MAPIT: Motivational Assessment Program to Initiate Treatment

Sponsor
University of North Texas Health Science Center (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01891656
Collaborator
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) (NIH)
380
2
3
44
190
4.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Substance abuse treatment in the criminal justice system can reduce drug use and related criminal behavior. Although drug and alcohol treatment are common mandates in criminal justice programs, only a minority of clients actually initiate treatment. This proposal will compare two intervention formats that target motivation to initiate and engage in treatment among a group of probationers who have drug or alcohol treatment conditions. Six hundred drug and alcohol offenders in two probation sites (Baltimore, MD and Dallas, TX) will be randomized to receive: 1) an in-person motivational interviewing session (MI), 2) a motivational computer program (MC), or 3) supervision intake and monitoring as usual (SAU). The MI condition will be structured along the lines of the "Check-Up" format which consists of an assessment and personalized feedback delivered in an MI style; the content of the MC condition will be drawn from previous literature on effective motivational computer programs. Both interventions will be delivered at the start of the probation process, with follow-up assessments at 2 and 6 months. Primary outcomes include engagement and participation in substance abuse treatment; secondary outcomes include drug and alcohol use, probation progress, criminal behavior, and HIV testing and care. This project will be the first to develop and test two interventions for encouraging criminal justice clients to follow through with treatment recommendations, with the goal of increasing treatment initiation, and reducing subsequent drug use and criminal behavior. It also contributes to ongoing partnerships with two large probation agencies-the Dallas County Supervision and Corrections Department and the Maryland Division of Parole and Probation.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing
  • Behavioral: Motivational Computer
N/A

Detailed Description

Specific Aims

  • Develop two intervention formats (Motivational Interviewing (MI) and Motivational Computer (MC)) for increasing motivation to initiate and engage in substance abuse treatment and/or HIV / AIDS testing and, if appropriate, HIV care.

  • Test the efficacy of MI and MC on treatment initiation and participation, substance abuse, HIV testing/care, and recidivism, as compared to Supervision As Usual (SAU);

  • Evaluate offender characteristics (e.g., risk level, gender, ethnicity, motivation) as potential moderators of the intervention effect; and,

  • Assess the relative cost and cost-effectiveness of MI and MC on substance abuse treatment and/or linkage to or participation in HIV/AIDS care, supervision outcomes, recidivism, and substance abuse.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
380 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
In-Person VS. Computer Interventions for Increasing Probation Compliance
Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Motivational Interviewing

Participants randomized to the MI group will receive a single 60-minute MI session focused on motivation to initiate and engage in treatment. The MI session will be organized around the "Check-Up" format, with additional planning components as desired by the client.

Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing
MI is a "client centered, directive style of interacting with a person to help explore and resolve ambivalence about change" (Miller & Rollnick, 2002). MI borrows from Client-Centered Counseling in its emphasis on empathy, optimism, and respect for client choice (Rogers, 1961). MI also draws from Self-Perception Theory, which says that a person becomes more or less committed to an action based on the verbal stance he or she takes (Bem, 1972). The effects of MI tend to be in the small-to-medium range when compared to no treatment, and nonsignificant when compared to more extensive treatment.
Other Names:
  • Motivational Enhancement Therapy
  • No Intervention: Supervision As Usual

    Participants randomized to the SAU group will receive the standard agency intake process as well as baseline and follow-up research interviews, but will not receive any additional intervention as part of the study. They will be referred to a treatment program as per the normal routine.

    Experimental: Motivational Computer

    Participants randomized to the MC group will complete a 60 minute computer intervention focused on motivation to initiate and engage in treatment. The program will be self-guided, interactive, and to the extent possible, will mirror the features of MI session. The MC program will have two main components: a motivation component and a planning component.

    Behavioral: Motivational Computer
    The growing use of technology has led to the development of automated interventions for behavior change, including some that target drug and alcohol use (Elliott, et al, 2008; Lustria, et al, 2009; Revere & Dunbar, 2001; Walters, et al, 2006) and treatment interest (Lieberman & Massey, 2008). As discussed by Hester & Miller (2006), automated interventions have several potential advantages over face-to-face interventions: (I) They require little or no staff contact, which may increase cost-effectiveness; (2) they can allow for automatic data collection and follow-up; and (3) they can be disseminated with little loss of fidelity.
    Other Names:
  • Web-Based Interventions
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Treatment Progress [6 months]

      Treatment progress assesses initiation, engagement and retention at 2 and 6 months via telephone. In-person visits are assessed at baseline and during a 6 month visit.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Drug and Alcohol Use [6 months]

      Drug and alcohol use is a secondary outcome measured at baseline and 6 months during an in-person interview. In addition, this outcome is measured at 2 via telephone.

    2. Probation Progress [6 months]

      Probation progress is measured at baseline and 6 months via in-person interview. In addition, this outcome is measured at 2 via a telephone interview.

    3. Criminal Behavior [6 months]

      Criminal Behavior is measured during in-person interviews at baseline and 6 months. In addition, this outcome is measured at 2 months via telephone.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • =18 years old

    • Drug or Alcohol use in the last 90 days

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • <18 years old

    • Cannot speak English

    • Already participate in a substance abuse treatment

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University of North Texas Health Science Center Fort Worth Texas United States 76107
    2 George Mason University Fairfax Virginia United States 22030

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of North Texas Health Science Center
    • National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Scott T Walters, PhD, UNT Health Science Center

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    University of North Texas Health Science Center
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01891656
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • R01DA029010-01
    • 5R01DA029010-06
    First Posted:
    Jul 3, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 13, 2016
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2016
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Keywords provided by University of North Texas Health Science Center
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 13, 2016