Control participants received "care as usual" from their provider | Computer Screen & Brief physician Advice: Participants in the experimental arm completed a computerized CRAFFT screen and received information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider was given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which guided a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. |
Measure Participants | 266 | 263 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
78
7.3%
|
61
5.9%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Control - New England, USA, Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England, USA |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | < 0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Adjusted Relative Risk Ratio |
Estimated Value | .73 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% .54 to .98 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: .11 |
|
Estimation Comments | Risk Ratio: (Intervention)/(Control) controlling for age; gender; connectedness to provider, and baseline DRWI risk. |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Through the course of the entire recruitment and follow-up period. | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||||||
Arm/Group Title | Control - New England | Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England | Control - Czech Republic | Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - Czech Republic | ||||
Arm/Group Description | Control participants will receive "care as usual" from their provider | Participants who are in the experimental arm will complete the CRAFFT screen on the computer and receive information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider will be given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which they will use to guide a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. Participants and their families will also receive educational brochures about substance use. Computer screen & brief physician advice: Participants who are in the experimental arm will complete the CRAFFT screen on the computer and receive information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider will be given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking point" which they will use to guide a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. Participants and their families will also receive educational brochures about substance use. | Control participants will receive "care as usual" from their provider | Participants who are in the experimental arm will complete the CRAFFT screen on the computer and receive information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider will be given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking points" which they will use to guide a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. Participants and their families will also receive educational brochures about substance use. Computer screen & brief physician advice: Participants who are in the experimental arm will complete the CRAFFT screen on the computer and receive information on the computer regarding the health effects of substance use. Their provider will be given the results of their CRAFFT screen and a list of suggested "talking point" which they will use to guide a discussion with the patient about drug and alcohol use. Participants and their families will also receive educational brochures about substance use. | ||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||||
Control - New England | Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England | Control - Czech Republic | Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - Czech Republic | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||||
Control - New England | Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England | Control - Czech Republic | Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - Czech Republic | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/1068 (0%) | 0/1028 (0%) | 0/297 (0%) | 0/292 (0%) | ||||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||||
Control - New England | Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - New England | Control - Czech Republic | Computer Screen & Brief Physician Advice - Czech Republic | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/1068 (0%) | 0/1028 (0%) | 0/297 (0%) | 0/292 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Sion Kim Harris, PhD |
---|---|
Organization | Boston Children's Hospital - Center for Adolescent Substance Use and Addiction Research |
Phone | 857-218-4304 |
sion.harris@childrens.harvard.edu |
- NIDA-R01DA0118848
- NCT00592878
- NCT00592956